Military spending splurge ‘risk factor' for EU economy, says Denmark
Stephanie Lose told Euractiv that Europe must ramp up defence spending 'very quickly' to deter Russia's growing military threat, but warned this outlay may pose an additional 'risk' to the bloc's economy, which is already reeling from the twin impact of US tariffs and fierce Chinese competition.
'At the same time as there is this unrest in the economies across the world, [we] need to boost defence spending very quickly,' said Lose, whose country took over the rotating Council presidency from Poland earlier this month.
'That is a risk factor for our economies, because if we don't combine that with wise decisions on ways to a more sustainable path for public finances, then I guess it will be a problem in terms of increased debt levels and unsustainable finances,' she added.
Lose's comments come after NATO members last month pledged to increase military spending to 3.5% of annual GDP by 2035, almost double the US-led alliance's previous 2% target.
The 32-member military bloc – which includes 23 of the EU's 27 member states – also agreed to allocate an additional 1.5% of total output to security-related infrastructure. Spain, however, secured an opt-out allowing it to spend just 2.1% in total on defence.
Sixteen EU countries – including Denmark – have also heeded the European Commission's recent call to activate the 'national escape clause," a key component of President Ursula von der Leyen's €800 billion 'ReArm Europe' plan to ward off Moscow's threat to the continent.
Activating the clause allows capitals to spend an additional 1.5% on defence without contravening the bloc's fiscal rules, which limit member states' deficits to 3%.
However, France, Italy, and Spain – the EU's second, third, and fourth-largest economies – have refrained from invoking the clause amid concerns about their already high budget deficits.
France and Italy are also among nine EU countries currently subject to a so-called 'excessive deficit procedure," or formal reprimand, by the Commission for breaching the bloc's 3% fiscal threshold.
Lose, who will attend her first meeting of European finance ministers as Council chair on Monday, said she couldn't 'judge' France, Italy, and Spain's decisions not to activate the clause, as this depends on their underlying motivations.
'On one side, it's good if you adhere to sound public finances: so if it means that they're exploring ways to fulfil the 3.5% NATO goal without being on an unsustainable path to a higher extent than they already are, then that's, of course, great news,' she said.
'[But] if it symbolises that there won't be any room at all to boost defence spending, then it's, of course, a problem,' she added.
(mm)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – The risks of Berlin's borderline behaviour
Nothing quite captures the essence of the European Union like freedom of movement, an ideal that delivers physical benefits while also conveying the profound trust that underpins the undertaking. That sense of "Europe you can feel", as one German MEP put it today, is under siege like never before amid an intensifying border dispute between Germany and Poland that has profound implications for the passport-free travel enshrined in the Schengen treaty. Early Monday, Poland responded to a recent German decision to reintroduce border controls by posting 2,000 sentries of its own along western and northern frontiers. Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who announced the move last week, framed it as a response to illegal border crossings from Germany, a pretext few will (or should) take at face value. Few European borders carry as much weight – or hope – as the one that separates Germany and Poland. Willy Brandt's decision in the early 1970s to accept the so-called Oder-Neisse line was a turning point in the Cold War that ultimately helped pave the way to reunification decades later. Ever since former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz introduced spot checks along the border with Poland in 2023, the Polish far-right has exploited the situation, with vigilantes patrolling the German border for migrants. Their activism has been cheered by the recently elected President Karol Nawrocki, who commended their "patriotism". The border dispute between two of Europe's largest countries, whose relationship remains fraught even 80 years after the war, has been especially unedifying for the Commission. The executive has done precious little to intervene either in the German-Polish case or in any of the other border flashpoints of recent years (in the process tarnishing what many present as Europe's "crown jewel"). As a consequence, a succession of unilateral Schengen suspensions has gone unchecked. Under the Schengen rules, border controls are supposed to be triggered as a "last resort". In reality, they have become a weapon that governments reach for when they need to assert their authority and counter domestic critics. And whilst these actions have been questioned by the European Court of Justice and the European Parliament, they have yet to impose any penalties. This failure to act was all the more conspicuous in June as Schengen celebrated 40 years. Rather than take the opportunity to reaffirm the principles of the 1985 treaty, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz doubled down on his predecessor's border patrols, further souring relations with Poland. Poland's opposition party Law and Justice (PiS) has latched onto the ensuing uproar, its co-founder Jarosław Kaczyński claiming, without evidence, that "Germany regularly transfers illegal migrants to our side." This line was echoed by the outgoing president Andrzej Duda: "Germany created this migration problem and must deal with it on their own. We will not solve it for them." If anyone can de-escalate the tension, it must be Merz, who himself acknowledged a "common problem" but stopped short of agreeing to a climb-down, focusing instead on the 13 checkpoints Poland has set up on its border with Lithuania, rather than the 52 along its border with Germany. Poland's interior minister indicated that the measures could be revoked, provided that Germany does so first. Merz, a former MEP, likes to present himself at home and abroad as a consummate European. This is his chance to prove it. The Roundup Tariffs delayed – Despite recent hints that American tariffs on some EU goods could be stayed until August 1 after the EU Trade Chief failed to secure a US-EU trade deal last week, the Commission announced it is still working to develop an agreement by the original 9 July deadline. Strategic stockpiling – The Commission is preparing a new strategy to strengthen the EU's response to future health crises, including pandemics and threats from chemical or biological warfare. The plan, expected in July, focuses on medical countermeasures like vaccines, treatments, diagnostics, and PPE. Pricetags on nature – The Commission has devised a plan to reward farmers and landowners for environmental actions and sustainable management beyond legal obligations, but critics have pushed back against the program, calling it a means for corporations to keep destroying nature as long as they pay for it. Across Europe Escalating border controls – At midnight on Sunday, border control checkpoints were established at 52 places on the Poland-German border by Warsaw in retaliation to Berlin's own controls. The checks apply to all crossings, and highlight tensions between the two countries. Division in Italy – Italy's right-wing coalition showed rare public signs of division this weekend as Forza Italia clashed with its allies over a proposal to expand access to citizenship for children of immigrants. Bulgaria baulks on drug procurement – Bulgaria's parliamentary majority has been blocking the adoption of a key drug procurement bill, which requires private hospitals to conduct public tenders when purchasing medicines, for more than two months. The Commission has been pressing the country to pass the reform, threatening sanctions.
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Censure motion against von der Leyen turns into attack on Weber
What began as a far-right attempt to topple Ursula von der Leyen turned into a rebuke of EPP chief Manfred Weber and his steady drift toward the far right. During Monday's plenary debate in Strasbourg, the Socialists, Greens, and Renewal seized the debate on the no-confidence motion to criticise Weber for courting the national-conservative ECR group, from watering down the Green Deal to wrecking ethics reforms. "This motion is the result of your totally misguided strategy in the European Parliament," said Iratxe García Pérez, head of the Socialist group. Her message: it's not the Commission under fire, it's the EPP's toxic alliances. Speaking about the EPP chief, García Pérez added, "he actually causes more problems for you every time he speaks about this motion," while looking at von der Leyen from the plenary podium. Most recently, Weber's group handed ECR the control of a key migration file in the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee, breaking the parliamentary cordon sanitaire . The move, which was backed by far-right factions, sidelined pro-EU voices and sparked outrage among its MEPs. "You asked pro-European parties to be responsible while you negotiate with the far right," García Pérez said, rattling off a laundry list of grievances as "food for thought": scuttling the EU ethics body, undermining child welfare initiatives, and a blatant war on NGOs. Green chair Bas Eickhout called the motion "one big political show of the far right," while Renew leader Valérie Hayer warned that Weber's strategy had led his political family to a 'dead end' by pursuing "opportunistic alliances" with extremists. Weber has played down the accusation of cooperating with the far right, stating that in 90% of all roll-call votes over the last year, the EPP voted with the pro-European forces. Though von der Leyen was the nominal target of the censure, she remained composed, calling it 'another crude attempt to drive a wedge' between democratic institutions. Parliament President Roberta Metsola was forced to intervene when far-right MEPs began heckling, but von der Leyen didn't flinch. The censure motion, tabled by ECR Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea and backed by 77 MEPs, stands no chance of passing: it would need a two-thirds majority and support from over half the chamber. Piperea described the move as a wake-up call, accusing the Commission of "eroding Parliament's power" and inviting European citizens to "begin a moment of reflection." ECR's real chaos Within ECR's top ranks, cracks are visible. Though one of their own tabled the motion, the group scrambled to distance itself. Italian ECR leader Nicola Procaccini openly admitted that two-thirds of his group refused to sign. Italy's Brothers of Italy, led by PM Giorgia Meloni and represented in the Commission by Raffaele Fitto, want no part in toppling von der Leyen just yet. Their Polish counterparts in Law & Justice, on the other hand, support the motion with Polish Co-chair Patryk Jaki signing it. Procaccini said that the motion reads like a gift to ECR's political opponents, warning that the socialists and greens are the ones who will "take advantage of this to call for a return to the 'Ursula majority'." "I will vote against this motion, as a European conservative and as an Italian," Procaccini added. (mm)
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Euractiv
Green groups uneasy as EU bets on market to drive nature restoration
The European Commission believes a market for nature credits will unlock private financing to fund ecosystem restoration and biodiversity protection, but critics are sounding the alarm over what they fear may become another greenwashing tool. Months after Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen floated the idea of a cash-for-nature scheme, the EU executive has developed the idea further with the publication of a nature credits roadmap. 'This not about turning nature into a commodity, but about recognising and rewarding actions that restore and sustain nature," environment commissioner Jessika Roswall told reporters on Monday. "Nature credits are emerging as a promising tool to change how we value nature,' she said. The Commission envisages a scheme to reward farmers and landowners for environmental actions and sustainable management that goes beyond legal obligations, thus reconciling the economics of farming and forestry with nature preservation. According to the roadmap, a nature credit is 'a unit that represents a nature-positive outcome, derived from a certified and independently verified action'. The fungible units would be generated in two steps. A given action, such as the restoration of drained wetland, must first pass a 'high-quality' standards test and be certified. The project must then be monitored, with the issuance of nature credits linked to demonstrable results. '[W]e face a €37 billion annual gap in biodiversity financing across the EU. To close it, we must unlock private finance to complement public support,' Roswall said. At a time when there is growing awareness that biodiversity loss leads to financial and economic risks – with 75% of European businesses dependent in some way on ecosystem services – the new market-based tool is presented as complementary to public funding. With the finance gap estimated globally at $200 billion a year until the end of the decade, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity calls for increased and diversified flows of money into nature restoration. Greenwashing risks To lay the groundwork for a future EU nature credits market, the Commission plans to launch an expert group tasked with developing initial criteria and methodologies over the coming year. In parallel, an EU-wide pilot project is slated to run from 2025 to 2027, after the Commission tested the concept in two national pilot projects in Estonia and France. 'To avoid greenwashing is key,' Roswall said, adding that it was 'crucial that we can trust nature'. But warnings have already emerged about a lack of demand for nature credits, even before the scheme gets off the ground. The Commission's efforts to avoid accusations of greenwashing – which have previously dogged the market for carbon credits used to outsource climate action – have not staved off criticism that it is promoting a false, possible even destructive, solution. 'It is absurd that discussions around nature finance are relying on a pilot that increases environmental destruction,' said Siim Kuresoo, a campaigner with the forest protection group Fern. Specifically, the NGO claims that one of the nature credits pilot projects, in Estonia, has led to 27 hectares of forest being clear-cut, some of it in ecologically sensitive areas. Roswall declined to answer when asked by Euractiv whether she was aware of or acknowledged this criticism. 'Nature credits are a cover for inaction, a greenwashing shortcut that allows corporations to keep destroying nature as long as they pay for it," said Clara Bourgin, a nature campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe. "This is not the time for market schemes that benefit only a few while putting nature at risk," Bourgin said. (rh, aw)
