The VAT betrayal: How South Africa's political charlatans sold out the people
Image: Tumi Pakkies/ Independent Newspapers
WHEN the African National Congress (ANC) announced plans to increase Value-Added Tax (VAT) in 2025, it struck a dagger into the heart of every struggling South African. VAT — a tax that punishes the poor for simply surviving — was once again being weaponised to protect the rich and punish the working class.
Today, the so-called "leaders" of South Africa's political parties stand exposed, naked before the nation, stripped of their empty rhetoric and false promises. The VAT saga has laid bare their treachery, their hypocrisy, and their unforgivable betrayal of the very people they swore to serve.
The Real Impact of VAT on the Poor
Let's be clear: VAT is not just another tax. It is a tax on survival. When government raises VAT, it increases the price of bread, milk, school shoes, and bus fare — essentials that millions of South Africans already struggle to afford. VAT doesn't ask if you are rich or poor. It strikes hardest at the empty pockets of the working class, pensioners, and the unemployed.
In a country where over 18 million people depend on social grants, unemployment has soared to over 32%, more than 55% of citizens live below the poverty line, a VAT increase is economic violence. And yet, knowing all this, the ANC still proposed a VAT increase of up to 3% in internal discussions — a brutal attack on the most vulnerable.
Only a massive public outcry and the ANC's weakened position in Parliament — thanks largely to the rise of the MK Party — forced them to reduce the immediate increase to 0.5%.
If Not for MK, VAT Would Have Increased Without a Fight
Had the ANC still held its old majority, the VAT increase would have sailed through Parliament unchallenged. Let the nation remember this: It was the entry of the MK Party into Parliament that weakened the ANC's iron grip.
It was the voice of the masses, echoed by MK MPs, that forced this government to at least slow down its assault on the poor.But even then, the betrayal was only beginning.
The Fiscal Framework Farce
When the Fiscal Framework, the blueprint for government spending, including the VAT increase, came before Parliament, the ANC desperately needed allies.
They found them among parties that had loudly campaigned against the ANC, sworn never to work with the ANC, and claimed to stand for the people.
Yet when the moment of truth arrived, ActionSA, BOSA (Build One South Africa), Rise Mzansi, Gayton Mackenzie's Patriotic Alliance, and others stood not with the people. but with the ANC.
In a narrow vote, the Fiscal Framework was adopted, giving life to the VAT increase. These so-called opposition parties handed the ANC a knife and pointed it at the neck of the poor.
ActionSA, a party that had thundered against ANC corruption and mismanagement, voted for the ANC's Fiscal Framework.
BOSA, led by the so-called "new hope" Mmusi Maimane, voted with the ANC.
Rise Mzansi, the party that brands itself as the future, voted for a future with higher VAT and deeper poverty. Gayton Mackenzie, who styles himself as a man of the people, handed the ANC the majority it needed.
The Great Lie: "The Fiscal Framework Had Nothing to Do with VAT"
When caught, these parties scrambled to spin a narrative so ridiculous it insults the intelligence of every South African. They claimed: "We voted for the Fiscal Framework, but it had nothing to do with VAT.
"Lies. Blatant, shameless lies. The Fiscal Framework explicitly includes the assumptions and parameters for government revenue — including the VAT increase.
It is the foundational document that dictates taxes, spending, and borrowing. Without the Fiscal Framework being adopted, the VAT increase had no legislative path forward.
Today, the Western Cape High Court confirmed what any honest politician already knew: The Fiscal Framework contained the VAT increase. The court set aside the adoption of the Framework and suspended the VAT hike, exposing the lies told to the people. The spin has failed. The betrayal stands naked before us.
The Reality Voters Must Never Forget
South Africans must remember this treachery. Remember that these parties made public pledges and broke them when it mattered most. Remember that in the corridors of Parliament, when faced with a choice between standing with the people or kneeling before the ANC, they chose to kneel.
They are not opposition parties. They are political charlatans. They are the ANC's convenient enablers, eager for scraps from the table of power.
The tragedy of South Africa is not just a corrupt ruling party. It is an entire political class — old and new — that talks revolution during elections but practices betrayal in Parliament.
A Systemic Betrayal
This is not a once-off event. It is a symptom of a deeper sickness: A political elite more interested in self-preservation than public service.
A culture of spin doctors, legal loopholes, and manufactured consent. An economy managed for the rich, subsidised by the poor.
And VAT is just the beginning. Behind every act of betrayal today lurks the threat of more taxes on the working class, more protection for monopolies and billionaires, and more lies dressed up as governance.
MK Party: A Different Road
In this sea of betrayal, the MK Party has stood firm. From the outset, MK MPs opposed the Fiscal Framework, exposed the hidden VAT increase, and demanded that the burden of fixing the economy be placed where it belongs: on the backs of the wealthy, not the poor.
Tax the billionaires. Tax the monopolies. Nationalise key industries. Use the wealth of the country for its people, not for its elite.
That is the road to freedom. Not endless VAT hikes. Not squeezing pensioners and single mothers to please global markets and local oligarchs.
The Final Verdict: Voters Must Choose
South Africa is at a crossroads. The mask has slipped. The lies have been exposed. In the next election — and every election to come — South Africans must remember who voted for higher VAT.
They must remember who lied to them. And they must punish every political party and every political opportunist who chose betrayal over bravery. Never again must we vote for cowards in nice suits.
Never again must we trust smooth talkers who sell us out behind closed doors. Never again must we allow political charlatans to dictate the destiny of our children. The VAT saga is a warning. Let us heed it.
DAILY NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
20 minutes ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Friday, 25 July 2025
A bundle of newspapers on the table. Image: The South African/CANVA Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Friday, 25 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the EU finds unity in a common antagonist. The Washington Post reported that deaths are rising as Gazans face starvation. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that eight soldiers were wounded in a car-ramming attack in Kfar Yona. China Daily's front page reported that the EU has been urged to make the right choices. The Daily Mail's front page reported that Wes Streeting criticised the leaders of today's striking doctors last night, whose five-day walkout is expected to inflict 'untold misery' on patients. The Guardian's front page reported: ' Let aid in,' pleads UN chief, as even his staff faint from hunger in Gaza. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
MK Party's budget vote confusion in National Assembly
MK Party chief whip Colleen Makhubele blamed their initial support for the Budget to mistaking the vote for the Ad Hoc Committee that will probe the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers Drama played out during the adoption of the Budget in the National Assembly this week when the MK Party supported the Appropriation Bill only to change its vote despite rejecting every departmental budget. The party's chief whip Colleen Makhubele blamed the confusion on mistakenly casting their vote for the Ad Hoc Committee that was established to probe allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi during the marathon session. The unexpected vote of the official opposition unfolded soon after all the 42 schedules were agreed to. House chairperson Cedric Frolick had asked the National Assembly Secretary to read the Fifth Order, which was the next to be considered on the agenda after the schedule of vote of department. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Frolick then immediately corrected himself that it was going to be the time for Fourth Order, which was meant to agree on the Appropriation Bill after consultation with the officials. The EFF was the first to object and called for the division, a move that led to Makhubele accusing Frolick of not recognising her hand first. When the voting took place, the ANC voted in favour with 140 votes, followed by the support of the DA with 74 in support and then MK Party supporting with 49. The EFF voted against with 35. When Frolick asked Makhubele to clarify her party's vote, she said: '49 in support.' ACDP chief whip Steven Swart suggested that there might be confusion on which item that was being dealt. In response, Frolick said he had been explicit that they were dealing with the Fourth Order. 'I followed the procedure and the EFF was the last one to indicate and now I am with the IFP,' he said. Voting by other parties continued with the Patriotic Alliance. Its chief whip Marlon Daniels said his party 'follows the lead of MK Party with eight votes in support'. After the voting session had closed, Makhubele stated that she had mistakenly thought that they were dealing with the Ad Hoc Committee. 'We are changing our vote. We will support the Ad Hoc committee when it comes. That was confusion,' Makhubele added. Frolick agreed that there was confusion in terms of the MK Party's vote. 'The party has now changed the vote three times. What is your final position?' he enquired. In response Makhubele said: 'I am just a new chief. I will make errors so relax. We are voting against this.' DA chief whip George Michalakis said the parliamentary rules did not provide once the voting has closed for parties to change their vote. 'That will be highly irregular to allow parties to change their vote once a vote has closed,' Michalakis said. But, Frolick blamed the confusion on the disorderly conduct that was taking place in the House. 'I called the member on more than one occasion to vote in a particular manner.' He then announced the results that the Second Reading of the Appropriation bill was agreed to with 256 in favour and the MK Party's votes included among the 87 that voted against. 'No abstention and the Second Reading is agreed to,' Frolick said, adding the bill was to be sent to the national Council of Provinces for concurrence. He maintained that even if there was a rerun of the vote, it would not make a material difference on the outcome. Frolick stood his ground when EFF leader Julius Malema maintained that he made a bad judgement because he set a wrong precedent. 'You ruled in our favour but that was not in line. You are making this process to have a problem of legitimacy and credibility. This has to be the most respected process that you don't make the mistake,' said Malema, referring to Frolick when he overruled the MK Party when it was outsmarted by the EFF earlier in objecting and calling for division on the schedule of all the votes. Frolick was unmoved, saying there would no material difference to outcome of the vote. 'The majority voted in support of the Second Reading,' he said. Cape Times
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SA's youth unemployment crisis: Can digital skills unlock their future?
A year into South Africa's national government of unity (GNU), the country's young people remain trapped at the precipice of despair. The promise of job opportunities and pathways for entrepreneurship continues to diminish, especially in a world increasingly led by a youthful population whose inventive thinking often conflicts with the traditional methods of those in power. This disconnection is not merely an abstract idea; it is a tangible reality for millions, showing as a deep sense of exclusion and a suppression of potential. Professor Khehla Ndlovu said the youth are not just the recipients of change; they must be its architects. He added that if SA is truly committed to building a future that works for everyone, we must invest in the blueprints that centre on youth, giving them the tools, networks, and confidence to shape their own futures The grim reality of South Africa's youth unemployment crisis is stark and well-documented. Statistics SA's Quarterly Labour Force Survey for the first quarter of this year paints a sobering picture: young people aged 15-24 face a staggering unemployment rate of 62.4%, while those aged 25-34 contend with 40.4%. These are not just numbers; they represent a generation sidelined, their energy and creativity unharnessed. With 20 million South Africans aged between 15 and 34, this demographic forms the largest segment of our population. This demographic dividend, a potential driver of economic growth and social progress, is instead becoming a source of national concern. This alarming reality requires urgent and decisive action, moving beyond mere discussion to implement tangible and impactful measures across all sectors of society. Our collective response must begin at home, extend through our communities, reshape our educational institutions, and energise our civil, public, and private sectors. The goal should be to nurture an active, future-oriented population, equipped to become tomorrow's leaders and innovators. Importantly, this quest for solutions must fully harness the transformative potential of technology. The rapid rise of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), for example, should not be viewed with concern but as a significant opportunity. It prompts us to reconsider how we can utilise this technology to empower young people, unlock entrepreneurial talent, and boost economic development. It is time to move past the negativity rooted in a failure to recognise opportunities and instead embrace the immense potential within this digital frontier. At the Vaal University of Technology (VUT), strategically located in one of Gauteng's most influential industrial regions, we have long recognised this necessity. Our commitment goes beyond traditional academic teaching to proactive engagement with the digital future. Through initiatives like our Strategy 2033+, we focus on attracting and nurturing students with exceptional talent and potential, equipping them with the digital skills essential for a rapidly changing job market. Our recent community service project, where our Faculty of Applied and Computer Sciences assisted Suncrest High School's 2025 Grade 12 students with online applications, showcases our commitment to closing the digital gap and promoting a culture of access and opportunity from the grassroots. The Gauteng government's commendable focus on the township economy has achieved significant progress in supporting existing businesses. Nonetheless, our efforts must also shift towards empowering young people in these communities who aspire to start their own ventures, developing solutions and products tailored to local needs. This requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, particularly financial institutions. They must explore innovative, concessional financing models that recognise the unique challenges and vast potential of youth-led township enterprises. We cannot continue to champion the township economy while failing to equip its most dynamic segment – our youth – with the necessary skills and financial lifelines. This year's UNESCO theme, 'Youth empowerment through AI and digital skills,' resonates profoundly with South Africa's challenges and aspirations. As a global community, we are collectively seeking solutions that improve young people's skills for both employment and entrepreneurship. UNESCO and other UN agencies have consistently supported the progress of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To truly accomplish these goals, we must put our solutions at the centre of the ingenuity and motivation of our young people, recognising them not merely as beneficiaries but as co-creators of our future. Furthermore, the latest World Economic Forum's World of Work report underscores that 'technological change, geoeconomic fragmentation, economic uncertainty, demographic shifts and the green transition – individually and in combination – are among the major drivers expected to shape and transform the global labour market by 2030.' While these are global forces, South Africa has a unique opportunity to lead in adapting and innovating. We can and must surpass the mediocre leadership that has often characterised our response to the challenges faced by our young people. This moment calls for visionary, agile, and collaborative leadership that recognises the urgency of digital transformation. At VUT, our concern about the high rate of youth unemployment runs deep. However, concern alone is not enough. We are committed to rolling up our sleeves and taking action that goes beyond mere talk. This commitment is reflected in concrete steps that clearly show our determination to make a difference. Skills development, especially in digital and AI skills, provides a strong pathway to solutions. Learning institutions are no longer static brick-and-mortar places; they are active partners in national growth, evolving to effectively address today's complex challenges and to produce graduates capable of leading in the digital era. This demands closer collaboration between academia, industry, and government to jointly create curricula, support innovation hubs, and enable smooth transitions from education to employment or entrepreneurship. The path ahead will be challenging. It demands courage, ingenuity, and most importantly, readiness to listen to young people's. The time for action is now. Professor Khehla Ndlovu is the Vice Chancellor of the Vaal University of Technology (VUT)
