Moon dust is less harmful than city air, new study shows
Scientists have found that
moon dust
is not as dangerous to human lungs as the pollution we breathe in cities. During the
Apollo missions
, astronauts experienced irritation from
lunar dust
that floated inside their spacecraft after moonwalks.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
They described symptoms like sneezing, sore throats, and itchy eyes—what one called 'lunar hay fever.' But recent lab tests using moon dust replicas show that while this dust can irritate the lungs, it is less toxic than the tiny particles found in
urban air pollution
. This discovery is good news for future space missions, suggesting that moon dust poses less risk to astronauts' health than previously thought.
Why moon dust was considered deadly
Lunar dust is sharp and sticks easily to spacesuits because it's charged with static electricity.
When astronauts returned to their landers, the dust became airborne and was inhaled. Apollo astronauts reported short-term respiratory problems, and medical teams noticed symptoms worsened with repeated exposure. This raised concerns about the long-term effects of breathing moon dust.
What does the new study reveals about moon dust and air on Earth
Researchers at the University of Technology Sydney used two types of lunar dust simulants—fake dust that mimics real moon dust from different parts of the lunar surface.
These tiny particles were tested on human lung cells to see how they reacted. For comparison, the team also exposed lung cells to pollution particles collected from a busy city street.
Findings of the test
The moon dust caused some irritation, but it was much less harmful than
city air pollution
. Unlike dangerous dust like silica, which can cause serious lung diseases, lunar dust seems to only cause mild, short-term irritation. This means it's a physical irritant but not a highly toxic substance.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
What this means for space travel
This research helps
and other space agencies plan safer moon missions. Strategies like keeping dusty suits outside the habitat and using airlocks can reduce dust exposure. Knowing that moon dust is less toxic than city pollution makes it easier to protect astronauts' health during long stays on the lunar surface.
In short, while moon dust can bother the lungs, it's not as harmful as the polluted air many people breathe every day on Earth.
This is a positive step for astronauts preparing to visit and work on the moon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Top 5 costliest space missions launched from across the world
From the early moon landings of the 20th century to today's orbiting laboratories and interplanetary probes, each mission has pushed the boundaries along with the budgets. Often, these ambitious space missions carry staggering price tags, reflecting the complexity, scale, and pioneering nature of these ventures. Here are the five most expensive space missions ever launched: 1. International Space Station (ISS) — $150 billion The International Space Station is a multinational space station collaboration between the USA, Russia, Japan, Europe and Canada. This figure includes the contributions of various space agencies from around the world, including NASA, Roscosmos, ESA, JAXA, and CSA. The construction phase took over a decade, beginning in 1998 and concluding in 2011. The space station orbits roughly 250 miles above the Earth's surface and has been continuously inhabited since 2000. According to NASA reports, it was built at $150 billion and cost $3 billion a year — roughly a third of NASA's annual human space flight budget. The space station serves as a hub for scientific research. Orbiting Earth every 90 minutes, the ISS is also a critical testbed for long-duration spaceflight, shaping our understanding of how the human body adapts to space. 2. Space Shuttle Program — $113 billion NASA's Space Shuttle program was the United States' fourth human spaceflight initiative. It relied on reusable spacecraft to carry astronauts and cargo to and from Earth orbit. Over its 30-year run, the program completed 135 missions—beginning with its first launch on April 12, 1981, and concluding with its final landing on July 21, 2011. The five space shuttle fleet—Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour — launched satellites, were instrumental in various missions including the Hubble Space Telescope, and played a central role in building the ISS. According to NASA's website, the life of the shuttle program cost $113.7 billion. 3. The Apollo Program — $25 billion The Apollo Program was born out of the Cold War and US President John F Kennedy's promise to land a man on the Moon — becoming one of the most ambitious missions in human history. As per BBC reports, the total estimated cost of the Apollo programme came to around $25.8 billion. Apollo was a three-part spacecraft — the command module (CM), service module (SM) and the lunar module (LM), according to NASA's website. From 1961 to 1972, NASA developed the Saturn V rocket and a suite of spacecraft that successfully carried astronauts to the lunar surface six times. The most iconic moment came in 1969, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took humanity's first steps on the moon. 4. Hubble Space Telescope — $16 billion The Hubble Space Telescope orbits just above Earth's atmosphere at an altitude of approximately 515 km. Hubble orbits at a speed of 27,000 kph and completes one orbit approximately every 95 minutes. Hubble gets clear images because it's above Earth's atmosphere, not because it travels or flies closer to cosmic objects. It continues to operate alongside its successor, the James Webb telescope. Hubble was launched in 1990 at an estimated cost of 16 billion (adjusted for inflation to 2021 dollars). 5. James Webb Space Telescope — $10 billion Built at a cost of $10 billion, the James Webb Space Telescope is said to be the most powerful space observatory. The telescope was on Christmas Day in 2021. The Webb does not orbit around the Earth; however, it orbits the Sun 1.5 million kilometres (1 million miles) away from the Earth at what is called the second Lagrange point or L2.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Apollo Hospital Share Price Live Updates: Apollo Hospital's Current Market Data
26 Jun 2025 | 09:55:21 AM IST Stay up-to-date with the Apollo Hospital Stock Liveblog, your trusted source for real-time updates and thorough analysis of a prominent stock. Explore the latest details on Apollo Hospital, including: Last traded price 7060.5, Market capitalization: 101476.02, Volume: 59690, Price-to-earnings ratio 70.18, Earnings per share 100.56. Get a comprehensive understanding of Apollo Hospital with our coverage of both fundamental and technical indicators. Stay informed about breaking news that can have a significant impact on Apollo Hospital's performance. Our expert opinions and recommendations empower you to make well-informed investment choices. Trust the Apollo Hospital Stock Liveblog to keep you informed and equipped in the dynamic market landscape. The data points are updated as on 09:55:21 AM IST, 26 Jun 2025 Show more
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Moon dust is less harmful than city air, new study shows
Scientists have found that moon dust is not as dangerous to human lungs as the pollution we breathe in cities. During the Apollo missions , astronauts experienced irritation from lunar dust that floated inside their spacecraft after moonwalks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They described symptoms like sneezing, sore throats, and itchy eyes—what one called 'lunar hay fever.' But recent lab tests using moon dust replicas show that while this dust can irritate the lungs, it is less toxic than the tiny particles found in urban air pollution . This discovery is good news for future space missions, suggesting that moon dust poses less risk to astronauts' health than previously thought. Why moon dust was considered deadly Lunar dust is sharp and sticks easily to spacesuits because it's charged with static electricity. When astronauts returned to their landers, the dust became airborne and was inhaled. Apollo astronauts reported short-term respiratory problems, and medical teams noticed symptoms worsened with repeated exposure. This raised concerns about the long-term effects of breathing moon dust. What does the new study reveals about moon dust and air on Earth Researchers at the University of Technology Sydney used two types of lunar dust simulants—fake dust that mimics real moon dust from different parts of the lunar surface. These tiny particles were tested on human lung cells to see how they reacted. For comparison, the team also exposed lung cells to pollution particles collected from a busy city street. Findings of the test The moon dust caused some irritation, but it was much less harmful than city air pollution . Unlike dangerous dust like silica, which can cause serious lung diseases, lunar dust seems to only cause mild, short-term irritation. This means it's a physical irritant but not a highly toxic substance. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now What this means for space travel This research helps and other space agencies plan safer moon missions. Strategies like keeping dusty suits outside the habitat and using airlocks can reduce dust exposure. Knowing that moon dust is less toxic than city pollution makes it easier to protect astronauts' health during long stays on the lunar surface. In short, while moon dust can bother the lungs, it's not as harmful as the polluted air many people breathe every day on Earth. This is a positive step for astronauts preparing to visit and work on the moon.
