Inside America's most secretive warriors: Delta Force and SEAL Team 6
Delta Force
and
SEAL Team 6
. Officially, they go by less dramatic titles —
1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta
(1st SFOD-D)
and the
Naval Special Warfare Development Group
(DEVGRU)
. But inside military circles, they're simply known as
Delta
and
Team 6
.
Both are considered
Tier 1 special mission units
under the U.S. military's
Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)
. They handle the kinds of missions that rarely make headlines: hostage rescues in hostile territory, hunting down terrorists, and carrying out operations so sensitive even members of Congress might not hear about them.
Army Sgt. 1st Class Randall 'Randy' Shughart (left) and Army Master Sgt. Gary Gordon
are two of the most celebrated Delta Force operators, honored for their incredible bravery during the
Battle of Mogadishu
(Oct 3, 1993)
Born from different branches, united by mission
Delta Force belongs to the
U.S. Army
. Modeled after the British SAS, it was founded in the late 1970s with a clear purpose — to give the U.S. military a dedicated, ultra-secret counterterrorism force. Their specialties include
covert hostage rescues, high-value target raids, and precision assaults
deep behind enemy lines.
SEAL Team 6, meanwhile, emerged from the
U.S. Navy
in the aftermath of the 1979 Iran hostage crisis. Originally designed to focus on
maritime counterterrorism
(ships, oil rigs, coastal threats), it has since evolved into a global strike force capable of executing any mission Delta might handle, but with unique expertise in waterborne and coastal environments.
How they operate and why both exist
While their missions often overlap, the reason both exist comes down to strategy and flexibility. JSOC wants options. If one unit is deployed, the other can step in. Geography also plays a role — Delta's roots are in land-based operations, while Team 6 retains capabilities better suited to maritime missions, though both are now fully capable of global operations on any terrain.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Chevrolet SUV LTZ: Tecnologia e Conforto
LocalPlan
Busque agora
Undo
Both forces are kept separate not just by branch but by
culture
. Delta's operators often come from
Army Special Forces or Rangers
, bringing a wide range of experience from conventional warfare and special operations. Team 6 recruits exclusively from within the
Navy SEALs
, selecting only the most capable and experienced. This difference influences their tactics, personalities, and approaches.
An official shot of DEVGRU operators during a training or mission-ready posture, showcasing the elite capabilities of SEAL Team 6 — released by the U.S. Navy in the public domain
Missions you've heard about — and some you haven't
If the names sound familiar, it's because both units have been behind some of the most historic military operations in recent memory.
Delta Force captured Saddam Hussein.
SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden.
But those are just the missions the public knows. Most of their work remains in the shadows — fast, violent, and surgical operations where failure isn't an option. They often work alongside the CIA and other intelligence agencies, operating in places where the U.S. technically isn't 'at war.'
Who's better? That's not how it works.
Inside the military, there's no official answer to which is 'better.' Both are the
best at what they do
. They exist to complement each other, not compete. Their operators train relentlessly, often pushing the limits of human endurance and skill. Both are said to operate on the mantra of
'quiet professionals.'
Live Events
In a world where modern warfare increasingly depends on precision and speed, Delta Force and SEAL Team 6 remain the
sharpest edges of America's spear
— unseen until the moment they strike.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
India tells Bangladesh to reconsider demolition of Satyajit Ray's ancestral home; offers support for repair
. NEW DELHI: A house in Bangladesh linked to three generations of Bengal's most respected literary and cultural figures is being demolished, drawing sharp concern from the Indian government. The building in question is the ancestral home of renowned children's author and publisher Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury, located in Mymensingh city. Upendrakishore was also the father of poet Sukumar Ray and grandfather of legendary filmmaker Satyajit Ray . The property currently owned by the government of Bangladesh. The ministry of external affairs (MEA) expressed regret over the demolition, noting that the house is a landmark tied closely to the Bangla cultural renaissance. It said the building could instead be restored and converted into a literature museum celebrating shared heritage. The ministry also said that the Government of India would be ready to offer support if such a plan is considered. West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee also raised concern, saying the demolition of such a memory-filled place was 'heartbreaking'. She called upon both the governments of Bangladesh and India to take steps to preserve the historic site, describing the Ray family as 'torchbearers' of Bengal's cultural legacy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Glasgow: If You Were Born Between 1945-1974 You Could Be Eligible For This British Seniors Read More Undo 'I learnt from media reports that the memory-entwined ancestral house of renowned writer-editor Upendrakishore Roychowdhury in Bangladesh's Mymensingh city is being demolished. The reports say that the demolition process had already begun. This is heartbreaking news. The Ray family is one of the most prominent torchbearers of Bengal's culture," Banerjee wrote on X. The house had fallen into disrepair and had been left unused for nearly a decade. It previously housed the Mymensingh Shishu Academy but was later abandoned. A Bangladeshi official told local media that the new plan involves constructing a semi-concrete building at the site to resume the academy's operations.
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Classrooms without backbenchers: With new sitting format, schools stand out
"Backbenchers, come sit in the front."If I had a rupee for every time a school teacher said that, I'd have saved enough to pay part of my college fee. Perennial backenchers like me would have memories, both fond and forgetable. But the times, they are a-changin'. Long seen as a comfort zone for some and a punishment for others, backbenches in schools could be on their way to becoming obsolete. That's to demolish the sitting hierarchy and making classrooms more a quiet but growing shift across states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and West Bengal, schools are rethinking how children sit. And the push isn't coming from top-down academic research or classroom reformers. It began with a scene from a Malayalam children's film, Sthanarthi Sreekuttan. The movie, which questions the divide between frontbenchers and backbenchers, features a seventh-grade student suggesting a simple but powerful change: rearrange the single scene has now snowballed into a wider conversation about shifting not just the backbencher but also the seating system a cue from the film, Ramavilasom Vocational Higher Secondary School (RVHSS) in Valakom, Kottarakkara, in South Kerala, decided to try out the before we go into how the seating system is changing, let's first look at how it DID THE FRONTBENCHER AND BACKBENCHER SYSTEM START?The traditional row-and-column classroom seating originated from the 19th-century Prussian education system. The Prussian government wanted to standardise education across its growing by military precision, they introduced a rigid classroom not born in the Industrial Revolution, this model aligned perfectly with its factory logic and was formalised in schools across schools began to mimic factory layouts, students sat in straight lines, facing forward, trained to follow instructions rather than question row-wise sitting allowed one teacher to control large classrooms efficiently, monitor behaviour, and deliver one-way India, the frontbencher–backbencher divide took root during the British colonial education in the colonial era was a means to produce compliant clerks, administrators, and interpreters of the empire's will. The row-column layout fit this agenda perfectly: it discouraged collaboration, promoted silence, and ensured that teachers remained the sole ROWS AND COLUMNS TO U-SHAPED SEATING IN CLASSROOMDesks in the Ramavilasom Vocational Higher Secondary School (RVSS) in Kerala were placed along the four walls of the classroom in a U- or V-shape, turning every seat into a "front row"."Minister Ganesh Kumar discussed this with us after watching a preview of Sreekuttan, a year before its release," Sunil P Sekhar, headmaster of RVHSS, told began with just one class. The results were overwhelmingly positive. We introduced it to all lower primary sections."Sekhar said the change allowed teachers to give equal attention to every student and monitor them better. More importantly, it removed the invisible wall that backbenchers often sit behind, both physically and in terms of engagement."It's especially helpful in primary classes, where students are still learning how to learn," he a lower primary teacher with 29 years of experience, called it "the most rewarding shift" she's seen in her teaching career."There's more eye contact, more involvement. The quieter students open up," she BENGAL, TAMIL NADU AND PUNJAB: NO BACKBENCHERSThe idea is now being tried out in Tamil state's School Education Department recently encouraged schools to experiment with a 'Pa'-shaped seating arrangement— named after the Tamil letter — under the belief that "engagement begins with arrangement".An education department official from Tamil Nadu confirmed the shift."We've encouraged schools to try the idea depending on classroom size and student strength. It doesn't need new infrastructure, just a new way of thinking," the official idea travelled to not just neighbouring Tamil Nadu but further West Bengal's Malda, the century-old Barlow Girls' High School in Englishbazar became the first school in the district to adopt the 'No More Backbencher' by Sthanarthi Sreekuttan, and encouraged by state education officials, the school conducted three pilot sessions for Class VII — one each in mathematics, history, and work education."In conventional classrooms, those at the back struggle to see the board or follow the discussion," said headmistress Deepasri Majumdar. "But in this setup, all 55 students were attentive, asked questions, and interacted. That kind of engagement is rare."The school replaced traditional rows with a semi-circular or horseshoe-shaped arrangement, making sure every student could see and face the district's school inspector, Banibrata Das, who was present during the rollout, said the results spoke for themselves."Sreekuttan moved us. It's a simple idea, but the impact is deep," Das sentiment has caught on in parts of Punjab as well. A school that screened the film reportedly introduced the new seating layout based on its states, at least eight schools in Kerala and several others in Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and Punjab are now tryingout the model in some form or the ARE PEOPLE SAYING ON CHANGED CLASSROOMS?Some people from other states too sought that a similar system be introduced there."No more backbenchers! Inspired by a Malayalam film, Kerala schools are adopting a U-shaped seating model to ensure every child gets equal attention. A simple shift with a powerful impact on inclusion, learning & confidence. Time for all state governments to implement this," wrote VV Lakshmi Narayana, former joint director of the others reacted to the news with humour and nostalgia."Thank goodness I didn't go to school in Kerala- they've abolished backbenchers! That was my permanent seat. Where would I have hidden my quick nap, my doodles, my secret samosa?," wrote industrialist, Harsh others said removing the last bench would not remove backbenchers, which is a mindset.- Ends
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Inside America's most secretive warriors: Delta Force and SEAL Team 6
When people talk about the most dangerous and secretive military units in the world, two names inevitably come up: Delta Force and SEAL Team 6 . Officially, they go by less dramatic titles — 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (1st SFOD-D) and the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) . But inside military circles, they're simply known as Delta and Team 6 . Both are considered Tier 1 special mission units under the U.S. military's Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) . They handle the kinds of missions that rarely make headlines: hostage rescues in hostile territory, hunting down terrorists, and carrying out operations so sensitive even members of Congress might not hear about them. Army Sgt. 1st Class Randall 'Randy' Shughart (left) and Army Master Sgt. Gary Gordon are two of the most celebrated Delta Force operators, honored for their incredible bravery during the Battle of Mogadishu (Oct 3, 1993) Born from different branches, united by mission Delta Force belongs to the U.S. Army . Modeled after the British SAS, it was founded in the late 1970s with a clear purpose — to give the U.S. military a dedicated, ultra-secret counterterrorism force. Their specialties include covert hostage rescues, high-value target raids, and precision assaults deep behind enemy lines. SEAL Team 6, meanwhile, emerged from the U.S. Navy in the aftermath of the 1979 Iran hostage crisis. Originally designed to focus on maritime counterterrorism (ships, oil rigs, coastal threats), it has since evolved into a global strike force capable of executing any mission Delta might handle, but with unique expertise in waterborne and coastal environments. How they operate and why both exist While their missions often overlap, the reason both exist comes down to strategy and flexibility. JSOC wants options. If one unit is deployed, the other can step in. Geography also plays a role — Delta's roots are in land-based operations, while Team 6 retains capabilities better suited to maritime missions, though both are now fully capable of global operations on any terrain. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Chevrolet SUV LTZ: Tecnologia e Conforto LocalPlan Busque agora Undo Both forces are kept separate not just by branch but by culture . Delta's operators often come from Army Special Forces or Rangers , bringing a wide range of experience from conventional warfare and special operations. Team 6 recruits exclusively from within the Navy SEALs , selecting only the most capable and experienced. This difference influences their tactics, personalities, and approaches. An official shot of DEVGRU operators during a training or mission-ready posture, showcasing the elite capabilities of SEAL Team 6 — released by the U.S. Navy in the public domain Missions you've heard about — and some you haven't If the names sound familiar, it's because both units have been behind some of the most historic military operations in recent memory. Delta Force captured Saddam Hussein. SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden. But those are just the missions the public knows. Most of their work remains in the shadows — fast, violent, and surgical operations where failure isn't an option. They often work alongside the CIA and other intelligence agencies, operating in places where the U.S. technically isn't 'at war.' Who's better? That's not how it works. Inside the military, there's no official answer to which is 'better.' Both are the best at what they do . They exist to complement each other, not compete. Their operators train relentlessly, often pushing the limits of human endurance and skill. Both are said to operate on the mantra of 'quiet professionals.' Live Events In a world where modern warfare increasingly depends on precision and speed, Delta Force and SEAL Team 6 remain the sharpest edges of America's spear — unseen until the moment they strike.
