
RSS affiliate slams US' coercive tactics, urges India to stay firm sans compromise
Swadeshi Jagran Manch
(SJM), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh Friday slammed the US for applying 'coercive tactics' on India to gain access to Indian markets in sensitive sectors, and asked the government to stay firm on its stance to protect
national interest
.
It also said that India must avoid concessions that undermine farmers, small-scale industries, or long-term economic self-reliance.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Technology
Leadership
CXO
Artificial Intelligence
Project Management
others
Finance
MCA
healthcare
MBA
Data Analytics
Healthcare
Management
Others
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
Data Science
PGDM
Data Science
Product Management
Cybersecurity
Operations Management
Design Thinking
Degree
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
'The Swadeshi Jagran Manch urges the Government of India to maintain its firm stance and to use this moment to strengthen strategic autonomy, protect national interest, and advance a truly multipolar and equitable
global trade order
, and make decisive move towards '
Aatmanirbhar Bharat
,' it said Friday.
The key sticking points in the ongoing India-US trade negotiations remain the US demand for market access for genetically modified (GM) crops, deregulation of medical devices, and unrestricted cross-border data flows. India, on the other hand, has legitimately sought exemptions from steel, automobile, and pharmaceutical tariffs and defended its policy of data localisation.
'Indian negotiators have rightly resisted attempts to force open our markets to GM agricultural products, dairy imports, and other sensitive sectors,' said Ashwani Mahajan, National Co- Convener, SJM.
SJM stated that India's sovereign right to procure defence equipment to strengthen self-reliance in defence production and to secure crude oil at the most competitive prices—essential to keeping domestic inflation under check—cannot be subjected to external pressure.
'India's principled stand—that GM food imports threaten both our biodiversity and
food security
, and that sensitive data must remain within sovereign control—is fully aligned with our long-term national interest,' Mahajan noted.
He said the US continues to exert pressure on multiple countries to lower tariffs outside the framework of WTO rules, often invoking non-trade considerations under the guise of reciprocity.
'If Washington believes that such coercive tactics can sway India's decisions, it must recognise that today's India is not the India of a decade ago…The United States, too, needs to move beyond the inertia of a unipolar worldview and embrace the reality of a multipolar, cooperative order,' he said.
As per Mahajan, it is unfortunate that the US has chosen to adopt punitive measures against a strategic partner at a time when the world must collectively respond to the far greater challenge posed by China's weaponization of trade and global value chains as Beijing's restrictions on rare earth exports is causing huge harm to manufacturing capacities worldwide.
He suggested that instead of resorting to pressure, the US and India should strengthen cooperation to build resilient, diversified, and equitable global supply chain.
'The experience of recent years has shown that India can leverage shifting global trade patterns—including those resulting from US–China tensions—to its advantage without compromising core interests.
Whether or not a trade agreement is reached, Indian exports to the US will continue on the basis of mutual economic benefit, the SJM said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
27 minutes ago
- The Print
Bangladesh envoy's assurance must translate into action. Neighbours can't afford mistrust
Bangladesh's envoy telling ThePrint that its soil won't host anti-India activity is reassuring. But intent must translate into action. India and Bangladesh share a historic but now complex bond that needs careful nurturing. Neighbours can't afford mistrust. Words help, but sustained respect and responsible conduct are what truly builds confidence. Trump's rants are destroying the most consequential bilateral relationship of the 21st century Tracking Trump is like watching a T20 thriller — odds flip with every ball, and whispers of a fixed match never fade. But this isn't a game. His ego-driven rants are destroying the most consequential bilateral relationship of the 21st century. Diplomacy deserves better than getting bowled by one man's tantrums.


Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann condoles demise of Satyapal Malik
Chandigarh: Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann on Tuesday condoled the demise of former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satyapal Malik. Malik died on Tuesday at a hospital in Delhi after a prolonged illness, his personal staff said. He was 79. In his condolence message, Mann said he was sad to hear the news of the demise of Satyapal Malik. "He always gave priority to the issues of farmers and the general public and fearlessly raised the voice of truth," Mann said in a social media post in Punjabi. Senior Congress leader and leader of opposition in the Punjab Assembly Partap Singh Bajwa too expressed grief over Malik's death. "Deeply saddened by the passing of Shri Satyapal Malik Ji, former Governor and a seasoned public servant. His contributions to Indian politics and governance will always be remembered. Heartfelt condolences to his family and loved ones," Bajwa in a post on X. Punjab Congress chief Amrinder Singh Raja Warring also expressed grief over the death. "The news of the demise of former Governor Chaudhary Satyapal Singh Malik ji is extremely saddening. He was a leader who fearlessly expressed his views and held clear opinions in the interest of the nation. His contributions will always be remembered, said Warring. Akal Takht officiating Jathedar Giani Kuldip Singh Gargaj too expressed deep sorrow over the demise of the former J-K governor. Gargaj said that Malik fearlessly raised his voice for Punjab and especially for the Sikh community'a contribution that will never be forgotten. In a statement, Gargaj noted that during the farmers' agitation on the borders of Delhi, Malik had strongly spoken in favour of the farmers' rights and held the government accountable. Malik, who had also held the positions of governor of Goa, Bihar, Meghalaya, and Odisha, besides being a member of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in his long political career, died at 1.12 pm at the Ram Manohar Lohia hospital here. He was in the ICU of the hospital for a long time, getting treatment for various ailments, the staff said. In his gubernatorial role at Jammu and Kashmir, Malik oversaw the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the state into two Union Territories on August 5, 2019.


United News of India
27 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC refers plea seeking lifetime ban on convicted MPs/MLAs to CJI
New Delhi, Aug 5 (UNI) The Supreme Court today took note of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking permanent disqualification of Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) upon conviction in criminal cases, and directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai for listing before an appropriate larger Bench. The PIL, filed by Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, challenges the constitutional validity of provisions under Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which currently bar convicted legislators from contesting elections only for six years after completing their sentence. Senior Advocate Vijay Hansaria mentioned the matter before a Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, urging for an early hearing. 'This is a matter of grave concern. Orders have been passed from time to time. The February 10 order requires that it be listed before a three-judge bench,' Hansaria submitted. The Bench acknowledged the urgency and referred to paragraphs 4 and 5 of the February 10, 2025 order passed by a Bench led by Justice Dipankar Datta, directing that the matter be placed before the CJI for further directions. The plea is now expected to be heard finally on October 20, subject to the CJI's listing. In February 2025, the Union government opposed the plea, arguing that a lifetime disqualification of elected representatives was a matter purely within the domain of Parliament and not for the judiciary to decide. The Centre, through the Legislative Department, maintained that while the court may declare a provision unconstitutional under its power of judicial review, it cannot rewrite legislation to substitute "lifetime" for "six years" as suggested by the petitioner. 'The relief sought effectively asks the Court to read 'lifetime' instead of 'six years' in all sub-sections of Section 8. This is unknown to judicial review and constitutional law,' the Centre submitted. The government emphasized that Parliament has the discretion to decide what duration of disqualification is appropriate, keeping in view principles of proportionality and reasonableness. 'It is one thing to say that Parliament has the power to impose a lifetime ban, and another to say that it must necessarily exercise that power in all cases,' it said. The Centre further argued that the PIL failed to distinguish between the basis for disqualification (i.e., conviction) and the effect of disqualification (i.e., its duration). It noted that Indian penal statutes often impose time-bound restrictions on rights and freedoms post-conviction, and that extending these indefinitely would be unduly harsh and disproportionate. 'At the end of the prescribed time, penalties cease to operate automatically. Deterrence is ensured, while undue harshness is avoided,' the government stated. It also reiterated that any direction to Parliament on how to draft or amend laws would be beyond the constitutional powers of the judiciary. The PIL raises a larger question regarding the criminalisation of politics, an issue repeatedly flagged by the Supreme Court in the past. The Court has, over the years, issued directions for the expeditious trial of criminal cases against lawmakers and for greater transparency in candidate disclosures. As the matter now heads to a larger Bench, the decision could have far-reaching implications for electoral reforms, legislative accountability, and the scope of judicial intervention in matters of legislative policy. UNI SNG AAB