Trump White House jeopardises EU-US data deal: German ministry
ADVERTISEMENT
The German Interior Ministry has expressed concerns about the future of the data transfer agreement between the EU and US after the Republican administration of President Donald Trump vowed to review, and possibly repeal, all the decrees signed by his predecessor.
The current
agreement
, known as the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and used by businesses on both side of the Atlantic for data transfers, is based on commitments made by the US administration led by Democrat Joe Biden, which were set out in an executive order. There are now fears that Trump could lift the legal basis for the agreement.
The German ministry
told
newspaper Handelsblatt that 'legally secure' data transfers are of 'great importance' for the German economy. Many businesses depend on cloud storage from the US for example, with Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and Google as dominant services.
The concerns of the ministry were echoed by privacy group NOYB, which told Euronews that the European Commission 'has always relied on a mosaic-puzzle approach' which when pieced together is sufficient to prove adequacy when drafting the agreement with the US.
It adds that companies are 'thinking massively about hosting in Europe and finding alternatives.'
Related
Donald Trump's first week: These are all the executive orders he signed that impact tech
As Donald Trump's second administration begins to takes shape, what will it mean for AI?
In 2023, the European Commission adopted the EU-US Data Privacy Framework which acknowledges that data transfers between the EU and US can be considered safe.
Two months later the deal was challenged before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by French politician Philippe Latombe. The case was heard earlier this month and a ruling will follow at a later stage.
It came after the previous data transfer agreements, Privacy Shield and Safe Harbor, were declared invalid by the ECJ, because US national privacy laws were deemed to lack sufficient safeguards to limit the access to personal data by national security authorities.
In the absence of an adequacy decision, businesses can use alternative data transfer mechanisms such as standard contractual clauses (SCCs), which need a review by the national data protection authorities and are therefore often lengthy processes.
The Commission will review the agreement periodically. According to the legal text, when the EU executive has 'indications that an adequate level of protection is no longer ensured', it will inform the US authorities, if necessary it can suspend, amend or repeal the decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Budapest Pride to challenge Orban's ban in Hungary
Organisers expect a record turnout for the 30th edition of the Pride march in the Hungarian capital despite a police ban imposed by Prime Minister Viktor Orban's nationalist government. Akos Horvath, an 18-year-old student who came to Budapest from a city in southern Hungary, said it was "of symbolic importance to come". "It's not just about representing gay people, but about standing up for the rights of the Hungarian people," he told AFP on his way to the march after travelling for two hours. Orban's governing coalition amended laws and the constitution this year to prohibit the annual celebration, justifying his years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights on "child protection" grounds. Orban said Friday that while police would not "break up" the Pride march, those who took part should be aware of "legal consequences". Newly installed cameras Parade organisers risk up to a year in prison, and attendees can face fines up to 500 euros ($590). The latest legal changes also empower the authorities to use facial-recognition technology to identify those who take part. Newly installed cameras have appeared on lamp posts along the planned route of the march. Despite the risk of fines, more than 35,000 people are expected to gather near Budapest's city hall for a march beginning at 3:00 pm (1300 GMT). "Freedom and love can't be banned," read one huge poster put up near the city hall. Ministers from several EU countries and dozens of European lawmakers are expected to attend in defiance of the ban. Earlier this week, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen called on the Hungarian authorities to reverse the ban. Thirty-three countries, including most EU countries, have also released a statement in support of the march. At a press conference Saturday, several French MEPs called on the EU to take tougher measures against Orban's government over the crackdown on civil rights and other rule of law issues. Budapest's opposition mayor Gergely Karacsony has insisted that no attendee could face any reprisals as the march is a municipal event that does not require police approval. "The police have only one task... and it is a serious one: to ensure the safety of Hungarian and European citizens attending the event," Karacsony said during a briefing with visiting EU equalities commissioner Hadja Lahbib on Friday. Far-right groups meanwhile have announced multiple counterprotests along the planned parade route, putting up a wooden cross adorned with protest messages. A woman who gave only her first name, Katalin, told AFP she agreed with the ban though she hoped there would be no clashes. "Disgusting... it's become a fad to show off ourselves," she said. 'Polarising society' Justice Minister Bence Tuzson sent a letter to EU embassies this week cautioning diplomats and staff against participating because of the police ban. Several EU countries have informed their citizens of the potential of fines through travel advisories. Since Orban's return to power in 2010, the country of 9.6 million people has been steadily rolling back LGBTQ rights. But it is the first move to ban the Pride ban, as Orban says he has been emboldened by the anti-diversity push by US President Donald Trump. "Orban is employing a tried-and-tested recipe ahead of next year's election by generating a conflict," political analyst Daniel Mikecz told AFP, saying that Orban was "polarising society".
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Supreme Court boosts Trump over federal judges, raising fears of an unchecked presidency
On June 27, the conservative justices of the US Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a political victory, which he loudly celebrated. By restricting federal judges' power to suspend executive orders, the Supreme Court chose to rule against the broader judiciary, of which it is the highest authority. This judicial deference follows that of Congress, where Republican majorities in both the Senate and the House of Representatives had already relinquished much of their authority in the face of Trump. It is hardly debatable that universal injunctions, which allow a single federal judge to block a presidential order, have always been seen as excessive by the party occupying the White House. The six conservative justices – who in their ruling denounced what they considered an abuse of power, over the objections of the three progressive justices – found nothing to object to when these injunctions targeted orders signed by Democrat Joe Biden between 2021 to 2025. This clear bias is compounded by the context. The Supreme Court had been asked to review the legality of an order abolishing jus soli – the right to citizenship by birthplace – which clearly violates the 14 th Amendment of the Constitution. Rather than ruling on substance, which would have been uncomfortable for the Trump administration, the Court chose to focus on procedure. While it maintained a path for legal challenges by ruling that such an order cannot take immediate effect, allowing for class action suits, this evasive tactic, in addition to the chaos it could create depending on the political leanings of each state, risks further damaging an already tarnished reputation. A trampled past Even before the July 1, 2024, decision granting Trump broad immunity for actions taken during his first term, the conservative majority had consistently worked to strengthen executive power. The new leeway given to the Republican president to dismiss federal agency heads without just cause – except for the Federal Reserve – confirmed this intent. It is troubling that this effort to roll back the American system of checks and balances, especially those added to the US institutional framework following the excesses of Republican President Richard Nixon, coincides with Trump's return to power. From his baseless and outrageous challenge of the 2020 presidential election results to the astonishing hoarding of classified documents at his private residence after his ignominious departure from office, Trump has amply demonstrated his disregard for norms and the law. , the decree overturning jus soli, introduced into the US Constitution in 1868, provided fresh evidence of this contempt. It is, unfortunately, likely that this increase in presidential power will outlast the next change of administration. As long as Congress remains paralyzed by division, it is unlikely that a Democratic president would willingly give up these expanded powers. It is therefore regrettable that a political movement that champions a return to "American greatness" should so trample its own institutional heritage. The US has nothing to gain from this.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Iran holds state funeral for military commanders killed in war in Israel
Iran held a state funeral service on Saturday, June 28, for around 60 people, including its military commanders, killed in its war with Israel, after Tehran's top diplomat condemned Donald Trump's comments on supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as "unacceptable." The proceedings started at 8:00 am local time in the capital Tehran, as government offices and many businesses were closed on Saturday for the occasion. The state broadcaster showed footage of thousands of people donning black clothes, waving Iranian flags, holding pictures of the slain military commanders, chanting slogans of "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" and trampling the flags of Israel and the US on the ground. Images displayed mock-ups of Iranian ballistic missiles as well as coffins draped in Iranian flags and bearing portraits of the deceased commanders in uniform near Enghelab (Revolution) Square in central Tehran, where the march began. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, along with other senior government officials and military commanders – including Esmail Qaani, head of the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of the Revolutionary Guards – attended the event. Senior advisor to Iran's supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, who was targeted and wounded during the war, also took part in the ceremony, using a walking cane, state TV showed. Commanders, scientists to be buried A patriotic eulogy blared from loudspeakers as the procession set out across the sprawling metropolis toward Azadi (Freedom) Square, 11 kilometres away. "Boom boom Tel Aviv," read one banner, referring to Iranian missiles fired at Israel during the conflict in retaliation for its attacks on Iran. Among the dead was Mohammad Bagheri, a major general in Iran's Revolutionary Guards and the second-in-command of the armed forces after the Iranian leader. Nuclear scientist Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, also killed in the attacks, will be buried with his wife. Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami, who was killed on the first day of the war, will also be laid to rest after Saturday's ceremony, which honored at least 30 other top commanders. Of the 60 people who are to be laid to rest after the ceremony, four are children and four are women.
