Sinn Féin TD denies 'tactical wee' after missing vote
Sinn Féin's Justice spokesperson says he missed a vote on his own amendment to the Offences Against the State Act - due to the need to answer nature's call.
Matt Carthy said the Minister of State Niall Collins was able to ensure the passage of the legislation without any votes, describing the move as "petty".
Deputy Carthy said these things happen, but the substantive point Sinn Féin wanted to make was that the government needed to accelerate the review into the law which he described as "outdated."
Asked if it was a "tactical wee" in the words of cartoon character Bluey, Deputy Carthy said it was a tactical position on the part of the Minister of State, saying "it was an old fashioned political stroke all's fair in love and politics".
"The Minister saw an opportunity to avoid a vote, and he took it."
Sinn Féin has insisted that it would have abstained on the renewal of the Offences Against the State Act, but it was ultimately not put to a vote.
Deputy Carthy had "stepped out" for a few minutes during the debate on the emergency measures that are renewed by the Oireachtas annually.
When he returned, to an almost empty Dáil, he was told by Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy that the matter had been dealt with.
Mr Carthy previously said that the emergency legislation, which dates back 90 years, should not be used on an ongoing basis.
He called for the the introduction of a modern legal framework to tackle organised crime and to protect jurors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: Ireland does not need a president
As the country faces another costly presidential election, one wonders if we need a president and can we afford to sustain what is largely a ceremonial office. For me, the answer is an emphatic no. The Constitution expressly vests executive authority in the democratically-elected government. The non-executive presidency is weighed down by protocols and formalities which are irrelevant in a modern republic grappling with very serious housing, health, criminal, and international issues. The president holds office for an inordinately long seven years, and can be elected for a second term. Unlike a general or local election, it's almost impossible for an ordinary Irish citizen to contest this election, as a nomination requires the support of at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or at least four local authorities. In addition to expense-free living in the opulent, 92-room Áras an Uachtaráin, the president is entitled to an annual salary of €332,070, nearly seven times the average working salary of €47,967. Presidential staff and ceremonial functions, at home and abroad, cost the taxpayer at least €5m per annum. Some very fine people, including the present incumbent, have held the office but, in my opinion, the position is now unsustainable and the money spent in electing and maintaining a president of Ireland, a nominal and virtually powerless figurehead, is urgently needed elsewhere. Billy Ryle, Tralee, Co Kerry Ban will just move smoking problem elsewhere It was with surprise that l learned of the suggestion by Cork county councillors to prohibit smoking and vaping in local authority amenity areas. 'The response of the local authority has been to ignore the enforcement of its own litter bylaws or general waste-management legislation.' Stock picture: Nicholas T Ansell/PA The proposed rule will at best simply move the problem elsewhere or, as I believe to be the case from experience, lead to another bylaw going on the statute book of the local authority that will not be enforced. As one who for many years has regularly gone on litter patrol, I can confirm that over 60% of all items dropped on our streets are cigarette or vaping related, yet the response of the local authority has been to ignore the enforcement of its own litter bylaws or general waste-management legislation. My appeals over the years for the provision of cigarette receptacles outside all local authority and State agency buildings falling on deaf ears, this is apart from my advocacy of local authorities rolling out a pilot scheme where, on request, cigarette receptacles would be provided to ratepayers. Until the mindset of the local authority changes in relation to litter and waste management enforcement, no amount of new legislation will have the desired effect Tadhg O'Donovan, Fermoy, Cork What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Mayo County GAA Board should apologise The choice of language used by the Mayo County GAA Board in sacking its management team was disgusting. Exactly what might be expected of the owners of a an English Premier League club when sacking a manager; and indeed, even then not always so. Gaelic Football is an amateur sport. An amateur sport that is now garnished with the worst aspects of corporate professionalism and elitism. Major fixtures behind pay walls. Highly paid officials. Corporate boxes. Exorbitant ticket prices. All totally based on the efforts of unpaid amateur players. Jarlath Burns needs to have a chat with his full-time permanent officials. Pundits speak of managers losing the dressing room. If GAA HQ is not careful, it may well lose a lot more than that. Mayo is a proud GAA county. An apology should come from HQ. And an assurance that county management teams will be treated with respect in future. After an opening phrase that a manager 'has been relieved of his duties with immediate effect' undermines whatever weasel words may follow. Larry Dunne, Rosslare Harbour, Co Wexford Profit of doom I notice that crude oil prices fell 7% on the open market, as reported recently in the Irish Examiner, in the wake of war breaking out between Israel and Iran. I also noticed that petrol and diesel prices went up at the forecourt pumps by almost the same amount at the same time. Let it not be said there's no opportunistic money to be made during a war. Nick Folley, Carrigaline, Cork What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Progress on speech and language therapy After reading the article 'Speech and language, occupational therapies to start in 45 special schools in September' (Irish Examiner, June 19), I screamed out loud, 'Hallelujah!'. It is about time! For the last several years I have been reading disturbing articles on the websites of various Irish newspapers telling of the long waiting lists for children to receive speech and language therapy. I applaud the Department of Education for finally addressing the issue and moving in the right direction. Stammering is one of the primary speech issues that affects children. Parents should know that there are great resources available on the websites of the Irish Stammering Association and Stamma (formerly the British Stammering Association). Also, the website of the Stuttering Foundation provides many free resources, such as e-books and streaming videos. Colm Ruane, Bronx, New York Putting words on the plight of Palestinians A lot of investment and effort is put into the production of TV shows and pop videos but I believe very little talent and imagination is being put into conveying the present extremely serious plight of the people of Gaza. A video should be produced which plays the voices of actors speaking repeatedly and with feeling some of the moving lines from Shakespeare to the background of the horrific scenes of destruction and death which are being broadcast daily from Gaza. Along with episodes of silence, the already recorded heartbreaking words and cries of the Gazan people themselves should also be included in this new video in an attempt to convey just a fraction of the pain and sorrow of their tragic situation. Some such appropriate lines from Shakespeare which could be included in this video might be 'drown the stage with tears' and 'there's matter in these sighs, in these profound heaves'. Also 'they are cruel tears' along with 'if you prick us, do we not bleed?' and on and on. Perhaps a few newly-written and appropriately matching lines could also be spoken to describe the plight of the people in Gaza. Sean O'Brien, Kilrush, Co Clare What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Affordable homes are key to preventing crime I commend the Irish Examiner in doing a three-day series on crime in Cork. This investigation found that almost a quarter of the jail sentences handed down in Cork over the past five years were to homeless people. Theft, assault, public order, or drug offences were the most mentioned, with men accounting for 87% of all the jail terms. As a Cork man, it breaks my heart to learn of these statistics. As a clinician, I have found that people who live on the streets often face a cruel choice — living rough in the cold or spending time behind bars. Sadly, we see that the numbers trapped in sleeping rough have again risen. This is why more social homes are desperately needed. It's hard to quantify the extent to which homelessness has contributed to chronic and mental poor health. There is no question in my mind that homelessness and poor mental health are inextricably linked. Homelessness is harmful, as pretty much everyone instinctively knows. It's my contention that charities on their own cannot solve this imbroglio. This is why it's incumbent on the Government to put pressure on developers and landlords. Homeless people sometimes have other problems too, but what the vast preponderance of these poor souls need more than anything else is an affordable house to live in. I find the following words which were once uttered by the late Mother Teresa to be apposite to the above: 'We think sometimes that poverty is only being hungry, naked and homeless. The poverty of being unwanted, unloved and uncared for is the greatest poverty. We must start in our homes to remedy this poverty.' John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Read More Irish Examiner view: Ireland needs immigrants to help address our labour shortage
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails ‘giant win' as supreme court rules on his birthright citizenship order
The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday to allow president Donald Trump to end birthright citizenship in some parts of the country, even as legal challenges to the constitutionality of the move proceed in other regions. The 6:3 decision, which was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and split along ideological lines, is a major victory for Mr Trump, and may allow the reshaping, even temporarily, of how citizenship is granted in the US. The order will not go into effect for 30 days, the justices said in their opinion, allowing its legality to be contested further. Mr Trump has hailed the ruling a 'giant win' and is due to hold a news conference at the White House shortly. READ MORE 'GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social. The justices also did not address the underlying constitutionality of the president's order to curtail birthright citizenship, potentially leaving that issue for another day. The court's ruling appeared to upend the ability of single federal judges to freeze policies across the country, a powerful tool that has been used frequently in recent years to block policies instituted by Democratic and Republican administrations. Justices across the ideological spectrum had been critical of these so-called nationwide injunctions, arguing they encouraged judge-shopping and improperly circumvented the political process by allowing one judge to halt a policy nationwide. The surprise decision means that an executive order signed by Mr Trump ending the practice of extending citizenship to the children of unauthorised immigrants born in the US would be set to take effect in 30 days in the 28 states that have not challenged the measure. The details of how the policy would be implemented were not immediately clear. The ability of a single federal judge in one part of the country to pause a policy nationwide has been a major stumbling block for Mr Trump. These so-called nationwide injunctions are controversial judicial tools, and have prompted intense debate over their legality. Federal trial judges have consistently ruled against the Trump administration, stymieing efforts to withhold funds from schools with diversity programs, to relocate transgender women in federal prisons and to remove deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants. The case before the justices arose from an executive order signed by Mr Trump on January 20th, the first day of his second term, that appeared to upend the principle known as birthright citizenship, which has been part of the American constitution for more than 150 years. The announcement prompted immediate legal challenges from 22 Democratic-led states, immigrant advocacy organisations and pregnant women concerned their children might not automatically be granted citizenship. Within days, a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the executive order. 'I've been on the bench for four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,' the Seattle judge said, calling Mr Trump's order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Federal judges in Maryland and Massachusetts also issued orders pausing the policy. All three judges extended their orders to the entire country, even to states that had not brought legal challenges. On March 13th, the Trump administration filed an emergency application asking the justices to weigh whether such nationwide injunctions were legal. The Supreme Court has never issued a ruling that squarely addresses nationwide injunctions. But justices across the ideological spectrum have expressed skepticism over them. In an unusual move, the justices announced that they would hear oral arguments on the emergency application. — The New York Times / Reuters
The Journal
11 hours ago
- The Journal
Homelessness figures hit record of 15,747 people in emergency accommodation
LAST UPDATE | 10 mins ago A RECORD NUMBER of people in the State are officially recognised as homeless as the latest figures reveal 15,747 people were living in emergency accommodation in May. This is an increase of 167 people on the 15,580 people recorded as homeless in April. The figure includes 4,844 children – some 69 more than last month. The statistics do not include people rough sleeping, refugees, asylum seekers, individuals in domestic violence shelters, or those experiencing 'hidden homelessness', such as sleeping in cars, on couches, or other unsuitable living conditions. The figures are taken from the week of 19-25 May Of the adults accessing emergency accommodation, 7,734 were in Co Dublin. Some 655 adults were in Cork, 505 were in Limerick, and 236 were in Galway. Meanwhile, there were 3,589 children living in emergency accommodation in Dublin. There were also 2,273 accessing emergency accommodation. Focus Ireland CEO Pat Dennigan said the 'government's current approach to homelessness is failing'. Advertisement 'There needs to be far more urgency in the Government's response to help end this terrible human crisis,' he added. Dublin Simon Community has called on Taoiseach Michéal Martin to 'bring stability to an unstable market for those in precarious rental agreements and those with nowhere to call home'. 'A housing crisis may be on the political agenda, but its most devastating consequence — homelessness — remains overlooked,' added Catherine Kenny, CEO of Dublin Simon Community. Elsewhere, Sinn Féin's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin accused the government of 'failing children'. He remarked that since 2014, 'there has been a 450% increase in child homelessness'. 'The dramatic increase in child homelessness over the last decade is the direct result of the failure of government to deliver a sufficient volume of social and affordable homes,' said Ó Broin. 'It is the result of government failing to prevent families with children from becoming homeless and a result of the government's failure to get families with children out of emergency accommodation in a timely manner.' Meanwhile, the Social Democrats described it as a 'shameful milestone'. Its housing spokesperson Rory Hearne remarked that the State 'could be facing a national redress scheme for children who have been in emergency accommodation'. 'The government knows the deeply damaging impact any length of time in homelessness has on young people, yet it is not doing everything it can to prevent children from becoming homeless,' he added. Hearne called on the government to 'maintain rent caps between tenancies, and extend the no fault evictions ban to all tenancies'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
