logo
For hard-right lawmakers, Trump's shift on Epstein is just the latest breach

For hard-right lawmakers, Trump's shift on Epstein is just the latest breach

Boston Globe2 days ago
It was the latest flash of frustration within Trump's hard-right faction on Capitol Hill. After a six-month honeymoon in which a fractious Republican Party has remained mostly united by unblinking allegiance to the president, there are now signs of a potential fraying of Trump's political coalition.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In the past few weeks, Greene and other right-wing Republicans have criticized the administration's bellicose stance on Iran, the president's reversal on supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia and the Justice Department's pivot on the Epstein matter. They have suggested that on each issue, Trump has betrayed the voters who elected him.
Advertisement
'I don't accept it, and I don't think anyone else should accept it,' Greene said of the decision not to release more information about Epstein. 'I just think that it's a punch in the gut when regular people go to jail all the time, when they mess up and do something wrong, and then it always seems the rich, powerful elites escape.'
Advertisement
The president said Tuesday that he trusted Attorney General Pam Bondi's judgment and that only 'credible' information should be released. He later called the Epstein inquiry 'boring.'
It was also not the first time in recent weeks that Democrats found themselves nodding along with Republicans they revile who are indignant about positions Trump and his administration have taken.
As the Senate debated Trump's sweeping domestic policy measure, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., over and over again expressed existential concerns about its deep cuts to Medicaid, eventually issuing an indictment of the bill that made for better campaign ad copy than Democrats could have written for themselves.
'We cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away health care for working-class people,' he said. (Hawley ultimately voted for the legislation, but on Tuesday introduced legislation to repeal the Medicaid cuts he had voted for.)
Greene and others, like Rep. Eli Crane of Arizona, have also condemned Trump's reversal on aiding Ukraine in its fight against Russia, a decision that they also said ran directly counter to campaign promises he and other Republicans made to end U.S. entanglement in foreign conflicts.
It's a recognizable dynamic in Washington, where intraparty feuds can reach a boil once a new president settles in and notches a few wins. In Trump's case, that dynamic is exacerbated by the fact that he entered office as a lame duck, while many of his allies in Congress will face voters in just 16 months.
For years, Trump and his Republican allies in Congress have promised voters that a trove of documents on the Epstein case would be released, and fed conspiracy theories about what would be found there. Much of their base consists of working-class people, many of whom are on Medicaid. Many of them want an end to American involvement in foreign wars.
Advertisement
Some GOP lawmakers, after spending much of the past six months ceding power to the White House, are now trying to carve a path where they can remain loyal to Trump while distancing themselves from the major decisions he has made.
'We're about to arm people we have literally no control over,' Steve Bannon, a Trump adviser turned influential podcast host, said on his show, speaking of Trump's decision to speed weapons to Ukraine. 'This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the blood lands of Europe -- and we're being dragged into it.'
But no issue has struck a chord as elemental as the issue of the Epstein files.
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., said in an interview that she has been bombarded by angry voters demanding more transparency from the Trump administration on the case.
'It's the only thing we've heard about for the last 100 hours,' Mace said. 'It's every social media platform, every phone call into the office. You see that interest on an issue, and you've got to respond.'
Mace said she supported the idea of appointing a special counsel to look into whether anyone destroyed evidence and who else might have been involved in trafficking girls and young women.
'If the Justice Department can be more transparent on this, it would be best for the country,' she said. 'People don't trust the government, and we haven't given them much reason to over the past few years.'
Advertisement
Even House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has never let any daylight show between him and Trump, called for the release of the files.
'We should put everything out there and let the people decide,' Johnson said in an interview on 'The Benny Show.' He added: 'This isn't my lane. I haven't been involved in that. But I agree with the sentiment that we need to -- we need to put it out there.'
Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said he was 'aggravated at Pam Bondi, claiming the list is on her desk.' referring to Bondi's decision not to release more disclosures in the Epstein case.
Burchett, unsurprisingly, stopped short of criticizing the president, who has not only backed Bondi's decision but has also encouraged his supporters to simply move on from the Epstein case and to stop asking questions.
'I haven't spoken to the president about it,' he said. 'I don't know the reasoning there.'
His comments hinted at the reality that despite the current fissures and angry talk, Republican lawmakers may fall in line with Trump, as they have always done.
Democrats on Monday were making sure Bondi did not become the easy scapegoat for GOP anger that otherwise would be directed at the president.
'This is definitely not a reason for her to resign, because it's clear that Donald Trump is the one who is calling the tune here,' said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md. 'The Republicans seem split. On the one hand, people understand that there's a lot of popular fervor on the subject. On the other hand, they continue to follow Trump's lead, and it's clearly Trump who is saying he doesn't want this to come out.'
Advertisement
Indeed, on Monday night, just one Republican on the Rules Committee, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, voted with Democrats for a proposal to force a floor vote on whether the Justice Department should release material on the Epstein case.
Democrats tried to force the issue again Tuesday; Republicans held together unanimously to block a debate on the release of the files.
But some Republicans wanted to do it their own way and lead on the issue. Later Tuesday evening, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said he was introducing a discharge petition to force a vote on the release of the Epstein files. He also introduced a bill with Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., to require the disclosure of all unclassified material in the case while protecting victims' identities.
A discharge petition would allow lawmakers to make an end run around their leaders and force consideration of legislation on the House floor if they collect the signatures of a majority of representatives. They rarely work, but there appeared to be bipartisan support for releasing the files.
Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, who introduced a separate resolution calling for the immediate release of all unclassified documents, said that Democrats wanted to know what was in those files as much as people in Trump's MAGA movement did. 'The president makes these claims, and people want to make sure children aren't being abused,' he said.
This article originally appeared in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House passes rescissions package slashing $9B in federal funding for foreign aid, NPR and PBS
House passes rescissions package slashing $9B in federal funding for foreign aid, NPR and PBS

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

House passes rescissions package slashing $9B in federal funding for foreign aid, NPR and PBS

House Republicans approved a clawback package Thursday that will cut $9 billion in previously approved federal outlays for foreign aid, NPR and PBS. The so-called rescissions bill passed 216-213, with GOP Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Mike Turner of Ohio joining all present Democrats in voting no. The House faced a Friday deadline to pass the measure, which the White House transmitted to Congress in June in an effort to codify cuts to wasteful spending identified by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Advertisement The Senate passed the bill early Thursday morning, with Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) joining all 46 present Democrats in opposition. 4 House Republicans approved a clawback package on Thursday, passing the so-called rescissions bill 216-213. AFP via Getty Images 4 The package will cut $9 billion in previously approved federal outlays for foreign aid, NPR and PBS. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The latest House vote approved changes to the measure made by the Senate. It will now head to President Trump's desk for his signature. The measure returns about $8 billion earmarked for the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and upwards of $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funds PBS and NPR — spending conservatives have long sought to slash. House Republicans had passed a form of the package early last month, but the Senate struggled over it for weeks amid various concerns about some of the cuts. Eventually, the Trump administration agreed to scrap plans to cut some $400 million from a federal program aimed at fighting AIDS worldwide. Advertisement 4 Returnees cross the border from Iran, on July 3, 2025 in Islam Qala, Afghanistan. Getty Images An effort by Democrats in the House Rules Committee to tack on an amendment calling for the release of documents related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was blocked by Republicans on the panel. Republicans in the Rules Committee opted to instead move forward with a nonbinding resolution backing the 'public release of certain documents, records, and communications related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who could have exercised his powers under the rules of lower chamber to speak for as long as he could in opposition of the measure, opted to give only a 15-minute speech Thursday night. Advertisement 4 President and CEO of PBS Paula Kerger speaks during the PBS Executive Session at the Television Critics Association Winter Press Tour at The Langham Huntington, Feb. 2, 2019, in Pasadena, Calif. Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP Earlier this month, Jeffries used his so-called 'magic minute' of debate delay passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for almost nine hours, shattering the record previously held by former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.). White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought is expected to send other rescissions requests to Congress in the coming months.

House sends cuts to foreign aid, PBS and NPR to Trump's desk
House sends cuts to foreign aid, PBS and NPR to Trump's desk

Axios

time23 minutes ago

  • Axios

House sends cuts to foreign aid, PBS and NPR to Trump's desk

The House voted early Friday to approve President Trump's requested clawback of $9 billion in federal funding for PBS, NPR and foreign aid programs. Why it matters: Democrats fear the victory for the White House — following on DOGE's massive cuts — opens the door for more rescissions packages negating bipartisan spending deals. The measure passed 216-213 with only Republican support shortly ahead of a Friday night deadline. GOP Reps. Mike Turner (Ohio) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.) voted with Democrats against the bill. The big picture: The GOP's rescissions package takes back money that has already been appropriated by Congress and signed into law by the president. The Senate stripped parts of the version the House passed in June, including cuts to PEPFAR — a global health program to prevent HIV and AIDS. The measure passed 51-48 early Thursday in that chamber — also with only Republican support. Two Republicans — Susan Collins (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) — voted with Democrats against the bill. Zoom in: The rescission package stalled in the House on Thursday due to a partisan fight over disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Multiple factions of the GOP conference raised concerns about Democratic maneuvers in the Rules Committee aimed at pushing Republicans into tough votes related to Epstein. House Republicans spent the day negotiating with leadership about the path forward, which ultimately resulted in a GOP-led amendment that calls for the release of information related to Epstein. The non-binding resolution, which does not have the force of law, is expected to be voted on by the House at a later date. Between the lines: Democrats on Capitol Hill have been exerting increasing pressure on Republicans to break with Trump over his handling of the Epstein files. It's a move designed to deepen divisions among Republicans. The bottom line: Democrats worry Trump will ask Congress to approve even larger rescission packages in the future, potentially undermining bipartisan deals to avoid a government shutdown. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has warned Republicans against more attempts to rescind federal funding, signaling that could threaten Democrats' support for government funding bills ahead of a Sept. 30 deadline. Unlike the rescissions bills, which have a simple majority threshold for passage, any measure to fund the government before the end of September will require Democratic support to get to 60 votes in the Senate.

House approves $832 billion Defense funding bill
House approves $832 billion Defense funding bill

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House approves $832 billion Defense funding bill

The House early on Friday approved legislation allocating roughly $832 billion in funding for defense programs for fiscal year 2026, just weeks after Republicans approved a separate $150 billion plan to advance President Trump's defense priorities. The GOP-led chamber approved the bill 221-209, mostly along party lines. The measure marks only the second appropriations bill that Republicans have been able to pass for 2026, after GOP appropriators said the effort to pass Trump's tax and spending cuts megabill dominated the party's focus over the past few months. The bill passed Thursday would boost funding for active, reserve, and National Guard military personnel by $6.6 billion above current levels, to a total of $189 billion. It also allows for an increase of 3.8 percent in basic pay for military personnel that would take effect beginning in January. It calls for $174 billion for procurement, up $6.5 billion from current levels, and would provide $283 billion for operation and maintenance, or a roughly $7 billion decrease below 2025 levels. The bill also includes about $148 billion for research, development, test and evaluation, as well as boosts for Defense Department health programs and overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs. The bill comes after Republicans greenlit additional defense dollars as part of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier this month. That plan called for $25 billion to fund Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense system, with billions more aimed at items like shipbuilding and the maritime industrial base, munitions and nuclear deterrence. Democrats have risen in sharp opposition to the overall defense appropriations plan, which also seeks to codify Trump's actions targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, advance prohibitions for funding for abortion-related travel, and block funds for gender-affirming surgeries. However, the party also managed to secure some changes during consideration in the House Appropriations Committee dealing with recent controversies at the Defense Department under the Trump administration. One measure was aimed at blocking armed forces from being deployed for law enforcement and another amendment that was later adopted sought to prohibit transmission of classified information over unsecured networks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store