‘Act now': National meeting to combat AI child abuse
The National Children's Commissioner will meet fellow experts in Canberra on Thursday for the roundtable discussions.
'We are seeing AI generate entirely new types of child abuse material. This is a turning point,' international expert Jon Rouse said.
Figures from the US-based National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children show AI use has massively increased among predators.
The centre reports a 1325 per cent increase in child sexual exploitation material reports involving generative AI, up from 4700 in 2023 to more than 67,000 in 2024.
While based in the US, the centre works closely with law enforcement around the world.
The meeting in Canberra has been called to discuss responses to AI-generated child sexual abuse material, deepfakes, automated grooming and childlike AI personas.
'This roundtable represents a pivotal moment for child protection in Australia,' International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children Australia chief executive Colm Gannon said.
'AI is being weaponised to harm children, and Australia must act swiftly to prevent these technologies from outpacing our systems of protection.'
Australian of the Year Grace Tame will lend her expertise to the roundtable, as will representatives from the eSafety Commissioner, child protection organisation Bravehearts, and Childlight Australia.
'If we act now, Australia can set a global benchmark for ethical AI and child protection,' Mr Gannon said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
17 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Jaye Lee Walton fronts court charged with seven-month-old baby's manslaughter after campsite drowning
A man charged with the manslaughter of a seven-month-old baby – who was found unresponsive in a lake at a Queensland campsite – has been named. Jaye Lee Walton was not brought before Ipswich Magistrates Court when his matter was first mentioned on Wednesday morning. Mr Walton, 42, was arrested in the suburb of Bundamba – a suburb of Ipswich – on Tuesday following a major update in the police investigation into the child's drowning, which occurred on July 12. Emergency services were called to Chatsworth Park, north of Gympie, about 10.40am on Saturday after reports the seven-month-old was found unresponsive in a lake. The child was rushed to Gympie Hospital but died that night. During a brief mention at court on Wednesday, lawyer Mark Butler – from Osborne Butler Lawyers – asked for his client's matter to be adjourned to Thursday. The court was told this was to determine if Mr Walton was in a 'show cause' position with regards to a bail application. Under Queensland law, defendants in a 'show cause' will need to demonstrate to a court their imprisonment on remand is not justified. Outside court, Mr Butler did not comment on the matter as he hurriedly exited into the nearby watch house. The major update in the case followed police on Monday saying the circumstances surrounding the baby's death were 'unclear'. Chatsworth Park is a well-used rest stop and campsite for highway travellers and has become a place where some homeless people stay long-term. 'Some people stay there permanently and some others are transient, they're just passing through town looking for a place to sleep and the council allows for that,' Inspector Mansfield said on Monday. Police are hoping to speak to anyone who was in the area between 9am and 11am on Saturday – including drivers who may have just been passing through. 'We have information that other vehicles were parked up in the rest stop area,' Inspector Mansfield said. 'They either left just prior or during, we just don't know until we speak to them. 'There were a couple of vehicles that left the scene who may or may not have seen or heard anything, but we just need to track them down in case they did.'
ABC News
21 minutes ago
- ABC News
What it's like being a criminal lawyer in the true-crime boom
From the moment Erin Patterson stepped into the courtroom for her murder trial, there were five high-profile podcasts following her every move. In the hours and days after Patterson was found guilty on three counts of murder, a flurry of follow-up content was revealed. ABC announced a drama Toxic, based on the case; Nine announced they already had a one-hour documentary titled Murder by Mushroom, ready for airing. This is in addition to a Stan doco, announced back in February, months before the case went to trial. This obsession with true-crime content — be it fact-based or fictionalised — is not new, nor is it localised to Australia. The Australian's Teacher's Pet podcast has been credited with bringing attention to Chris Dawson's crimes, but experts warned the attention threatened his right to a fair trial. In the US, Ryan Murphy's Monster series on the Menendez brothers brought attention to the pair's parole pleas, despite their family claiming it was 'riddled with mistruths'. The flood of content presents a peculiar conundrum for criminal lawyers, who find themselves in the middle of the media melee while also trying to give their clients the fairest treatment possible. Lauren Cassimatis is the founder and principal lawyer at Melbourne's Gallant Law, with more than 20 years' experience practising criminal law. We spoke to her about what it's like to be a criminal defence lawyer in the era of trial by entertainment. We have a lot of media approaching us wanting to talk about cases. There'll be some lawyers that attempt to get in the media and make that commentary, and they need to really think about how it might affect their clients and breach confidentiality obligations. The other thing is that we're all human, so the media might even skew us in terms of our thoughts or perspectives. So we need to detach from what's being put out there and just really focus on what we're trained to do, which is analyse the strengths and weaknesses of a case, develop a sound case theory, take into account our clients' instructions, and direct that strategy. You gotta turn your mind off from publications and portrayals and just really focus on trusting your instincts as a lawyer, and your intuition, and just focusing on the case at hand. I think that's what our ethical obligation is. We can't get caught up in the drama and the glamour of it all. We can't throw our clients under the bus for a bit of media. I am, and I'm also surprised by the fascination with the case. I don't know what it is. There've been plenty of murder cases I've been involved in that have been just as interesting. I don't know what it is. It almost feels comical, like we're being entertained by it, rather than [it being] seen as educational. I think so — there are some offenders out there that, whether they're found guilty or not, they become celebrities. People are fascinated by them because, for some reason, people have been entertained by them. In terms of it compromising the right to a fair trial, especially from a victim's perspective, I think it's dangerous. What does their future hold for them? I'm a big advocate for supporting reintegration into society and supporting offenders' rehabilitation; I think everyone deserves a second chance. Why are some people not given that second chance? I don't think it takes much, to be honest, because I think most people have the mentality that where there's smoke there's fire. So, if the perpetrator has already been charged, it's hard to get people to detach and focus on the weaknesses of the case, while also trying to get them to understand that there might be more to a case than what is presented in the media. I had a client where it was very high-profile in the media leading up to the trial, and the jury were directed to not do their own research, but they still decided to do it on their own time because they were fascinated by being part of this "Whodunnit?" case. As soon as this was revealed, the whole trial was aborted and we had to start again with a brand new jury. Another example, I represented a lady charged with manslaughter against her husband. She was a true victim of domestic violence by him. She came into court, very timid, very broken about what happened — but the media love a 'Black Widow' story. So there were drawings of her looking very sexy, very glamorous, nothing like what she looked like in reality. [There were] articles about her trying to steal the land he owned and murdering him for money. That definitely was an issue for us in the trial. We had to address that to the jury because it was all over the media. It depends which side of the fence you're on. If the offender is portrayed as a victim, in terms of some history and background to what happened, it could have a negative impact on the community, [especially] if they feel that the experience of the victim is being undermined and not appreciating the gravity of offending. But, on the other hand, if you're a defence lawyer like me, or if you've got someone in your family that's been accused of a crime or been through the justice system, sometimes if the offender is being portrayed sympathetically, it helps you see things from a position of empathy. So I think it could be detrimental in terms of really creating a mockery of whoever's involved in it, whether it's the victim or the offender. It definitely gives the wrong idea of how the justice system operates, the court procedure, the criminal procedure and process. It gives people false hopes about avenues open to them and timing. For example, shows like NCIS, where they get results back from the lab instantly: it just does not happen in reality. You've got forensic centres that the police rely on that could spend months, even years, trying to analyse evidence, whether it's technological devices or DNA. Also, the way trials are run, the way barristers jump up and down at the bar table, that rarely happens in reality. In fact, what we know is barristers that exercise polite persuasion in court get further than the ones that put on a performance, especially aggressive performances. The same with "approaching the bench", which happens often in American shows — it doesn't happen here in Australia. So clients often expect you to have a moment with the judge at the bench. It's a really hard one, because the law states that the public can have access to a trial. The public ought to know what's going on in the courtroom. So you can't necessarily stop the media from reporting on a case. The public needs to know what's happening. There are select cases where you can successfully apply for suppression orders, especially when someone's safety is at risk, but I don't think you can stop it. I think people are so enthralled by true crime, I don't think we'll ever be able to stop it or contain it. It's just a matter of educating people to appreciate that what you see in the media isn't necessarily reality. I'll read media reports about my own cases later, and I laugh because I go, "OK, yeah, that's right, that fits, true," but then there's some other bits that are missing.
News.com.au
44 minutes ago
- News.com.au
NSW Premier Chris Minns won't rule out further censure on Mark Latham after sext revelations
NSW Premier Chris Minns has refused to rule out further action against Mark Latham in state parliament after reports the former One Nation leader sent sexually explicit texts to his then-partner from the chamber. The one-time NSW One Nation leader has faced renewed controversy in recent days following allegations by his former partner of domestic abuse after an apprehended violence order application was filed in court. Mr Latham has denied the allegations, which do not involve any criminal charges and have not been tested in court, but again faced claims on Wednesday he sent explicit messages to his ex-partner from inside parliament. Asked whether he would move any additional censure motions following revelations of the messages, the Premier said he would 'reserve' his answer until more information was presented, but refused to rule it out. 'I wouldn't say categorically we wouldn't be prepared to move (a motion),' Mr Minns said. 'What I would say is that you're right, notice was given in relation to a censure of Mr Latham prior to any of these revelations. 'That goes to the point (that) people were warned about this guy for a long time, and we're going to go ahead with those motions and I am hopeful that it gets wide support to send a clear message that the kind of behaviour that he's been up to for a period of time is completely unacceptable.' Those sentiments were mirrored by Labor upper house leader Penny Sharpe who on Tuesday said she put two motions before the house when parliament resumes in August. One of those motions would seek to refer Mr Latham to the privileges committee over his behaviour. The second would be a more general motion calling into question his overall behaviour. 'Mark Latham has some questions to answer on a whole range of behaviours,' she said. Mr Minns has ramped up his attacks in recent months against Mr Latham, a former Labor leader who has become a key vote against the government in the Legislative Council. In June, Mr Minns called Mr Latham 'Australia's biggest bigot' in a surprise spray during question time, and claimed there was an a 'coalition emerging' between the Greens in the Upper House, the Legislative Council, the Coalition, and One Nation. He claimed they were 'voting together day after day' to 'platform one of the most shameful bigots in NSW', referring to Mr Latham. In a series of late night tweets on Tuesday, Mr Latham said the messages purported to be between him and his former partner were 'not accurate' and claimed 'someone has made changes in very important ways'. Mr Latham claimed the messages, as reproduced in The Daily Telegraph, omitted messages in the chain and claimed in one instance a word had been omitted from a message. But he did not deny claims a message had been sent during question time. 'The Tele is tut-tutting one of these messages was sent during question time,' he said. 'At least I was there. There's a terrible upper house tradition of a whole bunch of MPs never attending QT, they just pop in and out for their own question.'
