Man (61) who used false Afghan passport to claim €40k in social welfare spared jail
The judge heard that the Pakistani man is actually entitled to the money under his own name.
Advertisement
Faizal Akbar, with an address at Benburb Street in Dublin, appeared before Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, where he pleaded guilty to stealing the money on dates between 2010 and 2019.
Judge Orla Crowe noted that he had used the false passport to open a bank account, get an 'M10 form' and make an application to the Department of Social Protection. He then received €43,715 in payments from the department.
This false Afghan passport also allowed him to leave Ireland several times to travel back to Pakistan to see his wife and children.
The court noted that when the Afghan passport had expired, he had self-reported the situation to his bank, stating that he needed a real passport to travel and visit an ailing relative.
Advertisement
The bank contacted the gardaí.
In 2023, Akbar learned that he was eligible for the payment he had wrongly claimed and is now receiving that very same benefit in his own name.
Ireland
Conor McGregor's plans for new Kildare mansion ref...
Read More
The judge noted that he had no previous convictions and no trappings of wealth; he, in fact, shares a room with three other adults, despite working here. However, his family is understood to have difficult circumstances in Pakistan.
'It's a very unusual case,' remarked Judge Crowe. 'He shouldn't have done it by obtaining a false passport.'
She imposed a sentence of two years on him, but suspended it full on his own recognisance for four years.
'This will hang over him for that period of four years,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP to start 'monitoring' bank accounts in 2026 to combat benefit fraud
The Department for Work and Pensions is set to introduce new fraud-combatting measures - here's what you need to know This year, the UK Government announced what it calls 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation', aiming to significantly reduce the misuse of funds within the welfare system. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) believes that the new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be instrumental in saving taxpayers a hefty £1.5 billion over the coming five years. The bill introduces tough penalties, including driving bans of up to two years for persistent benefit fraudsters, as well as granting the DWP powers to directly seize funds from the bank accounts of those guilty of fraud. Additionally, the Eligibility Verification system will allow third parties, such as banks, to highlight suspicious benefit claims. The DWP has published 11 new factsheets to clarify how these measures will be safely implemented and monitored. These documents outline that the UK Government plans to start implementing the proposed measures in 2026. The factsheets also elaborate on the checks and balances, including reporting requirements and oversight mechanisms, designed to ensure that the new powers are used in a manner that is 'appropriate, proportionate, and effective'. According to the Daily Record, advice from states: "The Government will begin implementing the Bill measures from 2026. "For the Eligibility Verification Measure, the Government will implement a 'test and learn' approach to ensure the new powers to tackle public sector fraud are being used proportionally and effectively. DWP and the Cabinet Office will continue to work with industry to implement the new measures, consult stakeholders on Codes of Practice and publish guidance." The DWP will also gain the ability to gather data from additional third-party organisations, such as airlines, to confirm whether people are claiming benefits from abroad, potentially violating eligibility rules. Eligibility Verification Measure explained It's vital to note that the DWP won't have direct access to the bank accounts of millions of people receiving means-tested benefits like Universal Credit, Pension Credit and Employment and Support Allowance. The DWP will work alongside banks to identify people who may have surpassed the eligibility criteria for means-tested benefits, such as the £16,000 income limit for Universal Credit. Using this information, the DWP will scrutinise the claimant to prevent potential overpayments and possible fraud cases. The legislation only allows banks and other financial institutions to share limited data and forbids the sharing of transaction data, meaning the DWP won't be able to see how benefit recipients spend their money. Indeed, the factsheet makes it clear that banks and other financial institutions could face penalties for oversharing information, including transaction details. It adds: "Any information shared through the Eligibility Verification Measure will not be shared on the presumption or suspicion that anyone is guilty of any offence." New DWP steps to combat fraud The upcoming Bill will uphold the UK Government's manifesto promise to safeguard taxpayers' money, ensuring every pound is spent wisely and effectively: New powers of search and seizure - so DWP can control investigations into criminal gangs defrauding the taxpayer. Allowing DWP to recover debts from individuals no longer on benefits and not in PAYE employment who can pay money back but have avoided doing so. New requirements for banks and building societies to flag where there is an indication there may be a breach of eligibility rules for benefits - preventing debts accruing. All the powers will include strong safeguards to ensure they are only used appropriately and proportionately - including new inspection and reporting mechanisms. DWP will have a clearly defined scope and clear limitations for the use of all the powers it is introducing, and staff will be trained to the highest possible standards. This Bill will empower the Public Sector Fraud Authority to: Improve fraud management in future emergencies by creating specialist time-limited powers to be used in crisis management situations - building on lessons learned during COVID-19. Reduce fraud against the public sector by using its expertise to take action on behalf of other departments, against those who attack the public sector. Improve the government's ability to recover public money, through new debt recovery and enforcement powers. Use new powers of entry, search and seizure to reduce the burdens on the police in the most serious criminal investigations. Better detect and prevent incorrect payments across the public sector through new information gathering and sharing powers. Use strong non-criminal sanctions and civil penalties to provide an alternative to criminal prosecution and to deter fraud. The Public Sector Fraud Authority will adopt a 'test and learn' strategy when using these powers, trialling various methods and expertise to discover the most effective way to combat public sector fraud.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Deporting criminal would ‘hurt his son's mental health'
A convicted Pakistani criminal can stay in the UK after a judge ruled his deportation would damage his son's mental health. The father of two was jailed for more than two years for holding false identity documents after living in Britain for 18 years, an asylum tribunal was told. The Home Office decided to deport him, yet he has successfully appealed under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing that his son would not be able to get the same mental support in his home country. The court was told his 14-year-old son's mental health had deteriorated during his father's time in prison and would only get worse should be deported. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their removal. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to a family life, and article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The 56-year-old Pakistani national, who entered the UK in 2007 as a visitor, is married and has two children, aged 14 and 10. His wife suffers from depression and is undergoing therapy for chronic low mood, high anxiety levels and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. In February 2020, he was convicted of possession of false identity documents and sentenced to 28 months in prison. The Home Office decided to deport him but he launched legal action claiming the move would be 'unduly harsh' on his family. The lower tier tribunal judge accepted the claim by the man, known only as AA, saying he was genuinely remorseful and had a low risk of reoffending. The Home Office appealed the ruling. However, the upper tribunal was told by a psychologist that his eldest child was vulnerable and would be 'significantly affected' by his father's deportation. It was likely to worsen his 'extremely elevated levels of anxiety, depression and stress'. 'Should the child be forced to leave the UK with his family, the detrimental impact on his mental health would likely be profound,' the psychologist told the tribunal. 'He has a lack of family support in Pakistan, speaks limited Urdu and there are difficulties he would face adjusting to a different educational and cultural environment and the absence of his established support network leading to increased feelings of isolation, which could trigger self-harming behaviours.' Children's interests 'primary consideration' Another psychologist added: 'While I am not familiar with the conditions in Pakistan for children, as a UK-based psychiatrist, I would anticipate his mental health would deteriorate if removed from the UK and required to live in a country where he does not want to reside.' The Home Office argued that it would be 'extraordinary to imagine there being a scenario in a deportation case where a child would not feel disappointed by the prospect of his family departing the United Kingdom'. However, Judge Sarah Pinder, sitting on the upper tribunal, ruled in the criminal's favour. 'I must have regard to the children's best interests as a primary consideration,' she said. 'I am satisfied that [AA] has demonstrated, through the submission of medical, expert and country background evidence, that the health and needs of his eldest son in particular will be exacerbated upon any return to Pakistan. 'Expecting the eldest child to accompany the appellant to Pakistan would have a profoundly detrimental impact on his mental health. 'With the eldest child's needs, I do not consider that a move to Pakistan for him would just be merely uncomfortable, inconvenient, undesirable or just difficult. Rather, I am satisfied that, for him, such a move would be unjustifiably severe and would meet the threshold of 'unduly harsh'.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The photo that fooled thousands: How sports star faked having cancer by sticking iPhone wire up his NOSE to con wellwishers
One of Ireland's most renowned sports stars has pleaded guilty to pretending to have cancer to induce people to give him money - and it all centres on a photograph that fooled thousands. DJ Carey, who is widely recognised as one of the greatest hurlers of all time, pleaded guilty to 10 counts at the Circuit Court in Dublin's Criminal Courts of Justice on Wednesday. Billionaire Denis O'Brien is among the several people the ex-Kilkenny sportsman induced to pay him money by fraudulently claiming he needed to fund cancer treatment. Carey, 54, is one of the most acclaimed figures in GAA history, having won five All-Ireland titles and nine All-Star awards. When he retired from inter-county hurling in 2006, he was hailed as an 'idol' for young players and a legend of the game. Since his guilty plea, a photograph of the former star has resurfaced on social media, appearing to show him lying in a hospital bed. The image, thought to have been sent to his victims, shows Carey with 'tubes' up his nose - which, on closer inspection, seems to be an iPhone cable taped to his face. Carey was said to have induced his victims to make a monetary payment to him between 2014 and 2022 after fraudulently claiming to have cancer and saying he needed finances to obtain treatment. In relation to Mr O'Brien, he was charged with inducing him to make a payment to him between January 2014 and late 2022. The court heard from Carey's defence team that while cancer was referred to in the indictment, Carey 'does have very genuine health conditions' and required surgery for a heart condition last year. The court heard he needs to attend check-ups periodically and that evidence from his surgeons can be provided. The plea is a remarkable fall from grace from Carey - who enjoyed a celebrity-esque status after retiring from hurling in 2006. In a senior inter-county career that lasted for 15 years, he won five All-Ireland medals and his tally of 34 goals and 195 points from 57 championship games marks him out as one of the top scorers in the history of the game. In a recent episode of the Crime World podcast, he was described as the 'Maradona [referring to footballer Diego Maradona] of hurling' - one of Ireland's native Gaelic games played outside with a stick (hurley) and ball (sliotar). But his history of financial struggle has been well documented as Allied Irish Banks secured an initial debt repayment court order for about £7.3million in May 2011. Carey settled his debt with AIB in 2018 in a settlement that reduced his debt of over €9.5 million to €60,000 - just 0.63 per cent of the amount originally owed. In 2015, speaking on RTE's Ray D'Arcy radio show, Carey said: 'I am not one of those who would say 'I don't care' about repaying debt.' 'You borrow money, it should be paid back,' he said, adding that 'to whatever extent that can be, I would still be conscious it has to be done'. Carey's family members are also well-known in the world of Irish sport. His sister, Catriona, was a member of the Ireland women's field hockey team and the Kilkenny senior camogie team. Meanwhile his brother Martin was also a member of the Kilkenny hurling panel as the substitute goalkeeper. Carey had appeared in court in late 2023 charged with 21 counts under the Theft and Fraud Offences Act, at which point a four-week trial was expected to take place this year. On Wednesday, he arrived at criminal courts of justice where he was due to stand trial on deception charges at the Dublin circuit criminal court. Instead, prosecuting counsel Dominic McGinn told the court that a jury would not be required as Mr Carey would be entering guilty pleas. A sentencing date has been set for Wednesday October 29 and Carey was remanded on bail until then. Shockingly, Carey is not the only cancer faker, a fraudster who lies about having the illness to scam funds from concerned well-wishers, to have come from famous origin. In cases that have caused shock and outrage around the world, the con artists with public platforms have later been exposed for lying about having the sickness. One of the most renowned cases includes influencer Belle Gibson, who rose to prominence in 2012 as a self-proclaimed health guru who had 'cured' her own brain cancer through healthy eating, clean living and 'positive thinking'. Within a year, her inspirational Instagram account @healing_belle had amassed thousands of followers, many of them hopeful cancer sufferers, who would go on to download her wellness app, The Whole Pantry, and buy her cookbook of the same name. Throughout it all, Gibson claimed her earnings – reportedly more than $1 million - would be donated to various cancer charities. But there was one big problem: Gibson never had cancer, and eventually her empire came crashing down after two Australian journalists discovered she had been lying about it all – not just her disease but her philanthropy, too. Despite the con, Gibson never faced any jail time. After a drawn-out and dramatic case against the Federal Court of Australia, she was ordered by the court in 2017 to pay AU$410,000 (US$257,000) for her false claims of charitable donations. Her story was dramatised in Netflix show Apple Cider Vinegar earlier this year. Combined with her legal fees, she must cough up about half a million dollars (US$313,000). It's been almost a decade since then and she hasn't paid the fine.
