How Microsoft's rift with OpenAI is making this a mandatory part of Microsoft's work culture
Microsoft
's deteriorating relationship with OpenAI is forcing the tech giant to make AI usage mandatory for employees, as competitive pressures from the partnership dispute drive workplace culture changes at the company.
Lagging Copilot usage drives cultural shift at Microsoft
"AI is no longer optional," Julia Liuson, president of Microsoft's Developer Division, told managers in a recent email obtained by Business Insider. She instructed them to evaluate employee performance based on internal AI tool usage, calling it "core to every role and every level."
The mandate comes as Microsoft faces lagging internal adoption of its
Copilot AI services
while competition intensifies in the AI coding market. GitHub Copilot, Microsoft's flagship AI coding assistant, is losing ground to rivals like Cursor, which recent Barclays data suggests has surpassed Copilot in key developer segments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute
Navy Quest
Undo
OpenAI partnership tensions spill over into workplace policies
The partnership tensions have reached a critical point where OpenAI is considering acquiring Windsurf, a competitor to Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, but Microsoft's existing deal would grant it access to Windsurf's intellectual property, creating an impasse that neither OpenAI nor Windsurf wants, sources familiar with the talks told Business Insider.
Microsoft allows employees to use some external AI tools that meet security requirements, including coding assistant Replit. However, the company wants workers building AI products to better understand their own tools while driving broader internal usage.
Some Microsoft teams are considering adding formal AI usage metrics to performance reviews for the next fiscal year, Business Insider learned from people familiar with the plans. The initiative reflects Microsoft's broader strategy to ensure its workforce embraces AI tools as competition heats up.
Liuson emphasized that AI usage "should be part of your holistic reflections on an individual's performance and impact," treating it like other core workplace skills such as collaboration and data-driven thinking. The move signals how AI adoption has become essential to Microsoft's competitive positioning amid evolving partnerships and market pressures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
The stock-market rally is moving beyond Big Tech and investors are thrilled
The summer stock rally is broadening beyond big tech. Megacap technology stocks such as Nvidia, Microsoft and Broadcom led the market's rapid, tariff-spurred selloff earlier this year, only to rebound just as quickly a few weeks later when trade fears eased. Now, with economic fears diminished and optimism growing that the Trump administration will take a milder stance on trade, the recovery has expanded to include stocks across a more diverse group of sectors, such as financials, industrials and utilities. The number of stocks in the benchmark S&P 500 closing above their 50-day moving average has climbed recently to levels last seen in the fall, before Donald Trump's election victory launched an end-of-year rally. And in another sign of breadth, a measure that tracks the number of stocks rising versus those declining notched a new high on Friday. While the so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks still hold investors' attention—and sway over the market—a broader participation in the recovery has helped propel the Nasdaq composite and the S&P 500 to all-time-highs in June. It could also signal that stocks will keep climbing through the summer, analysts say. 'We've seen this before: big tech leads and the market follows," said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial. 'It seems like we are dusting off that playbook." Wall Street generally views improving breadth as a signal of a healthy stock market and a sustained advance. Whether the trend continues will depend on a few uncertainties still looming in the second half of the year: potential conflict in the Middle East, the path of interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve and the final outcome of President Trump's tariff plans. 'As long as things can stay stable, then this market is not exhausted by any stretch of the imagination," said Tom Essaye, founder of the Sevens Report, a market analysis firm. Market breadth has improved as investors who missed out on tech stocks' historic rebound search for new opportunities in different industries, Essaye said. He called it the 'FOMO trade," referencing the acronym for 'fear of missing out." Others have made longer-term bets in less popular industries. Jamie Cox, a managing partner at Harris Financial Group in Richmond, Va., didn't increase his proportion of big-tech holdings over the past few months even as prices dipped. But in recent weeks, his strategy—which includes a blend of defense, financial and large-cap international shares—has started to pay off. 'I'm surprised it took this long," he said. 'It's been a long time coming." Cox, who manages $1.2 billion at Harris, said that, in recent months, he has heard from clients looking to diversify the stocks in their portfolios. 'That lends itself to owning different things than just the most effective of the tech stocks," he said, such as shares of defense contractors Lockheed Martin and RTX Corp. 'You buy the less-aggressive, more tried-and-true, boring stocks." The recovery hasn't worked its way through every corner of the market. Small-cap stocks still lag behind major indexes. It might take a significant shift in the outlook to change that, said George Pearkes, macro strategist at Bespoke Investment Group. 'We would have to see a change in risk appetite." Some investors think that a confidence boost could come sooner than expected. Eric Teal, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, said he is adding midcap, small-cap and even microcap companies. He is buying shares of domestic banks that he thinks won't be affected by future tariffs, and said the Fed's rate cut could also boost smaller firms. 'The broadening out that we've seen over the last number of months is not something that's going to be short-lived," Teal said. It is unlikely that the market's biggest tech names will fade into the background soon, analysts said. Optimism for artificial intelligence, which powered tech stocks' ascendance to new highs, is still top-of-mind for professional and individual investors alike. But as tech shares have rebounded, so have valuations: Some large-cap names traded at more than 30 times their expected earnings over the next year last week, compared with an S&P 500 average of about 22 times. Those rich prices could be another nudge for traders to start snapping up shares in different industries, said Brian Buetel, a managing director at UBS Private Wealth Management. 'Nobody disagrees that the Mag Seven are just extremely expensive," he said. 'People forget there are sectors of the market that are on sale—that are cheap." Write to Hannah Erin Lang at and Roshan Fernandez at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Hunt for AI supremacy: Meta poaches more OpenAI researchers as talent war rages on
Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away read more Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta's campaign to lure away some of OpenAI's top researchers appears to be continuing at pace, with several high-profile names reportedly switching sides in what has become one of Silicon Valley's most intense rivalries. After the Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers had left OpenAI for Meta earlier this week, TechCrunch confirmed that Trapit Bansal, an influential figure in OpenAI's research ranks, had also joined the company. Now, The Information has named four more hires from OpenAI: Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi and Hongyu Ren. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The new appointments follow Meta's launch of its Llama 4 AI models in April. The models were met with a mixed response, with some reports suggesting they had not met the expectations of CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The company was also criticised over how it used an earlier version of Llama in a benchmark widely cited in AI performance comparisons. OpenAI, Meta tensions continue Tensions between the two companies have simmered publicly for months. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman previously claimed that Meta was offering '100 million signing bonuses' to tempt his employees away, though he added that 'so far, none of our best people' had accepted. Meta's chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth later addressed the remarks in an internal note, telling staff that while such figures may have been discussed at senior levels, 'the actual terms of the offer' were more complex. The race to secure top-tier talent has become increasingly fierce, as tech giants seek an edge in developing powerful foundation models and generative AI systems. Meta's latest recruitment wave suggests that, while some key OpenAI figures have resisted its advances, the company is steadily building its own cadre of AI researchers in hopes of catching up.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Book Box: How to cope with AI anxiety
Dear Reader, Empire of AI ticks all the boxes. These days, I see AI writing everywhere—on LinkedIn, in text messages from colleagues, and even in substack newsletters. There's something about these polished pieces of prose, glib and formulaic, with their idiosyncratic sentence structures and excessive dashes, that end up depressing me. Many of my writer friends won't touch AI. 'We can write just fine without it,' they say. But I can't stay away. I face my AI anxiety by finding out what this new beast is. As a teacher of management, and as someone who has pivoted careers three times already, I feel compelled to keep up with the times. AI making all writers redundant I sign up for 'Prompt Engineering 101 for Journalists' conducted by the non-profit Knight Centre. It teaches me how to prompt AI to 'red-team' my writing—to critique flaws rather than default to dishing out praise. And to watch out for AI 'hallucinations' like made-up names of books and fake quotations falsely attributed to real people. I stay conflicted: is it okay to use large language models that ride on the backs of writers and artists, that have learned by scraping creative works with no regard for privacy or copyright? And what about the environmental toll—the depredations on water and energy that the data centres inflict, especially in developing countries? I look for my answers in books about AI. Supremacy: AI, ChatGPT and the Race That Will Change the World is a 2024 book by Parmy Olson that won the Financial Times Business Book of the Year. It takes me close to AI stars like Sam Altman of OpenAI and Dennis Hassabis of DeepMind, as well as to the dangers of decision-making being left to a tiny elite. But it leaves me wanting more. A friend recommends The Worlds I See: Curiosity, Exploration, and Discovery at the Dawn of AI, a memoir by Chinese-American scientist Dr. Fei-Fei Li. It begins with an exciting chapter, with Fei-Fei traveling from her West Coast Google office to Washington, D.C., to testify to a US Senate committee on the direction of AI research. For many pages I am enraptured, reading Fei-Fei's family history, how she helped her parents run their dry cleaning store while studying at Princeton and then working at Stanford. Li has been a pioneer in AI image recognition with her ImageNet project, and this makes for fascinating reading. The book veers between scientific excitement, and apprehension at where AI research is going, and confirms my unease over the economic and existential implications of this new technology. Then I discover Empire of AI by Karen Hao. From the very first page, I am highlighting lines, drawn in by Hao's historical analysis of AI research over the years, everything from the 'AI winter' to the dispute between two schools of AI research—the symbolists and the connectionists. Empire of AI ticks all the boxes. It is rich in history and human detail, demystifying core concepts like deep learning and neural networks. Hao gives us the stars like Geoffrey Hinton, Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman—and also the workers, the data labelers and content moderators like Mophat Okinyi, Oskarina Fuentes Anaya, and shows the havoc that AI jobs have brought to their lives, as they are forced to deal with explicit sexual content and violent images and to perform AI training tasks for a pittance. For me, the most moving part is the story of Sam Altman's sister Annie Altman, who turned to sex work, having suffered huge health challenges and trapped in severe financial duress, against Sam's lifestyle featuring multimillion-dollar homes and luxury cars. 'Annie's story also complicates the grand narrative that Sam and other OpenAI executives have painted of AI ushering in a world of abundance. Altman has said that he expects AI to end poverty... And yet, against the reality of the lives of the workers in Kenya, activists in Chile, and Altman's own sister's experience bearing the brunt of all of these problems, those dreams ring hollow', says Hao. I put aside Empire of AI to go back to my day. I know it's ironic and it feels very meta, but after writing this, I ask Deepseek to design a brief depicting a writer dealing with the good and bad sides of AI, and then I use that output to ask Gemini to design the illustrations for me. AI, the perfect productivity tool ? That evening as I walk down towards the market to buy a AI-recommended geyser, I find myself grateful for Karen Hao's book. Because if AI's future is being written by the Altmans and the Musks of the world, excluding large sections of the world, there are things we can do to participate. Reading books like Hao's pushes us to pay attention—to the workers behind the algorithms, to the biases in the data, to the futures we're building one query at a time. Books like these arm us to fight back - to push for policy changes, demand transparency in training data, and support ethical AI movements. So yes, I will use AI. But I'll also keep reading and buying subscriptions to real writers and real news outlets, because the best defence against a dystopian future is to dream of a better one, and then to fight for it. What about you, dear Reader? Do you find AI more anxiety-inducing or enabling? Or a complex mix of both? And can you suggest any other such books on AI that we can add to this vital reading list? (Sonya Dutta Choudhury is a Mumbai-based journalist and the founder of Sonya's Book Box, a bespoke book service. Each week, she brings you specially curated books to give you an immersive understanding of people and places. If you have any reading recommendations or reading dilemmas, write to her at sonyasbookbox@
