US Orders Halt to New Student Visa Interviews, Politico Says
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman Says She's Helping an Ex Who's Going Through a ‘Crisis' — at the ‘Expense' of Her Current Relationship
The woman, who shared her story on Reddit, said she feels as though her boyfriend is "leveraging" the situation "to make me choose between them"NEED TO KNOW A woman claims her boyfriend is 'livid' because she is helping an ex who recently 'suffered a severe mental health crisis' The woman says she and the friend 'briefly' dated almost a decade ago She shared her story on Reddit, where the majority of commenters said they thought the woman's boyfriend was being unreasonableA woman says her partner is 'livid' because she's been helping out an ex in 'crisis' — and she's wondering who's in the wrong. The 34-year-old detailed her story on the popular Reddit forum 'Am I the A------,' a place where users can go to seek advice about interpersonal dilemmas. In her post, the woman said she has been dating her current partner, 'Tom,' for 'about eight years,' and they recently bought a home together. The woman went on to explain that she has a friend, 'Alex,' whom she 'briefly' dated 'for about six months almost a decade ago' — though she said that it was 'more like a platonic, asexual companionship than a romantic relationship.' The issue? The OP (original poster) said Alex recently 'suffered a severe mental health crisis.' 'He was involuntarily hospitalized, lost his job. He's disoriented, struggles with memory, and clearly needs support,' she added. 'I've been trying to help where I can, like helping him fill out job paperwork or apply for assistance because he has no one else here [in this country],' she continued. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The OP went on to share that her partner is now 'absolutely livid' over the situation — despite the fact that she only sees Alex 'about once a month.' 'He's never liked Alex, and now he openly hates him,' she wrote. 'He's said hurtful things like, 'Are we supposed to wipe his a-- forever?' and has called him cruel names." 'I can't help but feel that he's leveraging this situation as an opportunity to make me choose between them … which feels pretty bad, to be honest,' the OP added. The OP also said that while Tom 'demands transparency' about the current situation with Alex, he also 'blows up' when she shares details about what's happening. She additionally said that Tom refuses to go to couples counseling with her because he 'doesn't really seem to believe in therapy.' "He accuses me of choosing [my friend] over him and says he feels like I'm not hearing his concerns,' she added. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'So, AITA [am I the a------] for continuing to help my friend even though it's damaging my relationship?' the OP asked as she concluded her post. The vast majority of commenters said they thought the OP was perfectly within her right to want to help her friend — and also suggested that she perhaps reconsider her relationship with her partner. 'NTA [not the a------],' one person said. 'Your partner's comments are uncalled for, and his refusal to go to therapy is a big red flag. He sounds very emotionally immature and more than a little insecure.' 'NTA,' agreed someone else. 'Lose the load and get rid of Tom. You sound like a good friend to Alex. Tom sounds like a terrible boyfriend.' 'Have you fully considered what this behavior says about your partner?' yet another commenter asked. 'Leaving aside the fact that he's coming across as jealous and controlling, he's coming across [as] incredibly callous and selfish.' They added, 'Your friend is struggling alone, and your partner wants you to what? Forget that? Stop caring? He has zero concern for a fellow human who is important to you. Is that really someone you want to be with?' If you or someone you know needs mental health help, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
7 minutes ago
- New York Times
Until Trump Fired Her, She Was an Economist With Bipartisan Support
Nearly the entire Senate supported Erika McEntarfer in 2024 when she was nominated to lead the agency that produces key data on jobs and inflation. The widely respected economist was confirmed on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote, with support from Vice President JD Vance, who was then an Ohio senator, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, then a Florida senator. But Dr. McEntarfer was suddenly caught in the political crossfire on Friday when President Trump lashed out over the agency's most recent jobs report and fired her for releasing monthly jobs data showing surprisingly weak hiring. He called the data 'rigged' without offering any evidence, and he accused Dr. McEntarfer of manipulating the job numbers 'for political purposes.' Dr. McEntarfer was appointed to her most recent post by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2023. Before that, she earned her stripes at the Census Bureau, where she worked for over two decades under both Republican and Democratic presidents. She graduated from Bard College with a bachelor's degree in social sciences, and she obtained a Ph.D. in economics at the Virginia Tech. She began her career as an economist at the Census Bureau, where she worked for six years, according to her LinkedIn profile. In 2008, she joined the Treasury Department, where she analyzed the president's budget as well as the effect of tax policy proposals on revenue. Dr. McEntarfer returned to the Census Bureau in 2010, assuming more of a leadership role. She became the head of research for the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, which is responsible for developing new statistics on postsecondary employment outcomes and quarterly work force indicators. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Northern Colorado school district to ban cell phones in classrooms
Starting next year, all school districts in Colorado are required to have a policy in place limiting the use of cell phones in classrooms. But some schools will have those new policies in place this year. The Weld RE-4 School District in Weld County will not allow students to use their cell phones during class when school starts this month. The district, which serves Windsor, Severance and western Greeley, announced it will enforce a cell phone ban in nearly all situations while students are on school grounds. "We are implementing a new cell phone policy that we think will be great for everybody," said Kami Fockler, a local parent and member of the district accountability team. Fockler said a team of local parents and staff worked together to try and find a way to eliminate the distractions of cellphones in classrooms that was appropriate for all ages. She said she recently read the book "The Anxious Generation," which uses data to show how younger generations have been impacted by the emergence of cellphones and social media. The impacts can range from decreased learning to lower confidence and even depression. She said she has noticed many children are more likely to take comfort in their phones than with their peers. "They will text each other instead of talking," Fockler said. "They're more concerned with what is going on (in their hand) than they are with what is going on in their surroundings. I think that is a concern." The Weld RE-4 district will start the 2025-2026 school year with a new policy that nearly bans all cell phone use in schools. The policy prohibits the use of cell phones inside elementary and middle schools. For high school students, they can only use their cellphones during passing periods and lunch. Smartwatches are only allowed to be used for timekeeping purposes at all levels. "We just want the best learning environment for the kids," Fockler said. Many know that cellphones have been a distraction in classrooms for more than 20 years, especially as smartphones became more prevalent. While some students use the devices in class to scroll social media, others have used them to cheat on school work or even communicate with their family for non-school related reasons. "Kids will sometimes be ordering their lunch on them, they are playing a game. It takes away from the learning time," Fockler said. The district announced students at all grade levels could face having their phones confiscated and turned over to school administrators for the remainder of the school day if they are caught using them. First offenses could result in students having to pick up the phone from the school office. Repeat offenses may include parents having to go to the school to retrieve the phone for their students. Repeat offenders may also be required to complete additional assignments from the school to help them understand why the policies exist. "Learning for the kids is the important thing, and that is why we need to concentrate on this,' Fockler said. Governor Jared Polis signed a bipartisan bill into law that requires all Colorado school districts to create their own cell phone policies by the start of the 2026-2027 school year. Fockler said Weld RE-4 was already exploring the idea of creating its policy before the law was created, adding she thinks the 2025-2026 school year will give the district the chance to see if its policy was effective before making any possible changes for the 2026-2027 school year. "In the end, I hope we create great learning environments for the students, where their time isn't interrupted, and they can focus on their studies," Fockler said. "And (hopefully) the parents can see that in the kids' grades, they can see it in the way they feel about school."
