logo
Rural communities brace for Medicaid cuts in Republicans' big bill

Rural communities brace for Medicaid cuts in Republicans' big bill

NBC News4 days ago

HERMANN, Mo. — Like many Americans, Cierra Matthews doesn't have time to pay close attention to the flood of policy changes and announcements coming out of Washington, D.C. So when the single mom of two boys heard that her Medicaid benefits could be impacted because Republicans are proposing changes to the social safety net program, she was shocked.
Members of Congress, Matthews said, are 'covered no matter what, so they don't have to worry about it. So how is that fair to just take it away from somebody that does have to worry about it because of finances or because of a job?'
'I don't think it's fair that they don't care enough to think about that, and that they get to live in that happy little bubble of theirs,' she told NBC News in an interview on Friday.
Matthews lives in a rural community 90 minutes west of St. Louis, where she works in the public school system and falls below the poverty line. She is one of 72 million Americans that relies on Medicaid for her health care, and before Missouri voted to expand Medicaid access in 2020, she was uninsured.
She said that Medicaid saved her life: Matthews received a mental health diagnosis and is on medication that her sons said transformed their mom into a different person.
Provider tax crackdown
As part of a sweeping domestic policy bill, Republicans proposed adding work requirements for 'able-bodied' adults aged 19-64 with exceptions, including for those with dependents under 14, like Matthews.
But GOP lawmakers have also included provisions in their so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' to crackdown on the health care provider tax that states charge health care providers to help fund Medicaid, particularly in rural areas. Under the new proposal, the federal government would limit reimbursement to states, with some conservatives citing 'abuse' of the program by undocumented migrants in blue states.
A cap or freeze on that fee would cost rural hospitals, like the Hermann Area District Hospital, billions of dollars in funding, according to providers, physicians, hospital associations and even some Republican lawmakers. That includes Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who argued the provision would 'defund' rural hospitals.
Dr. Michael Rothermich, the chief of staff at the Hermann hospital, said they are already treading water with current funding levels.
'We've had to make a lot of tough choices, a lot of cutbacks. We've had to freeze salaries. The saddest for me was that we had to let go of our home health agency,' a service that helped rehabilitate people in the remote area, Rothermich told NBC News.
With the steeper cuts proposed by Republicans, Rothermich said there is no more room to trim.
'There's no magic money that pops up from someplace else or falls out of the sky to help us do our job. … We provide services to patients and we need to be reimbursed for those services so that we can take care of the next patient and we can buy the next medicine and we can buy the next piece of equipment,' said Rothermich.
The hospital has just three full-time physicians on staff to service patients in two counties, where one in four rely on Medicaid.
'There are fewer and fewer people to take care of it, and fewer and fewer resources to try and do what we need to do to take care of people,' Rothermich said.
In southern Missouri, Karen White, the administrator for Missouri Highlands Health Care, said the new provisions could mean they need to prioritize which patients to care for.
'I think we will see loss of life, maybe not immediate, but if chronic conditions go untreated for an extended period of time, it does result in lower quality of life, less people working,' White said. 'We've lost three hospitals in the last 10 years in our region, and that has left Missouri Highlands as the only form of health care.'
Missouri Highlands is a federally qualified health center, or FQHC — a community-based health care provider that relies on federal funding to operate. White said 46% of the population there is on Medicaid, and Missouri Highlands is the only health care provider in a 3-4 hour radius.
Republicans pitch a rural hospital fund
To help address the shortfall that Republicans are creating as part of their bill to fund President Donald Trump's campaign promises, Senate leaders are working on a separate fund that would go directly to rural hospitals. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told NBC News on Tuesday that in response to 'a number of concerns our colleagues had mentioned' about their rural constituents, they are 'making good headway' on a solution.
One such proposal landed on Wednesday from members of the Senate Finance Committee, the panel with jurisdiction over Medicaid, to funnel $15 billion to rural health care providers. But multiple Republican senators, including Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Hawley, feared it wasn't enough.
'I don't think that solves the entire problem,' Collins told reporters on Wednesday. 'Any money is helpful, but no, it is not adequate.'
The American Hospital Association, a group that lobbies on behalf of the industry, estimates that rural hospitals would lose $50 billion over the next decade if the GOP's crackdown of the provider tax went into effect. And an analysis from the Urban Institute found that hospitals overall could lose upwards of $300 billion as a result of the provision.
Tillis circulated a document to his Senate colleagues on Monday that illustrates the potential impact to rural healthcare providers in Republican states. In North Carolina, Tillis argued 600,000 people could lose access to health care as a result of Republicans' changes to Medicaid, and warned the party they could face losses in the 2026 midterm elections reminiscent of Democrats' defeats in 2014 after a rocky Obamacare rollout.
Matthews told NBC News that because of this issue, she partially regrets her vote in the 2024 presidential election, especially given the administration's push to realize these cuts.
'Why does somebody else get to make those choices for you? Why is somebody else in charge of [Medicaid]? For you? I don't think it's fair,' she said.
And White said she doesn't understand why Republicans are committing 'political suicide' by including these provisions in their signature piece of legislation.
'It does seem a little odd that the folks that elected [Republicans] will be the ones that are impacted the most with these cuts,' White said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medicaid cuts, SNAP reforms: What's in the Senate tax bill
Medicaid cuts, SNAP reforms: What's in the Senate tax bill

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Medicaid cuts, SNAP reforms: What's in the Senate tax bill

Supporters are emphasizing the chief engine of the Senate's proposal - extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts - and significant boosts to military and border security spending. They are also proceeding despite needing to remove sections of their bill that didn't meet the Senate's unique rules that would have repealed student loan relief and environmental regulations, restricting federal judges' powers and the Trump administration's efforts to bulk up immigration enforcement. More: Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned "If you like higher taxes, open borders, a weak military and unchecked government spending, this bill is your nightmare," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, chairman of the Budget Committee, said in a statement. Graham's team did have to make several adjustments in recent days. Certain Medicaid-related proposals were also left on the Senate cutting room floor. But other reforms - including new work requirements for able-bodied Americans - survived a complex review process and are now on deck for approval in the upper chamber. The Trump administration "strongly supports" the Senate version of the bill, in a White House Office of Management and Budget statement June 28. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the statement said. Democrats are not on board with the legislation that Trump and Republicans have dubbed the "big, beautiful bill." Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, said the president's legislative agenda looks more like a "big, ugly betrayal" because it gives tax breaks to wealthier Americans while cutting services to low-income people. "I am dedicated and determined to fight these kinds of changes that really impact adversely everybody in Connecticut and the country," Blumenthal said in a June 27 video posted to X. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, has been working behind the scenes to whip his members into a consensus. He's got support from Trump, who has spent days putting public pressure on any GOP senators considering defection. But it's still far from clear if Thune and Trump will be successful. Here's a closer look at what's in the Senate bill as the weekend floor debate gets underway. Medicaid and SNAP Medicaid, which provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans, has been a regular point of contention for both chambers grappling with the legislation. After the House narrowly approved big changes to the program that would save at least $625 billion - and potentially cause 7.6 million Americans over the next 10 years to lose their health insurance - the Senate sought even deeper cuts. Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough axed a handful of changes from the Senate bill, including prohibiting coverage for non-citizens and barring funds for gender-affirming care. The upper chamber's legislation maintains new work requirements and increased eligibility checks. The Senate plan seeks to force able-bodied adults to work 80 hours per month until age 65 to qualify for benefits, but it does include exemptions for parents or guardians of children under 14 and those with disabilities. Reforms to SNAP, another federal aid program long known as "food stamps," were sifted through the Senate's review process. MacDonough initially rejected Senate Republicans' attempt to push costs onto states. But the parliamentarian gave them the go ahead after Senate Republicans did some tweaking to the language that included giving states more time before they start paying. The latest version would also give Alaska and Hawaii temporary exemption from the cost-sharing and able-bodied requirements for up to two years, if the Agriculture secretary finds the two states are making a "good faith effort" to comply with the requirements. Many view the offer as a way to keep Alaska's two GOP senators, particularly Sen. Lisa Murkowski, in support of the overall bill. Extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts The heart of the legislation is an extension of the big tax cuts that Trump passed in 2017, which are set to expire on Dec. 31, 2025. The highest earner would continue to be taxed at a 37% rate under the bill, instead of 39.6% if the tax cuts expired. For individuals making between $9,525 and $38,700, they would continue to be taxed at 12%, instead of the 15% rate that would kick in if the legislation doesn't pass. More: How much will Trump's tax bill save you? Gains could vary by income. The 2017 law made other big changes to tax policy that will remain in place under the Senate bill, including doubling the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and nearly doubling the standard deduction. Other provisions in the 2017 tax law that affect both individuals and businesses will remain. "This bill prevents an over-$4 trillion tax hike and makes the successful 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent, enabling families and businesses to save and plan for the future," Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, said in unveiling the bill language. No taxes on tips, overtime Addressing one of Trump's most high-profile 2024 campaign promises, tipped employees like waiters and hairstylists would be able to claim a new tax deduction for tips through 2028, as could workers who are paid overtime wages. More: Americans are tired of tipping. Experts say no tax on tips could make things worse. The Senate kept this measure from the House version of the bill, but added on a $25,000 per year cap for the deduction and weakened the tax break for individuals whose income is above $150,000 or married couples making more than $300,000 combined. $5 trillion debt limit increase The Senate version looks to raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion, which is expected to aggravate fiscal hawks who were already concerned about the House bill, which projections say would raise that limit by $4 trillion. Including the language in this overall bill would give the federal government the OK to pay for programs that Congress has already authorized. Billions for U.S. military and 'Golden Dome' defense One area Republicans didn't spare an expense is defense spending, which some MAGA allies had suggested was "too much" in the lead up to the legislation's unveiling. More: Trump pushes $175 billion 'Golden Dome' missile defense plan The proposal injects roughly $150 billion into the military, including $9 billion for service members quality of life such as housing, healthcare, childcare and education. Another $1 billion is earmarked for border security, which Republican committee members have said will help carry out the president's immigration and "counter-drug enforcement" plans. One of the larger expenditures is $25 billion allotted for an initial investment in a "Golden Dome" missile defense shield that Trump promised will be fully operational by the end of his term in 2029. Green energy roll-backs A handful of moderate senators had pushed for a gentler approach to rolling back green energy tax credits passed under former President Joe Biden. The Senate's proposal heeds their call, slowing the phase-out of multiple clean energy provisions that the House had sought to eliminate more quickly. Billions for the border, deportations The Senate held onto the massive increase in funding for the Department of Homeland Security, increasing the department's budget by roughly $150 billion - which would more than double its current funding. The bill authorizes $45 billion for new immigration detention centers. Under the DHS umbrella, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement already operates more than 160 detention centers around the country. Many are full, as the Trump administration ramps up arrests of immigrants. Another $27 billion would go to fund the administration's mass deportation campaign, including to pay for 10,000 more deportation agents. ICE currently has about 6,000 deportation agents. At that funding level, the current administration "will be poised to dramatically expand community arrests and expand cooperation with state and local law enforcement agencies," according to an analysis by the American Immigration Council, which advocates for immigrant rights. The Trump administration's border czar, Tom Homan, said without additional money, "it's going to be a hard road" to achieve the president's goal of deporting 1 million immigrants this year. "We have a lot of people to look for, a lot of people to arrest, a lot of national security threats we know are in this country," Homan said during a White House press conference June 26. "We need to find them. We need more money to do that. We need more agents to do that."

Senate set to tackle Trump megabill but vote uncertain: Live updates
Senate set to tackle Trump megabill but vote uncertain: Live updates

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Senate set to tackle Trump megabill but vote uncertain: Live updates

"We'll find out," Thune said of the final vote anticipated June 29. If successful, the House would have to vote on the Senate changes in order to reach Trump's desk by his self-imposed deadline of July 4. The Senate has trimmed the House version from about 1,100 pages to 940 - and still faces votes on what are expected to be dozens of amendments. The success of Trump's domestic agenda for tax cuts and border security hangs in the balance. Republican approval of the spending blueprint would allow a majority of the 100-member Senate to approve all of Trump's priorities included in it through legislation later in the year, rather than needing 60 votes to overcome a filibuster for each measure. Here's what we know about the legislative package: What is in the bill? The largest provisions in the legislation would extend expiring tax cuts and create a few new ones, and a dramatic increasing in spending on border security. The heart of the legislation would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts which are set to expire at end of the year. Republicans have said defeat of the measure would lead to a $4 trillion tax hike over the next decade. New tax deductions Trump campaigned on would apply to tips for employees such as waiters through 2028 and for overtime pay. The Senate capped the deduction at $25,000 and weakened the break for individuals with income above $150,000. For border security, the bill would increase funding about $150 billion for the Department of Homeland Security. The bill authorizes $45 billion for new detention centers as Trump ramps up arrests and $27 billion for a mass deportation campaign. A crucial provision would increase the amount the country can borrow by $5 trillion. The country's debt is already approaching $37 trillion and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned the current limit on borrowing will be reached in August. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican holdout on the bill, said he wouldn't vote for the bill unless the debt limit gets a separate vote. But Republican leaders want to keep the unpopular vote within the overall package. -Bart Jansen What's not in the Senate version of the bill? Republican support in the Senate waned after Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled several significant provisions would have to be removed to avoid a filibuster. Republicans removed provisions to curb environmental regulations; restrict federal judges' powers; bulk up immigration enforcement; and cut funding from a consumer protection agency. MacDonough also ruled against provisions that aimed to reduce Medicaid spending on health care programs for undocumented immigrants. -Bart Jansen What does Trump say about the Senate version of the bill? The Trump administration "strongly supports" the Senate version of the bill, in a White House Office of Management and Budget statement June 28. The statement isn't intended to favor the Senate version over the House version on any particular provision, but to signal Trump would sign it if approved by Congress. The two-page statement highlighted provisions for tax cuts, border security, energy and defense. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the statement said. -Bart Jansen

Senate readies for weekend work on Trump's mega tax and policy bill
Senate readies for weekend work on Trump's mega tax and policy bill

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Senate readies for weekend work on Trump's mega tax and policy bill

The South Dakota senator told reporters as he left the U.S. Capitol on June 27 that he hopes to begin a marathon floor debate on June 28 but also acknowledged he may not have yet cobbled together the necessary support from inside his GOP ranks to officially begin the process. Thune and Trump face complications after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough's rulings on what was and was not within the scope of legislation that the president and Republicans have dubbed the "big, beautiful bill." MacDonough over the last several days has found several Senate GOP provisions in violation, including attempts to repeal federal food aid for noncitizens, multiple measures softening environmental regulations and restrictions on federal judges' ability to block government policies. Addressing many of those rulings, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham released significant portions of the new bill near midnight. "If you like higher taxes, open borders, a weak military and unchecked government spending, this bill is your nightmare," the South Carolina Republican said, adding that the legislation "contains all of President Trump's domestic economic priorities." Thune's next hurdle will be rounding up enough support to meet the 51-yes-vote threshold to begin debate, with numerous members of his Republican conference expressing reservations as of late June 27 and no Democrats signaling he'll have their support. In the Capitol heading into the weekend, several Republicans said they were itching to get going with the debate. "We're gradually going from thoughtful, rational deliberation into the foothills of jackassery," Sen. John Kennedy, R-Lousiana, told reporters on June 27. "We're talking about the same things over and over and over. It's clear we're not going to (have) unanimity on some of this. That's why God made votes." For now, the timing of the first vote remains unclear but the Senate is scheduled to convene at 2 p.m. ET for a rare Saturday session on June 28. If and when the Senate does approve the legislation, it will need to be reconciled with the House, which narrowly passed a first version in May. Trump has pressed Senate Republicans to stay on his ambitious timeline to complete their work and get it back through the House in time for the measure to be on his desk for signature into law by July 4. But the president and House Speaker Mike Johnson also are acknowledging their immediate ambitions might not become reality amid deep internal GOP policy disputes and complex Senate rules that have sent the mega bill through the legislative shredder.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store