
More ICE Deaths 'Inevitable' as Detention Numbers Soar
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Deaths in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers look set to surpass the previous year's total, with three months still to go.
With 12 people confirmed to have died while in ICE custody since October 2024, when the current Fiscal Year began, the number has already matched the previous year's total. Human rights groups are warning more are certain.
"These deaths are clearly attributable to the Trump administration's increased and aggressive detention policies, and I have no doubt that when more complete investigations take place, it will likely provide information that these deaths were likely preventable," Eunice Cho, senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) National Prison Project, told Newsweek.
The latest death came on June 26, when 75-year-old Cuban national Isidro Perez, in the country for decades, passed away in a hospital after suffering a heart issue while in a Miami ICE facility.
In response to that news, President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan told reporters outside the White House: "People die in ICE custody."
To be sure, ICE detention centers are not alone in experiencing deaths of detainees, with the the U.S. prison system — at both federal and state levels — frequently reporting deaths among inmates.
In 2019, the mortality rate across the prison system was 259 per 100,000 inmates, based on Department of Justice figures showing 4,234 deaths in prisons at state and federal level nationwide.
By comparison, the mortality rate of ICE detainees at the current numbers would work out to about 21.3 deaths per 100,000 people. The ICE population also has a far quicker turnaround than the prison system.
How Many Immigrants Die In ICE Custody?
In fiscal year 2022, running from the previous October through September 2022, three people died in ICE detention – the lowest number since reporting was mandated by Congress in 2018.
The highest recent yearly death total came in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, with 21 deaths across the agency's various facilities. Those facilities are often run by private companies contracted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ICE repeatedly says that individuals in its charge receive high-quality medical assessments and care, including 24-hour emergency medicine.
But several independent reports over recent years, including from the ACLU and Robert F. Kennedy Center for Human Rights, have given a very different picture of the conditions facing detainees who are awaiting immigration hearings or deportation.
In 2024, the ACLU outlined a lack of oversight when it came to ICE detention deaths, suggesting evidence may have destroyed and highlighting efforts to blame low-level employees for the incidents. The organization, working alongside others, found that many deaths were likely preventable, should medical care have been more readily accessible.
"People are dying preventable deaths in [Homan's] direct custody," Cho said. "People are dying because of the lack of constitutionally required medical care that should be provided to anybody in government custody."
A Growing Number of Detainees
A year later, far more people are being placed in ICE detention. Since January, the Trump administration has been increasing its efforts to arrest and detain illegal immigrants. While Congress has allocated funding for around tens of thousands of more beds in the current tax bill, the number of detainees stood at roughly 56,300 as of mid-June.
"There's never been a time where immigration detention hasn't been deadly, so it's just inevitable that the more people we detain, the more people who are going to die," Anthony Enriquez, the vice president of U.S. advocacy and litigation at RFK Human Rights, told Newsweek.
ICE is struggling with limited capacity and resources to fulfill its mission of millions of deportations. In addition to the new funds being allocated to the agency by Congress, the White House is trying other novel ways to expand capacity, from repurposing Guantanamo Bay to new detention center contracts issued for private companies GEO Group and CoreCivic, to the new so-called "Alligator Alcatraz" in southern Florida.
Following a tour of the new detention facility on Tuesday, which includes bunkbeds stacked together in wire-fenced cages, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem praised the standards on offer.
"Alligator Alcatraz can be a blueprint for detention facilities across the country. It will provide DHS with the beds and space needed to safely detain the worst of the worst," she posted on social media.
President Donald Trump tours "Alligator Alcatraz," a new migrant detention facility at Dade-Collier Training and Transition facility, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Ochopee, Florida.
President Donald Trump tours "Alligator Alcatraz," a new migrant detention facility at Dade-Collier Training and Transition facility, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Ochopee, Florida.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci
All of this is to deliver on the president's promise of mass deportations. Trump returned to the White House promising upwards of 11 million immigrants without legal status would be deported, targeting the "worst of the worst" first. Records have shown that a large share of those currently in detention do not have a criminal record, but civil immigration offenses instead.
"A lot of people misunderstand the purpose and the nature of immigration detention, and they think that if it's a detention center, then it's a jail, and if it's a jail, then that means this is someone who has already been found guilty of some type of bad act and should be serving a punishment," Enriquez said. "But in fact, many of the people in immigration detention do have lawful status to be here in the United States."
Cho, of the ACLU, told Newsweek that ICE was not exercising discretion with respect to those it was now detaining. Because more people are remaining in detention when they previously would have been released, the situation is leading to a "deterioration of conditions in custody," he said.
"My fear is this trajectory is only going to increase," Cho said. "That is because Congress is on the cusp of passing a new reconciliation bill that is providing $45 billion to the expansion of immigration detention in the country, and I want to compare that to the current $4 billion that ICE already receives every year for its already massive immigration detention system.
"This amount of money is going to provide ICE with the ability to not only double, triple, quadruple the capacity of people who are being held in immigration detention, it is going to allow a system that is larger than the entire federal Bureau of Prisons population put together, under the care of someone like Tom Homan who has expressed total disregard for the fact that people are dying in custody."
Newsweek reached out to ICE via email Tuesday for comment on the increase in deaths and measures being taken to prevent any more. The agency did not reply before publication.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
200 Marines sent to Florida to support ICE, U.S. Northern Command says
Around 200 Marines are heading to Florida to support Immigration and Customs Enforcement authorities, U.S. Northern Command said Thursday, noting that it was the 'first wave' of the organization's planned support for ICE operations in several states. Service members from Marine Wing Support Squadron 272 will 'focus on administrative and logistical tasks' and are 'specifically prohibited from direct contact with individuals in ICE custody or involvement in any aspect of the custody chain,' the command said in a statement.


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk teases plans for ‘America Party' after fury over Big, Beautiful Bill Act
Billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk spent July 4 publicly plotting a strategy for his proposed 'America Party' to gain control of the balance of power in Washington following next year's midterm elections. Peeved by Republicans' passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Musk declared on X that 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! 'Should we create the America Party?' the 54-year-old South Africa-born billionaire polled his followers, more than 62% of whom had answered 'yes' as of 2:30 p.m. 'One way to execute on this,' Musk continued, 'would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts.' 4 Tech baron Elon Musk has been publicly flirting with the idea of forming some sort of third party. REUTERS 4 House Speaker Mike Johnson has been forced to navigate an ultra-slim majority in the lower chamber. AP 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' Last month, Musk dramatically turned against President Trump and his second-term agenda legislation, calling it 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' Publicly, the Tesla and SpaceX has cited concerns about the bill's impact on the deficit, to which the legislation is projected to add about $3.9 trillion over the next decade. Musk served as the driving force behind the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting initiative, causing fierce personal and professional backlash. 4 Senate Republicans have a 53 to 47-seat majority. Getty Images 'What good is Doge saving $160B when this bill increases the debt ceiling by $5T? It makes [a] mockery of the work,' Musk groused on X Tuesday. Trump and GOP leaders have alleged that Musk's animus is really motivated by rollbacks to Biden-era green energy tax credits, which are expected to harm Tesla. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' Musk had complained last week ahead of the Senate's passage of the megabill. Over recent days, Musk has amplified social media posts by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who voted against the measure due to deficit concerns. 4 President Trump has traded barbs with Elon Musk, but largely held back against his former billionaire buddy. AP Trump and his allies have set their sights on ousting Massie in a Republican primary, but Musk has indicated he intends to support the legislator's expected re-election effort in 2026. As the world's richest man, Musk's pockets run deep, with an estimated net worth of $405 billion. During the 2024 election cycle, Musk doled out a whopping $290 million to support Trump, according to financial disclosures. Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate and a 220-212 majority in the House of Representatives.

Miami Herald
42 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why Tesla needs to fire Elon Musk: It's business, not politics
President Donald Trump and the Republican part have ignored climate change and demonized electric vehicles (EV). The president's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" phases out the tax credit for buying an EV with it disappearing in September. He has also repeatedly called out EVS as being unreliable and "not going very far." Before he became buddies with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, he ridiculed him and his businesses. Related: Costco has a massive labor problem nobody is talking about When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it's electric cars that don't drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, 'drop to your knees and beg,' and he would have done it," Trump wrote on social media. Musk, however, became a Trump advisor when he donated nearly $300 million to his election campaign. That got him appointed to lead the childishly-named Department of Government Efficiency where he gleefully harassed long-time federal workers and eliminated programs that wasted money doing things like feeding hungry people. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter It was a hard-right turn for Musk, which was and odd choice given who the buyers fro EVs. are Democrats: "On every dimension, Democrats view EVs more favorably than Republicans do," shared Pew Research. Image source: Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty Images While many CEOs lean right, or openly embrace right-wing ideology, but it's common to step down from any leadership positions before joining the government. Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets, for example, served in the first Trump administration and stepped down from his position running the team. New York is overly liberal, but Johnson separated his two live. Musk did not do that and that's a problem because the Pew data suggests that Republicans are not a real market for EVs. Environmental benefits: Democrats and those who lean to the Democratic Party are much more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say EVs are better for the environment than gas vehicles (69% vs. 24%).Cost to buy: A majority of both Democrats and Republicans say EVs cost more to buy than gas vehicles. But fewer Democrats than Republicans say this (65% vs. 81%).Cost to charge/fuel: Half of Democrats say EVs cost less to charge than gas vehicles do to fuel. That compares with a quarter of Very few Democrats or Republicans think EVs are more reliable than gas vehicles, but Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say this (14% vs. 5%). Half of Democrats say EVs and gas vehicles are about the same on reliability, while 34% say EVs are less reliable. Republicans are even more negative, with 69% saying EVs are less reliable. Musk's hard-right turn and eventual return to the middle, has had major consequences on Tesla. When a CEO does something that overshadows the brand, they get fired. Both Best Buy and McDonald's removed successful CEOs over inappropriate, but not illegal, relationships. Musk has done something far worse, He has made it so Tesla's (TSLA) core audience, liberals, sees the Tesla name as a sort of swear word. That has led to many existing owners adding a "I bought this before Elon went crazy" bumper sticker and new liberal customers staying away. Tesla sales dropped 13.5% in the second quarter, after also dropping in the first quarter. The company faces the Musk backlash, and concerns over its aging vehicle lineup. Musk has not hurt Tesla irreparably, but his presence makes it harder to fix the problem. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans, according to a June AP-NORC poll. Related: As shoppers ditch Shein and Temu, these stores are winning "Musk has acknowledged that his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his embrace of European far-right candidates have hurt the company. But he said earlier this year that much of the sales plunge is due to customers holding off while they waited for an ugrade to Tesla's best selling Model Y. That new version has been out for months now," reported. Take Musk off the top off the masthead, and liberals can go back to saluting the brand for its social responsibility, but leave him there, and your target audience simply won't buy. That's not a political decision. It's just business. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.