Iran: Is the cost of closing the Strait of Hormuz too high? – DW – 06/25/2025
Iran has struck back, but the Strait of Hormuz remains open. Why hasn't Tehran carried out its threat?China and Iran's neighbors may have affecte the decision?
For a few days, the world held its breath. It seems the conflict between Israel, the US and Iran is not going to escalate any further, at least for now. Iran opted to save face by launching an attack on a US military base in Qatar, which the stock market interpreted as a de-escalatory gesture.
This retaliatory strike by Tehran was "loud enough for headlines, quiet enough not to shake the oil market's foundations," Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management commented to Reuters. Immediately after the strike on Monday evening, the oil price fell again sharply.
And yet Iran holds a powerful trump card. It could do immense damage to the global economy by blockading the Strait of Hormuz. But would this really be to its advantage — or would it be more of an own goal?
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) says that "Iran's economy is relatively diversified compared with many other Middle Eastern countries." However, the goods produced by the country's industry are primarily sold on the domestic market.
The export of oil and petroleum products is therefore an important source of income for the government. These constitute more than 17% of the country's total exports, with natural gas at 12%. According to the EIA, Iran was the fourth-largest producer of crude oil among the OPEC countries in 2023, and in 2022 it was the world's third-largest producer of dry gas (natural gas that is at least 85% methane, containing only negligible quantities of condensable gases such as hydrogen).
Although it has been subject to sanctions for many years, this has not prevented the Iranian regime from exporting oil. China in particular has benefited: In 2023, it took almost 90% of the oil exported by Iran.
In March 2024, the Financial Times quoted Javad Owji, Iran's Minister of Petroleum at the time, saying that Iran's oil exports "generated more than 35 billion dollars" in 2023. According to the World Bank, between April and December 2023 the oil sector represented more than 8% of Iran's GDP. And based on estimates from the data analysis company Vortexa, it is believed to have exported even more the following year.
Iran would therefore damage itself if it blocked the Strait of Hormuz. Not only would its own oil revenue be affected, it would also upset its trading partner China, which profits from buying the oil at low cost.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The London-based TV station Iran International estimates that Tehran sells its oil at a 20% discount on the world market price, because its buyers risk getting into trouble on account of the US sanctions. The broadcaster explained that Chinese refineries are the biggest buyers of Iran's illegal consignments of oil. Intermediaries mix it with deliveries from other countries, and the oil is then declared in China as having been imported from Singapore or other countries of origin.
According to Rystad Energy, an independent energy research company based in Norway, China imports a total of almost 11 million barrels of crude oil per day, around 10% of which comes from Iran.
A blockade would also have caused trouble for Iran's neighbors. Kuwait, Iraq and the United Arab Emirates also transport their oil through the passage. In a post on Linkedin, the economist Justin Alexander, a Gulf region analyst, commented that if Tehran were to close the strait, this would "undermine remaining alliances" it still has with countries in the region.
Whether Iran could actually maintain a blockade is also doubtful. Homayoun Falakshahi from the analytics firm Kpler told German TV that he believed a blockade would provoke a swift and forceful military response from both the US and European countries, and that Iran would only have been able to close the strait for a day or two.
Furthermore, if Iran's economic situation were to deteriorate even further, it would go down very badly with the Iranian people. Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, professor of economics at Virginia Tech in the US, told DW that the standard of living in Iran had already dropped to the level of 20 years ago as a result of sanctions.
These apply not only to the oil industry, but also to international payment transactions with Iran, which drives up inflation. This has been rising steeply since the beginning of the year, to more than 38.7% in May 2025 compared with May 2024. The combination of sanctions and the low exchange rate is making daily life ever more expensive for people in Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
27 minutes ago
- DW
Turkey's main opposition party CHP set for showdown – DW – 06/30/2025
The CHP's presidential candidate is in prison, and its chairman under investigation. Now, a court case is looming. Turkey's largest opposition party, the CHP, is facing a litmus test. The Turkish public has recently become familiar with a legal term that could seal the fate of the largest opposition party, the Republican People's Party, or CHP. "Mutlak butlan" means absolute nullity, referring to a situation where something is considered completely void or invalid from the beginning. This is exactly what could happen on June 30, when the trial against the CHP comes to an end. If judges in the capital, Ankara, decide to declare the 38th party congress of the CHP null and void, the party's entire reform-minded leadership would lose its legitimacy. Turkey's oldest party, which has mobilized millions of people to protest since the imprisonment of its presidential candidate, Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, in March, would be plunged into total chaos. Following the CHP's landslide defeat in Turkey's presidential election in May 2023, there were calls for a change of leadership within the party. In particular, the self-confident Imamoglu, who defeated Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's candidate three times in Istanbul, urged his party to reform. At the party congress the following November, Imamoglu supported the current party chairman Ozgur Ozel, who prevailed against long-time chairman Kemal Kilicdaroglu in a vote that saw all party leaders replaced. The 76-year-old Kilicdaroglu — whom observers said had little charisma — had led the CHP for almost 14 years, losing every election against the ruling AKP party and President Erdogan. However, Kilicdaroglu's traditional nationalist wing did not accept the defeat. As a result, they filed criminal charges and claimed that the election process at the party congress in question had been conducted illegally. They also accused the reformist wing under Ozel and Imamoglu of having only won the victory by buying delegates' votes. In turn, the public prosecutor's office launched an investigation. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video To avert a negative verdict, the CHP held an unscheduled party conference this past April, during which a large majority reelected the new leadership. However, the old wing again filed criminal charges against the result. Meanwhile, Turkey's pro-government media has been trying to set the two sides against each other, claiming that the old chairman and his supporters were victims of internal party conflict. The result is a fierce dispute that has divided the party into two camps, with both sides hurling serious accusations and insults at each other. Berk Esen, a political scientist at Sabanci University in Istanbul, said Erdogan is trying to weaken and divide the CHP because of its popularity and efforts to resist the increasing repression. He told DW that the Turkish president had already used this method against three opposition parties, with success each time. Esen said Erdogan is once again stepping in the way of reform and rejuvenation in order to counteract the development of new groups of opposition voters, preferring the old, entrenched and unsuccessful opposition leaders as rivals. If the court rules against the young CHP leadership on Monday, Erdogan will be able to add another victory to his tally, he added. Legal experts don't consider the Turkish judiciary to be independent, and there has been speculation about the trail's outcome for several days. If the verdict is in favor of the current leadership, which is rather unlikely, the CHP under Ozgur Ozel can continue its course. If the judges rule against the current leadership, the party leaders and structure would lose their legitimacy. In this case, Kilicdaroglu, the former leader, could take over the party and shape the CHP according to his will. Kilicdaroglu has already said he would like to return to the party in order to prevent the appointment of a temporary administrator. Should that come to pass, said political scientist Esen, it would mean even more chaos because Kilicdaroglu would not have the support of the base. Should a temporary administrator end up assuming control of the party, Esen is convinced he would have no chance. The resistance within the party would be too great for him to be able to hold a party conference after around six weeks, as the current legal situation requires, and the current chairman Ozel and his faction would certainly emerge victorious once again. In a fourth scenario, the reformers would end up leaving the CHP and launching a new political party. However, observers have pointed out that such parties have never reached the strength of the parent party in the country's recent history, and the original parties end up weakened and ineffective. A final outcome could see the verdict postponed — a move that would further split the CHP and portray the party as an incompetent alternative that would be unable to govern a country. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The future of Turkey's largest opposition party is at stake. Since the arrest of its presidential candidate Ekrem Imamoglu, it has been organizing large rallies twice a week. They have mobilized millions of people, even in the strongholds of the ruling AKP party. A ruling that considers the current CHP party leadership unlawful risks diverting that spotlight, with the party preoccupied with itself and its own chaos for a long time. As a result, the popular Imamoglu — Erdogan's main challenger — could be banished to political insignificance in prison, without the support of a strong opposition party.
Int'l Business Times
32 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Over 230,000 Afghans Left Iran In June Ahead Of Return Deadline: IOM
More than 230,000 Afghans left Iran in June, most of them deported, as returns surge ahead of a deadline set by Tehran, the United Nations migration agency said on Monday. The number of returns from Iran rose dramatically in recent weeks. Afghans have reported increased deportations ahead of the July 6 deadline announced by Iran for undocumented Afghans to leave the country. From June 1-28, 233,941 people returned from Iran to Afghanistan, International Organization for Migration spokesman Avand Azeez Agha told AFP, with 131,912 returns recorded in the week of June 21-28 alone. Since January, "691,049 people have returned, 70 percent of whom were forcibly sent back", he added. For several days last week, the number reached 30,000 per day, the IOM said, with numbers expected to increase ahead of the deadline. Afghans spilled into an IOM-run reception centre out of buses arriving back-to-back at the Islam Qala border point in western Afghanistan's Herat province on Saturday. The recent returns have been marked by a sharp increase in the number of families instead of individuals, the UN said, with men, women and children lugging suitcases carrying all their belongings. Many have few assets and few prospects for work, with Afghanistan facing entrenched poverty and steep unemployment. The country is four years into a fragile recovery from decades of war under Taliban authorities, who have called for a "dignified" return of migrants and refugees from neighbouring countries. Kabul's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi raised the Taliban government's concerns in a meeting with Iran's ambassador, according to a statement, saying: "A coordinated mechanism should be put in place for the gradual return of migrants." The cash-strapped government faces challenges in integrating the influx of returnees, which has piled on to hundreds of thousands also forced out in recent years from Pakistan -- another traditional host of Afghans fleeing conflict and humanitarian crises. Severe international aid cuts have also hamstrung UN and NGO responses, with the IOM saying it was "only able to assist a fraction of those in need". "On some high-volume days, such as recently at Islam Qala, assistance reached as few as three percent of undocumented returnees," it said in a recent statement. Returnees AFP spoke to in recent days at the border cited mounting pressure by Iranian authorities and increased deportations, with none pointing to the recent Iran-Israel conflict as a spur to leave the country. However, "regional instability -- particularly the fallout from the Israel-Iran conflict -- and shifting host country policies have accelerated returns, overwhelming Afghanistan's already fragile humanitarian and development systems", the UN mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, said in a statement. Samiullah Ahmadi, 28, was seeing his country of origin for the first time when he crossed the border. Unsure of what he would do once he reached the Afghan capital Kabul with his family, he was defiant in response to the pressures to return. "I was born there (Iran). But the situation for Afghans is such that no matter how good you are or even if you have valid documents, they still don't treat you with respect." Afghans have reported increased deportations ahead of the July 6 deadline announced by Iran for undocumented Afghans to leave the country AFP Taliban security personnel look on as Afghan refugees arrive at the Islam Qala border crossing between Afghanistan and Iran AFP
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tougher Singapore Crypto Regulations Kick In
Singapore ramped up crypto exchange regulations Monday in a bid to curb money laundering and boost market confidence after a series of high-profile scandals rattled the sector. The city-state's central bank last month said digital token service providers (DTSPs) that served only overseas clients must have a licence to continue operations past June 30 -- or close up shop. The Monetary Authority of Singapore in a subsequent statement added that it has "set the bar high for licensing and will generally not issue a licence" for such operations. Singapore, a major Asian financial hub, has taken a hit to its reputation after several high-profile recent cases dented trust in the emerging crypto sector. These included the collapse of cryptocurrency hedge fund Three Arrows Capital and Terraform Labs, which both filed for bankruptcy in 2022. "The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, the MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons," the central bank said, referring to firms serving solely foreign clients. Analysts welcomed the move to tighten controls on crypto exchanges. "With the new DTSP regime, MAS is reinforcing that financial integrity is a red line," Chengyi Ong, head of Asia Pacific policy at crypto data group Chainalysis, told AFP. "The goal is to insulate Singapore from the reputational risk that a crypto business based in Singapore, operating without sufficient oversight, is knowingly or unknowingly involved in illicit activity." Law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher said in a comment on its website that the move will "allow Singapore to be fully compliant" with the requirements of the Financial Action Task Force, the France-based global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog. Three Arrows Capital filed for bankruptcy in 2022 when its fortunes suffered a sharp decline after a massive sell-off of assets it had bet on as prices nosedived in crypto markets. Its Singaporean co-founder Su Zhu was arrested at Changi Airport while trying to leave the country and jailed for four months. A court in the British Virgin Islands later ordered a US$1.14 billion worldwide asset freeze on the company's founders. Singapore-based Terraform Labs also saw its cryptocurrencies crash dramatically in 2022, forcing it to file for bankruptcy protection in the United States. The collapse of the firm's TerraUSD and Luna wiped out around US$40 billion in investments and caused wider losses in the global crypto market estimated at more than US$400 billion. South Korean Do Kwon, who co-founded Terraform in 2018, was arrested in 2023 in Montenegro and later extradited to the United States on fraud charges related to the crash. He had been on the run after fleeing Singapore and South Korea.
