JD(U) MP gets show-cause notice for criticising Bihar voter revision
The Janata Dal (United), headed by Nitish Kumar, is part of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance.
The show-cause notice, issued by the party's national general secretary Afaque Ahmad Khan, stated that Yadav's remarks came at a time when certain opposition parties were trying to discredit the Election Commission by raising doubts about electronic voting machines and the electoral process, ANI reported.
The notice said that JD(U) has always stood by the poll body, both when it was part of the INDIA Opposition alliance and now as a member of the ruling National Democratic Alliance.
'In this context, your public comments on such a sensitive matter, especially in an election year, not only cause embarrassment to the party but also inadvertently lend credibility to baseless and politically motivated allegations made by the opposition,' the notice added.
The Janata Dal (United) asked Yadav to respond within 15 days, saying that it could take disciplinary action against him if he fails to do so.
JDU has issued a show-cause notice to party MP Giridhari Yadav over his statement on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar.
The notice reads, "...Your public comments on such a sensitive matter, especially in an election year, not only cause embarrassment to the… pic.twitter.com/WyHlVGz1B8
— ANI (@ANI) July 24, 2025
Speaking outside Parliament on Wednesday, the Banka MP said the poll body has ' no practical knowledge ' of the history of Bihar and has ' forcefully imposed ' the revision of electoral rolls on the state's residents.
Yadav clarified that the statement was his personal opinion. 'It took 10 days for me to collect all of my documents,' the MP told ANI. 'My son stays in America. How will he do the signatures in just a month?'
He said that at least six months should have been given for the electoral roll revision.
The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24.
As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence.
Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents.
If the officers are satisfied with the details provided, the voters will be re-enrolled to a new voter list by electoral registration officers. If not, they will be removed from the voter lists.
On July 2, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents.
Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on July 6 defended the exercise, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls.
Opposition leaders in the Bihar Assembly have been protesting against the ongoing exercise and demanding a discussion on it.
On Wednesday, the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha also witnessed a ruckus over the exercise, with Opposition MPs shouting slogans in both Houses and demanding a rollback of the decision to review electoral rolls.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Drop SIR: Stalin to Centre
Chennai: Tamil Nadu chief minister M K Stalin has demanded that the Union govt drop the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, comparing the exercise to 'playing with fire'. In a social media post on Friday, Stalin said the SIR was being misused to erase voters from disadvantaged and dissenting communities, so that the outcome could be tilted in favour of the BJP . "This is not about reform. It is about engineering outcomes," he said. He said what had happened in Bihar during the SIR was a telling example of the potential threat posed by the exercise. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai "The Delhi regime knows the same electorate that once voted for it will now vote it out. That is why it is trying to stop them from voting altogether," he said. "If you (BJP) cannot defeat us, you seek to delete us. Don't play with fire. Any threat to our democracy will be met with firm resistance," he added. Stalin said that TN will raise its voice against SIR with full force. "Democracy belongs to the people. It will not be stolen," Stalin said in the post with the tag 'Quit SIR.' Meanwhile, CPM state secretary P Shanmugam has written to chief electoral officer Archana Patnaik asking her to convene an all-party meeting to discuss SIR. Stating that there are reports about preparatory work for commencing SIR in TN too, Shanmugam said the Election Commission of India should listen to views of political parties and then proceed with electoral roll revision.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Is Election Commission 'stealing' election as opposition alleges? Experts debate
The India Today roundtable delves into the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, a contentious exercise ahead of the November polls. The revision has excluded over 65 lakh voters, igniting political controversy. Opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal and Congress's Rahul Gandhi, allege voter disenfranchisement, calling it a threat to democracy and hinting at poll boycotts. Critics claim the move targets marginalised groups like Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis, and Muslims. Meanwhile, the Modi government and the Election Commission defend the SIR as essential for removing deceased, shifted, and duplicate voters to uphold electoral integrity. The debate examines the EC's neutrality, transparency, and timing, with accusations of it acting as a government tool.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"Don't Play With Fire": MK Stalin Slams Poll Roll Revision In Bihar
Chennai: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK President MK Stalin has come out strongly against the Election Commission of India's (EC) ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, calling it a dangerous attempt to "engineer outcomes, not reform the system." In a sharply worded post on X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, Mr Stalin warned that "any threat to our democracy will be met with firm resistance." "SIR is not about reform. It is about engineering outcomes. Don't play with fire," he wrote. "Delhi knows the Bihar electorate that once voted for it will now vote it out. That's why it is trying to stop them from voting altogether. Tamil Nadu will fight this injustice with every democratic weapon at our disposal," he added. His comments come days ahead of a crucial Supreme Court hearing on Monday, where the Opposition and civil society groups have challenged the Election Commission (EC) decision to carry out the sweeping voter verification exercise, starting in Bihar. In an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the EC has said that it has the constitutional authority to require voters to prove their citizenship through specific documents, especially for those born between July 1987 and December 2004. It has gone a step further to argue that even Parliament cannot curtail this authority. The EC insists that this is essential to ensure only Indian citizens are enrolled and says that Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) have full powers to seek and scrutinise such documents. It maintains that the onus to prove citizenship lies entirely on the individual. The Commission has excluded commonly held documents such as Aadhaar, ration cards, and Electors Photo Identity Cards (EPIC) issued before January 2025, from the 'acceptable list' for voter registration under SIR. It has also demanded parental citizenship proof from certain age groups - a move that has drawn widespread criticism. Multiple opposition parties have slammed the timing, intent, and process of the SIR exercise. They allege that the EC's move, beginning in Bihar just ahead of state elections, is aimed at mass disenfranchisement, particularly of poor and minority communities. They also point to procedural confusion, including the EC's mid-course change in requirements, initially mandating citizenship proof during door-to-door collection, only to later defer this to a separate verification process. Ground reports from Bihar suggest that a large number of enumeration forms were submitted without documents. Citizens are now expected to produce proof in person within a tight window, raising fears that many may be excluded. 'Parallel Mechanism' Legal experts point to a grey area. While the Union government alone can cancel citizenship, the EC claims that it, too, can verify citizenship for the limited purpose of electoral registration. Critics fear this could create a parallel and unaccountable determination mechanism. The BJP has defended the special intensive revision. Stating that the EC is ensuring only genuine citizens vote is in the national interest, the party has accused opposition parties of fear-mongering and spreading misinformation for political gain. Its leaders have argued that the move helps plug gaps in the system and uphold the integrity of elections.
