Judge says Trump administration can't use travel ban to keep 80 refugees out of the U.S.
In a decision late Monday, U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead in Seattle said President Trump's June order banning the entry of people from 12 countries 'expressly states' that it does not limit the ability of people to seek refugee status.
'In other words, by its plain terms, the Proclamation excludes refugees from its scope,' the judge wrote.
Barring refugees from entering the U.S. would limit their ability to seek refugee status and therefore run counter to the Republican president's order, the judge said.
He ordered the administration to immediately resume processing 80 'presumptively protected refugees' that were rejected based on the travel ban.
The State Department did not immediately have comment Tuesday.
Whitehead also set out a framework for the government to vet refugees from the countries covered by the travel ban and other countries who were denied entry when the president suspended the nation's refugee admissions program within hours of taking office on Jan. 20.
The decision left thousands of refugees who had already gone through a sometimes years-long vetting process to start new lives in America stranded at various locations around the world, including relatives of active-duty U.S. military personnel and more than 1,600 Afghans who assisted America's war efforts.
Some individual refugees sued, along with refugee aid organizations who said the administration froze their funding. They later asked the judge to make the case a class-action lawsuit so that the rulings could apply to other refugees facing similar circumstances.
In May, Whitehead said the suspension likely amounted to a nullification of congressional will, since Congress created and funded the refugee admissions program. He issued a preliminary injunction in February barring the federal government from suspending refugee processing and refugee aid funding.
But the 9th U.S. Circuit put most of that decision on hold in March, finding the administration was likely to win the case because the president has broad authority to determine who is allowed to enter the country.
Boone and Thanawala write for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UN council authorizes continuing vigilance of attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels on Red Sea shipping
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. Security Council on Tuesday authorized continued reporting on attacks on ships in the Red Sea by Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have defied its previous demands to immediately halt all such attacks. The vote in the 15-member council was 12-0 with Russia, China and Algeria abstaining because of attacks against Yemen in violation of its sovereignty, a clear reference to U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis who control most of northern Yemen. The Trump administration has carried out the strikes because of the group's attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and on close ally Israel. The resolution, cosponsored by the United States and Greece, extends the requirement that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres provide monthly reports to the Security Council about Houthi attacks in the Red Sea until Jan. 15, 2026. Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea said the resolution recognizes the need for continued vigilance 'against the Iran-backed Houthi terrorist threat.' She cited the two latest attacks by Houthis against civilian cargo vessels, the MV Magic Seas and the MV Eternity C, which caused both vessels to sink and led to the loss of innocent seafarers and saw crew members taken hostage. 'The United States strongly condemns these unprovoked terrorist attacks, which demonstrate the threat that the Houthis pose to freedom of navigation and to regional economic and maritime security,' Shea said, reiterating the council's demand for an immediate halt to Houthi attacks and the release of all crew members kidnapped from the Eternity C. The assaults represent the latest chapter of the rebels' campaign against shipping over the war in Gaza that began with Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 surprise attack in southern Israel. They also come as Yemen's nearly decadelong war drags on in the Arab world's poorest country, without any sign of stopping. Greece's U.N. Ambassador Evangelos Sekeris said the Houthi attacks have continued to fuel mistrust in the international maritime community, stressing that security and freedom of navigation are essential for the stability of global supply chains and economic development. 'If the Red Sea region — a critical international maritime route — becomes even more degraded, it will expose the international community to more acute security risks and economic uncertainty,' he warned. Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador Dmitry Polyansky said Moscow abstained because language in the previous resolution demanding a halt to Houthi attacks was arbitrarily interpreted to justify 'the use of force affecting the territory of the sovereign state of Yemen.' 'We stand convinced that any steps aimed at stabilizing the situation in Yemen and around Yemen should be taken in political and diplomatic ways,' he said. China's deputy U.N. ambassador Geng Shuang said his country abstained because 'certain countries took military action against Yemen, which seriously impacted the Yemeni peace process and exacerbated tensions in the Red Sea.' The Houthis have been launching missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Shuang called tensions in the Red Sea 'a major manifestation of the spillover from the Gaza conflict.' Russia's Polyansky also stressed the link between normalizing the situation in the Red Sea and the need for a ceasefire in Gaza and release of all hostages. Algeria's deputy U.N. ambassador Toufik Koudri, whose country is the Arab representative on the Security Council, expressed regret the Yemen resolution demanding an immediate halt to Houthi attacks made no mention of the Gaza war, which he called 'one of the catalytic factors.' 'The Security Council cannot disregard the clear nexus between the attacks in the Red Sea and the aggression against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the deep feelings that resulted from the brutal massacres committed against innocent civilians,' he said.
USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Who is Deja Foxx? Arizona Democratic primary challenger rejects 'influencer' tag
Activist and social media personality Deja Foxx has fallen short in her bid for the Democratic nomination to to replace Rep. Raúl Grijalva, the once Democratic stalwart of Southern Arizona who died from lung cancer in March. The 25-year-old was one of three major candidates in the Democratic primary July 15, which Adelita Grijalva, former Pima County Supervisor and daughter of the late representative, led Tuesday night. Grijalva led Foxx by 18,929 as of 11:30 p.m. ET, according to the Arizona Secretary of State's office. The Associated Press estimates that about 65% of the ballots cast have been counted and has called the race for Grijalva. Adelita Grijalva gets Dem. nom: Daughter of late Arizona congressman wins primary in bid to fill his House seat The winner of Tuesday's primary will be the favorite to head to Washington from southern Arizona, as a Democrat has held the seat since it was created following the 2000 census. Here's what you need to know about Deja Foxx. Who is Deja Foxx? Foxx was raised in Tucson by her single mother and experienced homelessness in childhood due to her mother's struggle with substance abuse, according to her campaign website. Foxx first rose to viral prominence in 2017, when she directly challenged then-Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake at a town hall for his stance on birth control and abortion. "I'm wondering, as a Planned Parenthood patient and someone who relies on Title X, who you are clearly not, why it's your right to take away my right to choose Planned Parenthood and to choose no-copay birth control, to access that," Foxx said. "If you can explain that to me, I would appreciate it." Flake announced his retirement later that year. Foxx worked for Kamala Harris' 2020 presidential campaign and hosted the Hotties for Harris party at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, according to Politico. Foxx part of young Democratic wave Foxx is one of a wave of young Democratic candidates who say they aim to remake the party that lost the White House last November. David Hogg, activist and former co-vice chair of the Democratic Party, and his political group, Leaders We Deserve, have endorsed Foxx in the primary. The two Democratic Senators from Arizona endorsed Grijalva - a move Foxx described to the Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network, as "putting their thumb on the scale in my race" – along with left-wing independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and progressive Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Foxx's stances lean to the left of the Democratic coalition, with her website stating, "housing is a human right" and calling for a $17 an hour federal minimum wage. Her previous work within the Democratic party is a contrast to Democratic Socialists of America-aligned challengers, such as Democratic nominee for New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh. Foxx told the Republic that voters would be able to decide whether the political experience of Grijalva or her lived experience of relying on government programs would matter more on primary day. "She's never relied on Medicaid, or food stamps, or Section 8 housing: The things that Donald Trump has in his crosshairs,' Foxx said. 'That's a depth that I think most politicians lack … They don't know what it's like for people in D.C. to debate the things that you live on, that you need just to get by.' Foxx rejects "influencer" label Foxx told the Republic earlier this month that she rejects the label of influencer. 'I think that people label me an influencer in an attempt to belittle the work that I do,' she said. "My first video that ever went viral, and the subsequent drumbeat of viral videos I've had, have had everything to do with my advocacy work on the ground." She told the newspaper that she believes it is reductive to label her as simply being an online personality. "Every save is something that has inspired someone enough that they want to come back to it … And every like is an endorsement that we are doing something different," Foxx said.
Boston Globe
23 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
For hard-right lawmakers, Trump's shift on Epstein is just the latest breach
It was the latest flash of frustration within Trump's hard-right faction on Capitol Hill. After a six-month honeymoon in which a fractious Republican Party has remained mostly united by unblinking allegiance to the president, there are now signs of a potential fraying of Trump's political coalition. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In the past few weeks, Greene and other right-wing Republicans have criticized the administration's bellicose stance on Iran, the president's reversal on supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia and the Justice Department's pivot on the Epstein matter. They have suggested that on each issue, Trump has betrayed the voters who elected him. Advertisement 'I don't accept it, and I don't think anyone else should accept it,' Greene said of the decision not to release more information about Epstein. 'I just think that it's a punch in the gut when regular people go to jail all the time, when they mess up and do something wrong, and then it always seems the rich, powerful elites escape.' Advertisement The president said Tuesday that he trusted Attorney General Pam Bondi's judgment and that only 'credible' information should be released. He later called the Epstein inquiry 'boring.' It was also not the first time in recent weeks that Democrats found themselves nodding along with Republicans they revile who are indignant about positions Trump and his administration have taken. As the Senate debated Trump's sweeping domestic policy measure, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., over and over again expressed existential concerns about its deep cuts to Medicaid, eventually issuing an indictment of the bill that made for better campaign ad copy than Democrats could have written for themselves. 'We cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away health care for working-class people,' he said. (Hawley ultimately voted for the legislation, but on Tuesday introduced legislation to repeal the Medicaid cuts he had voted for.) Greene and others, like Rep. Eli Crane of Arizona, have also condemned Trump's reversal on aiding Ukraine in its fight against Russia, a decision that they also said ran directly counter to campaign promises he and other Republicans made to end U.S. entanglement in foreign conflicts. It's a recognizable dynamic in Washington, where intraparty feuds can reach a boil once a new president settles in and notches a few wins. In Trump's case, that dynamic is exacerbated by the fact that he entered office as a lame duck, while many of his allies in Congress will face voters in just 16 months. For years, Trump and his Republican allies in Congress have promised voters that a trove of documents on the Epstein case would be released, and fed conspiracy theories about what would be found there. Much of their base consists of working-class people, many of whom are on Medicaid. Many of them want an end to American involvement in foreign wars. Advertisement Some GOP lawmakers, after spending much of the past six months ceding power to the White House, are now trying to carve a path where they can remain loyal to Trump while distancing themselves from the major decisions he has made. 'We're about to arm people we have literally no control over,' Steve Bannon, a Trump adviser turned influential podcast host, said on his show, speaking of Trump's decision to speed weapons to Ukraine. 'This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the blood lands of Europe -- and we're being dragged into it.' But no issue has struck a chord as elemental as the issue of the Epstein files. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., said in an interview that she has been bombarded by angry voters demanding more transparency from the Trump administration on the case. 'It's the only thing we've heard about for the last 100 hours,' Mace said. 'It's every social media platform, every phone call into the office. You see that interest on an issue, and you've got to respond.' Mace said she supported the idea of appointing a special counsel to look into whether anyone destroyed evidence and who else might have been involved in trafficking girls and young women. 'If the Justice Department can be more transparent on this, it would be best for the country,' she said. 'People don't trust the government, and we haven't given them much reason to over the past few years.' Advertisement Even House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has never let any daylight show between him and Trump, called for the release of the files. 'We should put everything out there and let the people decide,' Johnson said in an interview on 'The Benny Show.' He added: 'This isn't my lane. I haven't been involved in that. But I agree with the sentiment that we need to -- we need to put it out there.' Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said he was 'aggravated at Pam Bondi, claiming the list is on her desk.' referring to Bondi's decision not to release more disclosures in the Epstein case. Burchett, unsurprisingly, stopped short of criticizing the president, who has not only backed Bondi's decision but has also encouraged his supporters to simply move on from the Epstein case and to stop asking questions. 'I haven't spoken to the president about it,' he said. 'I don't know the reasoning there.' His comments hinted at the reality that despite the current fissures and angry talk, Republican lawmakers may fall in line with Trump, as they have always done. Democrats on Monday were making sure Bondi did not become the easy scapegoat for GOP anger that otherwise would be directed at the president. 'This is definitely not a reason for her to resign, because it's clear that Donald Trump is the one who is calling the tune here,' said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md. 'The Republicans seem split. On the one hand, people understand that there's a lot of popular fervor on the subject. On the other hand, they continue to follow Trump's lead, and it's clearly Trump who is saying he doesn't want this to come out.' Advertisement Indeed, on Monday night, just one Republican on the Rules Committee, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, voted with Democrats for a proposal to force a floor vote on whether the Justice Department should release material on the Epstein case. Democrats tried to force the issue again Tuesday; Republicans held together unanimously to block a debate on the release of the files. But some Republicans wanted to do it their own way and lead on the issue. Later Tuesday evening, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said he was introducing a discharge petition to force a vote on the release of the Epstein files. He also introduced a bill with Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., to require the disclosure of all unclassified material in the case while protecting victims' identities. A discharge petition would allow lawmakers to make an end run around their leaders and force consideration of legislation on the House floor if they collect the signatures of a majority of representatives. They rarely work, but there appeared to be bipartisan support for releasing the files. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, who introduced a separate resolution calling for the immediate release of all unclassified documents, said that Democrats wanted to know what was in those files as much as people in Trump's MAGA movement did. 'The president makes these claims, and people want to make sure children aren't being abused,' he said. This article originally appeared in
