Impact of US tariffs varies across European Union
France is less exposed, even if it does have aeronautics, food, wine and luxury goods companies that risk losing markets.
The EU as a whole has an annual trade surplus with the United States of $235.6 billion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), which reports to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Only China has a higher amount.
Germany, the industrial powerhouse
Germany, the EU's largest economy, is under particular pressure due to its dependence on exports: it has a surplus of $84.8 billion with the United States, thanks to its large automobile, chemical, steel and machine industries.
The United States accounts for 23 percent of the revenue of Mercedes Benz. While some of that is accounted for by SUVs manufactured in the United States and exported, they risk being hit by any tariff reprisals from the EU.
The Federation of German Industries (BDI) reacted promptly to Donald Trump's announcements on Saturday, calling on the EU and the United States to "quickly find solutions and to avoid an escalation".
READ ALSO:
German chancellor 'cautiously optimistic' on EU-US tariff deal
Advertisement
Italy, France in the second line
Italy and France, with surpluses of $44 billion and $16.4 billion respectively, according to US statistics (French data says the surplus is much smaller), would appear to be less affected. But some sectors are heavily exposed.
The food and wine industries would be particularly affected in both countries, as is also the case for Spain.
A 30-percent tariff would be a "catastrophe" for the French wine and spirits sector, Jerome Despey, head of the viticulture branch of the FNSEA union, said Saturday.
Coldiretti, Italy's main agricultural organisation, said Saturday that tariffs of 30 percent would cost US consumers and Italian food producers some $2.3 billion.
Like Germany, Italy is also concerned about its automotive sector. Franco-Italian manufacturer Stellantis (particularly Fiat and Peugeot) has suspended its forecasts for the year due to these uncertainties.
Exposed French sectors also include aeronautics and luxury goods. LVMH, the world's largest luxury conglomerate, makes a quarter of its sales in the United States.
About a fifth of France's exports to the United States come from the aerospace industry, much of it from Airbus.
Austria and Sweden also have surpluses with the United States, $13.1 billion and $9.8 billion respectively.
Advertisement
Ireland, Europe's lab
Ireland has the largest surplus among EU members, at $86.7 billion.
That is largely due to the presence of major American pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. They all set up in Ireland to benefit from a 15 percent corporate tax, compared to 21 percent in the United States.
These companies can thus host their patents in Ireland and sell on the American market, where drug prices are traditionally higher than in the rest of the world.
Ireland also hosts most of the European headquarters of American tech giants, such as Apple, Google and Meta, also attracted by the attractive Irish tax system.
Overall, pharmaceuticals account for 22.5 percent of EU exports to the United States, according to Eurostat, with many major players having announced major investments in the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Institutional Investment Strategies & Regulatory Clarity Driving Crypto Bull Run
In 2024, cryptocurrencies once again entered a bull market. However, unlike the crypto bull markets of 2017 and 2021, when both Bitcoin as well as Altcoins like Ethereum, experienced rapid price appreciation, this time it seems as though Bitcoin is the main beneficiary of renewed bullish sentiment. Cryptocurrency prices can be found on Binance . Take a look at price performance over the past year, and one can see that, while Bitcoin is up by 71.9% over the past twelve months, Ethereum has fallen by around 26.3% . Other major Altcoins, like BNB, Binance's native token have gained since last year, but these gains have trailed that of BTC. This is not surprising. A key driver of this latest crypto bull run has been institutional adoption of Bitcoin. First, in early 2024, the SEC approved the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. With a compliance-friendly vehicle for crypto ownership coming online, institutional investors cycled significant capital into these funds. By year's end, the value of all U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs totaled $104.1 billion , with $27.4 billion of this figure representing investment from institutions with assets under management exceeding $100 million. Then, the election of Donald Trump to a second term as U.S. President spurred another bullish wave, as market participants anticipated his new administration would fast-track regulatory clarity in the United States. So far, confidence in U.S. regulatory clarity has increased, as policymakers on both sides of the aisle finalize a clear and comprehensive crypto regulatory framework . Now, as the latest bull wave calms down, the questions now are whether a new bull wave will emerge, when regulatory clarity becomes reality, and whether major Altcoins, not just Bitcoin, will benefit in terms of price appreciation. For further insight into these questions, let's take a look at a recent interview with a crypto industry leader. 2024-2025 Crypto Bull Run: Driven by Institutional Allocation to Bitcoin Back in 2017, the cryptocurrency bull run was driven in large part by speculation in initial coin offerings (ICOs). During the 2021 bull run, a major factor at play was the rapid rise in popularity of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The 2024-2025 crypto bull run, however, has been differentiated by both its outsized focus on Bitcoin, and the outsized participation of institutional investors rather than crypto whales and a critical mass of retail traders. Earlier this month, Catherine Chen, Head of VIP and Institutional at Binance, sat down with Behind Binance host Jessica Walker, to discuss the dynamics of the latest crypto bull run , and what it means for crypto prices moving forward. According to Chen, institutional interest in crypto has been steadily growing, with last year's debut of spot cryptocurrency ETFs serving as a "pivotal moment" for institutional adoption. As Chen explained, "at the very minimum all of these institutional investor(s) has a fiduciary duty to at least take a proper look at this asset class and thanks to the introduction of ETF this asset class has also been given the much needed legitimacy." That said, Chen also argues that different types of institutional investors are moving into crypto at differing paces, with larger, more conservative institutional investors still largely sitting on the sidelines. Per Chen, "regulatory clarity" remains the key hurdle. Certain institutional investors, like insurance companies and pension funds, need well-refined regulations in order to move forward with direct crypto investments. What This Means for Bitcoin and Altcoin Prices Although the aforementioned interview focused primarily on institutional adoption, one can infer from this interview what recent institutional adoption trends could mean for both Bitcoin and Altcoin prices moving forward. Based on Chen's insights on regulatory clarity, it's clear that, once the U.S. and other major jurisdictions finalize and implement their cryptocurrency regulatory regimes, this could spur an even greater inflow of capital into this asset class. At first, as seen recently, this may simply mean a further bull run in which Bitcoin continues to experience outsized price appreciation relative to major Altcoins like ETH and BNB. However, in time, this could translate into a more significant bull run for Altcoins as well. Once institutional investors complete their initial allocation to Bitcoin, allocation to ETH and other major Altcoins could pick up as well, especially as new spot Altcoin ETFs make it to market. In short, given the large role institutional investors have played in this latest bull run, it is not surprising that the situation has played out far differently than the above-mentioned 2017 and 2021 bull runs. The Takeaway for Retail Investors With Bitcoin price plateauing, after extended rallies from October 2024 to January 2025, then from April 2025 through May 2025, it may at first seem like this latest bull run is coming to an end. However, per another crypto market expert, HashKey Capital's Xu Han, "the crypto cycle is still in a growth phase." Furthermore, per Han, there is another potential catalyst that could extend the current bull run. That would be the anticipated shift from hawkish to dovish monetary policy by the U.S. Federal Reserve. In other words, if the Feds continue to lower rates, as well as complete its wind-down of institutional tightening, the resultant liquidity boost could be a boon for crypto prices, given historical trends. Retail investors should keep all of this mind, when deciding whether to go bullish or bearish in the current market environment.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
EU backs Trump Ukraine U-Turn but wants US to 'share burden' – DW – 07/15/2025
The European bloc welcomed a shift in US rhetoric on Ukraine but pressed Washington to chip in. The EU, however, failed to agree on a new round of sanctions on Russia. The European Union's foreign affairs chief may be having something of an "I told you so" moment as US President Donald Trump reverses his past praise of Vladimir Putin and vows to ramp up pressure on Moscow. "We see from the United States that they have also realized that Russia does not really want peace," Kaja Kallas told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday. The former Estonian prime minister made a name for herself as one of Ukraine's staunchest political backers, and warned at this week's EU talks that Russia's bombing campaign had "reached record levels." Kallas and many of her EU counterparts welcomed Washington's shift in rhetoric as they filed into a meeting. "What we experienced yesterday with the new messages from Trump was very, very important," Denmark's Lars Lokke Rasmussen said. But some of the EU's top brass also had notes for the US on its latest announcements, including Washington's threat to slap 100% secondary tariffs on Russia and countries that trade with it unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached by early September. "The 50 days that Mr. Trump has announced is rather long," Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp said on the sidelines of Tuesday's talks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump also made headlines Monday with an announcement that he'd be greenlighting sales of Patriot air defense systems and other arms to European countries to send on to Ukraine, just two weeks after Washington paused some arms shipments to Kyiv. The new plan should speed up and expand deliveries of US arms which Ukraine says it needs as it faces increased Russian aerial attacks. Some European countries have already been buying and sending US-made weapons to Kyiv, though the latest scheme could offer more certainty on the permissions needed to swiftly transfer the arms. A US commitment to sell replacements for American-made weapons sent to Ukraine could also encourage European states to ship more of their own military supplies. NATO chief Mark Rutte said the deal would "work through NATO systems" and that European countries including Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands were all interested in taking part. But the US is yet to disclose more details of its new scheme and DW understands the technicalities of exactly how it will work are still being discussed. Trump was, however, quick to cast the new deal as a lucrative business opportunity for the US, stressing Europe would foot the bill. And that seems to be raising some eyebrows among his counterparts across the Atlantic. The EU's Kallas told reporters after Tuesday's meeting that she would like to see Europe and the US "share the burden" of arming Ukraine. "If we pay for these weapons, it's our support — so it's European support — and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine. And therefore the call is that everybody would do the same," she said. "If you promise to give the weapons then say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?" Kallas added. Denmark's Rasmussen made a similarly veiled allusion. "We are providing a lot of funding for Ukraine to buy whatever weapons and ammunition they need … But I mean, I would very much like to see all our partners actually also contributing if we want this war to stop," he said. While the US ranks as Ukraine's single largest donor since its full-scale invasion by Russia, the European Union as a whole has spent roughly the same amount as Washington over the same period, according to data from the Kiel Institute cited by Radio Free Europe. The EU outspends the US when the cost of hosting and assisting Ukrainian refugees is factored in. EU states may be breathing a sigh of relief after the US policy shift, but policy analyst Torrey Taussig says it's too soon to judge whether Trump's stance has changed for good. "There has been a seesaw approach to this relationship throughout the last several months of this administration, and I wouldn't be surprised if this relationship, the US-Ukrainian relationship, still has more turns that it can take," the former US government official turned Atlantic Council fellow told DW. "I'm very reluctant to call this a strategic shift in the US-Ukrainian relationship," she added, though added that the two sides' ties now seem far more "positive." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video With European countries racing to boost their own defenses amid pressure from the US and a broader rethink of the EU's geopolitical fragility, governments have been debating how much of a planned military spending splurge should go to US weapons. Arms purchases, especially those involving large weapons systems, tend to lock the buyer into a years-long relationship with the seller, from production to delivery to future repairs. Experts say ending Europe's dependency on the American-made weapons, logistics and intelligence capacities it lacks could take at least a decade — and with US foreign policy proving unpredictable, that leaves some worried. EU heavyweight France has pushed for more European-only purchases, frustrating some other states which argued this only serves to slow down the process of getting weapons into European and Ukrainian hands. The latest US-led plan may be seen by some as a blow to France's efforts, with the potential for more European money to flow toward US arms manufacturers. As Europe nudges the US to do more to support Ukraine and punish Russia, the bloc's own efforts are faltering. Kallas said she was "really sad" that ministers failed to adopt an 18th round of EU sanctions on Moscow on Tuesday due to a holdout by Slovakia. The landlocked central European state has been protesting planned EU laws to ban all sales of Russian gas, and Prime Minister Roberto Fico said in an online post on Tuesday that Slovakia had asked the EU to postpone the vote on sanctions while his government mulled its response to an exchange with the EU's executive aimed at ending the stalemate. Kallas said she was "optimistic" an agreement could be struck among EU states in the coming days.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Admin to Destroy Enough Emergency Food to Feed Every Child in Gaza for a Week Due to DOGE Dismantling USAID
The Trump administration is set to destroy enough emergency food to feed every child in Gaza for a week due to the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) dismantling of USAID. Several hundred metric tons of emergency food, including high-energy biscuits intended for children under 5, are set to expire in a matter of days after being held for months without being distributed, two sources told The Atlantic . After DOGE dismantled USAID earlier this year, the agency was taken over by the State Department. Under new leadership, any food, money or aid needed direct approval to be handed out. Multiple sources told the outlet that they asked for approval to move the food, but never heard back from officials. An order to destroy the food was sent out in May, just before Secretary of State Marco Rubio told members of Congress that he would see to it that the food gets delivered. An estimated 1.5 million hungry children could have been fed by the nearly 500 metric tons of food for a week, leading critics to review who could have received the much-needed food, such as famine-facing countries like Sudan. In Gaza, about 500,000 people are currently facing starvation, according to the United Nations . A Food Security Phase Classification report from May stated that 71,000 children under the age of 5 are facing acute malnutrition. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed over the last six weeks while trying to obtain humanitarian aid at aid distribution centers in Gaza, according to the UN. Israeli forces killed at least 31 people on Saturday alone while attempting to access aid from a US-backed food distribution site. The food aid had originally been intended for Afghanistan and Pakistan, however the State Department ended aid to Afghanistan and Yemen over concerns that it would fall into the hands of terrorists, NPR reported in April. Worries about accidentally aiding terrorists were not included in the reason for ending Pakistan's aid. Originally published on Latin Times
