Trump claims Israel has agreed to 60-day ceasefire in Gaza
Fresh from helping broker a truce between Israel and Iran after 12 days of fighting, Mr Trump is reportedly pushing for a breakthrough in Gaza where Israel's air and ground assault is about to complete 21 months.
The ceasefire deal, apparently months in the making, will represent a major diplomatic milestone if it comes through. But there is no sign that Hamas is ready to agree to the terms laid down by the US and Israel.
Mr Trump made the announcement days before hosting Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House.
The president has reportedly been ramping up pressure on both Israel and Hamas to finalise a ceasefire and hostage deal.
'My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War,' he said on his Truth Social platform, adding that Qatari and Egyptian officials would deliver the final proposal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better. IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.'
The specific terms that Israel may have agreed to remain unclear.
Mr Trump's announcement came the same day Israeli strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer reportedly met US secretary of state Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
They reportedly discussed a revised ceasefire and hostage exchange proposal put forward by Qatar. According to a senior Israeli official quoted by Axios, Mr Dermer told Mr Witkoff Israel accepted the Qatari plan and was ready to start indirect negotiations with Hamas to finalise the agreement.
The draft agreement proposes a 60-day ceasefire, during which Israel and Hamas will negotiate a permanent end to the war as well as a framework for post-war governance in Gaza.
Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 56,647 people and injured 134,105, according to the Gaza's health ministry, and left almost the entire population of 2.2 million displaced from their homes and on the brink of starvation.
Israel launched the air and ground assault in October 2023 after 1,139 Israelis were killed and 251 taken hostage during a Hamas attack.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Iran nuclear programme set back by up to two years, Pentagon says
The Iranian nuclear programme has been set back by up to two years after strikes by US stealth bombers, a Pentagon spokesman has said. 'We have degraded their programme by one to two years at least — intel assessments inside the [defence] department assess that,' Sean Parnell told journalists, later adding: 'We're thinking probably closer to two years.' American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last month, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles. President Trump has repeatedly maintained that Iran's nuclear programme was 'obliterated' by the strikes, which came after a series of unprecedented Israeli attacks. He dismissed leaked preliminary intelligence suggesting the strikes set the programme back by only a few months.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years'
The Pentagon has collected intelligence material that suggests Iran's nuclear program was set back roughly one to two years as a result of the US strikes on three key facilities last month, the chief spokesperson at the defense department said at a news conference on Wednesday. The spokesperson, Sean Parnell, repeated Donald Trump's claim that Iran's key nuclear sites had been completely destroyed, although he did not offer further details on the origin of the assessments beyond saying it came from inside the defense department. 'We have degraded their program by one to two years,' Parnell said at a news conference held at the Pentagon. 'At least, intel assessments inside the department assess that.' Parnell's description of the strikes marked a more measured estimate than Trump's assertions about the level of destruction. A low-confidence Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report based on early assessments said Iran's program was set back several months. The evolving picture of the severity of the damage to Iran's nuclear program comes as US intelligence agencies have continued to push out new assessments, using materials that suggested the centrifuges at the key Fordow enrichment site were destroyed even if it was unclear whether the facility itself had caved in. Trump advisers have used that material, which include the use of video taken from B-2 bombers to confirm simulation models of shock waves destroying centrifuges and other Israeli intel from outside Fordow, to defend Trump's assertions, two people familiar with the matter said. The extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear program and the fate of the country's stockpile of enriched uranium – which could quickly be turned into a crude nuclear weapon – is important because it could dictate how long the program has been set back. The head of the UN nuclear watchdog said on Sunday that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months. 'They can have in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium,' Rafael Grossi the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said, adding 'Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology … You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have.' The Pentagon's preliminary DIA assessment, which was based on information from little more than 24 hours after the strikes, the Guardian previously reported, found the damage could range from Iran being able to restart the facility with new centrifuges to having to abandon it for future use. The DIA report assessed the program had been pushed back by several months, although that finding was made at the so-called 'low-confidence' level, reflecting the early nature of the assessment and the uncertainty intelligence agencies have with initial conclusions. Trump advisers have pushed back on the DIA report and said privately the destruction of the centrifuges alone meant they had taken out a key component of Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons and meant it delayed the nuclear program by years. Battles over the conclusions of intelligence agencies have been at the center of American foreign policy determinations for decades, from warnings about Iraq's weapons programs that the Bush administration used to justify the 2003 invasion that were later found to be false, to claims that a Chinese lab leak was responsible for Covid. Still, much of the controversy about the US strikes has been generated by Trump's claiming that they 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites, which no intelligence agency has directly repeated because it is not a characterization used in intelligence assessments. Verifying the extent of the damage was made more difficult on Wednesday, after Iran put into effect a new law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. Iran has accused the nuclear watchdog of siding with western countries and providing a justification for Israel's airstrikes. A state department spokesperson called the move 'unacceptable' and said Iran must fully comply with its nuclear non-proliferation treaty obligations, including by providing the IAEA with information on undeclared nuclear material and providing unrestricted access to any newly announced enrichment facility.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
New legal filing details graphic ‘torture and abuse' of Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador prison
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia have detailed the 'severe mistreatment' and 'torture' he experienced during his month-long detention inside a notorious El Salvador prison, in a renewed lawsuit challenging his wrongful removal from the United States. His attorneys say the 29-year-old Salvadoran immigrant was subject to 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' at the facility, where lawyers for President Donald Trump's administration have admitted he was mistakenly sent in March before a weeks-long legal battle to keep him imprisoned there. Abrego Garcia was abruptly returned to the U.S. to face a federal criminal indictment accusing him of smuggling undocumented migrants across the country, allegations that were only raised after he was removed. He has pleaded not guilty. The new legal filing follows ongoing debates among attorneys, judges and the Department of Justice over whether Abrego Garcia should remain in jail before trial as lawyers for the government threaten to deport him as soon as he is released from custody. When he arrived in El Salvador on March 25, still in chains, two officials grabbed his arms and pushed him down the stairs from the airplane, according to the new complaint. He was 'forcibly seated' on a bus and placed in a second set of chains and handcuffs, then 'repeatedly struck by officers when he attempted to raise his head,' the filing states. Upon arrival at the Terrorism Confinement Center, officials told Abrego Garcia and other detainees, 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave.' He was then 'forced to strip, issued prison clothing, and subjected to physical abuse including being kicked in the legs with boots and struck on his head and arms to make him change clothes faster,' according to the filing. Prison workers shaved his head and 'frog-marched' him into a cell, striking him 'with wooden batons along the way,' lawyers wrote. By the following day, 'Abrego Garcia had visible bruises and lumps all over his body,' they said. He shared a cell with 20 other Salvadorans, who were 'forced to kneel' from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m., 'with guards striking anyone who fell from exhaustion,' according to the complaint. 'During this time, Plaintiff Abrego Garcia was denied bathroom access and soiled himself,' the filing states. 'The detainees were confined to metal bunks with no mattresses in an overcrowded cell with no windows, bright lights that remained on 24 hours a day, and minimal access to sanitation,' it claims. After one week at the facility, the prison director and other officials separated 12 Salvadoran men, with what they said were gang-related tattoos, from a group of 21 detainees. Abrego Garcia remained with eight others 'who, like him, upon information and belief had no gang affiliations or tattoos.' It was at this time that prison officials 'explicitly acknowledged' that Abrego Garcia's tattoos were not gang-related and told him 'your tattoos are fine,' according to the complaint. Prison officials repeatedly threatened to move him to cells where gang members would 'tear' him apart, lawyers wrote. Abrego Garcia 'repeatedly observed prisoners in nearby cells who he understood to be gang members violently harm each other with no intervention from guards or personnel,' the filing states. 'Screams from nearby cells would similarly ring out throughout the night without any response from prison guards on personnel.' After three weeks inside the prison, and after losing 31 pounds, Abrego Garcia and four other detainees were transferred to another part of the facility, 'where they were photographed with mattresses and better food — photos that appeared to be staged to document improved conditions,' according to the complaint. Nearly one month after he was deported, Abrego Garcia was transferred to a prison that explicitly did not house known gang members. At Centro Industrial, 'Abrego Garcia was frequently hidden from visitors, being told to remain in a separate room whenever outside visitors came to the facility,' according to the complaint. He was denied communication with his family and access to legal counsel throughout his detention, until he met with Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen on April 17. Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador when he was 16 years old and illegally entered the U.S. He was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage. Federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return after government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns. The government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the U.S. After spending three months inside those El Salvador jails, Abrego Garcia was returned to in June following a federal grand jury indictment accusing him of illegally transporting immigrants across the country.
