logo
Vape bans: A response to R. Paneir Selvam — Hafiz Hassan

Vape bans: A response to R. Paneir Selvam — Hafiz Hassan

Malay Mail4 days ago
JULY 22 — I refer to R Paneir Selvam's 'Vape bans: A slippery slope for legal governance'.
The July 2024 decision of the High Court referred to by the learned writer was the decision in the case of Lee Bak Chui & Ors v Kerajaan Negeri Kedah Darul Aman & Ors [2024] 11 MLJ 556
In that case, the applicants were the pool betting agents and aggrieved by the decision of the first respondent, the State Government of Kedah on the decision that the premise licences for the activities of the gambling business would not be renewed in the State of Kedah ('the said decision').
All the applicants then received letters from the respective Municipal Councils stating that it was agreed that the Ministry of Finance to not consider the renewal of gambling licences for the State of Kedah for the year 2023 since the licence fell within the purview of the Ministry of Finance and it was agreed that the Kedah State local authority and police should take strict enforcement action should there be any licence holders still in operation after December 31, 2022.
The applicants were informed of the said decision and were also informed that legal action would be taken if businesses were still carried out on the premises.
In their applications for judicial review of the said decision, the applicants argued before the High Court that the said decision was, among others, illegal and that the respondents had breached the applicants' legitimate expectation as provided under written law — that is, as long as the pool betting agents were licensed under Section 5 of the Pool Betting Act 1967, the applicants would be able to peacefully carry on their trade and business.
The applicants alleged that the respondents had acted more than their authority. Thus the application for judicial review of the said decision.
The learned High Court judge, Mahazan Mat Taib, allowed the application, ruling, among others, that the said decision was contrary to Article 80(1) read with Article 74 and Item 4(l) of the Federal List of the Federal Constitution.
Articles 74, 80(1), Item 4(l) of the Federal List and Item 4 of the State List are reproduced below:
Article 74 — Subject matter of Federal and State laws
(1) Without prejudice to any power to make laws conferred on it by any other Article, Parliament may make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Federal List or the Concurrent List (that is to say, the First or Third List set out in the Ninth Schedule).
(2) Without prejudice to any power to make laws conferred on it by any other Article, the Legislature of a State may make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List (that is to say, the Second List set out in the Ninth Schedule) or the Concurrent List.
(3) The power to make laws conferred by this Article is exercisable subject to any conditions or restrictions imposed with respect to any particular matter by this Constitution.
(4) Where general as well as specific expressions are used in describing any of the matter enumerated in the Lists set out in the Ninth Schedule the generality of the former shall not be taken to be limited by the latter.
Article 80 — Distribution of Executive powers
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this Article the executive authority of the Federation extends to all matters with respect to which Parliament may make laws, and the executive authority of a State to all matters with respect to which the Legislature of that State may make laws.
No smoking and no vaping warning displayed in food store in Puchong. — Picture by Choo Choy May .
Item 4(l) Federal List
Civil and criminal law and procedure and the administration of justice, including — (l) betting and lotteries.
Item 4 State List
Local government outside the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, including — (a) Local administration; municipal corporations; local, town and rural board and other local authorities; local government services, local rates, local government elections; (b) Obnoxious trades and public nuisances in local authority areas.
After setting out the above provisions, the learned judge said:
'An important point to note is that the words 'with respect to' in Article 74 must be interpreted with extensive amplitude. The cardinal rule of interpretation is that the entries in the legislative lists are not to be read in a narrow or restricted sense and that each general word should be held to extend to all ancillary or subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasonably be said to be comprehended in it.
'The widest possible construction, according to the ordinary meaning of the words in the entry, must be put upon them. In construing the words in a constitutional document conferring legislative power the most liberal construction should be put upon the words so that the same may have effect in widest amplitude.
'It is also well settled that the phrase 'with respect to' appearing in Article 74(1) and (2) of the Federal Constitution — the provision conferring legislative power upon the Federal and State Governments respectively — is an expression of wide import. As observed by Latham CJ in Bank of New South Wales v The Commonwealth:
'A power to make laws 'with respect to' a specific subject is as wide a legislative power as can be created. No form of words has been suggested which would give a wider power. The power conferred upon a Parliament by such word ... is wide.'
'Another equally important point to note is that the function of the entries in the Legislative Lists in the Ninth Schedule is not to confer powers of legislation, but merely to demarcate the fields in which legislative bodies operate. As summarized by the Federal Court in Gin Poh Holdings Sdn Bhd (in voluntary liquidation) v The Government of the State of Penang, the principles applicable to the interpretation of entries in the legislative lists as follows:
(a) the entries in the legislative lists do not confer legislative power. Rather, they are broad heads or fields of legislation to demarcate the respective areas in which Parliament and the State Legislature may operate;
(b) the entries must be interpreted liberally with the widest amplitude, and not narrowly or restrictively. Each entry extends to all ancillary and subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasonably be said to be comprehended in it;
(c) the rule of widest construction does not permit an entry to be interpreted so as to include matters with no rational connection to it or to override or render meaningless another entry;
(d) in the event of apparent conflict or overlap between entries, the court should attempt to reconcile the entries by adopting a harmonious construction; and
(e) in interpreting a particular entry, the court should confine its decision to the concrete question arising from the case, without pronouncing a more exhaustive definition than is necessary.
Accordingly, the entries in the Legislative Lists — that is, the Federal List, State List and Concurrent List (List I, List II and List III respectively) — in the Ninth Schedule to the Federal Constitution are not to be read in a narrow or restricted sense and that each general word should be held to extend to all ancillary or subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasonably be said to be comprehended in it.
Moreover, in the event of apparent conflict or overlap between entries, the court should attempt to reconcile the entries by adopting a harmonious construction.
The rule of widest construction does not permit an entry to be interpreted so as to include matters with no rational connection to it or to override or render meaningless another entry.
So, even though the first respondent had the Executive authority on the matter of local authority in relation to the licensing of premises for gambling, the said decision (to cease the renewal of premise licence for gambling) in effect rendered Item 4(l) of the Federal List on betting and lotteries meaningless.
The legislative authority of the State cannot be extended to banning betting and lotteries under the subject matter of licensing of premises for gambling.
Otherwise, it would be including a matter which overrides or render meaningless the entry in Item 4(l) of the Federal List.
Pool betting and lotteries are matters under Item 4(l) of the Federal List and not under the State List.
Therefore, the court was duty bound to interfere, and the application for judicial review ought to be granted on the ground of illegality.
Now, it is humbly submitted that R Paneir Selvam fell into error by seemingly listing vape as a matter under the Federal List only.
It is not.
Vape should be a matter under public health, which is a matter under Item 14 of the Federal List as well as Item 7 of the Concurrent List. It is therefore a matter which the Legislature of a State has power to make laws by reason of Article 74(2) of the Federal Constitution.
In other words, the legislative authority of the State can be extended to the subject matter of licensing of premises to regulate the sale, advertising, and promotion of all smoking products, including e-cigarettes and vapes, with a focus on preventing access by individuals under 18.
This despite the federal law, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852) referred to by the learned writer.
The primary goal of Act 852 is to reduce and prevent the use of tobacco and vape products, particularly among minors, and to safeguard public health and the environment.
The explanatory notes of Act 852 in fact states that the enforcement of the Act is the responsibility of the Ministry of Health with support from local authorities. (Read the comments by Health Minister Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad here)
A short response to R. Paneir Selvam is this: vape bans do not stand on the same legal footing as pool betting and lottery bans.
*This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protesters gather, chant ‘Turun Anwar' as rally kicks off in downtown KL
Protesters gather, chant ‘Turun Anwar' as rally kicks off in downtown KL

Malay Mail

time2 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Protesters gather, chant ‘Turun Anwar' as rally kicks off in downtown KL

KUALA LUMPUR, July 26 — Protesters have started to gather in the heart of Kuala Lumpur for the 'Perhimpunan Turun Anwar' rally. At the Sogo supermarket, people began to gather as early as 10am and had swelled to a few hundred people by 11.45am. They were seen predominantly clad in black, carrying Palestinian flags, and chanting 'Turun Anwar' and 'Turun Hari Ini'. Protesters gather during the 'Turun Anwar' rally at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur July 26, 2025. — Picture by Firdaus Latif. At Masjid Jamek, similar scenes were observed, although the group there was not as large as at Sogo. The protesters were being led by an emcee who coordinated the chants. They could be heard calling for Anwar's resignation. Some participants also brought up the Sabah scandal, calling for the resignation of Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor. Other areas in Kuala Lumpur also saw groups gathering to march to Dataran Merdeka at 2pm. No untoward incidents have been reported so far. The plan was for the procession to reach Dataran Merdeka, followed by speeches from PAS leaders such as Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang and former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is also expected to deliver a speech at 5pm. Police seen managing the crowd as they gather during the 'Turun Anwar' rally at Sogo Shopping Center in Kuala Lumpur July 26, 2025 — Picture by Raymond Manuel There is a heavy police presence at all hotspots, with guards seen stationed and access to Masjid Negara sealed. Outside the Masjid Jamek LRT station, police could be seen directing rallygoers to stand by the side and to watch where they were walking so as not to be hit by vehicles. Chants of 'Hidup, Hidup! Hidup Rakyat!' and 'Turun, Turun! Turun Anwar!' were continuously heard. Individuals helping to coordinate the rally were also heard asking participants where they were from. Chants of 'Kedah', 'Johor', and 'Melaka' echoed in response. The rallygoers are expected to march to Dataran Merdeka at 1pm.

Robbers break into Mirzan Mahathir's home, flee with RM1.8m in valuables
Robbers break into Mirzan Mahathir's home, flee with RM1.8m in valuables

Malay Mail

time2 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Robbers break into Mirzan Mahathir's home, flee with RM1.8m in valuables

KUALA LUMPUR, July 25 — The home of Mirzan Mahathir, the eldest son of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, was broken into on Wednesday, with robbers escaping with jewellery and other valuables estimated to be worth RM1.8 million. According to The Vibes, the break-in reportedly occurred around 5pm and was discovered by a Filipino domestic helper, who noticed that the padlock on the back door had been cut and the bedroom of Mirzan's daughter, Khadijah, 29, had been ransacked. Khadijah later confirmed that several items were missing, including a Cartier bangle, gold rings, earrings, a pair of golden chopsticks, jade bangles, old passports and foreign currency. The two-storey bungalow, located on a 1.5-acre end-lot, is equipped with 24-hour security. However, despite having 16 closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, the system only provides live viewing with no recording function. A forensic team from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters, comprising five officers and personnel, was deployed to the scene. They recovered three fingerprints from the bedroom, and also seized the cut Solex padlock as evidence. The fingerprints have been sent to Bukit Aman for further analysis. A K9 unit from the Police Training Centre (Pulapol) was also brought in to assist with investigations. The case is being investigated under Section 457 of the Penal Code for house-breaking.

Bursa faces choppy week ahead as US tariff decision looms, says analyst
Bursa faces choppy week ahead as US tariff decision looms, says analyst

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Bursa faces choppy week ahead as US tariff decision looms, says analyst

KUALA LUMPUR, July 26 — The risk of higher United States (US) tariffs on Malaysia as the Aug 1 deadline draws near is likely to weigh on Bursa Malaysia next week, although domestically-oriented counters are expected to remain relatively resilient, supported by firm internal demand and fiscal tailwinds. UOB Kay Hian Wealth Advisors Sdn Bhd head of investment research Mohd Sedek Jantan said volatility is expected to intensify as markets approach a critical inflection point in global trade policy. 'Domestically-oriented counters on Bursa Malaysia are likely to remain relatively resilient. However, export-driven sectors may continue to face pressure in the absence of a favourable resolution to the tariff negotiations,' he told Bernama. He noted that no formal announcement has been made on the revised US tariff schedule for Malaysia. 'Should Malaysia succeed in securing a rate below the symbolic 20 per cent threshold, we anticipate renewed investor interest, particularly in the manufacturing and electrical and electronics sectors. Until then, most investors are expected to adopt a wait-and-see approach, prioritising capital preservation over risk-taking,' he said. Regionally, market focus is shifting towards renewed US–China trade diplomacy as Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng is set to lead high-level negotiations in Sweden from July 27–30, ahead of the expiry of the 90-day tariff suspension on Aug 12. 'The outcome will be instrumental in shaping regional trade sentiment and broader market tone heading into August,' Mohd Sedek said. Globally, investor attention remains fixed on a packed US macroeconomic calendar, particularly with the upcoming the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on July 30, the June Personal Consumption Expenditure inflation print and July non-farm payrolls, which will provide important policy signals. Rakuten Trade Sdn Bhd equity research vice-president Thong Pak Leng said market participants will turn their focus to China's July Purchasing Managers Index as well as Eurozone Consumer Price Index. For the week just ended, optimism spurred by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's 'appreciation package' and renewed confidence in domestic fiscal support lifted utilities and consumer counters, but the momentum proved short-lived as broad-based selling later overshadowed mid-week support from telco stocks. For the week under review, the benchmark index rose 7.90 points to 1,533.76 on Friday from 1,525.86 a week earlier. The FBM Emas Index increased 26.99 points to 11,506.82 and the FBMT 100 Index gained 28.03 points to 11,269.72, but the FBM Emas Shariah Index slid 8.89 points to 11,528.98, the FBM 70 Index dipped 90.15 points to 16,607.57 and the FBM ACE Index dropped 32.77 points to 4,639.02. By sector, the Financial Services Index jumped 99.4 points to 17,454.23, the Plantation Index reduced 7.10 points to 7,434.79 and the Energy Index went up 0.21 of a point to 739.85. Weekly turnover narrowed to 11.92 billion units worth RM11.43 billion from 15.53 billion units worth RM11.77 billion in the previous week. Main Market volume slid to 6.63 billion units valued at RM9.70 billion compared with 6.73 billion units valued at RM10.07 billion previously. Warrant turnover grew to 7.10 billion units worth RM1.15 billion from 6.83 billion units worth RM966.72 million in the preceding week. ACE Market volume shrank to 1.68 billion units valued at RM577.05 million versus 1.97 billion units valued at RM729.96 million previously. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store