UN chief calls for ‘viable two-state solution' to Israel-Palestine conflict
The 193-member UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025.
Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran.
Addressing the attendees on Monday, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud urged all countries to support the conference goal of a roadmap laying out the parameters to a Palestinian state while ensuring Israel's security.
In opening remarks, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said, 'We must ensure that it does not become another exercise in well-meaning rhetoric.
'It can and must serve as a decisive turning point – one that catalyses irreversible progress towards ending the occupation and realising our shared aspiration for a viable two-state solution.'
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told the conference: 'We must work on the ways and means to go from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, at a time when this war is jeopardising the stability and security of the entire region.
'Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative.'
France intends to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, French President Emmanuel Macron said last week.
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called on all countries to 'recognise the state of Palestine without delay'.
'All states have a responsibility to act now,' said Mustafa at the start of the meeting.
The meeting comes as Israel's war on Gaza still rages after more than 21 months.
The war was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas led an attack on southern Israel, killing at least 1,139 and seizing more than 200 others as captives, according to Israeli statistics.
Since then, Israel's military assault on Gaza has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to health authorities in the besieged territory.
Israel, US boycott meeting
Despite growing international pressure on Israel to end its war, Israel and the US were not taking part in the meeting.
The US State Department said the three-day event was 'unproductive and ill-timed,' as well as a 'publicity stunt' that would make finding peace harder.
The diplomatic push is a 'reward for terrorism', it said in a statement, and it also called the promise to recognise a Palestinian state by Macron 'counterproductive.'
Speaking to reporters later on Monday, Prince Faisal called for US President Donald Trump's involvement in resolving the ongoing conflict.
'I'm firmly in the belief that the US engagement, especially the engagement of President Trump, can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' he told reporters.
Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, said that the regional powers appeared to have limited influence over the situation in Gaza.
'The Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians and others are all incapable of affecting the situation,' he said. 'They are weak and cannot do anything themselves about what is going on in Gaza.'
The UN has long endorsed a vision of two states side by side within secure and recognised borders.
Palestinians want a state in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighbouring Arab states.
The UN General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognising it as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council 'reconsider the matter favourably'.
The resolution garnered 143 votes in favour and nine against.
The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full UN member – a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state – after the US vetoed it in the UN Security Council several weeks earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
20 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why has Washington sanctioned the Palestinian leadership?
US accuses Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority of undermining prospects for peace. The Trump administration has sanctioned members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA), accusing them of undermining peace efforts. The move comes as more Western governments are openly criticising Israel, calling on the country to end the war on Gaza and move towards a two-state solution. More countries have also announced their intention to recognise Palestinian statehood under certain conditions, including the disarmament of Hamas and PA reform. So what's behind the US sanctions? Are they a bargaining chip to further peace talks, or a sign of more hurdles ahead? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Xavier Abu Eid – Former adviser to the Palestine Liberation Organization Eli Clifton – Senior adviser at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft Firas El Echi – Journalist and host of the Here's Why podcast
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Slovenia becomes first EU country to impose arms embargo on Israel
Slovenia has become the first country in the European Union to ban all weapons trade with Israel over its war on Gaza. The announcement comes two weeks after the Central European nation declared Israeli ministers persona non grata, the state news agency STA reported. The arms embargo was announced by Prime Minister Robert Golob after a government session on Thursday. 'Slovenia is the first European country to ban the import, export and transit of weapons to and from Israel,' the government said in a statement. It said it was moving ahead 'independently' because the EU was 'unable to adopt concrete measures … due to internal disagreements and disunity'. Amid the devastating war in Gaza, where 'people … are dying because humanitarian aid is systematically denied them', it was the 'duty of every responsible state to take action, even if it means taking a step ahead of others', the statement said. It added that the government had not issued any permits for the export of military weapons and equipment to Israel since October 2023 because of the conflict. Early in July, Slovenia – also in an EU first – banned two far-right Israeli ministers from entering the country. It declared both Israelis 'persona non grata', accusing them of inciting 'extreme violence and serious violations of the human rights of Palestinians' with 'their genocidal statements'. In June 2024, Slovenia's parliament passed a decree recognising Palestinian statehood, following in the steps of Ireland, Norway and Spain, in moves partly spurred by condemnation of Israel's bombing of Gaza. Last week, France, the United Kingdom and Canada also announced they may recognise a Palestinian state. Israel decried these announcements, saying they were a way of rewarding Hamas for its October 7, 2023 assault on Israeli territory. Israel has been waging a nearly 22-month war in Gaza that human rights groups and United Nations experts have compared to a genocide. More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's military campaign, with more at risk of dying from hunger as a result of Israel's blockade of the territory. Several countries, including South Africa, have also brought cases before the International Court of Justice alleging that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The United States, however, has been an unwavering ally of Israel throughout its war in Gaza, and President Donald Trump has also warned that recognition of Palestinian statehood would serve as a 'reward' to Hamas.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
DR Congo and Rwanda hold first talks since signing of peace deal
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda have held the first meeting of a joint oversight committee, taking a step towards implementing a peace deal even as other commitments are yet to be fulfilled. The African Union, Qatar and the United States joined the committee meeting in Washington on Thursday. The committee 'discussed progress on implementing the agreement', among other things, a joint statement released by Rwanda and DRC on social media said on Friday. The deal in June between Rwanda and DRC marked a breakthrough in talks held by US President Donald Trump's administration, which aims to bring an end to fighting that has killed thousands and attracted billions of dollars of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. The deal outlines provisions for the 'respect for territorial integrity and halting hostilities' in eastern DRC, which are still yet to be implemented. It also includes economic measures, but has few details. In the Washington agreement, the two African countries pledged to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern DRC within 90 days. The agreement also said DRC and Rwanda would form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. Congolese military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a DRC-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and fighter groups that carried out a 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same timeframe. But 30 days from the signing have passed without a meeting of the joint security coordination mechanism, and operations targeting the FDLR and the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers have yet to begin. 'Deal not off track' The joint oversight committee was established as a forum to deal with the implementation and dispute resolution of the peace agreement. The committee's meeting, due to take place within 45 days of the signing, was on schedule. Trump's senior Africa adviser, Massad Boulos, told reporters on Wednesday that the deal was not off track, adding that a meeting of the security mechanism was due to be announced in the coming days. Asked about the lack of progress on operations against the FDLR and withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers, Boulos said: 'There was no timeline for that … If you look at the chronology of what we've been able to do since April, it's been extensive, and it's been very much on point and very much in line with our aspirations. So it's not off track in any way.' Sources with knowledge of the negotiations recognised delays in the implementation of the deal, but added that they were not yet threatening the deal as a whole. Military and diplomatic sources told the Reuters news agency that the parties in conflict – including armed groups such as Rwanda-backed M23 and DRC-aligned fighters groups known as Wazalendo – have strengthened their military presence on the front lines.
