Somnee Secures $10M to Revolutionize Sleep with New AI-Powered Neurotech Sleep Wearables
The round was led by Khosla Ventures, with participation from Marc Benioff's TIME Ventures, LEAD VC (founded by the Adidas family), the NBA's Orlando Magic ownership group (DeVos family), Seaside Ventures, Nelstone Ventures, and Metalab, among others.
Unlocking health and wellness through better sleep
Sleep is one of the most powerful levers for health, longevity, and performance. Despite spending one-third of our lives asleep, nearly one in three adults suffer from poor sleep, ranging from insufficient deep sleep to insomnia.
Based on decades of sleep research and neuroscience, Somnee has developed an AI-powered headband that helps people fall asleep faster and maintain higher quality sleep for longer. Somnee uses proprietary electroencephalogram (EEG+) and AI technology to map each user's brain activity and deliver gentle, personalized stimulation that guides the brain into its natural sleep state. In a published sleep study, Somnee helped users fall asleep twice as fast, stay asleep over 30 minutes longer, and reduce tossing and turning by a third. It outperforms melatonin by four times, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-i) by two times, and Ambien by one-and-a-half times. Its therapeutic modality is backed by clinical studies and covered by 24 patents.
Introducing second-generation headband and AI operating system to scale company
The new funds will support Somnee as it prepares to launch the second-generation of its award-winning smart sleep headband, featuring its proprietary SmartSleep AI operating system, which enables personalized brain mapping, real-time monitoring, and AI-powered interventions throughout the sleep cycle. The second-generation product is currently in a beta pilot with select NBA teams and their performance training staff. The company is scaling to address the $91.4 billion sleep aid market and advance its mission to improve sleep through personalized neuroscience.
'Enhanced sleep can radically improve happiness, energy, and purpose. As such, Somnee isn't just a health product: it's a tool for better leadership, deeper compassion, and smarter decisions,' said Marc Benioff, founder of TIME Ventures and Chair, Founder & CEO of Salesforce. 'It's been a critical element of my sleep hygiene since they launched, and I was a customer long before Tim reached out to invest in their pioneering tech.'
The funding follows a milestone year for the company, including its selection for the NBA's 2025 Launchpad program, which supports the development of technologies that advance player health and performance, and winning best sleep technology awards and recognition from GQ Fitness Awards, Men's Journal, the Digital Health Hub Foundation Awards, and Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech.
'Sleep is the cheapest, most underused longevity drug we have. Few factors impact health more critically. Whereas others attempt to track sleep, Somnee's uniquely non-invasive and drug-free approach tunes it every night with a headband as effortlessly as brushing your teeth. That's why we backed them from day zero,' said Vinod Khosla, founder of Khosla Ventures.
Since joining 18 months ago, CEO Tim Rosa has led efforts to relocate manufacturing out of China and expand teams in Berkeley and India, enhance the company's next-generation hardware and proprietary SmartSleep AI operating system, and forged partnerships with Equinox Hotels and the NBA. Somnee is currently exploring additional partnerships with professional sports organizations, employers, and healthcare brands to build upon existing research linking sleep quality to athletic performance, employee productivity, and human longevity.
'We began building this technology to explore a provocative question: could a sleep aid communicate in the same electrical dialect as the brain itself? That is, an 'electroceutical,' not a pharmaceutical,' said Dr. Matt Walker. 'We're trying to speak to the brain in its own language – using gentle, precisely timed pulses of electricity, not unlike how a conductor uses subtle hand movements to guide an orchestra into harmony. The goal was to create what I call a 'blast radius' of benefit: deeper sleep, more efficient sleep, and a quicker descent into sleep itself by preparing the brain just before sleep, we're trying to drive more powerful deep-sleep brainwaves, and give you a faster entry into sleep to begin with.'
About Somnee
Somnee is on a mission to transform sleep and neurological health while fundamentally improving the human experience. The Somnee Smart Sleep headband combines clinically validated neuroscience and award-winning AI-powered neurotechnology to enhance the brain's optimal sleep signals naturally and has been proven to help people fall asleep faster, reduce nighttime awakenings, and improve overall deep sleep quality. Somnee was co-founded by world-leading neuroscientists, including Dr. Matthew Walker, Ph.D., author of New York Times bestseller Why We Sleep and Director of UC Berkeley's Center of Human Sleep Science; Dr. Robert Knight, M.D., Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at UC Berkeley; and ex-Fitbit executive, Tim Rosa leads as CEO. The Somnee team has spent decades pioneering sleep research, brain health, wearables, and personalized non-invasive neurostimulation applications. Sleep is one of the most critical functions of the brain, and our deep understanding of the neuroscience of sleep uniquely positions us to help solve the sleep health epidemic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Harvard Business Review
an hour ago
- Harvard Business Review
Research: Being Well Connected Isn't Always Good for Your Career
Conventional wisdom says that when it comes to career opportunities, it's not about what you know, but who you know. And research has found, in fact, that prestigious connections do open doors and make people seem more capable than their peers—as if proximity to greatness implies a degree of similar excellence. But what impact do these star connections have after someone has landed a new job? In new research, we sought to find out. Our recent paper, published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, investigated whether and how past connections with industry stars might shape long-term career evaluations and outcomes, particularly after an employee's objective performance data becomes available. Through an analysis of the careers of National Basketball Association (NBA) head coaches and an experiment with nearly 500 working professionals, we found that connections don't just help people land jobs: They continue to shape performance evaluations long after working relationships with stars have ended. How Ties to Titans Inflate Performance Expectations To begin our study, we examined the career trajectories of 179 NBA head coaches over 40 years. Professionals in the NBA, like many traditional firms, operate in high-stakes, performance-driven environments with clear career trajectories. This makes the NBA a useful context for studying career and talent decisions. We found that coaches who had previously served under legendary leaders, like Phil Jackson, for example, were less likely to be fired when their new teams performed worse than industry expectations, compared to coaches who weren't connected to stars. However, when connected coaches' teams performed exceptionally well, they were at greater risk of being fired, relative to head coaches who lacked any prior star connections. In other words, our study found that having a star connection helped buffer head coaches from the consequences of underperformance but could hurt them when they performed well. These effects lasted for up to nine years after a working relationship with a star coach had ended. To explore this dynamic further, we conducted a follow-up study with nearly 500 working professionals tasked with evaluating the performance of hypothetical new hires in the design industry. As evaluators, participants made an 'up or out' decision about each designer, one with a prior connection to an industry titan, and the other without such a connection. We found the same patterns arose: New hires with prior ties to an industry star were shielded when they underperformed, but their strong performance was often discounted. Although performance was presented as objective scores, participants' evaluations were skewed by the shadow of the industry titan associated with the connected designer. We also discovered that our participants, especially those who held more inflated expectations for star-connected designers, were significantly less likely to attribute star-connected employees' underperformance to low ability or low effort. Conversely, underperformance from a non-connected designer was attributed directly to the individual's ability and effort. Why Connections Influence Evaluations We believe that the answer lies in a psychological phenomenon known as balance theory. According to this theory, people strive for consistency in their beliefs and associations. When someone is linked to an industry star, evaluators set high expectations for the protégé and seek to maintain a positive image of them and their mentor. This leads people to rationalize evidence that contradicts their expectations, especially when the star-connected individual underperforms. Conversely, strong performance merely confirms what is already assumed and is therefore viewed as unremarkable. Consider Bob Nardelli, a protégé of the legendary General Electric CEO Jack Welch. After being recruited to be the CEO of Home Depot, Nardelli delivered strong financial results early in his tenure. However, he received little recognition and as ultimately forced out: In 2002, after announcing a 35% profit increase that beat Wall Street's expectations, the company's stock still dropped. Reflecting on this, Nardelli remarked: 'I can understand not getting rewarded, but I don't understand getting punished.' Of course, there could have been multiple factors contributing to Nardelli's downfall, including a leadership style that clashed with his company's entrepreneurial culture. Still, it is fair to speculate that his performance might have been judged against the towering expectations set by his association with Welch. Some Limitations As with any research, our findings should be interpreted with some caution. Our NBA field study focused on a male-dominated environment, which may not generalize to other industries with different make-ups. Additionally, the experimental study, although conducted with working professionals, relied on hypothetical scenarios, which may not fully capture the messiness of real-world evaluations. Still, the consistent patterns we found across our studies provides strong evidence that industry stars can, in fact, cast a long shadow on the future evaluations of their protégés. Strategies for Making Better Talent Decisions Whether you're an executive overseeing talent pipelines or an emerging leader navigating your career path, understanding how past ties to prominent figures can distort performance evaluations is essential. Prestige-by-association can create unrealistic expectations, offering not only unfair protection, but they can lead to blind spots and overlooked achievements. Here's how executive decision makers and rising leaders can respond: If you're evaluating rising leaders: Don't let reflected prestige cloud your judgment. Hiring star-connected people is not necessarily a bad thing, especially when their objective qualifications are strong. But be mindful that your (often unconscious) high expectations for star-connected employees can create blind spots in how you evaluate them, while others who lack star connections may be evaluated more critically. Before making key decisions (like promotions or dismissals), ask: Would I judge this person's performance the same way if I didn't know this person's background? What biases do their relationship with this star create? What expectations do I feel, because of this association? Create structured, criteria-based evaluation systems that focus on performance, behaviors, and competencies, minimizing the influence of what evaluators may already know about a person, such as their connections to industry titans or an elite MBA degree. Incorporate 360-degree feedback or use a promotion committee, as multi-source input can help reveal blind spots and social biases. If you're a rising leader: Own your accomplishments. Whether you're star-connected or not, it's important to take ownership of your achievements. Our study found that proximity (or distance) from stars can cause biases among evaluators. This makes it even more important to highlight specific outcomes you've delivered, challenges you've overcome, or innovations you've led that clearly demonstrate your individual contributions. If you do have a connection, it may be useful not to lean on it when it comes time for evaluations. . . . Prestigious connections are powerful. They can help you reach that important first rung on the career ladder. But the ongoing influence of star connections can distort how merit is evaluated and rewarded. In a world obsessed with who you know, let's not forget to focus on what people actually achieve.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Why The Phoenix Suns Can't Just Waive-And-Stretch Bradley Beal's Contract
PHOENIX, ARIZONA - APRIL 08: Bradley Beal #3 of the Phoenix Suns during the NBA game at PHX Arena on ... More April 08, 2025 in Phoenix, Arizona. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by)On Tuesday, the Milwaukee Bucks made the shocking decision to waive and stretch the remaining two years and $112.6 million on the contract of All-Star point guard Damian Lillard. They did so to create enough salary-cap space to sign former Indiana Pacers center Myles Turner to a four-year, $107 million contract in free agency, although they'll now have a dead cap hit of roughly $22.5 million for Lillard in each of the next five seasons. As soon as the Bucks did that with Lillard, attention quickly turned to the Bradley Beal and the Phoenix Suns, who've been mired in their own standoff for the past six months. The Suns shopped Beal ahead of the Feb. 6 trade deadline, according to multiple reports, but they couldn't find any takers for the two years and roughly $110.8 million that he has left on his contract. Even if they did, he could have scuttled any trade courtesy of the no-trade clause he possesses in his contract. That has the Suns considering other options. On Thursday, Duane Rankin of the Arizona Republic reported they "have been discussing a possible buyout" for Beal. However, he would forfeit his no-trade clause if he agrees to a buyout, which might make him reluctant to do so. "Brad worked really hard to earn a no-trade clause. We earned it and we have it—and it is really valuable," Beal's agent, Mark Bartelstein, told ESPN's Ramona Shelburne in January. "Does that mean that he would never, ever accept a trade? No. You always have an open mind and you always are willing to listen to things that you think might be great." The Suns could always outright waive Beal and eat his salary as dead cap hits for the next two seasons, although there's no real reason for them to do that. If they're going to pay him that amount of money, they might as well keep him around if only to dangle as an expiring contract next summer. Unless he does agree to give some money back in a buyout, though, the Suns aren't allowed to go the same waive-and-stretch route as the Bucks did with Lillard. The 15% Rule The NBA's latest collective bargaining agreement allows teams to stretch out the dead cap hits they incur from waiving players, although there are limits on how much they're allowed to do in a given season. That's where the Suns run into trouble. Teams aren't allowed to stretch a player's contract—i.e., spread the cap hits across twice as many seasons as they have left on their deal, plus one—if they would end up with dead cap hits worth more than 15% of the salary cap on their books. The salary cap landed at $154,647,000 this year, which means the Suns couldn't have more than $23,197,050 in dead salary. The Suns already waive-and-stretched Nassir Little ($3.1 million) and E.J. Liddell ($707,000) ahead of last season, which leaves them starting out with roughly $3.8 million in dead salary. At most, Beal could count as roughly $19.4 million against their cap this year after agreeing to a buyout. The Suns would be left with that same dead cap hit across each of the next five seasons. The problem is there's a roughly $13.9 million gap between the most that the Suns are allowed to stretch in total over the next half-decade and what Beal is set to earn this year and next. He could always decide that the freedom to choose his next team is worth the price of giving up $14 million, especially if he stands to make up some of that difference with his new team, but money is quickly drying up around the league. According to Marc Stein and Jake Fischer of The Stein Line, both the Milwaukee Bucks and Miami Heat would have interest in signing Beal if he gets bought out. The Bucks appear to have used a portion of their $8.8 million room mid-level exception to re-sign Kevin Porter Jr., although the Miami Heat haven't touched their $14.1 million non-taxpayer MLE. Beal might be more amenable to a buyout if his next team offers him anywhere close to however much money he decides to give up. Suns Impact Buying out Beal could be a much-needed lifeline for the Suns, who've been stuck in second-apron purgatory for the past two years. They're currently $12.5 million over the second apron and $24.4 million over the first apron, so they would dip under both with a Beal buyout. In fact, there's a chance they could even stay under the $187.9 million luxury-tax line, which would get them one step closer to resetting the clock on the punishing repeater tax. (They're about $30.9 million over it as of now.) If the Suns did manage to duck the tax this year by buying out Beal and stretching his remaining salary, it would save them upward of $230 million, according to salary-cap analyst Yossi Gozlan. There's just one problem: Beal reportedly doesn't want to leave Phoenix. "Beal would be open to the right trade that sends him the right destination, but his preference is to remain in Phoenix, even if the team won only 35 games a season ago and just downgraded from Kevin Durant, who it dealt to the Houston Rockets last weekend," Fred Katz of The Athletic wrote at the end of June. "Since leaving Washington in 2023, Beal's wife and kids have moved from D.C. to Los Angeles and then, before the start of this season, to Phoenix full time. Playing for another team would leave him with two options: He would have to either pull his kids out of school, moving them again, or leave his family altogether, neither of which excites him." Former Suns head coach Mike Budenholzer shifted Beal to the bench in January after he started each of his 501 regular-season games over the previous eight seasons. That led to some speculation about whether the Suns were trying to convince him to waive his no-trade clause ahead of the deadline. Beal didn't cause too much of a scene about it publicly, although he did make it known that he disagreed with Budenholzer's decision, telling reporters, "I'm a starter in the league. I firmly believe that. No disrespect to anybody, but I'm a starter. The Suns landed Jalen Green from the Houston Rockets as part of their return package for Kevin Durant this offseason, which leaves them with an awkward glut of 2-guards between him, Beal and franchise cornerstone Devin Booker. Beal once again figures to come off the bench if he remains in Phoenix, which could serve as further incentive to pursue a buyout and then sign with a team where he could play more minutes. Given the financial implications of escaping from Beal's contract, the Suns figure to turn over every stone this offseason. Unfortunately, their decision to waive-and-stretch both Little and Liddell last year came back to bite them, as they now have to rely on Beal giving back nearly $14 million to even put a waive-and-stretch on the table as an option. Unless otherwise noted, all stats via PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook. Follow Bryan on Bluesky.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lakers complete Kevin Durant trade involving 7 teams, NBA history
The Los Angeles Lakers can say they were part of the biggest trade in NBA history. A record seven teams joined together to complete a deal, centered around Kevin Durant's trade from the Rockets to the Suns. Also taking part were the Timberwolves, Warriors, Hawks and Nets. Advertisement The Lakers' role wasn't major and it didn't bring with it a bunch of new moves, but rather already reported dealings that got consolidated for efficiency reasons. According to Marc Stein, the Lakers' only acquisition in the deal were the already known draft rights to Adou Thiero from Brooklyn. MORE: Lakers make 'insane' decision that could jeopardize future with LeBron, Luka The Lakers sent out the draft rights to Rocco Zikarsky and cash considerations to the Timberwolves. It's not a crucial role for L.A. to play by any means, but the cash they sent to Minnesota must've helped facilitate other parts of the deal. Advertisement And now the Lakers can say they made history. MORE NBA NEWS:
