'De facto Australian President': Governor-General Samantha Mostyn makes 'political' media blitz to woo progressive outlets ahead of parliament's opening
The Governor-General of Australia, Samantha Mostyn, appears to have embarked upon a public relations campaign.
Since speaking with SBS on 17 October last year, which the broadcaster itself described as 'a rare, wide-ranging interview,' Mostyn has appeared across or provided comment to several media platforms.
In the last couple of months alone, she has spoken with Nine's newspaper arms, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, as well as A Current Affair.
She has also featured as a podcast participant for Missing Perspectives and, just recently, The Daily Aus.
This is highly irregular behaviour for a governor-general, even if it might otherwise reflect Mostyn's career in corporate affairs.
Historically – that is, beyond the last twenty years – Australian governor-generals have not sought to occupy the limelight; rather, they have quietly discharged their constitutional duties, as well as supported the organisations they patronise.
Moreover, the actual substance of Mostyn's most critical contributions to the media are grave.
'The King doesn't direct me,' she says, as printed by Nine's newspapers, 'and I don't seek his advice; it's the prime minister and the ministry I take my counsel from, and that I work with.'
'[Australia has] a historical connection to the monarch, but that has no bearing on the way in which I conduct myself in the role,' she reaffirmed to The Daily Aus.
Mostyn's words totally misrepresent the constitutional nature of her office; she is the King's vice-regal representative in Australia, bound by the authority of the Crown.
The Australian Constitution is perfectly clear in Section 2, where it states that the governor-general 'shall have and may exercise in the Commonwealth during the Queen's pleasure, but subject to this Constitution, such powers and functions of the Queen as Her Majesty may be pleased to assign.'
This, obviously, has a bearing, at least to some extent, on the way the governor-general conducts their duties, with those duties emanating from an office that without the Crown has no reason to exist.
Mostyn's claim concerning the granting of royal assent to bills passed by the Australian Parliament – that she 'can't read the bill and [ask] questions' about it – is also not within the spirit of the Constitution.
Section 58 provides our Governor-General, 'according to his discretion, but subject to this Constitution, [to declare] that he assents in the Queen's name, or that he withholds assent' to 'a proposed law passed by both Houses of the Parliament.'
The Governor-General, Her Excellency the Honourable Sam Mostyn and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during the swearing-in ceremony at Government House, Canberra. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman
Assent is not a rubber stamp just because convention requires it be granted in all but extraordinary circumstances, any more than weapons of mass destruction are superfluous if a suitable occasion to deploy them never arises.
The writings of Sir Paul Hasluck affirm this, holding that Section 58 exists not so that elected representatives can be 'overruled' by governors-general but so that governors-general can 'check elected representatives in any extreme attempt by them to disregard the rule of law.'
Sir David Smith concurs, arguing that, more broadly, a governor-general's 'presence in our system' is not about how much power that position itself has but, rather, how much 'absolute power' it denies to those 'who are in' government.
It is concerning, then, that Mostyn, who describes herself as 'a constitutional law nerd,' told Nine Newspapers: 'As the governor-general, you should always be conscious of maintaining the kind of relationship with the prime minister and the government where, if you see trouble ahead, you work with them to avoid the trouble.'
One wonders what Smith, who served as Sir John Kerr's official secretary during the Dismissal, might think about that.
Beyond interpreting her constitutional duties before the public eye, Mostyn has seen fit to detail the changes – seemingly small, yet so very consequential – she is making to her office, ever with increasing confidence.
For instance, she has moved Nathaniel Dance's famous 1776 portrait of James Cook, formerly centred in Admiralty House's entrance hall, to a poorly-lit crevasse behind the stairs.
Cook's painting has been replaced with a work by an Aboriginal Australian artist.
Mostyn's team has moved Nathaniel Dance's famous 1776 portrait of James Cook, formerly centred in Admiralty House's entrance hall, to a poorly-lit crevasse behind the stairs. Picture: Nine/A Current Affair
Cook's painting has been replaced with a work by an Aboriginal Australian artist. Picture: Nine/A Current Affair
Furthermore, in her podcast with Missing Perspectives, Mostyn goes as far to outline her ambitions for certain legislative agendas, including wage reform and subsidised childcare, only to eventually add: 'Now, I can't speak to… policy in this role.'
It is a disclaimer that should never need be expressed in the first place; unequivocally, governors-general cannot be involved with any part of the policymaking process.
So, why is Mostyn doing all that she is, and why now?
Well, responding to whether she is a republican or not, Mostyn told A Current Affair, 'I have no views on the republic issue.'
Notably, she didn't say, 'I am not a republican.'
We also know Mostyn considered herself a republican as little time ago as 2020, when she revealed to the Australian Institute of Company Directors that Paul Keating's republican vision was something she 'really cared about.'
It's hard to know what her previous beliefs were, considering her digital footprint was totally expunged, without explanation, when her appointment was first announced in 2022.
I am becoming increasingly disillusioned by what seems to be Mostyn's unconditional altruism; that is, her focus on care, kindness, social cohesion, modern Australia and – on the face of it, now amplified following the federal election – civics education.
My strong suspicion is that Mostyn has a mandate from Anthony Albanese, her appointee, to progress republicanism in Australia by converting her privileged post, insofar as she can, into a de facto presidential office.
To recall Edmund Burke's wisdom: 'You may have subverted monarchy, but not recovered freedom.'
Parliament opened this month, at which time Mostyn discharged various constitutional duties, and her words and actions in relation to those duties carry weight.
No doubt, the purpose of her recent liaison with the media shall shortly reveal itself.
Alexander Voltz is a composer. As well as contributing to SkyNews.com.au, he is the founding Music Editor of Quadrant, and writes also for The Spectator Australia. He directed The Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert, Australia's largest musical tribute during the Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. His music has been performed across the country and abroad.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Private R&D investment by Australian businesses falling, report finds ahead of roundtable
Private investment into research and development in Australian businesses is slipping backwards and comparatively lower to similar other nations, a new report shows. The report — collated by the Business Council of Australia ahead of Treasurer Jim Chalmer's productivity roundtable next month — identified a raft of targeted policies to boost business potential. It proposes offering extra incentives for collaboration and commercialisation, cutting red tape, and consolidating grants into major national programs. The report estimates that for every $1 spent on R&D, it generates $5 in economic value and $7 billion in gross domestic product (GDP) annually. If the suite of measures are implemented, it's expected to grow productivity in Australia 0.1 per cent each year. It also recommends a simpler R&D Tax Incentive by standardising tax offsets of 18.5 per cent above the company rate and removing its current $150 million cap. It's hoped having a single, consistent rule rather than the current different benefit rates depending on company size or how much they spend, would encourage firms to invest in R&D, especially smaller players. As for scrapping the cap, the policy is designed to allow businesses to claim tax offsets for all of their eligible R&D spend rather than just the first $150 million under the current framework. BCA chief executive Bran Black said the targeted policies were designed to fix Australia's productivity problems by unlocking investment, boosting jobs and wages. He said reversing the current trend, which has seen R&D investment drop 24 per cent in the last decade, would help drive innovation and productivity nationally. He said it was important businesses were given the 'right environment' to invest: 'If we don't act now then we will keep losing innovators, capital and ideas to other nations'. 'Better tax, collaboration and commercialisation policies will give businesses the confidence to take the next step and create new Australian technologies that benefit everyone's lives,' he said. The report will form part of a joint industry submission with well-known Australian software firm Atlassian and medical device company Cochlear. Cochlear chief executive and president Dig Howitt said policy reform and 'well-funded strategies' would be critical to unlocking more R&D in Australia. Atlassian chief of staff Amy Glancey said by supporting major companies to invest in R&D it would have a trickle down effect to create a better environment for entrepreneurship and innovation. Dr Chalmer's roundtable will be held at Parliament House August 19–21 and is expected to shape a shared agenda on improving productivity, strengthening budget sustainability, and building economic resilience. It has prompted a number of state-level consultations and spin-off roundtables, including one held on Friday by Independent MP Allegra Spender involving economists and industry figures in Canberra. The BCA, along with other industry bodies, companies, and government representatives, are finalising submissions ahead of the August roundtable, outlining ideas across tax, regulation, innovation, skills, and digital transformation to help lift Australia's productivity.


Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Big step to kick off $25 medicines pledge
Labor will begin its first steps to legislate its election promise to cap the cost of scripts listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to $25 from January 1 of next year. Once passed, eligible medicines will be lowered from $31.60 to $25. The government estimates the change will save Australians $200m a year, while costing the budget $690m over four years. This is in addition to previous reforms which allowed patients to acquire 60-day prescriptions, and freezing the cost of medicine for pension and concession card holders at $7.70 until the end of 2029. Labor will begin its first steps to bring down the cost of PBS-listed medicines to just $25. NewsWire/ Dan Peled Credit: News Corp Australia The election pledge was also matched by the Coalition, suggesting the Bill will likely have a swift passage through parliament. Anthony Albanese said it was a promise delivered. 'This is another example of cost of living relief that helps every Australian,' Mr Albanese said. 'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare. My government will continue to deliver cost of living relief for all Australians.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said 'the size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Albanese said the government would continue to deliver cost of living relief for Aussies. NewsWire/Philip Gostelow Credit: News Corp Australia Health Minister Mark Bulter also welcomed the incoming Bill. 'Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health,' Mr Butler said. 'For general patients medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004. 'For pension and concession card holders we've frozen your medicine prices at a maximum price of $7.70 until the end of the decade.' The Bill comes as the United States lashed Australia's PBS as 'discriminatory' amid tariff negotiations to remove the general 10 per cent levy, as well as fees on Australian steel and aluminium US imports. The government estimates the change will save Aussies $200m a year. NewsWire/Joel Carrett Credit: News Corp Australia Concerningly, US President Donald Trump has also flagged a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceutical imports, which could have a major impact on $2bn of Australian exports. However the Albanese government said it is unwilling to use the PBS as a bargaining chip. On Sunday, Mr Albanese also faced a grilling over when Labor would introduce its proposed plan to double the tax on superannuation accounts over $3m up to 30 per cent. He said the Bill 'will come in time' and that the priority in the first fortnight was policies 'that make a difference to people's money in their pocket'. Perth MP and assistant minister to the Prime Minister Patrick Gorman said the government had been 'clear about our priorities' for the Bill and said he was 'confident it will pass'. 'I think we have seen in this building, time and time again, that when it comes to getting things through parliament, you have got to also let the parliamentary processes do their piece,' he said.

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Reckless': Albanese blasted for ‘premature' Palestinian state comments
Sky News host James Macpherson slams Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for being open to recognising a Palestinian state, describing it as 'reckless'. 'What I find outrageous is that this is even being discussed, while 50 Israelis are still being held hostage … and while the terrorist organisation Hamas is yet to surrender or be defeated,' Mr Macpherson said. 'This is so premature to be talking about a Palestinian state that it plays into the very goals of Hamas themselves. 'I just think this is reckless on the part of the Australian government.'