Ohio man hopes to heal hurting hearts in wake of London tornado devastation
The responsible man sits on Keavy Road, just steps away from the destruction of the tornado.
He tips his cowboy hat to folks passing by.
His name is David Graham, but he is better known as 'Cowboy Dave.'
'God has put on my heart to share people's burdens, and that's what I do,' he said.
Cowboy Dave is the founder of Hearts Hurt. For more than 20 years, he's gone out to more than 40 natural disasters across the country, delivering supplies to people in need.
Madisonville man accused of watching porn with 10-year-old in room
University of Kentucky students release first-ever bourbon brand
Temporary trailers arrive in London for displaced tornado survivors
But more than that, he's acted as a friend and a source of support for people during the hardest times of their lives.
'Everyone has seen me since the first full day, and they'll see me for another 30 days,' he said. 'People might've wondered, is this guy homeless? Is he in town? Is he a contractor? Is he a lawyer? What's his deal? And eventually they come to realize Cowboy cares. I really do.'
Next to his setup sits a row of white wooden crosses. They stand at about three feet tall. Each one has the name of a life taken by the tornado.
'It's about the people and the names on here. And the fact that not only did people die here, but people's spirits died here, and their hopes died here,' Cowboy Dave told FOX 56.
Read more of the latest Kentucky news
He said the crosses were put in place by people from North Carolina who were moved by the help they received from Kentuckians in the past after natural disasters of their own.
Cowboy Dave said he's not going anywhere.
'I said I'm right here. If something blows down, a flag gets crooked, anything. If people need help, I will be here. I'll make sure until they take their cross away. I'll be here until the last cross is gone.'
As the debris clears and headlines fade, Cowboy Dave will live up to the mission printed on the side of his truck: 'Hurting hearts do not have to hurt forever.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
4 days ago
- Gizmodo
This Experimental Weight Loss Drug Works Without the Nausea or Vomiting
What if you could lose weight with a drug that won't make you lose your lunch at the same time? New research shows it might be possible. Scientists at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Kentucky, and other institutions say they've found a potentially novel way to suppress people's appetite and treat obesity—without causing the nausea or vomiting commonly experienced with semaglutide (the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy). In early animal experiments, the team's experimental drug appears to be working as intended. Semaglutide and similar drugs mimic the natural GLP-1 hormone, which is important to regulating our insulin production and hunger. As effective as these medications are at helping people lose weight, they have their tradeoffs—most notably a high chance of gastrointestinal side effects. So there's clearly still a need for improved obesity treatments, according to lead study author Caroline Geisler, an assistant professor at UKY's College of Pharmacy. This Simple Strategy Could Curb One of Semaglutide's Worst Side Effects Geisler and her team have been exploring one particular strategy for treating obesity, involving a protein called octadecaneuropeptide, or ODN. ODN is produced by the brain's glia, specialized cells that support neurons. But glia aren't just the brain's support troops, and ODN seems to be important to controlling our sense of hunger. 'Now we know that [glia] play a large role in sensing and communicating the status of the body, and we hope that by targeting a glial signaling molecule, we can engage many energy-regulating pathways in the brain and avoid the side effects of nausea and vomiting,' Geisler told Gizmodo. The researchers first tested their hypothesis by delivering ODN directly to the hindbrain of rats. Once treated, the rats lost weight and improved their blood sugar control. And when they blocked ODN signaling in rats, the animals exhibited a weaker response to GLP-1 treatment (suggesting its effects are at least partly tied to ODN). Finally, they indirectly dosed mice, rats, and shrews with an experimental drug derived from ODN, called TDN. In mice, TDN improved blood sugar control; in rats, it caused weight loss without nausea or vomiting; and in shrews (animals commonly used to test motion sickness and vomiting), the drug triggered no puking at all. The drug also appeared to not have any noticeable effects on the animals' heart rate, movement, and temperature. 'This paper shows for the first time that giving a smaller version of ODN in the periphery is still effective to improve body weight and metabolic control without side effects,' Geisler said. The team's findings, published Wednesday in Science Translational Medicine, are only a proof of concept for now. There remain many questions about exactly how ODN works in the brain to tamp down our appetite and control blood sugar. It's also possible that ODN-based drugs can be further optimized for medical use, though TDN seemed to produce steady weight loss in animals for at least over a week without waning. Still, the researchers are hopeful this potential new drug class can match or even surpass the effectiveness of today's GLP-1 therapies while being less of a hassle to take. And they're now planning to develop such drugs for testing in people. 'We have an optimistic timeline that we could be ready to start clinical trials within 2 years,' Geisler said. The Best Obesity Drugs Aren't Even Here Yet The study researchers are hardly the only ones working to introduce the next generation of improved obesity and diabetes treatments. But it's likely plenty of people would sign up for a safe weight loss drug that comes without the need for a barf bag.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Think Kentucky Medicaid cuts won't affect you? Think again.
Nearly 1 in 3 Kentuckians are covered by Medicaid, the federal-state insurance program for low-income Americans. If you're not among them, you probably think you won't be affected by the big bill that the Republican Congress passed for President Trump. Think again. You are likely to be hurt by it, because Medicaid has become such an essential part of Kentucky's health-care system. If you've heard anything about Medicaid in the big bill, it's probably the 'work requirement' for able-bodied adults without dependent children to spend 80 hours a month working, performing community service, going to school at least half-time or a combination of those activities. When Republican Matt Bevin was governor of Kentucky, he tried to impose such rules, but a federal judge in Washington said no, and while Bevin was appealing in 2019 he was ousted by Democrat Andy Beshear, who scuttled the plan. Drafting of the new national plan was overseen by 2nd District Rep. Brett Guthrie of Bowling Green, as chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He said on X that the panel 'made sure that able-bodied Americans who get free health care, if they're able to work, work for it, like every other American has to get up and go to work every day for their health care. It's only fair that people who are able to work, do work.' That argument appeals to Americans who have at least a mild resentment of people who get something from the government by doing little or nothing. But in practice, work requirements have saved money mainly by disqualifying Medicaid beneficiaries who fail to document their qualifying activities or otherwise fall short on paperwork. That happened in the only such program that was fully implemented, in Arkansas, and projections for the Kentucky program predicted likewise. Republicans in the General Assembly will try to solve that problem, said state Sen. Julie Raque Adams, R-Louisville, co-chair of the legislature's Medicaid Oversight and Advisory Board. 'Nobody should be cut off because of a paperwork error,' she said on KET's 'Kentucky Tonight' Monday. She said legislators will 'ask some really hard questions' about 'how to proceed in this new world order,' and try to improve beneficiaries' health. Medicaid cuts likely will force rural hospitals to cut services or close The work requirement was the most-cited reason that the big bill would lead to closure of many rural hospitals, by reducing the number of Medicaid beneficiaries and thus the revenue on which most hospitals depend. But in Kentucky, the bill's biggest effect on hospitals will be more direct, and it seems likely to force many of them to cut back on services or even close. The bill wipes out most of a funding scheme that the legislature has used to help Kentucky hospitals: Raise the 'provider taxes' they pay, use the money as a state match for federal funds, and use the windfall to increase hospitals' Medicaid payments, which usually don't cover the cost of care. Some senators called that 'money laundering,' and the Senate limited it. The House passed the revised bill under deadline pressure from Trump. Opinion: Kentucky depends heavily on federal funding. Trump's cuts will be devastating. The change made the Kentucky Hospital Association withdraw its support for the bill. The Senate added a $50 billion fund to help hospitals, and that will bring Kentucky hospitals at least $100 million a year. But the state's rural hospitals are getting $1 billion a year from the current provider-tax scheme, 'so $100 million is not gonna cut it,' KHA President Nancy Galvagni said on 'Kentucky Tonight.' She told a legislative committee in January that without the scheme, Kentucky hospitals would be operating at a 6 percent negative margin. Kentucky may lose the most from Trump's big bill Kentucky is one of the states that may lose the most from the big bill. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that the state will get $25 billion less in federal Medicaid money from 2028 to 2037, a decrease of 17%. Most of the hurt will be on rural hospitals; based on the number that get 'disproportionate share payments' because they are so Medicaid-dependent, Kentucky will have more rural hospitals at risk of closure than any other state. Opinion: McConnell, KY has too much to lose if Medicaid is cut. We won't 'get over it.' Just how much Kentucky stands to lose is an open question, because Democrats use worst-case scenarios, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has a sketchy record of predicting the effects of health-care legislation, and most Republicans don't want to talk about it. Guthrie didn't respond to repeated requests for an interview, and Sen. Mitch McConnell said of his complaining constituents, 'They'll get over it.' Not if their hospital closes or drastically reduces its services. However, the big bill may have little immediate political impact, because the work requirement doesn't take effect until 2027 and the Medicaid funding changes are set for 2028. Congress and the legislature could ease the blow, especially for hospitals, which have a strong lobby. But who lobbies for the poor? And do legislators listen? Al Cross is professor emeritus of journalism at the University of Kentucky and a former political writer for The Courier Journal. The NKyTribune is the home for his commentary, which is offered to other publications with appropriate credit. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Medicaid cuts from Trump's big bill may hit Kentucky hardest | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
McConnell, KY has too much to lose if Medicaid is cut. We won't 'get over it.'
No, Sen. McConnell, people who need health care aren't going to 'get over it.' The stakes are far too high for such a dismissive response about proposed cuts to Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office estimates these changes could leave nearly 11 million Americans uninsured by 2034. These aren't abstract budget decisions. This legislation will have dire consequences for families, communities, and the providers that serve them. Kentucky has more hospitals at risk of closure than any other state, according to the Sheps Center for Health Service Research at the University of North Carolina. With proposed Medicaid reductions threatening up to $1.3 billion in lost federal funding, as many as 35 hospitals could close, many of them in regions that are already underserved. That kind of loss isn't just a health-care crisis; it's an economic one. According to the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, these cuts could result in 12,100 fewer jobs and $98 million less in state tax revenue, with ripple effects on education, infrastructure and public safety. Medicaid expansion has been one of the most impactful health policy decisions in our state's history, with Kentucky's uninsured rate falling from 14.5% in 2013 to 5.6% in 2023. This coverage has meant improved access to cancer treatment, preventive care, lifesaving medications, and mental health and addiction recovery services. It's helped stabilize rural hospitals, improve health outcomes, decrease racial disparities in coverage, and reduce medical debt. Now, all of that is at risk. And for what? Opinion: McConnell wants KY coal miners to 'get over' Medicaid cuts closing their hospitals Medicaid cuts in Kentucky will hit kids, elderly and people with disabilities Proponents claim these cuts target waste, fraud and abuse. However, the legislation does nothing to rein in drug prices, stop corporate price gouging or address the administrative inefficiencies that drive up costs. Instead, it strips care away from people with the least resources while giving tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans and the largest corporations. Medicaid is vital in Kentucky. It covers roughly a third of the state's population, including: 68% of nursing home residents 46% of Kentucky children 51% of working-age adult Kentuckians living with disabilities Medicaid also plays a critical role in our fight against addiction. Kentucky has one of the highest drug overdose death rates in the country, and Medicaid is the largest payer of substance use disorder treatment. Cutting Medicaid would mean fewer detox beds, less access to counseling and longer waits for recovery services at a time when families can't afford to wait. Beyond Medicaid, other provisions in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' threaten to destabilize the ACA Marketplace, where 24 million Americans, many of them self-employed or small business owners, purchase coverage. Failing to extend enhanced subsidies could cause an additional 4 million Americans to become uninsured, leading to higher premiums and reduced benefits for those who remain. Letters: McConnell got caught telling a truth he didn't want us to know about Cutting Medicaid services for Planned Parenthood, other providers is alarming As an OBGYN who spent her clinical career promoting gynecologic health, I am dismayed by the bill's intent to prohibit Medicaid funding for nonprofit essential community providers, such as Planned Parenthood clinics, for 10 years. I am further alarmed by the Supreme Court's ruling that will allow states to withhold Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood. This money pays for contraception and screening services, such as pap smears, for primarily low-income patients. It almost never funds abortion; it simply helps those who do not desire or cannot afford to have children avoid unplanned pregnancies, keeps people from getting cancer, and helps people to be healthy so that they can be productive members of society. Bills such as this 'save' money by denying care. Going without medication, heart surgery or cancer treatment costs payers less. Is that the answer? I say NO. Health care is not a luxury. It is a human right. Legislation that makes health care more expensive or difficult to access is morally and ethically wrong. It says that those in power determine who gets care and who doesn't, who lives and who dies. Kentuckians don't need to 'get over it.' We need to demand a system that protects every one of us, before more hospitals close and more lives are lost. Agree or disagree? Submit a letter to the editor. Susan G. Bornstein, MD, MPH, is an OBGYN by training. She became so frustrated with the challenges that many of her patients faced with cost and access to care that she returned to school for a master's degree in public health. In 2021, she founded The Asclepius Initiative, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Learn more at This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: McConnell's Medicaid dismissal will save money, not Kentucky | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword
