5 ChatGPT Mistakes That Are Keeping You Broke
One in eight people on earth use ChatGPT, but many are still using it ineffectively
ChatGPT crossed over one billion users within a two and a half years since its launch. It's permeated thousands of workplaces worldwide and has been the catalyst to set off the AI revolution.
But even though one in eight of the global population are using this generative AI tool, there are still many professionals who are not utilizing it the way it should be.
Incorporating AI into your workflow or using it to help you make money as a freelancer is not as simple as plug-and-play and hope for the best. You need to be strategic and ensure that you're avoiding making the common mistakes that others are falling into, so that you stand out in an AI-ridden job market.
In this article, we'll explore a few common mistakes that both employed professionals and freelancers make when using ChatGPT, and how to fix them easily.
The 5 Biggest Mistakes ChatGPT Users Make
No doubt you've heard, 'Generative AI will replace your job,' or 'ChatGPT will make you money.' And while both statements are true to a great extent, here's the part you need to know even more importantly:
Here are the mistakes you're likely already repeating every day you use ChatGPT, plus how to remedy them:
If you use AI outputs to write your content for you, you have a big problem.
Here's what you should do instead:
Let AI assist you in outlining, brainstorming, researching, and grammar-checking. Even use it to give you ideas to spruce up your existing content. But never copy-paste ChatGPT word-for-word and pass it off as your own.
Also, don't forget to incorporate personal stories and insight into your content. This makes you more relatable, and more trust, connections, and rapport, leads to more partnerships, clients, and job opportunities. People are the currency of business after all.
There's nothing wrong in using AI to write your resume, but you must know where your limits are. After all, only you can sell your story honestly.
ResumeNow's recent Hiring Trends survey of more than 900 professionals noted that most recruiters and talent managers are cautious about candidates using AI to create their resumes, noting that their should be regulations in place or this can cost them their jobs.
'Workers using AI to write applications should do so thoughtfully,' ResumeNow suggests. "While AI can help with formatting and phrasing, employers still expect authenticity and personalization. An AI-generated skills section should only include skills that the candidate actually has.
'Job seekers should review and edit AI-generated content to ensure it accurately reflects their experience, avoids exaggeration, and includes specific, human details that demonstrate genuine interest in the role,' the report advises, before adding: 'Using AI to apply for jobs is efficient, but it must be done with care.'
Stop using AI as a replacement for your own critical thinking skills. While it helps to have a second pair of eyes or an assistant, a fresh MIT study revealed some insight into the fact that repetitively using tools like ChatGPT could potentially negatively impact your critical reasoning skills.
So it's essential to allow your expertise to lead the way and allow AI to guide you along the process.
Do this instead:
Every now and then, practice stepping away and performing cognitive functions without using AI.
This helps you in situations like a live negotiation, when you're in a meeting or confronted with a situation that doesn't permit you the time to 'check with ChatGPT.' In times like these, this skill set becomes invaluable and a direct precursor to financial and career success.
This shouldn't need to be said but it must be said: stop sending bots into emails and DMs. How would you like it if you received a generic, robotic outreach email or LinkedIn InMail? Cold pitching is already something that puts people's backs up initially, so why make it harder for yourself and place any roadblock in the way?
Instead, try this:
Use ChatGPT to write the template and research the individual you're reaching out to, then personalize your outreach.
Never build your entire freelance business model off AI. It's not worth it. You'll look fake in the end and it will seriously hurt your profits.
Instead, focus on:
ChatGPT can certainly boost your salary and your income, but you've got to know how to wield this tool ethically, learn the guardrails, and balance with your personal expertise. After all, whether you're freelancing or employed in a traditional job sense, that's why they hired you.
Every now and then, exercise your brain and practice independent thinking outside of AI
FAQs
How do I avoid ChatGPT and Gen AI making me sound fake and robotic?
Audit your AI usage, and focus on defining your personal voice and let that shine through. Rewrite in your words, edit the output, and use the AI results as a rough outline. Most importantly, blend your unique insights and stories.
Is prompt engineering a high-income skill?
Yes it is, but you can only build a high income by combining your prompting skills with your own expertise and domain knowledge, to produce the highest quality results.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How To Raise My Credit Score Fast: Here's What It Said
Your credit score feels like one of those mysterious numbers that controls your financial life, but you might not know anything about improving it quickly. Can you actually boost your score in weeks instead of years? I decided to ask ChatGPT for the fastest ways to raise a credit score, and the AI delivered some surprisingly actionable advice. Find Out: I Read Next: Here's what ChatGPT told me about raising my credit score fast (and why some of its suggestions are better than others). First, the good news. ChatGPT gave me several strategies that financial experts actually recommend: Pay down credit card balances: The AI called this the 'biggest impact' move, and it's absolutely right. Your credit utilization ratio, aka how much you owe compared to your credit limits, makes up about 30% of your credit score. Ask for credit limit increases: ChatGPT explained this smartly. 'If your limit goes up but your balance stays the same, your utilization drops.' Simple math that works. Fix errors on your credit report: The AI recommended checking all three credit bureaus for mistakes, which can genuinely boost your score overnight if you find and dispute errors. Pay everything on time: ChatGPT warned that 'even one late payment can hurt your score by 90+ points.' That's not an exaggeration because payment history is 35% of your score. So far, the advice was solid and actionable. Learn More: Here's where ChatGPT surprised me with a smart but limited suggestion: becoming an authorized user on someone else's well-managed credit card. The AI explained that if someone with good credit adds you to their account, 'that info may show up on your report and boost your score.' This can work, but ChatGPT should have been clearer about the downsides. You're basically piggybacking on someone else's credit responsibility. If they mess up, it hurts your score too. Plus, not all lenders give full credit to authorized user accounts when you apply for loans later. This strategy can work for a quick boost, but it's not building your own credit foundation. ChatGPT mentioned Experian Boost as a way to get 'instant' credit score improvements by adding utility and phone payments to your credit file. While this is a real tool that's free to use, the AI made it sound more powerful than it actually is. Experian Boost only affects your Experian credit score, meaning it doesn't affect the scores from Equifax or TransUnion. Many lenders don't even use the boosted version of your Experian score. So, while you might see a number go up, it might not help you get approved for that car loan or credit card you actually want. The AI should have been more upfront about these limitations instead of presenting it as a quick win. The biggest issue with ChatGPT's advice was setting realistic expectations. The AI promised results 'within a few weeks to a few months,' but that's only true if you're starting from a decent credit foundation. If your credit score is really damaged — say, below 600 — these strategies will help, but it's going to take longer than a few months to see dramatic improvements. Major negative marks like bankruptcies or foreclosures can stay on your report for years. ChatGPT also didn't mention that some positive changes, like increasing your credit history length, literally cannot be rushed. Time is the only solution there. Here's where ChatGPT gave genuinely useful specific advice: Keep your credit utilization below 30%, ideally under 10%. But the AI also shared a pro tip that many people don't know: 'Make a payment before your statement closes, not just before it's due.' This timing hack can make a real difference. Most credit cards report your balance to credit bureaus when your statement closes, not when your payment is due. So even if you pay your full balance every month, you might still show high utilization if you pay after the statement date. This is the kind of specific, actionable advice that can actually move your score quickly. ChatGPT's credit score advice was mostly solid, practical and based on how credit scoring actually works. The AI correctly identified the fastest-moving factors: utilization, payment history and fixing errors. The biggest takeaways you should remember included paying down those credit card balances, never missing payments and checking your credit reports for mistakes you can dispute. Was it as comprehensive as talking to a credit counselor? Probably not. But for free advice that took two minutes to get, ChatGPT gave me a legitimate roadmap for improving my credit score. More From GOBankingRates 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How To Raise My Credit Score Fast: Here's What It Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Which Cryptocurrency Is More Likely to Be a Millionaire Maker? XRP vs. Shiba Inu
It's tempting to pile all your money into investments that claim to offer huge returns. The ones that don't make those claims tend to be the better bets. XRP and Shiba Inu embody this clash very precisely. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Most investors know the lure of a lottery ticket. In crypto, that ticket often takes the form of a meme coin promising overnight riches -- and, in very rare cases, buying the ticket does pay off. Yet wealth is far more commonly built the unglamorous way, not in a single moonshot, and more than one investor has lost it all betting on a speculative asset when a less flashy one held for the long term would have made them much richer. With global liquidity thawing and a fresh crop of crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) inching toward approval, chatter about millionaire makers is back. Two fan favorites are quite popular in the conversation: XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), a utility fintech coin aimed at capturing institutional money flows, and Shiba Inu (CRYPTO: SHIB), a meme coin powered almost entirely by vibes. Let's dig in and determine which of the two is more likely to make investors a lot wealthier. One of XRP's biggest assets in the matchup against Shiba Inu is that its issuer, Ripple, is actively developing the XRP Ledger (XRPL) to appeal to a specific group of institutional investors. Ripple's ledger is built for banks, currency exchange houses, and those seeking payment rails. In April, Ripple agreed to buy prime broker Hidden Road for $1.2 billion, bringing with it a client base that clears roughly $3 trillion in trades each year into XRP's orbit. Now, Hidden Road's volume will be cleared in the back end using the coin, which supports its price by increasing demand. Furthermore, offering institutional plumbing matters because it turns a token from a speculative chip into working capital. Momentum is building on the market-access side, too. Cash-settled XRP futures trading just launched in May, pulling in $19 million on day one. Analysts now assign roughly 90% odds of an XRP ETF getting the green light within months, which could only happen if futures trading were proceeding smoothly. The current set of macro conditions will also help buoy XRP's price. Central banks from Europe to Canada have recently pivoted to cutting interest rates, reducing the cost of borrowing money, and the Federal Reserve in the U.S. is widely expected to cut rates before the end of 2025, turning liquidity from headwind to tailwind for risk assets like XRP. Could these factors drive up XRP 100-fold and mint millionaires overnight? Probably not. That would require a $12.9 trillion market cap --from $126 billion today -- which is not happening anytime soon. But a realistic scenario of steady regulatory wins, ETF inflows (assuming the ETFs get approved), and continued banking adoption could still deliver a respectable and consistent return over the next decade. Shiba Inu's elevator pitch is simple. What if there were a coin that could repeat Dogecoin's magic, but with trillions more tokens, and a mascot dripping with internet culture? Well, that coin might just go to the moon -- or so buyers are perpetually hoping. To mint a single new millionaire from a very large $10,000 stake, this coin must climb 100-fold, lifting its valuation to roughly $680 billion from about $6.8 billion today, which is to say it would need to be a bit bigger than some of the world's largest companies creating real value every day, like Visa, which has a market cap of $678 billion. Defenders point to Shiba Inu's aggressive token burning program. In mid-June, there were 116 million tokens burned, which sounds like a lot. But 116 million is 0.00002% of the supply, which means it's mathematically irrelevant to the coin's float of 589.2 trillion tokens. Meanwhile, every macro catalyst that might lift Shiba Inu will also lift higher-quality assets. Investors chasing meme coins for the liquidity wave argument ignore that the same flood of easy money can flow into XRP as well, which has dramatically stronger fundamentals and thus more staying power. The bottom line here is that Shiba Inu is unlikely to make you a millionaire unless you already put down near-millionaire money or catch an unpredictable, sentiment-driven spike and exit before gravity returns -- and you almost certainly won't. For most long-term investors, that is neither a strategy nor a plan. In closing, XRP may not deliver a fairy-tale 100-fold gain, but at least it has a road map to justify calculated optimism and long-term holding. Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Alex Carchidi has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Visa and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Which Cryptocurrency Is More Likely to Be a Millionaire Maker? XRP vs. Shiba Inu was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
I turned off all AI features on my Pixel phone — and instantly regretted it
Robert Triggs / Android Authority I had this realization — epiphany of sorts — that while we've become more conscious of generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini, we often use AI much more than we actively perceive. Every app you touch on your phone has some kind of smarts and automation baked in. It's constantly learning from your patterns and improving in the background. That nudged me to experiment with becoming more intentional about these AI additions and disable them for a cleaner look and feel. No smart suggestions I mindlessly use, no Assistant to speak to, and no on-device smarts. All turned off. I enthusiastically planned to do this for a week, but I soon realized I was being too optimistic. What sounded like a solid digital detox plan turned into a quiet reckoning: my phone is a well-oiled system with subtle automations I don't think I can live without anymore. How smart do you like your smartphone to be? 0 votes I like my phone as basic as possible NaN % I like to balance — smart where needed NaN % Give me all the AI, everywhere NaN % This is the most digitally impaired I've felt Andy Walker / Android Authority I imagined turning off smart features across all my main apps would feel like going back to the good-old Nokia bar phone days. Nostalgia made that seem enticing — something I thought I'd actually want — but practically, it was far from rosy. The most frustrated I got during my time off AI was with Gboard. Without swipe typing, predictive text, and autocorrect — the very features we all love to meme about — my entire phone felt broken. The number and variety of misspellings I could come up with made me question my self-worth as a writer. And fixing each one of them made me a painfully slow typist. Group chats would often move on from a topic by the time I'd finished typing my take — total Internet Explorer–style late blooming. In Google Photos, edits became much more manual. While I enjoy playing with contrast and tone and whatnot myself, I really missed the one-tap fixes that helped with lighting and gave me a quick, clean version to share on Instagram or at least build on. More importantly, I couldn't use any of the smart editing features you get a Pixel for — Magic Editor, Photo Unblur, Best Take. Without them, it was like going back to the cave days of modern tech (2010, I mean). Ryan Haines / Android Authority Oh, and I had to completely disable Gemini/Google Assistant. I honestly felt like Joaquin Phoenix in Her, sorely missing his AI companion. I couldn't ask it to control smart home devices or help with Android Auto — everything became manual. I had to now type out my reminders, and changing music in the car turned into a dangerously distracting chore. That's when I noticed how often I absentmindedly said 'Ok Google' while walking around the house. I guess we've all been in the Her era all along without even realizing it. Quality Inferiority of life Andy Walker / Android Authority Beyond the big-ticket features I lost, I found myself stumbling without all the little ones, too. Without Pixel's Live Captions, I couldn't watch videos in noisy places and ended up saving them for later — not to consume more intentionally, but out of frustration. Gmail and Google Messages no longer suggested quick replies or helped finish my sentences. I had to type out full messages and emails like it was 2015. I noticed how often I absentmindedly said 'Ok Google' while walking around the house. I guess we've all been in the Her era all along without even noticing it. Maps stopped telling me when to leave home based on traffic, and it didn't remember my parking spot either. Once, I forgot where I'd parked because I didn't save the location manually. Google Photos stopped resurfacing old memories during the day — no surprise moments with friends, family, or random mountain dogs I clicked a decade ago. Not getting to see dog photos randomly is the lowest kind of inferiority in life. The good side of un-intelligification Ryan Whitwam / Android Authority Besides sparing me time to coin my own words, the lack of AI on my phone did help in a few ways. You must've already guessed the first one — battery life benefits. I couldn't track it rigorously since I had limited time with this setup, but the gains were in the 10–15% range, which was noticeably better than usual. More importantly, the phone just felt quieter. No unnecessary alerts, no screen lighting up every half hour with nudges I didn't need. It felt more analog — like a tool I controlled, not something that subconsciously controlled me. I picked it up when I needed to, not because I was tempted to see what was waiting for me. But was it enough to keep me on this routine? You already know the answer to this, too. I want all the AI magic back — right now Stephen Schenck / Android Authority That was me last weekend, soon after I started the experiment. The lack of AI smarts was annoying at first, then it got frustrating enough to slow down my regular day. Simple things took twice the time, especially without Gboard's assistive typing. And that's when it hit me that AI isn't just Gemini or the ChatGPT app. It's ambient. It works in the background, often silently, making tiny decisions and smoothing over rough edges without drawing attention to itself. Quiet enough to fade in the background — until you turn it all off. AI is ambient. It works in the background, often silently, making tiny decisions and smoothing over rough edges without drawing attention to itself. Hopefully, this little try-out gives you a good idea of why it's not worth trying for yourself. Convenience is the point of AI, and I'm all for it. Like I said, I lasted far fewer days than I'd planned. I remembered the exact sequence in which I turned everything off and flicked it all back on just as quickly. I want Photos to clean up distracting objects in my shots. I want the Assistant to find my playlist while I'm driving. And I absolutely cannot live without Gboard's smarts. So yes, I'm back to using my smart-phone the way it was meant to be — smartly.
