logo
How Nine is farewelling ousted MPs this election

How Nine is farewelling ousted MPs this election

9 News03-05-2025
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Each time an election rolls around, the team at Nine comes up with a creative graphic to appropriately farewell MPs as they are bumped from their seats. In previous years, politicians unsuccessful in retaining their patches have been shredded, crushed and given the boot. This time around, Nine has unveiled an election "Dunk Tank" for the evening. This time around, Nine has unveiled an election "Dunk Tank" for the evening. (Nine) Throughout the evening, if an MP is turfed from their seat, they will be bid adieu with a plunge into the Dunk Tank. "Because politics is a circus, anyway," Federal Politics reporter Liz Daniels says. "If a politician tonight is dumped out of Parliament by you, they will be dunked out of Parliament by us." Federal Election 2025
elections
federal election CONTACT US
Property News: The Perth suburbs where residents rarely leave.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade Minister Don Farrell clarifies that Anthony Albanese was not directly lobbied by Donald Trump on US beef
Trade Minister Don Farrell clarifies that Anthony Albanese was not directly lobbied by Donald Trump on US beef

West Australian

timea day ago

  • West Australian

Trade Minister Don Farrell clarifies that Anthony Albanese was not directly lobbied by Donald Trump on US beef

One of Anthony Albanese's senior Cabinet ministers has admitted that he was mistaken after claiming Donald Trump personally lobbied the Prime Minister to lift restrictions on US beef imports to Australia. Trade Minister Don Farrell had on Sunday indicated that the US President had raised the issue directly in one of the three phone conversations the leaders have shared. 'Of course, the president of the United States has raised it with the prime minister,' he told Sky. 'I couldn't tell you off the top of my head which of the discussions, but I'm aware that this issue was raised by the president of the United States.' However, the Prime Minister later clarified on ABC that the import ban had only been raised when Mr Trump said it publicly at his 'Liberation Day' tariffs event in April. Asked whether Donald Trump raised the issue directly with him, the Prime Minister replied, 'No. Donald Trump did raise it at the so-called 'Liberation Day'. He raised it publicly, and so his views were well known'. By mid-day, Senator Farrell had clarified in a Nine interview 'I made a mistake' and had confused that White House address with a private conversation between the two leaders. Australia this week lifted a long-standing ban on US beef imports—specifically meat from cattle born in Canada or Mexico but slaughtered in America —following a decade-long, science-based biosecurity review. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins, Mr Albanese and Mr Farrell had said strict standards remained in place and the decision's timing amid tariff threats wasn't suspicious. Mr Trump had declared the move this week a trade triumph for America, calling it a 'golden age of America,' and warning other countries were now 'on notice.' It comes after concern from Opposition and industry that the Albanese government compromised Australia's strict biosecurity rules to appease Mr Trump amid his tariffs regime. Nationals leader David Littleproud and other Coalition figures have questioned whether the decision was truly based on biosecurity and demanded an independent review. Shadow Foreign Minister Michaelia Cash added to Littleproud's calls on Sunday, saying she too would like an inquiry to come before the Senate. 'We now urgently need an independent review into this decision,' she said. 'It could be an independent review. I think it's incredibly important, based on the responses that Minister Farrell has given… that we get the Department in front of us very, very quickly.' Senator Cash also described Senator Farrell's claims on the Trump phone call as an 'extraordinary interview', adding 'there are even more questions now to answer'.

Extra $800m for AUKUS was scheduled, PM
Extra $800m for AUKUS was scheduled, PM

Perth Now

time5 days ago

  • Perth Now

Extra $800m for AUKUS was scheduled, PM

Australia has sent another $800m to the US as part of the AUKUS deal, which the Trump administration has under review, but the Prime Minister says it was simply a part of the 'schedule'. Anthony Albanese was asked about the new payment that took the total to $1.6bn, which was reported in Nine newspapers on Wednesday. 'There is a schedule of payments to be made, we have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom,' Mr Albanese told ABC's Afternoon Briefing. 'It is about increasing the capacity, their industrial capacity, and as part of that, we have Australians on the ground, learning the skills so that when it comes to the SSN-AUKUS, the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the $800m sent to the US for AUKUS was a scheduled payment. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Defence Minister Richard Marles earlier confirmed the report saying 'the payments are occurring in line with Australia's commitment to contribute US$2bn by the end of 2025, which underscores our commitment to the successful delivery of AUKUS Pillar I outcomes'. The US' review was announced in June and is being headed up by Elbridge Colby, the US undersecretary of defence. Mr Colby recently made headlines when it was revealed he was pressuring the Australian and Japanese governments to reveal what they would do if China invaded Taiwan. The nuclear submarines are set to be built in Australia. NewsWire / Morgan Sette Credit: News Corp Australia The AUKUS deal is a long-term arrangement that will cost upwards of $268bn, and as much as $368bn, over the next 30 years. Australia would buy nuclear submarines from the US, while developing our own capacity to build submarines in Adelaide. The new payment came as Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was 'worried' about the government's position on defence. 'I worry that the government – I think it's not just me worried, I think every expert looking at this is making these comments – they're deeply worried that we're not on our way to having the defence force we need in such an uncertain time,' Mr Taylor said. 'We've got authoritarian regimes around the world flexing their muscles.'

'De facto Australian President': Governor-General Samantha Mostyn makes 'political' media blitz to woo progressive outlets ahead of parliament's opening
'De facto Australian President': Governor-General Samantha Mostyn makes 'political' media blitz to woo progressive outlets ahead of parliament's opening

Sky News AU

time5 days ago

  • Sky News AU

'De facto Australian President': Governor-General Samantha Mostyn makes 'political' media blitz to woo progressive outlets ahead of parliament's opening

If you haven't already noticed, something odd is going on. The Governor-General of Australia, Samantha Mostyn, appears to have embarked upon a public relations campaign. Since speaking with SBS on 17 October last year, which the broadcaster itself described as 'a rare, wide-ranging interview,' Mostyn has appeared across or provided comment to several media platforms. In the last couple of months alone, she has spoken with Nine's newspaper arms, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, as well as A Current Affair. She has also featured as a podcast participant for Missing Perspectives and, just recently, The Daily Aus. This is highly irregular behaviour for a governor-general, even if it might otherwise reflect Mostyn's career in corporate affairs. Historically – that is, beyond the last twenty years – Australian governor-generals have not sought to occupy the limelight; rather, they have quietly discharged their constitutional duties, as well as supported the organisations they patronise. Moreover, the actual substance of Mostyn's most critical contributions to the media are grave. 'The King doesn't direct me,' she says, as printed by Nine's newspapers, 'and I don't seek his advice; it's the prime minister and the ministry I take my counsel from, and that I work with.' '[Australia has] a historical connection to the monarch, but that has no bearing on the way in which I conduct myself in the role,' she reaffirmed to The Daily Aus. Mostyn's words totally misrepresent the constitutional nature of her office; she is the King's vice-regal representative in Australia, bound by the authority of the Crown. The Australian Constitution is perfectly clear in Section 2, where it states that the governor-general 'shall have and may exercise in the Commonwealth during the Queen's pleasure, but subject to this Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may be pleased to assign.' This, obviously, has a bearing, at least to some extent, on the way the governor-general conducts their duties, with those duties emanating from an office that without the Crown has no reason to exist. Mostyn's claim concerning the granting of royal assent to bills passed by the Australian Parliament – that she 'can't read the bill and [ask] questions' about it – is also not within the spirit of the Constitution. Section 58 provides our Governor-General, 'according to his discretion, but subject to this Constitution, [to declare] that he assents in the Queen's name, or that he withholds assent' to 'a proposed law passed by both Houses of the Parliament.' The Governor-General, Her Excellency the Honourable Sam Mostyn and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during the swearing-in ceremony at Government House, Canberra. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Assent is not a rubber stamp just because convention requires it be granted in all but extraordinary circumstances, any more than weapons of mass destruction are superfluous if a suitable occasion to deploy them never arises. The writings of Sir Paul Hasluck affirm this, holding that Section 58 exists not so that elected representatives can be 'overruled' by governors-general but so that governors-general can 'check elected representatives in any extreme attempt by them to disregard the rule of law.' Sir David Smith concurs, arguing that, more broadly, a governor-general's 'presence in our system' is not about how much power that position itself has but, rather, how much 'absolute power' it denies to those 'who are in' government. It is concerning, then, that Mostyn, who describes herself as 'a constitutional law nerd,' told Nine Newspapers: 'As the governor-general, you should always be conscious of maintaining the kind of relationship with the prime minister and the government where, if you see trouble ahead, you work with them to avoid the trouble.' One wonders what Smith, who served as Sir John Kerr's official secretary during the Dismissal, might think about that. Beyond interpreting her constitutional duties before the public eye, Mostyn has seen fit to detail the changes – seemingly small, yet so very consequential – she is making to her office, ever with increasing confidence. For instance, she has moved Nathaniel Dance's famous 1776 portrait of James Cook, formerly centred in Admiralty House's entrance hall, to a poorly-lit crevasse behind the stairs. Cook's painting has been replaced with a work by an Aboriginal Australian artist. Mostyn's team has moved Nathaniel Dance's famous 1776 portrait of James Cook, formerly centred in Admiralty House's entrance hall, to a poorly-lit crevasse behind the stairs. Picture: Nine/A Current Affair Cook's painting has been replaced with a work by an Aboriginal Australian artist. Picture: Nine/A Current Affair Furthermore, in her podcast with Missing Perspectives, Mostyn goes as far to outline her ambitions for certain legislative agendas, including wage reform and subsidised childcare, only to eventually add: 'Now, I can't speak to… policy in this role.' It is a disclaimer that should never need be expressed in the first place; unequivocally, governors-general cannot be involved with any part of the policymaking process. So, why is Mostyn doing all that she is, and why now? Well, responding to whether she is a republican or not, Mostyn told A Current Affair, 'I have no views on the republic issue.' Notably, she didn't say, 'I am not a republican.' We also know Mostyn considered herself a republican as little time ago as 2020, when she revealed to the Australian Institute of Company Directors that Paul Keating's republican vision was something she 'really cared about.' It's hard to know what her previous beliefs were, considering her digital footprint was totally expunged, without explanation, when her appointment was first announced in 2022. I am becoming increasingly disillusioned by what seems to be Mostyn's unconditional altruism; that is, her focus on care, kindness, social cohesion, modern Australia and – on the face of it, now amplified following the federal election – civics education. My strong suspicion is that Mostyn has a mandate from Anthony Albanese, her appointee, to progress republicanism in Australia by converting her privileged post, insofar as she can, into a de facto presidential office. To recall Edmund Burke's wisdom: 'You may have subverted monarchy, but not recovered freedom.' Parliament opened this month, at which time Mostyn discharged various constitutional duties, and her words and actions in relation to those duties carry weight. No doubt, the purpose of her recent liaison with the media shall shortly reveal itself. Alexander Voltz is a composer. As well as contributing to he is the founding Music Editor of Quadrant, and writes also for The Spectator Australia. He directed The Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert, Australia's largest musical tribute during the Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. His music has been performed across the country and abroad.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store