
Who is Saagar Enjeti? Tucker Carlson's guest who claims the CIA is involved in and covering up Epstein files
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Backing Carlson's theory that intelligence services are 'at the very center of this story,' Enjeti dismissed claims that current U.S. President Donald Trump was being shielded and instead emphasized what he called 'the most obvious explanation' — that the
and others are protecting their own. The pair cited disturbing examples of CIA misconduct, including documented instances of child exploitation by agency personnel.
Citing former CIA counterintelligence official Daniel Payne, Carlson added a chilling note: 'The amount of child porn I see [on government devices] is just unbelievable.' Enjeti's pointed accusations, combined with Carlson's claims, reignited debate over deep-state secrecy, raising troubling questions about who is truly being protected and why.
Saagar Enjeti: A populist voice disrupting the political establishment
Born to Indian immigrant parents who are professors at Texas A&M University, Saagar Enjeti grew up in College Station, Texas, and attended the American School of Doha.
He is a prominent U.S. political analyst and commentator, best known as the co-host of the widely followed independent news show Breaking Points. With academic degrees in economics from George Washington University and security policy from Georgetown University, Enjeti brings a well-informed, sharp analytical lens to American politics and global affairs.
His early career included work as a White House correspondent for The Daily Caller and later as co-host of Rising on The Hill, where he gained national attention for his critiques of establishment politics from a populist perspective.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Enjeti is widely recognized for advocating a populist realignment in American politics. He supports policies aligned with economic nationalism, frequently criticizing corporate power, globalism, and the bipartisan political elite. A vocal supporter of President Donald Trump's outsider appeal, Enjeti emphasizes the importance of addressing working-class concerns across partisan lines. His commentary often calls for challenging both mainstream Republicans and Democrats in favor of a more citizen-focused, economically grounded political approach.
The Epstein Files, CIA links, and the cover-up debate
During the segment on Tucker Carlson's show, Saagar Enjeti challenged the Department of Justice's recent conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein's death was a suicide and that no charges would be brought against uncharged third parties. Enjeti rejected this official narrative, pointing to the CIA's documented history of shielding agents involved in criminal activities, especially those related to child exploitation, which often go unprosecuted unless tied to other offenses such as mishandling classified information.
He argued that this pattern supports a theory of a deliberate intelligence cover-up to protect powerful individuals connected to Epstein.
Enjeti highlighted sworn testimony from former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who indicated that Epstein had intelligence ties, which contributed to his lenient plea deal. The discussion also emphasized the suspicious timing of the DOJ's report coinciding with high-level diplomatic visits, suggesting political motivations behind the cover-up. This perspective fuels ongoing debate about the extent of government transparency and accountability in the Epstein case.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
AP U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard departs following a closed door meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at Malacanang Palace in Manila, Philippines Monday, June 2, 2025. (Ezra Acayan/Pool Photo via AP) Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice, calling for a full investigation. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations?Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
AIMPLB urges Union min for safety audit of Ajmer dargah
Jaipur: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board ( AIMPLB ) has urged Union minority affairs minister Kiran Rijiju to conduct an urgent structural safety audit of Ajmer Sharif Dargah, following two concerning incidents of roof and ceiling collapse in the past two weeks. The Board has also demanded that the 800-year-old shrine be released from central govt control, citing neglect and mismanagement. In a letter addressed to Rijiju, the AIMPLB, which is currently leading the opposition to the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, reminded the Union govt of the 1955 assurances made when the Dargah was brought under state management. The Board claims those assurances included the complete protection and maintenance of the shrine's heritage structures. "Several parts of the Dargah complex are 500 to 600 years old. With monsoon in full swing, a single spell of heavy rain could cause more damage or even result in tragedy if urgent repairs and safety inspections are not carried out," said Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi, general secretary of AIMPLB. The Board has gone a step further by demanding that the Dargah be freed from central govt control, accusing the current administration of failing in its responsibility. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "This is example of the Modi govt's neglect of Muslim heritage sites. They haven't even conducted a structural audit of this 800-year-old shrine. If this is how they treat Ajmer Dargah, imagine what they plan to do with Waqf properties under the new amendments," said Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, spokesperson of AIMPLB. Ilyas added, "We demand that the Dargah be released from the clutches of the Union govt. Muslim organisations across the country should register their protest." Syed Sarwar Chishty, secretary of the Dargah Anjuman, on Friday released a video showing water seepage in the outer wall of the main sanctum along with the Sandali Mosque, raising alarms about the structural integrity of the shrine. The incessant rains on Friday, which caused flood-like conditions in Ajmer, endangered several other parts of the Dargah complex. Community leaders and shrine authorities are calling for immediate intervention to avert a potential disaster.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes ‘Coup' files targeting Obama-era officials with treason, but is it all a smokescreen to bury Epstein scandal?
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday, July 18, unleashed a barrage on posts X, accusing former Obama administration officials of politicizing intelligence ahead of the 2016 US election. She claims that the intelligence community's assessment of Russian election interference was manipulated to falsely suggest that foreign cyber operations influenced Donald Trump 's victory. 'These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House,' Gabbard posted, adding that the effort was to 'subvert the will of the American people.' Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category PGDM Project Management Design Thinking Public Policy Cybersecurity Data Science MBA Product Management Leadership CXO Healthcare MCA Operations Management Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Digital Marketing Degree healthcare Technology Data Science Others Management Finance others Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details Also Read: How much is Dylan Dreyer worth in 2025; and who's doing better after her split from Brian Fichera? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ethiopia: Bathroom Remodeling Trends in 2025 May Surprise You Bathroom Remodeling | Search Ads Search Now Undo She further stated she has handed over all related documents to the Department of Justice , calling for a full investigation. Live Events New declassifications of an old allegation The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released declassified documents that revisit intelligence assessments made after the 2016 election. The documents, originally circulated within national security agencies, suggested that foreign actors, primarily Russia, did not alter vote counts or directly impact election results via cyber means. Earlier, in one such Presidential Daily Brief from December 2016, intelligence officials reportedly assessed it was 'highly unlikely' that Russian actors had succeeded in changing vote outcomes. Despite these conclusions, a separate Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released on January 6, 2017, indicated that Russia sought to help Trump win. That assessment became central to the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion and later led to investigations, including the Mueller probe . The credibility of Muller Probe The Mueller probe was launched in May 2017 under Special Counsel Robert Mueller to examine Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, and whether President Trump obstructed justice. The investigation concluded that Russia did interfere through hacking and propaganda but did not find sufficient evidence to charge Trump or his campaign with conspiracy. Now, with newly declassified documents released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, questions have resurfaced about the origins and motivations behind the probe, raising claims that the intelligence was politicized to justify a prolonged campaign to undermine Trump's presidency. Why Now? Epstein case receives little attention The timing of Gabbard's post and document release has also raised eyebrows among political observers. On July 17, the WSJ published a report detailing the involvement of President Donald Trump in a 2003 birthday letter that he allegedly signed in a leather-bound album for Jeffrey Epstein. However, he called it fake and threatened legal action. With renewed interest in the matter, critics point out that Donald Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from the controversial case involving alleged ties between global elites and the now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. Observers also note a sudden shift in both media and political discourse, steering attention back to long-standing Russia-related narratives and raising questions about whether this pivot is intended to divert focus from the unresolved Epstein saga. Online commentators have begun asking: Is the revival of this 2016 controversy meant to bury or distract from Epstein-related revelations? Accountability Promised, but Questions Linger Gabbard, who was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence earlier this year under President Trump's second term, said that her actions are not partisan. 'This is about the integrity of our democratic republic,' she wrote. While she has called for accountability, none of the individuals named, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, or former FBI Director James Comey, have publicly responded to the allegations as of publication. The Department of Justice has not confirmed any formal investigations on the newly declassified documents.