An Amazon seller doing 7 figures says one strategic addition has doubled her profit
Her business selling interior cat doors took off after hiring a PPC coach.
She emphasizes investing in coaching and networking for long-term business growth.
Lisa Harrington's e-commerce career began in the early 2010s when she started selling clothing, purses, and other items in her closet that she didn't need anymore.
She used the eBay profit to launch her first Amazon product — dog harnesses — and sold enough to quit her corporate job in 2016. She eventually created and patented interior cat doors, which have become a top-selling Amazon product and bring in seven figures in annual revenue.
Harrington, who's been doing e-commerce for more than a decade, can pinpoint one decision that took her business to the next level: hiring a PPC coach.
PPC (pay-per-click) refers to Amazon's advertising platform, where sellers can pay to have their products displayed prominently. Many sellers consider ads an essential aspect of succeeding in the competitive e-commerce space.
For years, "I had a very low spend on my advertisement," Harrington told Business Insider. Figuring out how to run Amazon ads wasn't how she wanted to spend her time.
"I just didn't have much interest in it. I really wanted to focus on branding and product development, but it has such an enormous impact on your profit and loss statement that you really can't ignore it."
The idea to hire a coach came from an industry event.
"I remember talking to this woman, and she's like, 'I hire a coach for everything I don't know how to do. It is the fastest way to level up,'" recalled Harrington.
She took the advice, found a coach to help her specifically with ads, and, "in the time I've worked with her, my profit has doubled," said Harrington.
It took her six months to find the right fit.
"Coaches are hard to find. But when you do find one, it levels your business up," she said.
Over the last couple of years, her PPC coach has become more of a general business coach. They discuss everything from product development to effective employee management.
"She's the only person I can talk to about every aspect of my business. She not only has the expertise but has the background information, so I can spitball with her, solve problems, and come up with great ideas," said Harrington.
The full-time entrepreneur and mother of two kids doesn't hesitate to outsource when she can.
"I try to get a coach for everything because, thankfully, I've gotten to the point where I can pay people to help me," she said. "That, in some cases, tends to be a cheaper way to learn a skill or a cheaper way to get something done."
Harrington is also a member of the elite group of seven-figure Amazon sellers called Million Dollar Sellers. Members must complete an interview and application and pay $7,497 a year to join the group, which grants them access to exclusive events and a robust network of top-tier entrepreneurs.
She's adamant that investing in yourself "always pays dividends," she said.
"The knowledge that you gain, the networks that you gain, the experience shares that you hear, the tips and tricks that you get access to — not only is that short-term helping your business and helping your profit and loss statement, but you're also learning all of those things, so that if everything fell apart tomorrow, you could rebuild it again."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Married childfree millennials have a $120,000 net worth advantage
It turns out that some millennials have been able to get ahead — they just had to put a ring on it, while holding off on having kids. A Business Insider analysis of new data from the Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation finds that millennials who are married, but don't have children under 18 in the household, are sitting on net worths that exceed those of their parental, single, and divorced peers. It's yet another point in favor of what's fast becoming a new version of the American dream: Living in a high-earning household without kids. Many of those high-net-worth millennials are likely DINKs, meaning that they're in dual-income households with no kids. Others may have arrangements like stay-at-home husbands or wives, where the couple is able to comfortably live off one earner. This data is based on the most recent release of SIPP data; we looked at data from December 2023, which was the last month recipients were surveyed for this wave. We separated out Americans who were married, not a reference parent for any household children under 18, and then sorted by those who were ages 27 to 42 — the age bounds of millennials during the survey period. Childfree and married millennials had a few demographic differences from the larger millennial cohort. They were, for instance, more likely to have a bachelor's degree or a post-graduate degree. Married and childfree millennials were also more likely to be white than the wider millennial cohort, and far less likely to be Black. There were also some key economic differences between married and childfree millennials and the larger millennial group; married and childfree millennials had on average slightly more credit card debt, carrying around $2,456 compared to $2,203 for all millennials. But married and childfree millennials were also more likely to have money socked away for retirement — the average value of their retirement accounts was around $71,886, which far exceeds the $48,408 of the average millennial's retirement accounts. Of course, not all married and childfree millennials are sitting on large net worths. The net worths represent an average across the group, meaning a swath of married and childfree millennials have far less in the bank. Some married and childfree Americans don't want to be in that position — as Business Insider has previously reported, one subset of DINKs would like to have children, but can't afford it, struggle with infertility and uncertainty over family planning, or are turned off by the lack of support for parents in the US. It's also entirely possible that some of those surveyed millennials are biding their time and waiting to have children later in life, a rising trend among some in their generation. There's also another barrier for childfree and married millennials, who are already paying on average around $3,447 in rent or mortgage — the US just doesn't have the housing to accommodate a potentially growing family. Even so, the numbers show it's paying for some millennials to get hitched, but not add to their families. And as Gen Zers think about their futures, financial security is top of mind, while growing their families isn't as high a priority — indicating that the ranks of the financially secure and childfree might only grow.
Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Student-loan borrowers on Biden's SAVE plan are struggling to plan for higher payments: 'We're all in limbo'
Mary Smith is considering bankruptcy. "I don't have it," Smith said, referring to the extra money she would need to afford the higher student-loan payments she's facing in the coming year. "Everything we've done, we've done ourselves," Smith said. "Nobody handed me anything. I didn't grow up in a rich family. We live paycheck to paycheck, like most of the country." The 50-year-old nurse is enrolled in former President Joe Biden's SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment plan that offers cheaper monthly payments and a shorter timeline to debt relief. The plan is now on its last legs — it has been blocked since July 2024 due to legal challenges, and Trump's spending law eliminated the plan, replacing it with two less generous options that will go into effect next summer. In addition, the Trump administration restarted interest charges on SAVE balances on August 1 after a yearlong pause. This means Smith and the 8 million other borrowers enrolled in SAVE can either switch to a new plan and likely face higher monthly payments or remain on SAVE for now and watch their balances grow. Smith said that she asked her servicer for an estimate on her interest charges, and she was told it would be about $468 a month. "I did vote for Trump," Smith said, "I am a Trump supporter, but there are a couple of things I don't really agree with, and this is one of them." On the SAVE plan, Smith said her payments were around $150. Federal Student Aid's loan simulator predicted that her payments could surge to nearly $1,000 off the SAVE plan, which Smith said she "definitely cannot afford." Business Insider heard from dozens of student-loan borrowers enrolled in SAVE who are concerned about interest charges restarting and eventually having to move to a different repayment plan. Some borrowers are balancing their agreement with Trump that loans should be repaid with the reality of the financial strain that comes with losing SAVE. Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, said in a statement announcing the interest charges restart that the administration is focused on "strengthening the student loan portfolio and simplifying repayment to better serve borrowers." "As part of this effort, the Department urges all borrowers in the SAVE Plan to quickly transition to a legally compliant repayment plan — such as the Income-Based Repayment Plan," McMahon said. "Borrowers in SAVE cannot access important loan benefits and cannot make progress toward loan discharge programs authorized by Congress." Smith is hoping she'll be able to cover the interest charges, but she doesn't have a plan for potentially much higher payments down the road. "It's a struggle. I do agree we have to pay them, but it's really hurting us," Smith said. "It's a shame." 'A wait and see game' Justin Krull's goal is to pay off his student-loan balance. He was never trying to find a way out of repayment, and he wants a concrete plan to fit monthly student-loan payments into his budget. The constantly changing student-loan policies make that difficult. "We're not trying to cheat, we're not trying to not pay our bills," Krull, 42, told BI. "We want to take care of our responsibilities. We just want a system in place that we can rely on and be able to financially plan for our futures and endeavors that exist out there." Krull went back to school in his late 20s on the pre-law track with the goal of earning a law degree, but his priorities changed. He got married and had children, and once the pandemic hit, he lost his job as a retail manager and now works in operations at a factory. He said he qualified for $0 monthly payments on the SAVE plan, and he's been unable to get an estimate of his new payment on a different repayment plan. He plans to see how much interest starts building on his balance and determine at that point whether it makes the most sense for him to remain on SAVE and pay off the interest or take action to get on a new plan. Either way, the uncertainty is taking a toll. "At this point, I'm playing a wait-and-see game and making the move that makes the most sense financially once I can determine what those finances are going to be," Krull said. He added that he's worried he'll have to scale back on his retirement and health savings should his payments surge. Alannah is in a similar boat. Working in public health, she said the SAVE plan halved her payments from around $800 a month to just over $400, which allowed her to put more money into savings and put a down payment on a house. The uncertainty with SAVE has been frustrating, she said, because she planned her budget around her lower monthly payments. Additionally, she heeded the administration's advice and submitted an application to switch to an income-based repayment plan earlier this year, but she said the application is still processing, keeping her in limbo. The Department of Education also posted a notice that loan forgiveness through IBR plans is paused to comply with a court order. Alannah said she plans to hold off on making any student-loan payments until she has certainty that the plan she is on will count toward debt relief. She said that if she paid off her loans aggressively, she would run through her savings — and be left with nothing for retirement. 'Everything right now is backlogged' The changes to SAVE come as the Department of Education itself is undergoing a major overhaul. Trump signed an executive order earlier this year to begin dismantling the department, and the Supreme Court recently ruled that the agency can proceed with firing 1,400 workers, about half of its staff. McMahon said following the ruling that it was "a significant win for students and families" and allows the department the " authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations." Still, it leaves the department with fewer resources to manage major tasks, including creating a new repayment system and processing millions of borrowers' applications. It has Holly Atkinson, a 57-year-old nurse who voted for Trump, concerned. "It's such a hot mess over there," Atkinson told BI. "Everything right now is backlogged as it is, and if they lay off these people at the Department of Education, it's going to make the situation worse." Atkinson said she was enjoying low monthly payments on the SAVE plan before it was blocked. With her repayment future up in the air, she's now unsure if she'll ever be able to retire with student loans hanging over her head, while also managing a separate private student-loan balance and mortgage payments. "I just feel like it's a weight on my shoulder that's never going to get lifted," she said. "And I see people my age planning to retire and go on vacations and travel, and I don't see any of that happening for me." The department said it would be communicating with SAVE borrowers over the next few months regarding their options to switch to a new repayment plan. Atkinson wishes there was more clarity upfront. "I don't regret voting for him, but what I'm seeing right now makes me very uncomfortable," Atkinson said. "We're all in limbo right now, and I don't like being in limbo."
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I'm a TV expert who's picky about performance — these are the 5 TVs I'd buy for under $500 right now
As a TV expert, I field my fair share of questions about the best TVs money can buy, but I get asked about cheap TVs from friends, family and readers more than anything else. It makes sense: Not everyone is looking for high-end performance or fancy features they might not ever use. With the summer winding down and the season of sales rapidly approaching, I thought I'd put together an up-to-the-minute, top-five list of my favorite TVs under $500. They're not peak performers, but they're much better than flimsy, bottom-of-the-barrel sets. My name is Michael, and for over ten years I've been the person everyone in my immediate circle asks for advice when the time comes to upgrade their TV. I don't mind, though, because affordable TVs are often the hardest to shop for. There's a thin line between an low-cost, reliable TV and a cheap, undependable one — and I'm quite familiar with it. The Samsung Q7F is on deck for testing, so we can't speak to its performance metrics, but I've seen this TV in person and I'm confident that it's a reliable pick for folks shopping at or below $500. The Q7F doesn't feature local dimming (or Mini-LEDs, for that matter), so if you can justify the extra $50, I still recommend the Panasonic W95A and the TCL QM6K over it due to their superior display technology. Nevertheless, the Q7F is a quantum dot-enhanced Samsung TV, which should fit the needs of someone who's especially appreciative of the Samsung aesthetic. Remember: No Samsung TV supports Dolby Vision, so adjust your expectations accordingly. The Samsung Q7F isn't as flashy as some of the other TVs on this list, but if you're a fan of Samsung software and design, it'll meet your needs for under $500. Just keep in mind that this TV doesn't support Dolby Vision, the most popular enhanced HDR format. This is by far my favorite TV on this list. The Panasonic W95A impressed me when it debuted last year at $1,299. Now that it's below $500, I think it's one of the best-kept secrets on the market. The W95A not only delivers exceptional brightness (which is critical if you get a lot of watching done during the day), it also features terrific backlight control. These two performance features put it well ahead of every other TV on this list. I should mention that the W95A is a Fire TV, meaning it leverages Amazon's Fire TV operating system for all of the built-in streaming features. Fire TV is not my favorite platform, as its UI is relatively cluttered and navigation can be sluggish at times. Still, at this price point, the W95A's sensational performance makes it easy to look past these shortcomings. Panasonic's fantastic Mini-LED TV has never been more affordable, so it's worth pouncing on this right away. You're not just getting a great sale price with the W95A, you're also getting a superb, 55-inch Mini-LED TV loaded with extra features. We dug this TV when it was over a thousand bucks, and we really dig it now that it's below $500. If you're shopping at the 55-inch size point and the Panasonic W95A doesn't suit your taste, check out the TCL QM6K, another Mini-LED TV that's currently on sale for a hair below $500. You can peruse our TCL QM6K review for a full report, but here's what I love about this TV: It's just bright enough for the average living room and it comes with Google TV baked right in. For most people shopping in this price range, Google TV is a great software suite to have in one's back pocket. It's easy to use and offers top-tier app support. If the inclusion of Fire TV scared you away from the Panasonic W95A, the 55-inch QM6K might be a better choice. The QM6K represents one of the most affordable ways to land a Mini-LED TV at the 55-inch size point. Google TV is available right out of the box, and the TV's relatively modest Mini-LED backlight keeps scenes visually appealing. It also comes with a handful of useful gaming features. Roku TVs tend to be laser-focused at the type of TV-shopper who just wants a dependable, easy-to-use smart TV, and the 65-inch Roku Plus Series is just that. Why do I love the Roku experience so much? There are three reasons: Its app support is among the best you'll find, there are minimal ads across the user interface and, as mentioned, it's incredibly easy to use. From a performance standpoint, this TV isn't as impressive as the previous two, but you are getting quantum dot-color for your troubles. The Roku Plus Series' superb software is the real selling point. The Roku Plus Series is a perfect fit for folks who just need an easy-to-use TV above all else. Thanks to Roku's excellent app support and minimal ad experience, the Plus Series is the most user-friendly TV on this list. If you passed on the aforementioned, 55-inch TCL QM6K because you're looking for a 65-inch model, why not go for the step-down QM5K? Full disclosure: We haven't tested the QM5K yet, but given its place in TCL's 2025 TV lineup and some of its specs, I'm confident that this set is worth a look. Like the QM6K, the QM5K arrives with Google TV. It also features Mini-LED backlighting (though it probably doesn't wring as much out of this feature as the higher-end QM6K). Still, it's a 65-inch TV for under $500, so it's worth checking out. The QM5K arrives with built-in Google TV features for all of your streaming needs, plus Dolby Vision support. Its handiest feature is its Mini-LED backlighting. If the 55-inch QM6K is too small, the 65-inch QM5K is a good compromise for around the same price.
