Opinion: Bridging barriers of California's bilingual education: From legislative intent to meaningful action
When it comes to the value of bilingual education in improving educational outcomes for Hispanic youth, the message should not get lost in translation: dual-language academic offerings dramatically enhance these students' English language acquisition, standardized test scores, graduation rates, and college preparation, as reported by CalMatters .
Based on overwhelming evidence supporting these benefits, California enacted Proposition 58 in 2016, repealing the restrictions imposed by Proposition 227, which had previously banned bilingual education. Even with Proposition 58, CalMatters says the expansion of bilingual education in California has been slow, despite a desperate need. Such programs in states like Texas had a more rapid implementation, even though California has more English learners than any other state.
Why?
According to Century Foundation , the primary barrier is a shortage of qualified bilingual teachers, underscoring the necessity of backing such legislation with resources to enable its success. To address this gap, California should create incentives to attract and retain bilingual educators and partner with colleges to create robust teacher training programs. The lack of qualified instructors —a consequence of the previous ban—has created a professional deficit that should be bridged to meet the demand for dual-language programs.
This situation mirrors the challenges of de jure versus de facto implementation seen in the civil rights movement in the United States. Simply passing legislation is not enough; achieving meaningful change requires the necessary infrastructure and strong legislative and executive support. For example, according to EdSource , only 16.4% of English learners in California are enrolled in bilingual classrooms, compared to 36.7% in Texas.
In response to these challenges, California launched the Global California 2030 initiative. This ambitious plan aims for half of the state's students to be on a path to bilingualism and for 1,600 schools to offer dual-language programs by 2030. While well-intentioned, this initiative faces the same implementation hurdles. As stated in EdSource , Goals without actionable plans can falter, and this initiative is no exception. To make bilingual education more accessible and empower Hispanic youth, policymakers should provide funding for specialized training programs, offer financial incentives, establish targeted recruitment programs, and ensure robust oversight and planning.
Without addressing the logistical and practical barriers to implementation, reaching the intended outcomes of policies like Prop 58 can take much longer and be more difficult to achieve. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of California's Hispanic students will miss out on valuable educational opportunities. We owe it to them to ensure that Prop 58 is accompanied by the necessary funding, oversight, and planning to set ESL students up for success. Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
At CPAC Latino, Salazar says give immigrants contributing to US a chance to stay
Immigrants who have been contributing to their U.S. communities for years while in the country illegally should be given the opportunity to earn legal status, Miami Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar said Saturday during a gathering of conservative Latinos. Salazar, a Republican whose coastal Miami-Dade district includes more than 535,000 people who identify as Hispanic or Latino, spoke about her 'Dignity Act' that she drafted with fellow Hispanic Rep. Veronica Escobar, a Texas Democrat The bill, which they introduced in 2023, would offer a way for immigrants who years ago arrived illegally to stay in the United States if they don't have a criminal record, contribute to the economy and pay restitution. Salazar, who has said she will reintroduce the legislation this month, emphasized that those who qualify would receive no government assistance, just a way to continue working in the country. 'Let's seal the border,' Salazar said. 'But once that is done, then we have to look back and start this national conversation, and then give some type of dignity to those people with no criminal record, who have been a part of our communities and who are decent human beings.' Though Salazar has been critical at times of elements of President Donald Trump's sweeping plan to deport millions of immigrants, she heaped praise on the Republican president. 'Trump will be for immigration what Lincoln was for slavery, and what Reagan was for communism,' she said. Salazar's comments came during a Conservative Political Action Conference event held at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Hollywood, co-hosted by Latino Wallstreet. Conservative leaders said during the conference that Hispanic Americans are only increasing their power and influence across the United States, touting the growing diversity of the Republican Party. This year's conference began one day after the U.S. Supreme Court decided Trump could move forward for now with a policy preventing children born to immigrants in the country illegally from receiving citizenship in places where there isn't pending litigation — which includes Florida. The policy also applies to children of some temporary visa holders. The policy is part of a bigger Trump administration agenda to deport millions of undocumented immigrants and end programs that have either provided temporary legal status or deferred immigration enforcement for people who came from places like Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Beyond Salazar's comments, the topic of immigration enforcement went mostly undiscussed throughout the day. When event organizer Mercedes Schlapp, a senior adviser for communications during Trump's first administration, was asked prior to Salazar's speech about the congresswoman's position on immigration — including a social media post saying she was 'heartbroken' by the way ICE raids were affecting Miami communities — Schlapp said events like CPAC are meant to bring people with different viewpoints to the stage. 'We're not going to agree on everything,' Schlapp said. 'And I think for Maria Elvira, she is speaking up for her community in South Florida.' During her speech, Salazar also denounced socialism and said Democrats have been 'infiltrated' by it, referencing self-titled democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's recent win in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. She said Hispanic Republicans have to act as 'saviors of the party' to prevent the same thing happening across the aisle. Several speakers said Hispanic people were at the heart of the modern Republican Party. Former Republican U.S. Rep. Mayra Flores from Texas and Trump special assistant Jenny Korn said that without the Hispanic vote, Trump would not have won the 2024 election. Trump 'loves Latinos,' Korn said, and he works with advisers of Latino descent, like her, on issues of national security. Flores said she wanted to see more Hispanic people in Congress to represent that influence. 'Hispanics are the future of this party,' Flores said. 'If the Republican Party wants to win big this upcoming midterm, they've got to continue investing in the Hispanic community.'
Los Angeles Times
12 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
By stooping to conquer, Sacramento Democrats show their pettiness and arrogance
There are plenty of reasons to dislike Carl DeMaio, if you so choose. The first-term San Diego assembly member is MAGA to his marrow, bringing Donald Trump's noxious politics and personal approach to Sacramento. For Democrats, the mere mention of his name has the same effect as nails applied to a chalkboard. Fellow Republicans aren't too fond of DeMaio, either. Party leaders worked strenuously — and far from successfully — to keep DeMaio from being elected last fall. They accused him of criminal wrongdoing. Allies spent millions of dollars to boost his GOP rival. Republican foes 'cite his relentless self-promotion, his criticism of his party and his tendency to take credit for victories he played little or no part in to help him fundraise and elevate his political brand,' CalMatters wrote in a harsh January profile. None of that, however, excuses the silly and juvenile behavior of the Assembly's majority Democrats last week when the chamber took up a resolution commemorating Pride month. DeMaio, the Assembly's first openly gay Republican member, rose on the floor to voice his objections. Usually lawmakers have around five minutes to offer their remarks without interruption. Not this time. DeMaio complained that the resolution — larded with more than three dozen whereas-es — strayed far afield from a straightforward commendation, endorsing some 'very controversial and extremist positions' opposed even by members of the LGBQT+ community. 'This is not about affirming the LGBT community,' DeMaio said. 'It's about using them as a political pawn to divide us.' You can agree or disagree with DeMaio. You can embrace the resolution and its myriad clauses with all your heart, or not. That's beside the point. About 90 seconds into his remarks, DeMaio was interrupted by the Assembly member presiding over the debate, Democrat Josh Lowenthal of Long Beach, who said he had a 'very important announcement' to make. And what was the pressing matter that couldn't possibly wait a second longer? Wishing another Assembly Democrat a happy birthday. Cheers and applause filled the chamber. DeMaio resumed, only to be interrupted a short time later. Lowenthal deadpanned that he'd forgotten: It had been another Democratic lawmaker's birthday just a few days earlier. More cheers and applause. DeMaio resumed and then was interrupted a third time, so Lowenthal could wish 'a very, very happy birthday' to a third Democratic Assembly member, who was marking the occasion the next day. The response in the chamber, laughter mixed with more whoops and cheers, suggested the hazing by Lowenthal and fellow Democrats was great good fun and oh-so-clever. It wasn't. It was petty. It was stupid. And it bespoke the arrogance of a super-majority party too used to having its way and bulldozing Sacramento's greatly outnumbered Republicans. A few things are worth noting here, seeing as how California is supposed to be governed by a representative democracy. DeMaio's political peers may not be terribly enamored of the freshman lawmaker. But he was the clear-cut favorite of voters in San Diego, who sent him to the Assembly by a whopping 57% to 43% margin. Their views and voices deserve to be heard. Democrats may be California's majority party, enjoying a sizable registration advantage. They hold 60 of 80 seats in the Assembly and 30 of 40 in the state Senate. But the state has nearly 6 million registered Republicans. There are doubtless many more in California who support the party, or at least its policies and broad philosophy, but choose not to formally affiliate with the GOP. They, too, deserve to be heard. A not-insignificant number of California residents feel overlooked, ignored and unrepresented by Democrats and their hegemonic rule over Sacramento. The frustration helped spawn the fruitless and wasteful 2021 attempt to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom — which cost taxpayers more than $200 million — and fuels the perennial fantasy of a breakaway rural state called Jefferson. To a larger point: One-party rule is not good for California. 'When you're competing, you've got to be sort of on your toes,' said Thad Kousser, a UC San Diego political science professor who's researched the difference between states with two vibrant political parties and those ruled by one or the other. 'When you're solidly in control, you don't feel like you need to prove it to voters,' Kousser went on. 'You can write off certain areas of the state. You can ignore legislators in the other party, because you don't think the shoe will ever be on the other foot. 'None of that,' Kousser concluded, 'is good for democracy.' It's been well over a decade since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger left office and Republicans wielded meaningful clout in Sacramento. The last time the GOP controlled the Assembly was when Bill Clinton was in the White House. Gerald Ford was president the last time Republicans had a majority in the state Senate. That's not likely to change anytime soon. In the meantime, Democrats don't have to love their fellow lawmakers. They don't even have to like them. But at the very least, Republicans elected to serve in Sacramento should be treated with respect. Their constituents deserve as much.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F.'s Great Highway recall fight begins: Did Joel Engardio mislead the Sunset?
The campaign to recall San Francisco Supervisor Joel Engardio kicked off canvassing efforts Saturday at McCoppin Square Park along Taraval Street in the Sunset District, one month after successfully triggering a special election set for Sept. 16. Armed with bright yellow pamphlets bearing Engardio's face and text in both English and Chinese that read 'He turned his back on the Sunset,' dozens of volunteers gathered to knock on doors and canvas their neighbors to vote for the recall. The trouble for Engardio, a moderate elected out of District 4 in 2022, started when he championed a ballot measure that would permanently remove cars from a 2-mile stretch of the city's westernmost coastal boulevard, the Upper Great Highway, in favor of opening a park. That measure, called Proposition K, passed with 55% of the citywide vote in the November election. But a majority of voters in westside precincts, where residents say they relied on the highway to drive around their neighborhood, rejected the measure. Engardio has defended the measure that converted the highway into what's now called 'Sunset Dunes Park,' arguing it was a democratic opportunity to restore access to the coast for all residents. He said he's been his district's 'champion' since day one, pointing to his support for restoring algebra to eighth grade, adding police beat patrols to Irving Street and creating the Sunset Night Market. The recall effort reflects not only the intense controversy over urban land use in San Francisco, but also the burgeoning political power of westside residents who feel their quality of life was harmed by what they perceive as a 'war on cars.' 'I've lived out here for years and I've never seen the Chinese community get so behind anything,' said Susan Chen, a 30-year Sunset resident and recall volunteer, at Saturday's canvassing effort. Meanwhile, Engardio's supporters have argued that recalls, funded by taxpayer money, are a waste of city resources, that it's undemocratic to vote out a supervisor based on a single issue and that the Sunset Dunes Park has had a minimal impact on congestion. A Chronicle data analysis of westside traffic data painted a complicated picture of how the highway closure has impacted traffic: Some commutes have become longer during rush hour as drivers are forced onto more congested alternative routes, especially Chain of Lakes Drive in Golden Gate Park. But some arteries showed no slowdowns at all. Engardio said he's worked with SFMTA to alleviate the traffic impact. Those interventions include adding dual left and right turn lanes and a traffic signal at a key intersection to ease congestion on Chain of Lakes Drive. Engardio's backers ramped up advertising and appealed for Mayor Daniel Lurie to support Engardio last week. Engardio has some high-profile supporters, including Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelmann, who posted on his X account Monday, 'Moderate SF Supervisor @JoelEngardio fixes potholes, supports small biz, brought back Algebra, and fights for what's right no matter how high the personal stakes.' Stoppelmann, who donated $175,000 to the 'Stand with Joel' anti-recall campaign, added that Lurie should back Engardio. Lurie has, so far, not taken a public stance on the recall effort against Engardio. If he is recalled, it will fall on Lurie to pick his replacement. 'This recall is wasteful and threatens to derail all the progress that's been made to tackle the city's biggest challenges,' said Joe Arellano, spokesperson for the Stop the Recall campaign, in a statement, adding that 'Joel will be out knocking on doors and earning votes, like a true public servant.' Arellano also called the recall effort 'GOP-backed,' pointing to an email sent out by the San Francisco Republican Party this week that encouraged followers to join Saturday's rally. Jamie Hughes, one of the lead organizers for the recall, said that the effort includes 'everybody from every ideology' and that the group tries 'to stay away from labels.' Hughes is an ally of former progressive San Francisco Board of Supervisors president Aaron Peskin. He said the recall campaign isn't coordinating with the Republican Party and argued that GOP support shows that the recall is drawing people from all sides of the political spectrum. That's because, in his words, 'Joel messed up.' Recall proponents said the recall isn't only about the Great Highway, but how Engardio's behavior during the past year showed what they consider to be a lack of transparency, accountability and representation. John Higgins, a Sunset resident, said he never even used the Great Highway and is not looking to reopen it, but he felt Engardio lied about his stance. He pointed to how Engardio, alongside four other city supervisors, submitted a proposal to place Proposition K on the ballot on June 18, 2024, the last possible day for them to do so. 'These are shady methods,' Higgins said. Many recall proponents said they were taken by surprise, only learning about Engardio's proposal through news articles, and were upset that Engardio never held town halls prior to placing the issue on the ballot. Many said they thought Engardio had lied to them because, in 2022, while campaigning against then-incumbent District 4 supervisor Gordon Mar, he had said he supported what was then the status quo of pedestrianizing the highway on weekends only. 'Had he told this district when he was running for supervisor that he was going to close down the Great Highway 24/7, he would never have been elected,' Chen said. Engardio rejected that characterization. He supported the status quo in 2022, he said, compared to the alternative at the time, which was a ballot measure to open the Great Highway to cars 24/7. He said he had told voters he didn't want to rule out the option of a permanent park in place of the highway when campaigning in 2022. He also posted on X, then known as Twitter, in December 2022, after being elected, 'I believe the future is a permanent oceanside park.' Those explanations ring hollow to Selena Chu, who had campaigned to elect Engardio in 2022, believing he supported the compromise of keeping the highway open to cars on weekdays. 'We felt our voice was heard and that's why we advocated for this person,' Chu, a recall organizer, said. 'It was a personal betrayal and it was also a betrayal to the community. This was a guy I had advocated for for two years.' As Chu walked down 22nd Avenue Saturday, a fellow Sunset resident, spotting Chu's Recall Engardio sign, started clapping. 'Everything he's done has been underhanded,' Gene Pulliam, who's lived in the Sunset for 60 years, said to Chu. 'He put the paperwork in the last week or something. That's just wrong.'
