logo
Piyush Goyal seeks apology from CM Siddaramaiah over remarks on vaccine

Piyush Goyal seeks apology from CM Siddaramaiah over remarks on vaccine

Union Minister Piyush Goyal on Saturday demanded that Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah apologise to the country's scientists and pharmaceutical sector for his recent remarks linking COVID-19 vaccines to a spate of heart attack deaths in the state and questioned whether he was "running the agenda of foreign forces".
Accusing the Chief Minister of "insulting" India's scientists, startups, and its pharmaceutical strength, Goyal said his comments undermine the people who worked tirelessly during the pandemic.
According to Goyal, it is "unfortunate" that such remarks are coming from the CM of a country that is known as the 'pharmacy of the world', a country where our startups are expanding and forming an ecosystem, a country where our vaccines were exported on a large scale to other nations.
This was possible only because our pharmaceutical companies had the strength and innovation to produce vaccines at a cost of less than Rs 100, he told reporters here.
Lauding the pharmaceutical companies, he said they made India proud.
"We didn't just roll out one vaccine, but two. The country was able to provide free vaccines to our entire population... He insulted our scientists and pharmaceutical companies," he claimed.
"Is he running the agenda of foreign forces that want to harm India's pharmaceutical sector, disturbed by India's financial growth? Whether it is the Congress party, the CM, or all their partners, do they want to strengthen the hands of foreign forces by demeaning India? He should answer and apologise to our scientists and pharmaceutical companies," he further alleged.
Earlier, addressing the IIT Madras Alumni Association's Sangam 2025 event here, he added that Siddaramaiah does not take pride in India's success or its startups and scientists. Instead, he is "ashamed of India and its startups achieving such remarkable success." He credited Bharat Biotech for developing India's first indigenous COVID-19 vaccine, Covaxin, and Oxford-AstraZeneca for granting rights to produce Covishield at Pune-based Serum Institute of India.
"We were not only able to provide 2.5 billion vaccines free of charge to all our citizens, but also supplied vaccines to over 100 nations, particularly less developed or developing countries that otherwise had no protection against this disease," he said.
Goyal pointed out that even today, India is being thanked for the medicines and vaccines it provided to other nations during the pandemic.
"They (Congress) want to run down India's success stories, and it pains us when we hear this kind of negativity coming from certain sections of society," he alleged.
Neither the Congress nor Siddaramaiah has responded to Goyal's claims so far.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Covid cases decline in Pune after brief rise in May
Covid cases decline in Pune after brief rise in May

Hindustan Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Covid cases decline in Pune after brief rise in May

After a slight surge in Covid-19 cases in May, Pune city reported a decline in numbers in the month of June, Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) officials said. However, the situation improved in June, with the number of cases decreasing to 68, they said. (FILE) According to PMC officials, in May, the city reported 93 Covid cases, a significant increase after months of very low activity. However, the situation improved in June, with the number of cases decreasing to 68, they said. Furthermore, from January to April this year, Pune had reported just one COVID-19 case, indicating almost no presence of virus circulation in the city during that period. The rise in May was not serious and was handled well due to ongoing health surveillance and prompt response measures, said the civic health officials. 'The increase in May was minor, and there is no reason for concern at this time. Many cases tested positive in private city hospitals were incorrectly reported to be from the PMC limits. We are continuing our surveillance to ensure early detection and control,' said Dr Vaishali Jadhav, assistant health officer, PMC. PMC authorities have urged citizens to stay alert, maintain hygiene, and consult doctors if they experience symptoms. People should avoid panic and instead focus on being cautious, especially people in high-risk categories. Besides, vaccination, timely testing, and responsible behaviour are still important in keeping COVID-19 under control, they said. As per the statement issued by the Public Health Department, on Sunday Maharashtra reported 8 fresh COVID-19 cases. Of which, 2 are from PMC, 5 are from Mumbai and 1 from Kolhapur. Since January 2025, as many as 2577 covid cases and 41 deaths amongst the infected have been reported. Also, the state has a recovery rate of 95.92%. Besides, since January, as many as 2569 covid cases and 41 deaths amongst the infected have been reported. Furthermore, currently, there are 64 active Covid cases in the state. Since January, Mumbai has reported 1012 covid cases, of which the highest 551 cases were reported in June alone, said Dr Sandeep Sangale, joint director of Health Services. Dr Sangale said the number of cases have declined in the state. 'The team is conducting regular surveillance of influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARI) patients. Around 5% of ILI patients and all SARI patients are tested for COVID-19. Besides, samples of all positive patients are sent for Whole Genome Sequencing.'

Congress govt to spend Rs 22,500 crore on Indiramma housing, says Telangana deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka
Congress govt to spend Rs 22,500 crore on Indiramma housing, says Telangana deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Congress govt to spend Rs 22,500 crore on Indiramma housing, says Telangana deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka

HYDERABAD: Deputy chief minister Bhatti Vikramarka on Sunday stated that the Congress govt will be spending 22,500 crore on the implementation of the Indiramma housing scheme, under which 4.5 lakh houses are being constructed for the poor in Telangana. Construction is already underway for 1.1 lakh Indiramma houses, with work on the remaining units set to begin soon. The govt has sanctioned 4.5 lakh housing units in the first phase of the scheme. The govt is extending 5 lakh financial assistance to the scheme beneficiaries for the construction of houses. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad 'Opposition conspiring' Addressing a public meeting held as part of the distribution of Indiramma housing sanction letters in the Madhira assembly constituency, Bhatti noted that of the 1.1 crore families in Telangana, approximately 93 lakh are benefiting from one or more welfare schemes implemented by the Congress govt. "The opposition is fearful and conspiring against us because our welfare programmes are transforming the lives of the poor for the better. Regardless of their conspiracies, this govt will continue to work tirelessly for the people. The aspirations of the poor can only be realised through the Congress govt," he said. He added that had the previous BRS govt fulfilled its promise to build 2-BHK homes for the poor during its 10-year tenure, there would have been no need for the current administration to invest thousands of crores in the Indiramma Housing Scheme. The present govt, he asserted, will boost revenues and channel them into welfare initiatives, enabling the poor to live with dignity. He further stated that 93 lakh families across the state are currently receiving fine rice free of cost through fair price shops. "We are providing gas cylinders at 500 each and supplying free electricity up to 200 units for the poor. The govt is also distributing Cheyutha monthly pensions to the elderly, persons with disabilities, and single women," he added.

Operation Sindoor showed us MPs can do what foreign ministries can't
Operation Sindoor showed us MPs can do what foreign ministries can't

The Print

time28 minutes ago

  • The Print

Operation Sindoor showed us MPs can do what foreign ministries can't

In Track 1½, every word still matters. A heartfelt story from one's constituency or personal experience can break the diplomatic freeze. That blend of authority and flexibility makes parliamentary diplomacy surprisingly effective in global problem-solving, from ending wars to writing rules for artificial intelligence. Parliamentary diplomacy is a fancy term for something very simple: elected representatives talking to one another across borders to ease tensions, exchange ideas, and build trust when formal diplomats hit roadblocks. Because MPs are answerable to voters, the tone is often more down-to-earth than the stiff notes exchanged by foreign ministries. Scholars call this Track 1½ diplomacy, a lane that sits halfway between official talks, known as Track 1, and the informal chats of academics or NGOs, called Track 2. Also Read: Modi vs Indira is a needless debate. Operation Sindoor has defined PM Modi's legacy Operation Sindoor as a turning point When India struck terrorist camps across the Line of Control after the brutal and barbaric Pahalgam attack as part of Operation Sindoor, the Modi-led government began sending multi-party teams of MPs to foreign capitals, instead of letting only seasoned envoys carry India's message. The logic was very clear—when lawmakers from both treasury and opposition benches speak in a common voice, partners abroad see it as a national stand, not a partisan talking point. Seven different delegations, adding up to 59 MPs from the BJP, Congress, DMK, and others, were sent to 33 countries. They sat with foreign legislators, think-tank experts, editors, and Indian communities overseas. They explained why India had no choice but to act, how the strikes were measured and lawful, and why Pakistan must stop giving safe havens to militants. Those conversations mattered. Reports from Washington, Europe, and the Gulf all said one thing: India's story sounded more convincing when told by lawmakers from various shades of political affiliation, who do not hesitate to bicker, often acrimoniously, at home. Even more important, the delegations reminded Indians back home that on national security, the House could still speak in one voice. The ripple effect at home was institutional. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, noting that several host countries had requested permanent channels, recently pushed to revive formal friendship groups with foreign parliaments—a practice that had gone cold for years. Prime Minister Narendra Modi backed the plan, showing that the executive wants Parliament in the foreign-policy cockpit, not just cheering from the back. Operation Sindoor was not a one-off. Back in 2012, an all-party group led by then Leader of Opposition, the late Sushma Swaraj ji, flew to Sri Lanka to press Colombo on Tamil rights. Their common stand eased worries in Tamil Nadu and nudged the Sri Lankan president toward some devolution steps. In 1994, then Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao sent a delegation led by Leader of Opposition Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji to the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) in Geneva to counter Pakistan. Such stories match global patterns. During the late Cold War, US and Soviet lawmakers linked by satellite for the 'Congressbridge' dialogues. The public could watch rivals trade barbs one moment and laugh the next, humanising each side long before formal arms deals were signed. Similar logic now guides the NATO Parliamentary Assembly's outreach to Ukraine or ASEAN's efforts to coax Myanmar back to democracy. The need to scale up Still, parliamentary diplomacy has its flaws. MPs juggle tight calendars, sparse research support, and election cycles that reset relationships every few years. Friendship groups risk becoming junkets if they lack clear goals, and bills can stall in committees. The remedy is to institutionalise the craft: brief lawmakers before trips, give them professional staff, and store every visit's minutes in a shared digital vault so successors start from version 2.0, not blank pages. The Speaker's new plan for friendship groups should include a modest budget for such continuity tools. Why does this matter for the average citizen? Because wars and AI glitches both end up hitting pocketbooks and personal freedoms. If a ceasefire fails, fuel prices soar. If a malicious bot floods social media with a virus, investors panic. MPs are closest to these everyday problems. When they step onto the international stage, they carry the hopes and fears of real people, not just bullet points from foreign-office cable grams. That human link can soften hard positions, keep talks alive during crises, and spot solutions diplomats might miss. Imagine an Indian MP in Berlin explaining how a farmer in Kalahandi uses UPI and crop-insurance apps built on open-source platforms. That story can nudge German lawmakers to back joint funding for global digital public goods, giving both nations a stake in shared standards. Or picture an Indian MP at a parliamentarian forum hearing a Bangladeshi MP cite flooding data from Bangladesh that match rainfall patterns in Indian territories. They might jointly lobby for a climate-alert grid, knitting cooperation from common pain. Track 1½ diplomacy draws strength from such stories. It turns abstract strategy into talks, which can be carried back home and translated into budgets, school programmes, or start-up rules. For India, scaling this tool is both self-interest and soft-power display. A permanent Joint Committee on International Affairs, staffed with experts in peace studies and data security, could travel as easily as it legislates. It could run tours in the Indo-Pacific, host dialogue with African digital ministers, and even open its doors to diaspora town halls streamed online. When a crisis strikes—for example, a border flare-up, a rogue AI virus, or a vaccine rush—the committee would already know whom to call and what trust roadmap to follow. That readiness is cheaper than emergency firefighting. Also Read: India's all-party delegations show a problem with our embassies A way to build credibility and resilience The Modi government, by embracing parliamentary outreach after Sindoor and by putting MPs at the centre of tech talks, has set the direction. Legislators of every party should see foreign engagement as part of the job. Voters must reward serious cross-border work, not just television debates. Ministries can share briefings on time and treat MPs as partners. Think-tanks and universities should feed quick factsheets and longer studies, so that lawmakers land abroad armed with more than just talking points. Parliament cloud could store country notes, contact books, and draft MOUs searchable by future delegations. The world is listening. Many partners now ask India to lead South-South caucuses on AI ethics, digital payments, and climate-smart farming. Our MPs, shaped by the give-and-take of Indian democracy, are trained negotiators even before they step off the plane. If they speak with unity—ruling party, opposition, or regional voices—that chorus can be louder than any single ministry. The ceasefire that ends the next war, the treaty that stops a rogue algorithm, or the green corridor that stabilises supply chains might well be born in a roundtable chaired by a Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha member. And that, in plain words, is why parliamentary diplomacy deserves more airtime, budget, and respect. India's edge is credibility. We host both billionaires and subsistence farmers, quantum labs and tribal schools. Our MPs straddle that range every week in their constituencies. When they enter the Track 1½ space, they bring practical insights: how to price solar pumps, how to teach AI basics in local languages, and how to police deepfakes. That lived reality can bust myths and unblock talks. Countries that once saw India through the narrow lens of non-alignment now see a partner who codes, vaccinates, mediates, and legislates at scale. That impression did not come only from G20 headlines; it came from MPs shaking hands in committee rooms. Parliamentary diplomacy will not erase all wars or tame every dispute. But it certainly adds a layer of resilience. When leaders cannot meet, lawmakers still can. While diplomats talk numbers and protocol, legislators tell stories. One persuades the head, the other moves the heart. If we keep investing in this people-powered channel, our Parliament may yet prove to be the world's best conflict-prevention tool—not with soaring speeches alone, but with steady, patient, everyday conversations that turn rival states into responsible neighbours and runaway tech into trusted tools. The author is a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha from Odisha and a practicing Advocate. The co-author is a Mukherjee Fellow working with MP Sujeet Kumar. Views are personal. (Edited by Asavari Singh)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store