UN rights rapporteur accuses Israel of apartheid, genocide
Geneva
A UN official tasked with monitoring the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip on Tuesday accused Israel of using companies to pursue a 'settler-colonial' displacement project aimed at apartheid and genocide.
Francesca Albanese, an Italian legal and human rights academic, said that while political leaders and governments shirked their obligations, 'far too many corporate entities have profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid and now genocide.'
Albanese, who was appointed UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian Territories in 2022, has published a report entitled 'From economy of occupation to economy of genocide.'
Israel has long accused Albanese of lacking fairness, neutrality and impartiality. The Israeli government rejects cooperation with the UN Human Rights Council and its organs.
The Israeli diplomatic representation in Geneva described her report as being 'motivated by her obsessive hate-driven agenda to delegitimize the existence of the State of Israel' and as a flagrant abuse of her office.
Albanese's report investigates what it terms 'the corporate machinery sustaining the Israeli settler-colonial project of displacement and replacement of the Palestinians in the occupied territory.'
It goes on to describe 'the role of corporate entities in sustaining the illegal Israeli occupation and its ongoing genocidal campaign in Gaza' and says that corporate interests underpin the Israeli settler-colonial logic of the displacement, replacement and dispossession of Palestinians.
It adds that corporate actors have contributed to the acceleration of this displacement-replacement process since the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel mounted from the Gaza Strip that has led to the current war.
On Tuesday, at least 95 Palestinians were killed in Israeli attacks throughout Gaza, including more than a dozen desperate people seeking food at US-Israel-backed aid distribution sites.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Keep your America, Mr Trump, and we'll keep our Africa
On June 16, The New York Times disclosed that United States President Donald Trump is considering broadening his travel ban list to include as many as 36 additional countries, most of them African – including my country, Zimbabwe. Twelve days earlier, Trump had enacted a proclamation barring citizens from 12 nations from entering the US. Seven of them – Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan – are African. He also imposed partial travel restrictions, rather than a complete ban, on individuals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Citizens from these nations are barred from permanently relocating to the US or obtaining tourist or student visas. As promised on the campaign trail, Trump is cracking down on immigration. For the first time in my life, I now face the extraordinary prospect of being barred from travelling to the US – a nation that several of my family members and friends call home. My cousin, Dr Anna Mhaka, for example, completed her medical studies and practised exclusively in the US. Spencer Matare, a former classmate, has lived in Indianapolis for more than two decades and is a US citizen. Despite the Trump administration's political grandstanding and vilification of migrants – both legal and undocumented – Anna and Spencer, like millions of others, are industrious, law-abiding members of US society. I know many in Africa hope to follow in their footsteps, and are deeply alarmed by the growing barriers to migration that Trump has erected. Yet, I am not one of them. Since graduating from the University of Cape Town in 1997, I have never felt inclined to travel to America – let alone live there. I recognise that this makes me something of an anomaly. I come from a time and place where the West was idealised – romanticised through the assimilated lens of an Anglicised upbringing. That longing was all around me, not just in my community but across the African continent, shaped by the enduring legacies of French, Portuguese, Spanish and British colonial rule. Yet it was never mine. On International Migrants Day – December 18, 2024 – Afrobarometer released a report based on data from 24 African countries. It found that 49 percent of Africans had considered emigrating, with North America and Europe the top destinations – though a significant number preferred relocation within Africa. Nearly 49 percent cited the search for better work opportunities as their reason for wanting to emigrate; 29 percent pointed to poverty and economic hardship. Many Africans still believe in the 'American dream' – or its European equivalent – and I do not begrudge them. Across the US, Africans have found success in business, academia, and sport. The late NBA star Dikembe Mutombo, from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), is a case in point. During his lifetime, Mutombo donated $15m of his wealth to establish the Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital in Kinshasa – a $29m medical and research centre built in memory of his mother, who died in 1997 after failing to receive timely care. Her tragic, though common, story reflects the deep-rooted socioeconomic challenges across Africa – the very conditions that continue to drive emigration: Broken healthcare systems, entrenched corruption, unemployment, poverty. In contrast, the US often appears as a refuge. A January 2022 report by the Pew Research Center on Black immigrants in the US showed that African-born Black immigrants are among the most recent arrivals: Three-quarters came in 2000 or later, with 43 percent arriving between 2010 and 2019. Though the Caribbean remains the top source region, Africa has spurred much of the recent growth. Between 2000 and 2019, the number of Black African immigrants rose by 246 percent – from about 600,000 to two million. Today, individuals of African descent account for 42 percent of the US's foreign-born Black population – up from 23 percent in 2000. When I first heard of Trump's proposed visa bans, I felt profound disdain. It was impossible not to recall his infamous 'shithole countries' comment from January 11, 2018 – another act of racial profiling aimed at African nations. But, on reflection, I have come to see his divisive, insular policies in a different light. On January 20, he froze US aid to Africa. Now, he is close to denying many of us visas – from Burkina Faso to Cameroon and Ivory Coast. Unwittingly, Trump is nudging African nations towards greater self-reliance – forcing us to confront the unmet needs of our restless populations. But he is not alone in 'anti-African' politicking. Anti-immigration rhetoric has hardened across the US political spectrum. For Africans, even securing a student visa has become harder. In 2023, sub-Saharan African countries had the highest US visa refusal rates – averaging 57 percent. Excluding Southern Africa, where rejection sits at about 19 percent, the rate across other regions rises to 61 percent. These declining approvals do not affect me, as I have no desire to visit or settle in the United States. My reluctance to set foot in the so-called 'land of the free' stems from a deep-seated fear: The fear of becoming yet another victim of American police brutality – as the world witnessed with the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020. I know that Black people – African or otherwise – are far too often subjected to racism, violence and discrimination in the US, regardless of their immigration status. But racially charged police brutality is not the only reason I choose to stay away. There are many more reasons for an African never to consider settling there. Many Americans struggle with the same, deep-rooted problems facing Africans across the continent. Roughly 29 million adults in the US struggle to access affordable healthcare, according to the West Health-Gallup healthcare indices – a challenge as familiar in Kinshasa as it is in many parts of America. In 2023, the US Census Bureau reported that 36.8 million Americans were living in poverty. Despite the glossy illusion projected by Hollywood, the US is no utopia. While people like Anna and Spencer have succeeded there, for most Africans there is no path to achieving the 'American dream'. They must find their futures within their own countries or in other parts of Africa. A huge transformation is needed. China, after all, achieved sweeping economic reform in just 40 years. With Africa's vast mineral wealth and its young, educated population, similar change is possible. A focus on domestic processing of raw materials could drive industrial growth, job creation, and higher gross domestic product. But peace and good governance must come first. And our investment priorities must change. Rather than pouring money into defence and security, African governments should focus on artificial intelligence, healthcare, and scientific research. As Africans, we must stop defining ourselves through Western aid, validation, or instruction. Whatever comes, I will remain in the motherland. Keep your America, Mr Trump – and we will keep our Africa. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
IAEA inspectors depart Tehran after US-Israel-Iran conflict
A team of inspectors from the UN's nuclear watchdog have left Iran, following Tehran's decision to suspend cooperation with the organisation after its 12-day conflict with Israel and the United States. In a statement posted on X on Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said its employees would return to its headquarters in Vienna, Austria. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi stressed 'the crucial importance' of holding talks with Iran to resume its monitoring and verification work as soon as possible, the post added. The inspectors stayed in the Iranian capital throughout the recent fighting, which started on 13 June when Israel targeted Iranian military sites and killed some of the country's most senior commanders, top scientists, and a number of civilians. The US later became involved in the conflict, dropping bunker buster bombs on nuclear facilities in Iran, in a mission the Trump administration claimed had significantly set back the country's nuclear programme. In the aftermath of the US and Israeli aerial attacks, Iran, which has said it is still committed to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), but made painfully clear its burgeoning distrust of the IAEA. Since the start of the conflict, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked. On Wednesday, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered the country to cut ties with the nuclear watchdog. A bill to suspend cooperation had already been passed in the Iranian parliament and approved by the country's Guardian Council. Guardian Council spokesperson Hadi Tahan Nazif said the decision had been taken for the 'full respect for the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran'. The bill itself says the suspension 'will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists', according to Iranian state television. The US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce called Iran's decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA 'unacceptable', urging Tehran 'to reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity'. 'Iran cannot and will not have a nuclear weapon,' she reiterated. Tehran denies wanting to produce a nuclear bomb, reiterating for years that its nuclear programme is for civilian use only. Neither US Intelligence, nor Grossi said they had found any proof Tehran was building a nuclear weapon.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Hamas in consultations with Palestinian factions over Gaza ceasefire
The Palestinian group Hamas has said it is in consultations with various Palestinian factions about the latest ceasefire proposal for Gaza, as Israel's relentless bombardment of the besieged enclave enters its 21st month. The Hamas statement early on Friday said: 'In the context of the movement's commitment to ending the Zionist aggression against our people and ensuring the free entry of humanitarian aid, the movement is conducting consultations with the leaders of Palestinian forces and factions around the proposal it received from the brotherly mediators. 'The movement will submit a final decision to the mediators after the consultations are over and will announce that officially,' it added. A source close to Hamas said the group has sought guarantees that the new United States-backed ceasefire proposal, the details of which two Israeli officials said were still being worked out, would lead to an end to Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and not allow Israel to break the ceasefire and continue its war at any time of its choosing. US President Donald Trump has said he expects a response from the Palestinian group Hamas within 24 hours on whether they will accept what he describes as a 'final proposal' for a ceasefire, as he prepares to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next week. When asked on Friday whether Hamas had agreed to the latest ceasefire deal framework, Trump replied: 'We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours.' Trump said on Thursday that 'I want to see safety for the people of Gaza. They've gone through hell.' 'I want the people of Gaza to be safe, more importantly,' Trump told reporters when asked if he still wanted the US to take over the Palestinian territory as he announced in February, a proposal which was condemned globally by rights experts, the United Nations and Palestinians who described it as 'ethnic cleansing'. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, during which the parties will work to end the war. A previous two-month ceasefire ended when Israeli strikes killed more than 400 Palestinians on March 18 and led to what UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called 'the cruellest phase of a cruel war'. More than 6,000 Palestinians have been killed since that truce was ended by Israel. Trump will host Netanyahu on Monday, pushing for a key legacy moment for his presidency during which he can declare a truce. More than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel since the war began after the Hamas-led October 7 attacks, hundreds of thousands have been displaced multiple times, cities and towns have been razed, hospitals and schools targeted, and 85 percent of the besieged and bombarded enclave is now under Israeli military control, according to the UN.
