Senate GOP declines to meet with parliamentarian on whether Trump tax cuts add to deficit
And Republicans so far have 'flat out refused' to have any such discussion, they say.
The partisan battle over how to 'score' the budgetary impact of making Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent could determine whether Senate Republicans would need to rewrite the sprawling 940-page bill on the Senate floor.
Democrats must decide whether to force Republicans to obtain a parliamentarian ruling on the Senate floor Monday on whether making the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent would violate Senate rules.
An adverse ruling on the issue could derail the bill, but Republicans are confident that won't happen.
Democrats say Republicans are trying to dodge the Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough from ruling on whether the tax portion of the 'big, beautiful bill' exceeds the reconciliation package's deficit target for 2025 to 2034 and whether it increase deficits beyond 2034.
Democrats think that if MacDonough weighs in on the subject, she would rule that Senate precedent requires that changes in tax law be scored on a 'current law' baseline.
Such a ruling that would show that extending the Trump tax cuts permanently violates the Senate's Byrd Rule.
A person close to the conversation said that Senate Budget Committee Republicans 'flat out refused' to meet with the parliamentarian to talk about what baseline should be used for Trump's big, beautiful bill.
Democrats 'asked that this be adjudicated by the parliamentarian' and Republicans 'have refused, basically saying they can do what they want,' said the source familiar with the behind-the-scenes debate.
Democrats brought up the issue at the start of the Byrd Bath process for the bill.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) again tried to meet with Republicans this past week to discuss the budget baseline with the parliamentarian and Republicans once again declined to participate, according to the source.
The Byrd Rule determines what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote and avoid a filibuster.
It states that legislation passed on the reconciliation fast track must comply with the reconciliation instructions, and it requires the legislation not increase the deficit in fiscal years beyond the budget window.
Merkley on Sunday circulated a letter he received from Congressional Budget Office Director Phillip Swagel stating that the Finance portion of the GOP megabill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.5 trillion over the 2025-2034 window, exceeding the target set by the reconciliation instructions.
Swagel also told Merkley that the Finance text would 'increase deficits in years after 2034.'
That would appear to violate the Byrd Rule and subject the entire bill to a 60-vote point-of-order objection.
Republicans, however, say that the parliamentarian doesn't have a role in judging how much the tax portion of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act would add to the deficit within the bill's 10-year budget window or whether it would add to deficits beyond 2034.
They argue that Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has authority under Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act 'to determine baseline numbers of spending and revenue.'
Ryan Wrasse, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) pointed to a Budget Committee report published when Democrats were in the majority in 2022 stating that the Budget Committee, through its Chair, makes the call on questions of numbers,' not the parliamentarian.
Graham received a letter from Swagel, the CBO director, on Saturday stating that the Finance Committee's tax text does not exceed its reconciliation instructions or add to deficits after 2034 when scored on the 'current-policy' baseline that Graham wants the Joint Committee on Taxation and CBO to use.
Taylor Reidy, a spokesperson for the Budget panel, asserted on X, the social media platform, that 'there is no need to have a parliamentarian meeting with respect to current policy baseline because Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act gives Sen. Graham — as Chairman of the Budget Committee — the authority to set the baseline.
Senate Democrats, however, argue that a current policy baseline has never been used for a budget reconciliation package before and that directing JCT and CBO how to score a bill violates the spirit of the Byrd Rule and Section 313 of the 1974 Budget Act, which determines what can get into a reconciliation package.
Democrats note that conservative Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a fiscal hawk, compared the 'current-policy' baseline to 'fairy dust' if it's used to argue that extending tax cuts don't add to the deficit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Stock Futures Drop on Latest Trump Tariff Salvo: Markets Wrap
(Bloomberg) -- US stock futures retreated Friday after the latest threat on tariffs from the Trump administration took the shine off a record rally for the S&P 500. Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Contracts for the US benchmark fell 0.6% after the gauge ended the trading week at a fresh all-time high, with payrolls data affirming the economy's resilience. Trump dialed up trade tensions after Thursday's close, warning partners he may start setting levies of as much as 70% unilaterally as soon as today. Europe's Stoxx 600 dropped 0.7%, with trade-exposed miners and automakers among the biggest decliners. Asian stocks also fell. Gold rose 0.3% as investors sought havens. The dollar dipped. US stocks and Treasury markets were closed for the July 4 holiday. Equity markets have rallied sharply since April's tariff-related volatility. Still, some investors remain cautious as uncertainties surrounding the trade war and its potential impact on the US economy and corporate earnings persist. 'There's a little bit of doubt of creeping in, especially after the bump up this week,' said Neil Wilson, investor strategist at Saxo UK. 'Today's a good day to take a little bit of risk off. But I don't think there's a fundamental shift, it's all on the margins at the moment.' What Markets Live Strategists Say: 'It would take a shocking set of trade outcomes to overwhelm the slew of good news we've recently had. All the more so, given that the bullishness of institutional investors has been tempered by constant threats, leaving them relatively underexposed to a market at record highs.' — Mark Cudmore, Markets Live Executive Editor The S&P 500's surge has put it on the verge of triggering a sell signal, according to Michael Hartnett of Bank of America Corp. The strategist advised that investors consider trimming their holdings once the index climbs beyond 6,300, a level just 0.3% above where it closed on Thursday. He also reiterated that bubble risks are mounting into the summer, especially following the House's approval of a $3.4 trillion fiscal package featuring tax cuts. 'Overbought markets can stay overbought as greed is harder to conquer than fear,' Hartnett wrote in a note. European bond markets firmed on Friday, but UK gilts made little headway after a selloff on Wednesday that was driven by fiscal concerns. The yield on 10-year UK government debt was little changed at 4.53%, compared with 4.45% at the close on Tuesday. The pound was flat. In signs of diplomatic and trade tensions escalating between China and the European Union, Beijing said it intends to cancel part of a two-day summit with EU leaders planned for later this month. China also imposed anti-dumping duties on European brandy for five years, while exempting major cognac makers that meet a price commitment. Remy Cointreau SA briefly slipped before trading higher. Pernod Ricard SA pared losses. In commodities, oil dropped in the lead-up to an OPEC+ meeting that's set to deliver another oversized production hike, threatening to swell a glut forecast for later this year. Corporate Highlights: Air France-KLM will initiate the process of raising its minority stake in Scandinavian airline SAS AB to 60.5%, as it looks to extend consolidation in European aviation. India's regulator has temporarily barred Jane Street Group LLC from accessing the local securities market, dealing a severe hit to the US firm that allegedly made $4.3 billion in trading gains in the South Asian nation in less than two years. French train maker Alstom SA has won a €2 billion ($2.4 billion) order from New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which is in the process of modernizing its fleet. A European insurance group backed by Apollo Global Management Inc. offered to acquire a specialist UK insurer that's partly owned by a company controlled by South African billionaire Johann Rupert for about £5.7 billion ($7.8 billion). Some of the main moves in markets: Stocks The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.7% as of 10:55 a.m. London time S&P 500 futures fell 0.6% Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.5% Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.5% The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell 0.3% The MSCI Emerging Markets Index fell 0.5% Currencies The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell 0.2% The euro rose 0.2% to $1.1779 The Japanese yen rose 0.4% to 144.33 per dollar The offshore yuan rose 0.1% to 7.1629 per dollar The British pound was little changed at $1.3658 Cryptocurrencies Bitcoin fell 0.9% to $108,994.31 Ether fell 1.9% to $2,552.14 Bonds The yield on 10-year Treasuries was little changed at 4.35% Germany's 10-year yield declined three basis points to 2.59% Britain's 10-year yield was little changed at 4.53% Commodities Brent crude fell 1% to $68.09 a barrel Spot gold rose 0.3% to $3,335.67 an ounce This story was produced with the assistance of Bloomberg Automation. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump to Host UFC Fight on White House Grounds: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has said he is thinking of hosting an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event at the White House to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence next year. Trump said the event would be a "full fight" with about 20,000 to 25,000 people in attendance. "So every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250. And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight," the president said during a speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines on Thursday. Newsweek contacted the White House and UFC for comment by email outside regular working hours. President Donald Trump at a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines on July 3. President Donald Trump at a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines on July 3. Alex Brandon/AP Why It Matters Trump, an enthusiast for the sport, has attended multiple mixed martial arts matches in recent months and is a friend of Dana White, the UFC's president. The unprecedented White House event forms part of Trump's broader effort to celebrate the nation's 250th birthday, which is also expected to feature national ceremonies, military flyovers and special programs at national parks. Trump has also described plans for the "Great American State Fair," a nationwide series of events culminating on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Each state would have a pavilion to showcase its culture and contributions. What To Know Speaking in Iowa on Thursday, Trump said: "We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there." "Dana is going to do it," he continued, adding, "We are going to have a UFC fight—championship fight, full fight, like 20-25,000 people—and we are going to do that as part of 250 also." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed after the speech that Trump was "dead serious" about hosting the event. Trump has regularly attended UFC fights, most recently last month in Newark, New Jersey. He also attended a fight in Miami in April. Trump's friendship with White goes back to at least 2001, when he allowed the UFC to hold a fight at his Trump Taj Mahal hotel in Atlantic City. White also introduced Trump at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last July. What People Are Saying A UFC official told CNN: "We are in discussions with the White House about hosting a UFC event on site." President Donald Trump said during his Memorial Day address in May: "We're gonna have a big, big celebration, as you know, 250 years. … In some ways, I'm glad I missed that second term where it was because I wouldn't be your president for that." Monica Crowley, the chief of protocol of the U.S., said: "We've had so much division and so much polarization over the last many decades, but certainly over the last few years, that to be able to bring the country together to celebrate America's 250th birthday through patriotism, shared values and a renewed sense of civic pride, to be able to do that in the center of the country, is incredibly important." What Happens Next Officials have not yet confirmed a date for the proposed UFC fight or provided logistic details.
Indianapolis Star
20 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
If you hate America, there's the door this Fourth of July
It's America's 249th birthday, and here's what I want for a gift: I want the people who live in the United States and hate it to leave. That sounds harsh, but hear me out. More than two centuries ago, men and women far more courageous than I am broke Britain's chains of tyranny at the risk of their lives and their livelihoods. They founded a country that made liberty its priority. And with free speech and free markets as guideposts, the United States has become the world's most prosperous nation, generating more than 26% of the global gross domestic product. It's not just about wealth − it's about opportunity. The fact that more than 10 of the most highly valued companies in the world were founded and thrived in the United States speaks to how fertile the entrepreneurial soil is in America. The United States also possesses the most lethal military in the world. Yet, our military might has been used far more often to liberate than to conquer. Opinion: Defunding Planned Parenthood won't stop virtual abortions in Indiana That fact is often overlooked, but it shouldn't be. For most of human history, the strongest nations subjugated weaker nations with swords and ships. America has changed that reality, especially in the past century after winning two world wars. It may sound silly, but I wish the signers of our Declaration of Independence could see America now. We have much to thank them for. But not everyone feels proud to be an American. A Gallup poll released four days before the Fourth of July found that only 58% of U.S. adults say they are 'extremely 'or 'very' proud to be an American. That was down 9 percentage points from last year. Democrats are largely responsible for the decline in patriotism. Only 36% say they are extremely or very proud to be an American, down from 62% a year ago when Joe Biden was president. I observed the decline in patriotism after Donald Trump was reelected president in November. Liberals were deeply angry for months after the election, and they still haven't recovered. Their rage wasn't directed only at Trump. They also smeared the 75.6 million Americans who voted for him. Hicks: The middle class isn't disappearing. It's just spending money differently We've also seen an increase in anti-American attitudes − along with antisemitism − at protests on college campuses and in our major cities. Americans have a right to peacefully protest, of course. And to hate the current occupant of the White House. But I have to wonder at the mindset of people who express so much anger at America while enjoying the freedom and protection it so richly provides. I also have to ask: If America isn't good enough for you, what country is? Perhaps it's Finland, with a personal income tax rate of more than 57% and a sales tax of 24%. Or maybe it's Saudi Arabia, where women continue to face widespread discrimination and LGBTQ+ rights are nonexistent. Then there's China and Russia − countries where 20% of the world's population lives but where freedom is worse than tenuous. Opinion: Indiana should close marijuana loophole putting drugs in hands of 38,000 kids America isn't perfect, of course, but I hope that a glance around the globe provides a reality check for those who believe our democracy is doomed and our citizens oppressed. In America, we are accustomed to an incredible array of choices in almost everything we consume. But when it comes to loving or hating America, we really have only two options: Embrace and be grateful for our God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Or leave.
