logo
Sale of loose cigarettes to be BANNED under new law

Sale of loose cigarettes to be BANNED under new law

Remember when you could just score loose cigarettes at the little shop on the corner? Well, updates to the Tobacco Bill aim to ban the sale of loose cigarettes by informal traders and spaza shops. And anyone caught doing so faces hefty fines and even imprisonment.
However, the Portfolio Committee on Health has been hearing arguments against the law over the last week. Specifically, the Tobacco Products Control Bill in South Africa regulates all aspects of tobacco control, public smoking, advertising and packaging. Millions of illegal cigarettes smuggled into South Africa have been destroyed. Image: Pixabay
According to the Cancer Association of South African (CANSA), tobacco-related diseases kill nearly 50 000 South Africans annually. More than 7-million South Africans smoke and there are over 1-billion smokers worldwide.
Nevertheless, spaza shop owners and informal traders believe the banning of loose cigarettes could bankrupt their businesses, reports The Citizen . A spokesperson from the Enterprises and Hawkers Association told parliament that the ban on single cigarettes would cripple operations. He said customers only buy loose cigarettes because they cannot afford a full box. And they're a reliable means to bring customers to the shop/trader. The vast majority of e-cigarettes are sold online and therefore suffer from lax safety control, which the new laws hope to amend. Image: File
Furthermore, the new Tobacco Bill aims improve public health by introducing stricter regulations. It will hold traders liable if customers are found smoking publicly near where they've purchased products. These laws include not just loose cigarettes but banning tobacco product displays at point of sale and regulating electronic nicotine devices (e-cigarettes).
Currently, smoking in indoor public places is banned. Unless the smoking area makes up 25% of the premises. However, the new Tobacco Bill will completely ban smoking in all indoor public places and certain outdoor areas, too. Sale of tobacco products online will also be banned. This is in a bid to control underage smoking. As such, anyone who buys cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes will need to do so in person and produce a physical identification document at the point of sale.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SA's illegal alcohol trade costs R16bn in lost tax revenue
SA's illegal alcohol trade costs R16bn in lost tax revenue

TimesLIVE

time2 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

SA's illegal alcohol trade costs R16bn in lost tax revenue

South Africa's illicit alcohol market has grown by 55% over the past seven years, outpacing growth of the legal alcohol market, and is now worth R25.1bn. This has prompted a call from the Drinks Federation of SA (DF-SA) for collaboration between the government and the private sector to fight the growth of illicit trade in alcohol which has cost the government R16.5bn in lost tax revenue. Benjamin Rideout, research consultant at Euromonitor International, said nearly one in five alcoholic drinks sold in SA is illegal. 'Unlike some countries where home brews are the issue, SA is facing large-scale counterfeiting. The situation demands better control over production inputs like ethanol and much stronger enforcement.' The chair of DF-SA and CEO of SAB, Richard Rivett-Carnac, said illicit alcohol distorts the market and undermines trust in legitimate brands. 'In a tough macroeconomic environment, consumers are looking for bang for buck, goods that are affordable and the price gap of between 37% and 70% between illicit and legal alcohol makes illicit products more appealing, especially in low-income communities. He said 67% of surveyed consumers in the Euromonitor study, for instance, said they would knowingly buy illicit alcohol due to the lower price.' Moreover, he said illegal alcohol is a growing threat to South Africa's economy and public health. 'It drains billions from public funds, threatens jobs, and weakens the formal legal, taxed alcohol industry. Understanding the drivers of illicit alcohol growth and its magnitude is a step in the Right direction but we need stronger collaboration with the industry and government to really start removing the incentives that allow for the illicit market to thrive and intensifying enforcement.' During a panel discussion, Dr Shamal Ramesar, head of research at DF-SA, said 'communities are at risk, and the economy is the biggest loser when we delve into the pervasiveness of illicit alcohol. Recent testing with the University of KwaZulu-Natal found that many illegal products contain dangerous substances like methanol, which can cause serious harm. Unless we shut down illegal producers and educate consumers, lives will continue to be at risk.' DF-SA also announced a new national awareness campaign to help South Africans recognise illegal alcohol and understand the risks. The campaign will include tools for traders and consumers, tips on spotting fake products, and information on how to report them.

Cross-examination denied in Judge Mbenenge's sexual harassment tribunal
Cross-examination denied in Judge Mbenenge's sexual harassment tribunal

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

Cross-examination denied in Judge Mbenenge's sexual harassment tribunal

Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge attending the tribunal. Image: Office of the Chief Justice / N Mabusela Sexual misconduct accused Judge President Selby Mbenenge will not be cross-examined by sexual harassment complainant Andiswa Mengo's legal team after their application for such was denied at the Judicial Conduct Tribunal on Tuesday. Tribunal chairperson, retired judge Bernard Ngoepe, denied the application brought by Nasreen Rajab-Budlender on behalf of her client Mengo. Further to Mbenenge, witnesses brought on his behalf will also not be cross-examined, Ngoepe ruled. The ruling was made in accordance with the Judicial Service Commission Act. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'After looking at the Act, we are of the view that such a right should not be granted. We say so for certain considerations, indicating that we strove to achieve fairness as far as possible. 'This includes that we allowed legal representation for the complainant, albeit within limits. Secondly, we allow the complainant's legal representatives to put questions to witnesses who had been called by the evidence leader.' The ruling was made ahead of Mbenenge's legal team, who would present their case at the Tribunal. Counsel for Mbenenge confirmed they would be calling four witnesses - the last of which would be the judge president himself. Earlier on Tuesday, continuing her testimony, gender equality researcher Lisa Vetten maintained that when Mengo engaged in conversation with Mbenenge, in what she interpreted as sexting, it had come at a much later stage in their conversations after Mbenenge persisted with untoward chats. Vetten continued her testimony to the Judicial Conduct Tribunal on Tuesday after the Tribunal resumed on Monday. Mbenenge is accused of sending Mengo untoward WhatsApp chats over an extended period, and in one incident, it is alleged that he asked Mengo to engage in a sexual act in his chambers. Mengo lodged the complaints in December 2022. During cross-examination, and seemingly aggrieved by the response submitted by Vetten, Mbenenge's counsel criticised Vetten for her 'long-winded explanations' and sympathetic approach to the complainant in her (Vetten's) responses. The submission by advocate Muzi Sikhakhane was affirmed by a vigorous head nod of his client, Mbenenge. Vetten submitted, during cross examination by Sikhakhane on Tuesday, that Mengo had given quite different responses at different times. Sikhakhane probed Vetten on whether it undermines her decades of work when false claims are made. Vetten confirmed that she has dealt with false claims of sexual harassment, but did not ascribe to the falsehood that 'if one woman lies, therefore everybody else lies'. 'When somebody lies about their house being broken into in order to claim insurance, we do not start to doubt everybody who makes an insurance claim. That is the attitude we should take with these matters. We should make it less exceptional. 'We should allow for the fact that yes some women will not behave well. And the fact that some women behave well does not mean that all women behave well,' said Vetten. Sikhakane said that Vetten had given sympathetic interpretations when it came to Mengo's statements, but did not do the same for the respondent (Mbenenge). Vetten submitted that Mengo's conduct did become ambiguous. 'At times she does not say anything, then she does engage, then she is evasive. The respondent is pretty clear about what he wants… What I am saying is when you look at the times when she is saying 'no, no, no', and gives a response like that (referring to a sexting message), there is ambiguity,' said Vetten. Proceedings continue.

Mbenenge tribunal: Sikhakhane argues cultural, linguistic nuances important in analysis of person's actions
Mbenenge tribunal: Sikhakhane argues cultural, linguistic nuances important in analysis of person's actions

Eyewitness News

time4 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Mbenenge tribunal: Sikhakhane argues cultural, linguistic nuances important in analysis of person's actions

JOHANNESBURG - Advocate Muzi Sikhakhane has argued that cultural and linguistic nuances are important in the analysis of the appropriateness of a person's actions. Sikhakhane made the assertion before the Judicial Conduct Tribunal sitting in Sandton, where he continued his cross-examination of expert witness, Lisa Vetten. The senior counsel submitted that the evidence provided by the research associate at Wits University was deficient as Vetten did not possess the cultural background to adequately interpret the interactions between Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge and high court secretary, Andiswa Mengo. Mengo, who accuses the judge president of making unwanted sexual advances towards her between 2021 and 2022, had several exchanges with the top judge on the social media platform, WhatsApp, in their language, isiXhosa. Vetten testified that Mbenenge, on several occasions, insisted that Mengo send him her pictures despite her reluctance to engage with him. Sikhakhane said that in some cultures, courting meant persistence. "The word 'uk'qasa.' Are you familiar with the Zulu word 'uk'shela'?" To which Vetten answered: "I've heard it." "Are you familiar with the word 'uk'phemisa'? Would you differ with me when I say those three words emerging from those particular cultures, in them, they connote and involve persistence, pleading?" asked Sikhakhane. He added that this was an aspect that was missing in Vetten's analysis. "When you are not aware of particular cultural notions, you can miss in language a discussion between two people of a particular culture if your interpretation comes one from a position of ignorance or you come from a position of what you would call a superior culture. A culture that assumes that its understanding of things must be universal." ALSO READ:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store