logo
Middle East's cultural treasures vulnerable to conflicts – DW – 06/30/2025

Middle East's cultural treasures vulnerable to conflicts – DW – 06/30/2025

DW4 days ago
During the Israel-Iran war, the countries traded missile and rocket fire that killed and injured hundreds of civilians and put the region's cultural heritage at risk. How can artifacts and historical sites be protected?
The Paris-based International Council of Museums had issued an emphatic warning after the first bomb strikes: There was a "growing danger" for museums and their employees in Israel and Iran.
The ICOM, which consists of 8,000 museum professionals worldwide, including members from Israel and Iran, had demanded that both sides adhere to international conventions for the protection of cultural heritage, even in the event of conflict. "However, we can do no more than admonish and warn," the president of the ICOM's German National Committee, Felicia Sternfeld, told DW.
Did this appeal have an impact? The news situation on the ground is thin, with only sparse information coming out of Iran in particular, as it allows hardly any foreign journalists to enter and severely restricts press freedom. However, one thing seems certain: Contingency plans were activated in both countries at the start of the Israel-Iran conflict. As far as possible, experts worked to secure, remove and relocate cultural assets. It is currently unclear whether despite all the warnings there has been any damage.
Iran has a rich cultural heritage. This includes 28 UNESCO World Heritage Sites and around 840 museums, 300 of which are under the administration of the Ministry of Culture. "Iran has a well-organized and professional heritage authority," Judith Thomalsky, the head of the Tehran branch of the German Archaeological Institute, said in an interview with Deutschlandfunk radio.
Thomalsky's office has been operating from Berlin since 2023, when thousands of Iranians protested the mullah regime and the German Federal Foreign Office withdrew staff from German institutions as a precaution. The Institute itself continues its work on the premises of the German Embassy in Tehran with local staff, and Thomalsky maintains as much contact as possible with her Iranian network.
Barbara Helwing, director of the Museum of the Ancient Near East in Berlin and Thomalsky's predecessor from 2000 to 2014, is also an expert on Iran. She told German regional broadcaster RBB that she was in contact with her colleagues at the National Museum until recently; there has been occasional radio silence because the Iranian regime had shut down the Internet.
"We know that the museum and its two large buildings near the Foreign Ministry have been emptied," said Helwing, adding that she has seen photos showing empty display cases.
The Iranian National Museum is not only the oldest but also the most important museum in Iran. Comprising two buildings with three halls each, it houses more than 300,000 archaeological finds from pre-Islamic [before 7th century CE: Eds.] and Islamic times, including many objects made of stone, ceramics, glass and metals.
"In Iran, the relationship with cultural heritage is very close," Helwing said. The country's cultural identity is based on a long history and the awareness that the first real-world empire in history, the ancient Persian Empire (around 550 to 330 BCE), originated in Iran. According to Helwing, all portable museum objects were hastily transported into the cellars.
The non-movable artifacts, mainly stone objects, were covered with sandbags to protect them from strikes and flying debris. Unlike in Israel, there are no bunkers in Iran — neither for people nor for valuable art treasures.
Protecting archaeological sites that are often located in open areas has proven to be far more difficult: "You can't really protect them," Helwing said, "You can only hope that they are far enough away from potential targets."
According to the English-language , Taq-e Bostan, an archeological complex from the era of the Sasanian dynasty (224-651 CE) that includes a one-of-a-kind monumental rock relief, faces particular danger. The newspaper reported that the Israeli Air Force bombed a weapons depot just two kilometers away from the complex. The resulting shock waves and vibrations may have damaged the site, Helwing fears, though she lacked more precise information.
"Iran's Department of Antiquities knows what it needs to do," says Judith Thomalsky, a historian who focuses on prehistoric times and who has spent over 20 years working in Iran. She also believes it isn't possible to protect open archeological sites like the Persepolis complex, the Bisotun inscriptions and Takht-e Soleyman, or "Throne of Solomon," an archeological site. She told the Berlin daily that while she doesn't believe cultural assets face an acute threat, it is impossible to know how things may develop.
Institutions in Israel, for their part, activated emergency plans following the first Iranian counterattacks. For instance, the Tel Aviv Museum of Art secured its collection of Israeli and international art in underground storage, the French Magazine reported. It is planning to reopen its doors on July 3. It is already possible to visit Jerusalem's Israel Museum again, which with its 500,000 objects is one of the largest in the Middle East. The museum website informs visitors that it is equipped with safe rooms that are located in the museum in case of emergency.
Israel is currently home to nine UNESCO World Heritage Sites, including the White City of Tel Aviv, a neighborhood with numerous buildings in the Bauhaus architectural style, the Masada mountaintop fortress and the Old City of Acre.
"To our knowledge there has been no damage to archeological artifacts under the management of Israel Antiquities Authority, nor to objects in museums," the authority has stated, as reported by both and .
World heritage sites are under formal protection of the international community. The 1954 Hague convention regulates the protection of cultural material in armed conflict, while the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention governs conservation of cultural assets among nations.
From July 6-16, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee will be holding its 47th session in Paris. Among other things, experts will discuss potential future UNESCO cultural heritage sites. The session will be live-streamed. The Israel-Iran conflict was not on the agenda as at June 30.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs: Crunch time looms in US-EU trade talks  – DW – 07/04/2025
Trump tariffs: Crunch time looms in US-EU trade talks  – DW – 07/04/2025

DW

time27 minutes ago

  • DW

Trump tariffs: Crunch time looms in US-EU trade talks – DW – 07/04/2025

EU and US negotiators are attempting to finalize a deal on tariffs before an impending deadline on July 9. Experts say a no-deal scenario is possible. July 9 is almost upon us. That's when 50% tariffs could kick in on EU goods sold to the US if the two sides don't strike a deal beforehand. US President Donald Trump hit EU goods with a baseline tariff of 10% on April 2, and a rate of 25% on imported cars and 50% on steel and aluminum. He threatened to ramp the 10% rate up to 50% by April 9, but a stock market selloff prompted by his tariffs led to a postponement. In the meantime, EU and US negotiators have been working to strike an agreement ahead of the looming deadline, amid doubt in European capitals that EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic will be able to strike a deal that satisfies the member states. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told a press conference on Thursday (June 3) that striking a comprehensive trade deal in 90 days was "impossible" but was hopeful of "an agreement in principle", specifically referring to the agreement the US and UK had struck as a model to aim for. Those watching the negotiations closely say there have been sharp divisions among European Union member states over what concessions are acceptable and on what the US side should offer. For example, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has spoken of the need to strike a deal quickly, criticizing the European Commission's "complicated" approach. "What is at stake here is the rapid resolution of a customs dispute, particularly for our country's key industries," he said. Yet, French President Emmanuel Macron has decried the idea of tariffs being levied by powerful countries as "blackmail", without specifically referring to Trump. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, from the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C., doesn't think the position of the German chancellor will be "acceptable" for all EU members. "Merz has said a number of times that we can live with a 10% across the board tariff. As long as we don't get a 25% sectoral tariff on cars, etc.," he told DW. While the comments of Sefcovic and von der Leyen have been somewhat conciliatory towards Trump and the US, Kirkegaard considers this to be an attempt to maintain unity amongst member states. "That's basically the Commission trying to protect itself against attacks from member states, because it's obviously they would have to bear the consequences of a trade war," he said. If the UK deal is a model, then the EU will likely have to live with 10% tariffs remaining in place on many goods, as the UK has done. The US-UK agreement cut the 25% tariff on UK cars to 10%, but the number of cars that can be imported on that duty is limited to 100,000 — roughly the amount of cars the UK sold to the US in 2024. Any cars exported above that quota will be subject to a 27.5% tax. The EU sold over 700,000 cars to the US last year. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, Kirkegaard believes if the steep car, steel and aluminium tariffs remain at the same level, it will hard for many on the EU side to accept. "As long as that's the case, there's not going to be a deal, in my opinion," he said. "It is ultimately not acceptable to the EU, which is an economy roughly comparable in size to the US, for US tariffs to go up and the EU's to not go up." Kirkegaard argues that in a trade confrontation between economies of the same size, tariffs should "go up together and down together." Bill Reinsch, a senior economics adviser with the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), thinks a UK-style agreement is the most likely outcome. However, what is most important for Trump is the perception that he has "won" rather than what has actually been agreed, Reinsch told DW. "What matters for him is the Oval Office meeting, that so-and-so was agreed, and now everything's going to be fine. So it wouldn't surprise me if in the end there's a 'quote, unquote agreement' with the EU." He argues it would be prudent for the EU to focus on policy outcomes rather than perceptions of who has won. "Let him have the win. If you let him have the win, what he wins doesn't matter. So you don't have to give up very much if you handle it right." One area where there has been a lot of speculation around possible EU concessions, away from tariffs, is on its digital policy, particularly its Digital Services Act and possible digital sales taxes. Germany has been considering a 10% tax on the sales of US digital giants such as Google and Meta's Facebook in Europe. Trump has spoken out against such plans and this week Canada dropped a digital sales tax proposal to keep trade talks with the US alive. Reinsch thinks the EU should prevent member states introducing these taxes because "Trump is right" in his position, he argued, and that is "not even rhetoric." "I think they are clearly discriminatory against some American companies," he said, adding that from a policy standpoint "it's totally the wrong approach." "If you want to build European competitors, you don't do that by dragging down the competition this way. You do it by building European competitors and creating viable options," said Reinsch. As the July 9 deadline looms, serious consideration is being given to the implications of a negotiations blow-up. The EU has described thetrans-Atlantic trade relationship as "the most important commercial relationship in the world," as bilateral trade in goods and services reached €1.6 trillion ($1.88 trillion) in 2023, according to EU Commission data. Kirkegaard says a no-deal scenario could lead to the requirement for fiscal stimulus in some EU countries due to "short-term volatility." But the EU can cope with that, he believes. "We would not be back in [financial crisis of] 2008 or facing a situation similar to even the energy price shock that happened after the Russian invasion in 2022 — absolutely not," he said. He expects the EU to "lose half a percentage point of growth" this year and next year, which was "not trivial," but at the same time "nothing we couldn't live with." Reinsch has a different view, saying a failure would be "bad news" for everybody. "I think in terms of actual trade, it probably would not be as impactful as a blow-up with China because we buy so much more from China. But in terms of disrupting the relationship and particularly disrupting trans-Atlantic investment, I think it would be a huge problem."

Germany considers buying US air defence systems for Ukraine
Germany considers buying US air defence systems for Ukraine

Local Germany

time37 minutes ago

  • Local Germany

Germany considers buying US air defence systems for Ukraine

Asked to comment on reports that the government in Berlin had reached out to Washington over a deal for new anti-missile systems, government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said he could "confirm that more intensive discussions are indeed taking place on this". The United States, which has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since the launch of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, said Tuesday it was halting some key weapons shipments to Ukraine. Among the items affected, according to US media, were Patriot anti-missile systems, which Ukraine deploys to shield itself from Russian attacks. Moscow has in recent weeks ramped up missile and drone attacks on Ukraine, as US support for Kyiv has appeared to waver under President Donald Trump. German officials were particularly concerned about the impact of a potential halt to deliveries of Patriot systems and ammunition, German daily Bild reported Thursday. Berlin had spoken to US officials about a deal that would see it purchase the weapons on Kyiv's behalf and deliver them to Ukraine, Bild reported. Advertisement Germany was waiting on a response from the US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to a request for two Patriot units made "several weeks ago", the paper said. Ukraine has long stressed its need to improve its air defence, including with more Patriot systems, but has struggled to source them. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in April his government wanted to purchase "at least" 10 Patriot systems to defend against Russian attacks.

Tax cuts and pensions: How Germany's budget changes could impact you
Tax cuts and pensions: How Germany's budget changes could impact you

Local Germany

time2 hours ago

  • Local Germany

Tax cuts and pensions: How Germany's budget changes could impact you

Following the approval of the federal budget for 2025, which came at the end of June , leaders of the government met this week to try and agree on some critical budget adjustments. Namely, they wanted to agree on where money might be saved to pay for a formerly promised electricity tax cut for German households. After a lengthy debate, members of the black-red coalition - comprised of the conservative Christian Union parties (CDU/CSU) and the Social Democrats (SPD) - emerged with bad news for German residents: The electricity tax cuts for families and small businesses will not go forward in the foreseeable future. But the meeting did result in an agreement to bring forward changes to the Mothers' pension ( Mütterrente ) by one year. Here's what to know about the changes made to the government's budget plans this week. EXPLAINED: What Germany's new 2025 budget means for you About those electricity tax cuts... The decision not to reduce electricity taxes for everyone in Germany means that households will continue to pay some of the highest electricity prices in Europe. Ahead of the coalition meeting German media had called the effort to save the electricity tax cuts "the first real acid test" for the black-red government. Now that the coalition has failed to bring the tax cut forward, just about everyone - from coalition partners to business associations to the opposition - is upset about it. In their coalition agreement, the government said they would "reduce the electricity tax for everyone..." However, they also said that doing so would depend on financing. The cost of the tax cuts was expected to be €5.4 billion in 2026. In their talks, the parties were unable to agree on where that much financing could be found. READ ALSO: German government scraps electricity tax cuts for households Defending the cabinet's decision, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said, 'We can only spend the money we have.' But the announcement has not been taken well by stakeholders and voters who feel duped. The chairwoman of the Social Association of Germany (SoVD), Michaela Engelmeier spoke of a 'fatal signal' for citizens. 'In times of high living costs, they need tangible relief,' she told the German Press Agency. Advertisement The President of the German Confederation of Skilled Crafts (ZDH), Jörg Dittrich, accused the coalition of breaking trust: 'The electricity tax cut for all set out repeatedly and bindingly in writing..." Black-red coalition leaders suggest that other energy cost relief measures will result in potential savings up to three cents per kWh for consumers. That's less than the five cents suggested in the coalition agreement but still worth up to €100 a year for a family of four, according to government estimates. However, the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce calculates that a maximum of 15 percent of businesses will benefit from the changes. It's also worth noting that the coalition's plan to stick to the elimination of a levy on gas while scrapping tax cuts for electricity has been criticised as a step in wrong direction in Germany's climate policy, because it effectively incentivises gas use and disincentivises electrification at a time when heatwaves are becoming more common and more severe. READ ALSO: School closures to rail chaos - What happens when Germany is hit by extreme heat Mothers' Pension brought forward The coalition committee did agree to bring forward the introduction of the extended Mothers' Pension to the start of 2027 – one year earlier than planned. The changes will see Mütterrente , which compensates parents who take time away from paid employment to raise children, adjusted for parents whose children were born before 1992. Currently, eligible parents of children born before 1992 receive up to 2.5 years worth of Mütterrente payments, whereas parents of children born in 1992 or later, receive three years. The reform extends the three years of payments to all parents. Despite the announcement, Germany's pension insurance fund has said that implementation would likely not be possible until early 2028, due to extensive individual entitlement checks. Committee members insist the mothers' pension will be paid retroactively if technical implementation is not possible until later than January 1st 2027. Advertisement Other pension changes to come The committee confirmed that the second part of the pension package is to be adopted in autumn of this year. Those changes are set to include an active pension, an early start pension and the Act to Strengthen Company Pensions. READ ALSO: Q&A - What we know about Germany's plan to give kids pensions Pension payments are set to increase by 3.74 percent from January 1st, 2026, a move designed to keep pensions broadly in line with inflation and wage developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store