Mac Vs Windows: Which One Is Better In 2025?
Anaika Sohal
Jun 27, 2025
Windows offers an open system with a wide range of device options, making it ideal for users who prefer flexibility and customization.
Windows offers variety, but it often lacks the smooth and seamless experience that mac OS delivers.
For gaming, Windows is the go-to platform as it supports a wider range of game titles and offers customizable hardware.
Thanks to optimized performance, color accuracy, and smoother workflows, mac OS is the preferred choice for professionals in creative fields like video editing, music production, and graphic design.
Students who need to work on specific professional or creative software may benefit more from using a Mac over a Windows PC.
Windows PCs typically offer better affordability and more pricing options, making them accessible to a wider audience compared to Apple's premium pricing.
MacBooks generally offer better battery life, especially the recent models, when compared to most Windows laptops.
While Windows is better for gaming and affordability, Mac stands out in terms of reliability, battery life, and creative tasks. Both have their own strengths and weaknesses; it ultimately depends on your personal or professional needs. Read Next Story
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Microsoft retires iconic 'Blue Screen of Death' after three decades
Sopan Deb For millennials, blue can be a significant colour. It is associated with clues left by a well-meaning dog in our youth. Songs about a little guy that lives in a blue world (Da Ba Dee Da Ba Di). Or the rage-inducing abject failure of the Windows computer in front of us. In other words, the Blue Screen of Death. And now, the world is set to bid a fond farewell to a generation's most feared and notable error message, as Microsoft announced on Thursday that the screen was being officially replaced by a less friendly but more efficient Black Screen of Death. The simplified screen, Microsoft said in a blog post, would roll out later this summer, and 'improves readability and aligns better with Windows 11 design principles, while preserving the technical information on the screen for when it is needed.' A new message — in white lettering — is slated to say, 'Your device ran into a problem and needs to restart.' For more than three decades, Windows has denoted some sort of serious crash or slow down in its system with a blue screen. An early version of the message was written by the former chief executive, Steve Ballmer, according to Raymond Chen, a longtime Microsoft programmer. The message, released in the early S, would fill the screen: 'This Windows application has stopped responding to the system.' Underneath, multiple soothing options were provided over the blue-screen background, including ESC, and ENTER — which would give you false hope that the problem was fixable — and then the last resort 'Ctrl+Alt+Del' to give up and start over. An engineer named John Vert designed one for Windows NT soon after, and Chen helped finalise a new one for Windows 95 in 1995. All of them were blue by coincidence, according to a blog post by Chen. The change to a black screen comes in the wake of last year's outage generated by the cybersecurity company CrowdStrike. Its software update unintentionally crippled computers using Windows software all around the world, causing disruption. 'I like the Blue Screen of Death. To me, it means a lot. It's calming because it's blue and it's got this kind of comical side to it,' Jake Moore, a cybersecurity adviser for the European-based company ESET, said. But after the CrowdStrike incident, Moore said that the blue screen may have overstayed its welcome. 'When it triggered millions of blue screens of death around the world, I think the way it has become so synonymised with the outage, I could see that may have created a time for change,' Moore said. The change of the blue screen to black is causing an unusual type of nostalgia — longing for a reminder of bad times. The black screen, Microsoft says, is a signifier of better days ahead. It will be 'easier than ever to navigate unexpected restarts and recover faster,' the company said in its blog post. Customers may get a better experience, but that doesn't mean everyone is ready to say goodbye.'I've learned so much from playing around with hardware, making mistakes, understanding what caused the 'Blue Screen Of Death,'' Moore said. 'It made me want to progress. It'll be a shame to see it go. To some people it might not mean much. They might not even realise or notice any change. But to me, it's an end of an era.'
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Mercedes, Audi, Volvo decline Apple CarPlay Ultra over control concerns: Report
The new and upgraded Apple CarPlay will be rolling out to most vehicles within the next 12 months. Check Offers Several of the world's top carmakers, such as Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Volvo, Polestar, and Renault, have supposedly ruled out incorporating Apple's next-gen CarPlay Ultra system in their future models. This comes against previous expectations after Apple revealed the new-gen in-car experience in 2022. While Apple positioned CarPlay Ultra as a futuristic leap from its standard CarPlay system—offering control over all in-car displays including the instrument cluster—many European automakers appear hesitant to give Apple such extensive control over their digital ecosystems. According to a Financial Times report, a Renault executive directly told Apple: 'Don't try to invade our own systems." This statement encapsulates broader concerns among manufacturers that adopting CarPlay Ultra could erode their control over user experience, vehicle data, and system design. Also Read : WWDC 2025: Apple CarPlay gets 3 new features with iOS 26 Select automakers still on board Despite the resistance, Hyundai, Kia, Genesis, and Porsche continue to commit to adding the CarPlay Ultra system to their offerings. Jaguar Land Rover, however, said it is still considering the system, an attitude of more guarded but open-ended considering. Other manufacturers such as Ford, Nissan, and Infiniti, who were included in Apple's original 2022 list of partners, declined to provide updates but didn't completely rule out adoption. Honda and Acura are also reportedly still on track to implement the new system in future vehicles. Apple CarPlay Ultra: Features CarPlay Ultra is intended to take Apple's user interface beyond the infotainment screen and into the instrument cluster, showing important data such as speed, battery/fuel levels, and climate controls through Apple's software rather than the automaker's native design. Also Read : Apple CarPlay Ultra debuts in Aston Martin DBX 707. Now gets multi-screen support The system is currently available only in select vehicles—such as the Aston Martin DBX—and requires an iPhone 12 or newer running iOS 18.5 or later, with a wireless connection initiating the interface automatically on vehicle start-up. Apple's iOS 26 update, expected in September or October, will include enhancements to both standard CarPlay and CarPlay Ultra. New features include updated UI brackets, compact calling notifications, 'Tapback' emojis as reactions in Messages, and Live Activities through the vehicle's display experience. The reluctance of some auto OEMs to adopt CarPlay Ultra reflects the growing dispute between automobile manufacturers and tech companies regarding ownership of the in-car digital experience—which is becoming more central to both modern vehicles and user expectations. Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape. First Published Date: 29 Jun 2025, 15:59 PM IST
Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 17: Should you upgrade now or wait?
When it comes to upgrading iPhones, even tech journalists find themselves playing personal tech support—especially for family. That's what Richard Priday faced when his dad asked whether to upgrade his aging iPhone 14 Pro or wait for the upcoming iPhone 17 series. The Context: Richard's father was frustrated with his iPhone 14 Pro's battery, which had dropped to 80% capacity. Though a battery replacement would be a quick fix, the allure of new features had him eyeing a fresh upgrade. Sound familiar? Why Not Upgrade to iPhone 16 Right Now? The iPhone 16 Pro offers substantial upgrades over the iPhone 14 Pro: Larger, lighter design with titanium sides Faster A18 chip and more RAM 5x telephoto zoom USB-C port Apple Intelligence support Bigger battery with faster charging Tempting, yes. But with the iPhone 17 just a few months away (typically launched in September), Richard advised waiting. Why Wait for the iPhone 17? Rumors suggest the iPhone 17 lineup could bring: A larger 6.3" display with 120Hz refresh (on base model) A new ultra-thin 'iPhone 17 Air' A 48MP telephoto lens on the Pro Better durability and faster A19 Pro chip Holding off also means iPhone 16 prices could drop post-launch, potentially saving hundreds. Don't Let Trade-In Offers Rush You Apple had briefly bumped its trade-in values—offering $420 for a well-kept iPhone 14 Pro. But Richard warned that the slight bonus isn't worth missing out on a better phone just months away. Final Verdict? Wait. Richard told his dad to hang on a little longer—even if it wasn't what he wanted to hear. It's the kind of advice that may not be exciting, but it's grounded in real-world logic. So, if you're debating an iPhone upgrade, consider battery health, software support, upcoming features, and timing before taking the plunge. It might just save you from buyer's remorse.
