logo
Keep your America, Mr Trump, and we'll keep our Africa

Keep your America, Mr Trump, and we'll keep our Africa

Al Jazeera7 hours ago
On June 16, The New York Times disclosed that United States President Donald Trump is considering broadening his travel ban list to include as many as 36 additional countries, most of them African – including my country, Zimbabwe.
Twelve days earlier, Trump had enacted a proclamation barring citizens from 12 nations from entering the US. Seven of them – Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan – are African.
He also imposed partial travel restrictions, rather than a complete ban, on individuals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Citizens from these nations are barred from permanently relocating to the US or obtaining tourist or student visas.
As promised on the campaign trail, Trump is cracking down on immigration.
For the first time in my life, I now face the extraordinary prospect of being barred from travelling to the US – a nation that several of my family members and friends call home.
My cousin, Dr Anna Mhaka, for example, completed her medical studies and practised exclusively in the US. Spencer Matare, a former classmate, has lived in Indianapolis for more than two decades and is a US citizen.
Despite the Trump administration's political grandstanding and vilification of migrants – both legal and undocumented – Anna and Spencer, like millions of others, are industrious, law-abiding members of US society.
I know many in Africa hope to follow in their footsteps, and are deeply alarmed by the growing barriers to migration that Trump has erected.
Yet, I am not one of them.
Since graduating from the University of Cape Town in 1997, I have never felt inclined to travel to America – let alone live there.
I recognise that this makes me something of an anomaly.
I come from a time and place where the West was idealised – romanticised through the assimilated lens of an Anglicised upbringing. That longing was all around me, not just in my community but across the African continent, shaped by the enduring legacies of French, Portuguese, Spanish and British colonial rule. Yet it was never mine.
On International Migrants Day – December 18, 2024 – Afrobarometer released a report based on data from 24 African countries. It found that 49 percent of Africans had considered emigrating, with North America and Europe the top destinations – though a significant number preferred relocation within Africa.
Nearly 49 percent cited the search for better work opportunities as their reason for wanting to emigrate; 29 percent pointed to poverty and economic hardship.
Many Africans still believe in the 'American dream' – or its European equivalent – and I do not begrudge them. Across the US, Africans have found success in business, academia, and sport. The late NBA star Dikembe Mutombo, from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), is a case in point.
During his lifetime, Mutombo donated $15m of his wealth to establish the Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital in Kinshasa – a $29m medical and research centre built in memory of his mother, who died in 1997 after failing to receive timely care.
Her tragic, though common, story reflects the deep-rooted socioeconomic challenges across Africa – the very conditions that continue to drive emigration: Broken healthcare systems, entrenched corruption, unemployment, poverty. In contrast, the US often appears as a refuge.
A January 2022 report by the Pew Research Center on Black immigrants in the US showed that African-born Black immigrants are among the most recent arrivals: Three-quarters came in 2000 or later, with 43 percent arriving between 2010 and 2019.
Though the Caribbean remains the top source region, Africa has spurred much of the recent growth. Between 2000 and 2019, the number of Black African immigrants rose by 246 percent – from about 600,000 to two million. Today, individuals of African descent account for 42 percent of the US's foreign-born Black population – up from 23 percent in 2000.
When I first heard of Trump's proposed visa bans, I felt profound disdain. It was impossible not to recall his infamous 'shithole countries' comment from January 11, 2018 – another act of racial profiling aimed at African nations.
But, on reflection, I have come to see his divisive, insular policies in a different light.
On January 20, he froze US aid to Africa.
Now, he is close to denying many of us visas – from Burkina Faso to Cameroon and Ivory Coast.
Unwittingly, Trump is nudging African nations towards greater self-reliance – forcing us to confront the unmet needs of our restless populations.
But he is not alone in 'anti-African' politicking.
Anti-immigration rhetoric has hardened across the US political spectrum. For Africans, even securing a student visa has become harder. In 2023, sub-Saharan African countries had the highest US visa refusal rates – averaging 57 percent. Excluding Southern Africa, where rejection sits at about 19 percent, the rate across other regions rises to 61 percent.
These declining approvals do not affect me, as I have no desire to visit or settle in the United States.
My reluctance to set foot in the so-called 'land of the free' stems from a deep-seated fear: The fear of becoming yet another victim of American police brutality – as the world witnessed with the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020. I know that Black people – African or otherwise – are far too often subjected to racism, violence and discrimination in the US, regardless of their immigration status.
But racially charged police brutality is not the only reason I choose to stay away. There are many more reasons for an African never to consider settling there.
Many Americans struggle with the same, deep-rooted problems facing Africans across the continent. Roughly 29 million adults in the US struggle to access affordable healthcare, according to the West Health-Gallup healthcare indices – a challenge as familiar in Kinshasa as it is in many parts of America. In 2023, the US Census Bureau reported that 36.8 million Americans were living in poverty.
Despite the glossy illusion projected by Hollywood, the US is no utopia.
While people like Anna and Spencer have succeeded there, for most Africans there is no path to achieving the 'American dream'. They must find their futures within their own countries or in other parts of Africa.
A huge transformation is needed.
China, after all, achieved sweeping economic reform in just 40 years.
With Africa's vast mineral wealth and its young, educated population, similar change is possible. A focus on domestic processing of raw materials could drive industrial growth, job creation, and higher gross domestic product.
But peace and good governance must come first. And our investment priorities must change. Rather than pouring money into defence and security, African governments should focus on artificial intelligence, healthcare, and scientific research.
As Africans, we must stop defining ourselves through Western aid, validation, or instruction.
Whatever comes, I will remain in the motherland.
Keep your America, Mr Trump – and we will keep our Africa.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN rights council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights investigation
UN rights council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights investigation

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

UN rights council rejects Eritrea's bid to end human rights investigation

The United Nations Human Rights Council has rejected Eritrea's attempt to shut down an independent investigation into alleged rights abuses, in a move hailed as vital to preventing impunity. Eritrea's rare bid to scrap the mandate of the UN special rapporteur on its human rights record was defeated on Friday, with only four votes in favour, 25 against, and 18 abstentions. The move by Eritrea surprised some observers and marked one of the few times a state under active investigation tried to end such scrutiny through a formal vote. Human Rights Watch welcomed the outcome, calling it 'an important message that the international community is not fooled by Eritrea's efforts to distract from, and discredit, independent human rights reporting on the country's dire rights record.' Eritrea's motion argued that alleged rights violations were not systemic and blamed 'capacity constraints' common to other developing nations. But European states responded with a counter-resolution to extend the mandate for another year, which passed with ease. In his latest report in June, Mohamed Abdelsalam Babiker, the UN-appointed special rapporteur and a Sudanese human rights lawyer, said Eritrea had shown 'no meaningful progress' on accountability. He referenced the 2016 UN inquiry that found 'systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations … committed in Eritrea under the authority of the Government … may constitute crimes against humanity.' In the 2016 report, the UN's Commission of Inquiry (COI) for Eritrea said the government of President Isaias Afwerki had committed heinous crimes since independence a quarter-century ago, including the 'enslavement' of 400,000 people. Many of those abuses are allegedly linked to a harsh national service programme in the secretive Horn of Africa state, which for many is almost impossible to escape and which the COI compared to lifetime enslavement. Ending investigation would enable 'impunity' DefendDefenders, a pan-African human rights organisation, said Babiker's role remained vital for victims and the wider Eritrean diaspora. 'The expert plays an indispensable role, not only for the victims and survivors of Eritrea's abuses, but also for the Eritrean diaspora,' the group said in a statement. The EU warned that terminating the mandate would enable 'impunity and repression to deepen in silence.' Eritrea's representative, Habtom Zerai Ghirmai, lashed out at the decision, accusing the EU of displaying a 'neo-colonial saviour mentality complex'. He added, 'The continued extension of the Special Rapporteur's mandate is an affront to reason and justice.' Iran, Sudan and Russia – all under their own UN investigations – supported Eritrea's motion. China also backed the move, arguing that such mandates were a misuse of international resources.

Rwanda president unsure if DRC peace deal will hold, warns against ‘tricks'
Rwanda president unsure if DRC peace deal will hold, warns against ‘tricks'

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Rwanda president unsure if DRC peace deal will hold, warns against ‘tricks'

Rwandan President Paul Kagame has cautiously welcomed a United States-brokered peace deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), while suggesting Kigali will retaliate if provoked. Speaking at a news conference in Kigali on Friday, Kagame said Rwanda remained committed to the agreement but questioned whether Kinshasa would uphold its part of the deal. 'If the side that we are working with plays tricks and takes us back to the problem, then we deal with the problem like we have been dealing with it,' Kagame said. The agreement, backed by the administration of US President Donald Trump, was signed last week and calls for Rwandan troops to withdraw from eastern DRC within 90 days. The region has seen intense fighting this year, with M23 rebels seizing major towns. The United Nations has accused Rwanda of backing the group with thousands of troops – an allegation Kigali denies. While the peace deal is seen as a turning point, analysts do not believe it will quickly end the fighting because M23 – a major belligerent in the conflict – says the agreement does not apply to it. US 'not to blame' if deal fails Rwanda insists its military presence in eastern DRC is a response to threats from the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group made up of ethnic Hutu fighters linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kagame said Kinshasa must act to dismantle the FDLR if the deal is to succeed. 'We are grateful to the Trump administration for its efforts,' he said. 'If it doesn't work, they aren't the ones to blame.' There has been no official response from Kinshasa, which has consistently accused Rwanda of fuelling the conflict. Rwanda-backed M23 is the most prominent armed group in the conflict in eastern DRC, and its major advance early this year left bodies on the streets. With 7 million people displaced in DRC, the UN has called it 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth'. M23 has not been involved in the US-mediated efforts, although it has been part of other peace talks. On Thursday, both the Congolese government and M23 representatives agreed that they would return to Qatar for further discussions aimed at ending the conflict. Meanwhile, Washington has proposed a separate investment plan that could allow Western companies to tap into the region's rich deposits of tantalum, copper, and gold – resources that have long fuelled violence in eastern DRC. Kagame's appearance on Friday marked his first public remarks since June 6, prompting speculation during his absence about his health. Dissidents abroad, including former adviser David Himbara, claimed the president was seriously unwell. Kagame dismissed the rumours with a joke. 'Some of my personal health problems might originate from managing you people,' he said, sparking laughter. 'What is the problem? What would people want me to account for? That I am not human?' he added. The president appeared in good health throughout the briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store