US to punish top ANC officials over foreign policy, graft allegations
Former South African ambassador to US, Ebrahim Rasool.
ANC first deputy secretary general Nomvula Mokonyane.
South Africa's relationship with the United States is on a diplomatic knife-edge, as the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee push forward a bill that could see senior African National Congress (ANC) leaders hit with sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes.
The proposed U.S. – South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 calls for a sweeping 120-day probe into Pretoria's foreign policy stance, targeting individuals accused of corruption or of acting against American interests.
The looming sanctions have intensified diplomatic tensions, placing several senior ANC figures squarely in the crosshairs. President Cyril Ramaphosa, ANC National Chairperson Gwede Mantashe, former International Relations Minister Dr. Naledi Pandor, ANC First Deputy Secretary-General Nomvula Mokonyane, and former U.S. Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool have all been flagged as potential targets of the proposed U.S. action.
The bill's advancement has triggered a political storm in Pretoria, with ANC leaders condemning it as an affront to South Africa's sovereignty and its right to pursue an independent foreign policy. Although the U.S. legislation stops short of naming individuals, growing pressure is falling squarely on President Ramaphosa and his cabinet, whose diplomatic choices have increasingly drawn fire from U.S. lawmakers.
At the heart of the growing rift is South Africa's vocal and consistent defence of Palestine. Pretoria has become one of the strongest international voices condemning Israel's war on Palestinians, and this has not gone unnoticed in Washington.
The South African government's move to initiate a case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza was seen as a deliberate shift away from its previously neutral stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Alongside this, Pretoria's growing alignment with Russia, China, and Iran has further strained its relationship with the U.S., who view these ties as contradictory to American geopolitical interests.
President Ramaphosa, who has steered South Africa's foreign policy in this direction, faces intense scrutiny. His administration's engagement with Russia and its stance on the Middle East has drawn sharp rebuke from U.S. lawmakers, who have accused South Africa of aligning with authoritarian regimes and undermining democratic values. U.S. diplomats have expressed frustration over Ramaphosa's outspoken criticism of U.S. policy, particularly on issues such as Israel and the war in Gaza.
In June, IOL reported that President Ramaphosa released a cautious statement calling for dialogue and a peaceful resolution to rising geopolitical tensions. His remarks highlighted South Africa's sensitive diplomatic position, balancing its longstanding relationship with Iran and its vocal criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza.
'President Cyril Ramaphosa and the South African government have noted with a great deal of anxiety the entry by the United States of America into the Israel-Iran war," the statement read.
'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute.
'South Africa calls on the United States, Israel, and Iran to give the United Nations the opportunity and space to lead on the peaceful resolution of the matters of dispute, including the inspection and verification of Iran's status of uranium enrichment, as well as its broader nuclear capacity,' the statement reads.
Gwede Mantashe, serving as both ANC National Chairperson and Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, is among those who could come under scrutiny. He was named in the Zondo Commission report, which linked him to alleged corrupt dealings with the now-defunct facilities company Bosasa. The report detailed claims that Mantashe received illicit security upgrades at his properties, allegations he has consistently denied, but which continue to cast a shadow over his political standing.
Nomvula Mokonyane, ANC First Deputy Secretary-General and former Minister of Environmental Affairs, also appears to be in Washington's sights. Her alleged involvement in the Bosasa corruption scandal remains a point of concern, but it is her recent proposal to rename Sandton Drive, where the U.S. Consulate is located, to 'Leila Khaled Drive' that has drawn international attention. Khaled, a Palestinian militant associated with plane hijackings and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a group designated as a terrorist organisation by the U.S., has made Mokonyane's comments especially controversial, sparking widespread outrage and potentially deepening the diplomatic rift.
Then there is Dr. Naledi Pandor, South Africa's former Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, who has emerged as a central figure in the foreign policy debate. Her vocal defence of South Africa's position on Israel, along with continued diplomatic engagement with Iran and Hamas, has made her a lightning rod for criticism. U.S. lawmakers have accused Pandor of steering South Africa toward increasingly adversarial alliances, arguing that her actions are undermining the country's longstanding relationship with the West.
Ibrahim Rasool, former South African Ambassador to the United States, has also come under scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers. Known for his outspoken criticism of U.S. foreign policy, especially regarding the Middle East and Israel, Rasool has often been at odds with American diplomats. His influential role in shaping the ANC's foreign policy during the Obama administration is now being reexamined amid Washington's broader review of its diplomatic relationship with South Africa.
The ANC's response has been one of defiance, with ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula condemning the bill as an 'attack on our sovereignty.' Mbalula has warned that the proposed sanctions are part of a broader U.S. effort to undermine South Africa's political independence and foreign policy decisions.
"There is no justification for sanctions against our leaders simply for standing up for what we believe is right, especially on the issue of Palestine," Mbalula said in a statement.
While the US sanctions bill may pass into law, it is far from certain that the Trump administration will take immediate action.
Joel Pollak, a former senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, suggested that the sanctions would likely be targeted at individuals deemed to be responsible for actions that go against U.S. interests.
'The Magnitsky Act is about holding people accountable for undermining democracy and supporting corrupt practices. This is not an attempt to punish South Africa, but to target those who undermine key democratic norms,' Pollak said.
As the U.S. Congress moves closer to passing the bill, South Africa faces a crossroads in its relationship with the United States. Should the sanctions go ahead, it will signal a significant shift in South Africa's international standing, particularly with the U.S., and potentially mark the beginning of a new phase in its foreign policy, where its support for Palestine and criticism of Western powers takes centre stage.
The Star
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 minutes ago
- IOL News
Employment, not politics, must be our priority in South Africa
Letter to the Editor Image: File 80 years later, we need to follow France International anti-Israeli sentiment is understandable but misplaced. It's like being anti-American because of Donald Trump. The sitting Israeli Knesset is the elephant in the room, not the Israeli people per se. The mayhem in Gaza is driven by a rightwing-led government with a mere 3% majority. The Times of Israel reports that a recent poll indicates that 70% of Israelis don't trust their government. When the dust settles and the destruction of Gaza ceases, the existing Knesset will go up in smoke and blow away in the wind. The new Knesset will accept that the only way forward isn't the destruction of Hamas, but talks resulting in the formation of the State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel .Those calling for the destruction of Israel are wasting their efforts. An attack on Israel would be like throwing stones at Table Mountain. They need to live with that – that's just the way it is. French President Emmanuel Macron breaking ranks with Western allies by recognising the State of Palestine is a milestone, which, hopefully, others will follow – it is after all almost 80 years overdue! | Colin Bosman Newlands Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Racism will never end unless confronted Why is it so hard for people to stand up to, or act against, racism, discrimination, violent crime, social injustice, and rampant corruption in their local communities and /or countries of birth or countries they have migrated to?Does it inconvenience them or cost them anything to do so? In America for instance, it is said that among white people, solidarity involves an unspoken agreement to protect their advantages and avoid discomfort by not confronting racist behaviour. Correspondingly, for people of colour in the US, seeing racism happening in real time also leans to silence out of fear of reprisal. In both these cases of white and black Americans it is generally acknowledged that these dynamics create critical barriers to bringing about change to racist and socially oppressive systems. | Eric Palm Gympie, Australia We sit on a powder keg of unemployment Our embattled nation is hurtling from crisis to crisis as we wage a losing battle to contain a vast amount of poverty. Corruption land has reached epidemic proportions and is so pervasive that it is destroying the future of this and the next generation. The corruption epidemic is evident in the general climate of unethical leadership and bad governance throughout the political spectrum. After 30 years of democracy, our rich country remains a land of peasants, and increasingly of landless urbanised populations living on the margins of squalid squatter camps that are bursting at the seams – political dynamite waiting to explode in a seismic eruption. Our silent emergency comes in the form of pernicious killers: Poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy and massive unemployment. Statistics do not capture the extent of human suffering and lost opportunities. When democracy dawned in 1994, many hoped for liberty, prosperity and a fresh new start, but were cruelly disappointed. This is unacceptable and untenable. South Africa is a powder keg, waiting to explode and vision, foresight and courage is urgently required to forestall cataclysmic events | FAROUK ARAIE Benoni Employment must be our top priority Last Monday (July 21), Independent Newspapers reported on the horrific reality of youth unemployment. The report reflected that more than a million young South Africans had applied for the police service learning programme. Even more shocking was that over three hundred thousand of those graduates had NQF Level 6 or higher qualifications. The situation is now so bad that six in 10 of our youth are unemployed. These numbers are not just statistics. They are basically almost every family. Despite these stark figures we still have the government putting enormous restrictions on job creation. We constantly see how small businesses are blocked from their very survival because of regulations and harsh restrictions. The labour ministry seems hell bent on trying to control who can be employed and where. We have archaic regulations controlling the employment of people with certain skin pigmentation. We also have legislation telling employers how much they must pay for certain jobs. If the employer can't afford that they are told to apply for an exemption. These are almost impossible to obtain and the few that do get exemptions from the minimum wage in certain categories, that exemption is for only a short period of time and only in very limited circumstances. Even the few exemptions that are obtained don't go far enough, despite the fact that the individuals would rather earn a lower amount than no salary. These individuals are not entitled to agree to take the lower amount. Their only other alternative is to resort to crime, drugs, or nothing but despair. Such circumstances tend to lead to some employers breaking the law and to many employees being complicit in breaching the rules and regulations. In many circumstances in my daily dealing with trade unions even they are willing to overlook these breaches. In my travels across South Africa, I speak to shop stewards who tell me they would rather have their members employed than to strictly enforce the minimum wage. Unfortunately, when an employer breaches one piece of legislation, we invariably see that this leads to other unlawful behaviour. For instance, if an employer is forced to ignore the minimum wage legislation they then feel complete indifference to health and safety regulations. This one wrong leads to many others. To top all of this, we have too few inspectors and the ones that we do have are not properly resourced. When we read about an inspection blitz this normally targets larger businesses in city centres and never reaches informal businesses. Of course, this also leads to businesses rather employing foreign nationals who have no papers at all. Because of the precarious situation that these foreigners find themselves in, we see silence from those individuals who are earning a pittance. This situation in turn leads to xenophobic reaction from South Africans who can't find jobs. Xenophobia is encouraged by community leaders and to a large degree some of the political parties. Instead of the government going all out to tackle unemployment they often find various ministries using foreign labour as the scapegoat. There is, however, light at the end of the tunnel. We are seeing fantastic news come out of our Home Affairs Department where they are encouraging and targeting certain industries to create jobs. Specific visas and a helping hand in the film industry is one such example. Another is where Minister Dean Macpherson has entered into agreements across the board including with foreign governments to engender job creation in the building industry. We've seen the Department of Agriculture doing everything necessary to ensure that our fresh produce is exported to other jurisdictions, despite the American tariffs. It is also extremely pleasing to see enormous efforts being driven in the Western Cape in the call centre industry including all types of beneficiation of our local goods. The Government of National Unity, although under threat, has at least given our economy a boost. Foreigners have been pouring money into various industries around the country. Organisations, such as the Federated Hospitality Association of Southern Africa, have stepped forward and applauded the introduction of two new visa categories. Our conferences and exhibitions sector are growing at an amazing pace. Our people are innovative and for the first time in many years I'm noticing small manufacturing businesses opening up. As the world stage becomes more and more complicated, our consumers are once again turning to home grown manufacture. All of us can play a part in buying South African-made goods and supporting local industry. It is always refreshing to see labels on goods stating, 'Made in South Africa!' | MICHAEL BAGRAIM Cape Town DAILY NEWS
The South African
44 minutes ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Monday, 28 July 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Monday, 28 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the US and Europe have reached an agreement on a 15% tariff. The Washington Post reported that more food has entered Gaza. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that the IDF declared a localised Gaza ceasefire to facilitate the delivery of food. China Daily's front page reported that the nation is boosting global AI governance. The Daily Mail's front page reported that a migrant protest hotel has now been shut. The Guardian's front page reported that England made history with the Euro 2025 victory. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
The 30% U. S. tariff and Its global ripple effects
On August 1, the United States will impose a 30% tariff on select South African exports, a move the Trump administration frames as a corrective to trade imbalances but which South Africa decries as a unilateral overreach. President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected the U.S. justification, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, with an average tariff of just 7.6%. Yet, the policy threatens to derail South Africa's fragile economic recovery, destabilise global supply chains, and escalate protectionist tensions worldwide. South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. This article examines the tariff's sectoral impacts, systemic risks to multilateral trade, and strategic responses to mitigate the fallout. South Africa's automotive sector, a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), faces existential risk. Reuters reported that the U.S. absorbed 6.5% of South Africa's vehicle exports (worth $1.8 billion in 2024) and is a critical market for manufacturers like BMW and Ford. The 30% tariff could force plant closures and mass layoffs, eroding a sector contributing 5.2% to GDP. The U.S. accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35,000 jobs. Tariffs may cede market share to Chile and Peru. Wine: Producers are scrambling to redirect stock or absorb price shocks, but the U.S. market's premium margins are irreplaceable. High-value perishables face logistical hurdles in pivoting to new markets swiftly. The textile sector may lose competitiveness in the U.S., while aluminum exports face a $534.5 million risk, with 24.6% going to the U.S. Furthermore, the South African Reserve Bank warns of 0.3% GDP contraction and 100,000 job losses. Fiscal strain from reduced export revenues and a weaker rand. The tariffs will disrupt global logistics: Freight bottlenecks: A pre-tariff rush to ship goods to the U.S. has already caused 6–10-week delays on routes like China and South Africa. Cost inflation: U.S. consumers will pay more for South African goods, while businesses face redundant inventory and working capital crunches. The U.S. has threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS-aligned nations, politicizing trade. South Africa may expand its exports by increasing trade with markets in the EU and Asia. The trade deal reached on July 27, between the United States and the European Union will ease tariff barriers and improve market access between the two economies. For South Africa, this development could have significant ramifications. First, EU exporters may displace South African goods in U.S. markets, particularly in competitive sectors like wine, citrus, and manufactured components. Second, the EU may divert more of its exports to the U.S., limiting the space for South African exports to expand into Europe. Unless offset by diplomatic interventions and aggressive trade diversification, this deal risks marginalizing South Africa in both the U.S. and EU markets simultaneously. To navigate the crisis, South Africa must leverage trade finance tools: Export Credit Facilities: Bridge cash flow gaps for exporters facing margin compression. The U.S. tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resilience. While the short-term pain is inevitable, strategic diplomacy, trade finance innovation, and market diversification could transform this threat into an opportunity for long-term resilience. The world will watch whether South Africa and the global trading system can adapt without fracturing further. Nyaniso Qwesha, MBA, is a trade finance consultant with expertise in global commerce and risk management. He advises clients on trade policy, market access, and financial solutions in emerging economies.
