logo
MP CM Mohan Yadav distributes free bicycles to students, to give scooty next month

MP CM Mohan Yadav distributes free bicycles to students, to give scooty next month

India Gazette11-07-2025
Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) [India], July 11 (ANI): Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav distributed free bicycles to class 6th and class 9th students and announced that scooty will be distributed to the toppers of class 12th next month.
CM Mohan Yadav on Thursday distributed bicycles at the Kamla Nehru Sandipani School in Bhopal on the occasion of Guru Purnima.
Addressing at the event he also announced that 1 lakh free laptops will be distributed to the students who scored 75 per cent or more marks in the class 12th board examination.
'We will give them (students) Scooty next month. We will give laptops to students above 75 per cent. And those who will top their school. We will give them scooty. And there will be no issue of filling the petrol, we will distribute EV vehicles,' Mohan Yadav said.
'Last year we distributed 94, 000 Laptops, next year we will distribute more than 1 Lakh laptops,' he added.
Last week, CM Mohan Yadav transferred Laptop grants worth Rs 235.58 crore to bank accounts of 94,234 students who scored 75 per cent or more marks in the class 12th board examination of the Madhya Pradesh Board of Secondary Education in academic session 2024-25.
The laptop aid was given to the students at the rate of Rs 25,000 each under 'Pratibhashali Vidyarthi Protsahan Yojana' of the School Education Department during a programme held at Kushabhau Thakre Convention Centre in Bhopal.
After the programme, CM Yadav told reporters, 'Today, a programme of providing laptop aid to 94234 students of private as well as government schools across state who scored 75 per cent or more marks in the class 12th board examination of MPBSE was concluded. I am happy to share that the way we have encouraged our students within the last two years is a big achievement. Additionally, with the previous tenure of Shivraj Singh Chouhan and till date over 4 lakh (4, 32,016) students have benefited from the scheme in the last 15 years.'
Yadav also said that the government is providing scooty to school toppers
'On the one hand, the state government is providing laptops to students who scored 75 per cent or above marks and scooty to school toppers. Along with the scooty, the CM said.
Earlier in February of this year, Yadav had symbolically handed over scooty keys to 10 students out of 7,900 who topped the Class 12 board examinations for the academic session 2023-24.
Yadav also clarified that no tender process would be involved in distributing scooties to meritorious students, and they would receive them directly based on their choice, petrol or electric.
Responding to the allegations, CM Yadav told ANI, 'I am happy that there is a conducive environment for providing scooties to meritorious students across the state, in the meantime someone has spread misinformation that scooty will be given to them after placing a tender. No tender will be placed, the students will get scooty directly according to their choice either petrol scooty or an e-scooty,' he said. (ANI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Lalu, Kejriwal will be ex-CM languishing in jail for longest period: Sirsa
After Lalu, Kejriwal will be ex-CM languishing in jail for longest period: Sirsa

Hans India

timea minute ago

  • Hans India

After Lalu, Kejriwal will be ex-CM languishing in jail for longest period: Sirsa

Delhi Minister for Food & Supplies, Industry, Forest & Environment, Manjinder Singh Sirsa, launched a sharp attack on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal on Friday, accusing him of large-scale corruption during his tenure as Chief Minister. Talking to media persons here, Minister Sirsa claimed that the AAP chief will be the longest-serving former Chief Minister in jail after Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad. His remarks came soon after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) registered money laundering cases in three scams during the AAP's tenure. Sirsa pointed out that the previous AAP government's "corruption" is coming to the fore in education, power, health, and various other sectors. "Even if trials are conducted daily, it may not be enough to cover the extent of corruption during 10 years of AAP rule," Sirsa claimed. He alleged that the AAP-led government in Punjab is also indulging in corruption, which will soon be unearthed. "The AAP extorts money from businessmen. Those who resist face threats, or the government uses the mafia to get them killed. After that, the AAP government kills mafia in staged encounters," he said. Notably, the ED has filed Enforcement Case Information Reports (ECIRs), the equivalent of an FIR, in hospital construction, CCTV, and shelter home scams worth Rs 6,368 crore. Though the ED confirmation is awaited. In the hospital construction case, former health ministers and AAP leaders Saurabh Bhardwaj and Satyendar Jain were booked by the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB), Delhi, for alleged corruption. Earlier in the day, on the occasion of the Van Mahotsav programme under Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam 2.0, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta and Environment Minister Sirsa planted a sapling at the PBD ground. On Thursday, Chief Minister Gupta accused the previous Kejriwal government of financial irregularities and corruption in the 'Jai Bhim Mukhyamantri Pratibha Vikas Yojana'. On Thursday, Delhi Minister Ashish Sood alleged that Kejriwal used government funds to buy mobiles costing up to Rs 1.63 lakh.

In Cash-At-Home Case, Justice Varma's 5 Reasons Why He Shouldn't Be Impeached
In Cash-At-Home Case, Justice Varma's 5 Reasons Why He Shouldn't Be Impeached

NDTV

timea minute ago

  • NDTV

In Cash-At-Home Case, Justice Varma's 5 Reasons Why He Shouldn't Be Impeached

New Delhi: Justice Yashwant Varma - the ex-Delhi High Court judge likely to be impeached after "piles of burnt Rs 500 notes" were found at his home - has offered the Supreme Court five reasons why he must not be sacked. These include questions over the jurisdiction and authority of an in-house committee - set up by ex-Chief Justice Sanjiv Kumar - to investigate a sitting judge. Justice Varma argued the committee ignored questions he had raised, and that could speak to his innocence, and denied him a fair hearing. He also argued that neither the Chief Justice nor the Supreme Court had 'power of superintendence', i.e., they cannot take disciplinary action against High Court judges, because their tenure is protected by the Constitution. The in-house committee red-flagged by Justice Varma consisted of Sheel Nagu, the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court; GS Sandhawalia, the Chief Justice of the Himachal Pradesh High Court; and Karnataka High Court judge Justice Anu Sivaraman. Justice Varma's Objections In-house procedure lacked legal sanction - Justice Varma has argued the three-member committee that investigated him and the recovered burnt piles of cash lacked authority to recommend his removal from office. In-house panels - a procedure adopted by the Supreme Court in 1999 - are 'administrative in nature', he said, and have a limited function, i.e., they can only act in a fact-finding capacity. He argued that allowing such committees power to recommend impeachment risks creating an extra-constitutional framework that breaks from Articles 124 and 218 of the Constitution, which outline procedure to remove a judge of the Supreme Court or any High Court. The Judges (Inquiry) Act, he argued, would have been a better balanced option in this case. Improper investigative procedure - Justice Varma further argued the investigation process was flawed from the outset because it began without a formal complaint of wrongdoing against him, and made "sweeping conclusions without concrete evidence'" It relied on the "presumption", he said, that the cash was his. He said the committee also ignored key questions - 'who placed the cash', 'was the money genuine', and 'what caused the fire' - that are central to establishing his guilt or innocence. Scraps of burnt Rs 500 notes allegedly found at Justice Yashwant Varma's home. Finally, Justice Varma also argued the committee had failed to offer him a fair hearing to respond to the allegations and explain the money found on the grounds of his bungalow. The committee, he said, denied him access to evidence it collected and examined key witnesses in his absence, all of which violate the principle of natural justice. In earlier and comparable situations judges were granted personal hearings - to explain themselves - before action was taken against them, he said. Media trial caused damage to reputation - The discovery of the burnt cash at his home - the money was found on Holi by firefighters trying to put out a blaze that had spread to the outhouse - made national headlines for weeks. NDTV Explains | How Do You Remove A Sitting Judge? Impeachment Explained Questions were raised over the sanctity of the judiciary and the possible erosion of public trust, prompting the release of a (partly redacted) initial report into the finding of the money. Justice Varma has argued the release of that report, and a Supreme Court press release on March 22 that made public the allegations against him, caused irreparable damage to his reputation and career as a judicial officer, and violated his right to dignity. Visuals from the burnt outhouse on Justice Varma's bungalow grounds. He also noted that sections of the final report, i.e., the in-house Supreme Court committee, which was meant to be confidential, had been leaked and "misrepresented" by the press. This aggravated potential damage to his reputation and undermined the sanctity of the investigative process, Justice Varma told the Supreme Court. Impeachment recommendation is unconstitutional - Justice Varma also questioned the letter sent by then-Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, recommending he be impeached. Justice Varma - who was transferred back to the Allahabad High Court after the cash was found - has argued the former Chief Justice did not have the power to seek his removal, and that this can only be done by the President of India, as outlined in the above articles of the Constitution. Not given time to read report - Finally, Justice Varma also argued then-Chief Justice Khanna did not give sufficient time for him to review the final report. He claimed impeachment was recommended to President Murmu and Prime Minister Modi "within hours" of Chief Justice Khanna getting that report. Government To Seek Impeachment? Last week sources told NDTV the government may introduce an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma during the monsoon session of Parliament, which begins Monday. The government has been assured of support from the opposition on this topic, sources said. This was days after the Supreme Court-appointed panel recommended Justice Varma be removed. The panel's 64-page report was accessed by NDTV and these are the operative bits. The first is on page 60 - "... this committee holds the money/cash was found in the storeroom located within the premises of 30 Tughlaq Crescent... officially occupied by Justice Varma". The second is on page 59 - "... access to the storeroom was with Justice Varma and his family members, and (was) well-monitored without any outsiders getting access without permission". No judge in independent India has been impeached, although there have been five it was a possibility. The most recent case was in 2018 and involved ex-Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra, who was accused of administrative misconduct and arbitrary allocation of cases.

'Hounded' by govt for 10 years: Rahul slams ED chargesheet against Vadra
'Hounded' by govt for 10 years: Rahul slams ED chargesheet against Vadra

Business Standard

timea minute ago

  • Business Standard

'Hounded' by govt for 10 years: Rahul slams ED chargesheet against Vadra

Gandhi also asserted that the truth shall eventually prevail and that his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and her family will withstand any kind of persecution Press Trust of India New Delhi Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday accused the government of launching a witch-hunt against his brother-in-law Robert Vadra after the Enforcement Directorate filed a chargesheet against the businessman in a money laundering case linked to alleged irregularities in a land deal in Haryana's Shikohpur. Gandhi also asserted that the truth shall eventually prevail and that his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and her family will withstand any kind of persecution. "My brother-in-law has been hounded by this government for the last ten years. This latest chargesheet is a continuation of that witch hunt," he said in a post on X. "I stand with Robert, Priyanka and their children as they face yet another onslaught of malicious, politically motivated slander and harassment," he added. Gandhi said, "I know that they are all brave enough to withstand any kind of persecution and they will continue to do so with dignity". "The truth will eventually prevail," the leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha asserted. The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday filed a prosecution complaint naming the 56-year-old Vadra in a criminal case. The federal investigative agency also attached 43 immovable properties located in Rajasthan, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Gujarat worth Rs. 37.64 crore pertaining to Vadra and his linked entities like Sky Light Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and others. Vadra's office issued a statement on Thursday, saying the present proceedings are nothing more than an extension of the political witch-hunt by the present government against him. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store