Trump threatens Washington stadium deal unless NFL team re-adopt Redskins name
US President Donald Trump on July 20 threatened to interfere with a deal to build a new football stadium in Washington, DC, unless the local National Football League team, now known as the Commanders, changes their name back to Redskins.
The American football team dropped the name Redskins in 2020 after decades of criticism that it was a racial slur with links to the US genocide of the indigenous population.
Mr Trump had called for a return to the name Redskins - and for the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to once again adopt the name Indians - on other occasions, but on July 20, he added that he may take official action.
'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' he said in a post on his Truth Social platform.
The team moved from Washington to suburban Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but earlier this year reached an agreement with the local District of Columbia (DC) government to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030.
Mr Trump has limited authority to intervene under the current home-rule law governing federal oversight of the District of Columbia, but he has raised the prospect of taking more control, telling reporters in February, 'I think we should take over Washington, DC'.
Representatives of the Commanders did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise
Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers
Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle
Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore
Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups
Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins?
Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation
World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers
Some fans have advocated readopting the name Redskins out of tradition, but leading indigenous rights organisations have opposed the name, including the National Congress of American Indians, the Association on American Indian Affairs, and Cultural Survival.
At least one group, the Native American Guardian's Association, has supported the name Redskins and the 'respectful use of Native American names and imagery in sports, education and public life'. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Judge questions legality of Trump administration's US$2 billion Harvard fund freeze
A federal judge in Boston cast doubt on the legality of the Trump administration's termination of more than US$2 billion in federal research funding for Harvard University over alleged institutional failures including antisemitism on campus. In a hearing on July 21, US Judge Allison Burroughs raised questions about the constitutionality of the government's decision to slash the funding and called some of their arguments in defense of the move 'mind boggling.' She pushed back in particular on the administration's claims that the funding cuts were justified by Harvard's failure to tackle antisemitism. 'There are limits to what you can terminate, and why, and how,' Ms Burroughs said to Justice Department lawyer Michael Velchik during the hearing. 'It seems to be your idea that you can terminate a contract even if the basis for termination is a constitutional violation.' President Donald Trump has made Harvard the main target of his effort to force universities to reshape higher education by cracking down on alleged antisemitism, removing perceived political bias among the faculty and eliminating diversity programs. Harvard's lawsuit alleges Mr Trump's move violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The Trump administration announced earlier this year that it was scrutinising billions in federal grants and contracts to Harvard. The government has also threatened Harvard's tax-exempt status and tried to prevent international students from enrolling. Mr Velchik said at the hearing that he attended Harvard and considered it to be the best place to get an education. But he repeatedly echoed Mr Trump's argument that the school 'exhibited a wanton disregard for antisemitism' during campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. 'I am both Jewish and American so I hear what you are saying,' the judge said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US President Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria World US not rushing trade deals ahead of August deadline, will talk with China, Bessent says Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for the hospitality sector? Both sides of the case have asked Ms Burroughs to issue final rulings in their favour without a trial, an action known as a summary judgment. The judge ended the hearing without ruling and said she had not yet made a decision on the release of the funds. The hearing came about a month after Mr Trump said in a social media post that the administration was nearing a deal with Harvard. 'We are confident that Harvard will eventually come around and support the President's vision, and through good-faith conversations and negotiations, a good deal is more than possible,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement on July 21. On a social media post on Truth Social on July 21, President Trump referred to Ms Burroughs as an 'Obama appointed Judge' and 'an automatic 'loss'' for the government's case, but vowed to immediately appeal any ruling against the administration. 'Harvard has US$52 billion dollars sitting in the bank, and yet they are anti-semitic, anti-christian, and anti-America,' Mr Trump said in a post. 'Much of this money comes from the USA, all to the detriment of other Schools, Colleges, and Institutions, and we are not going to allow this unfair situation to happen any longer.' After the hearing, dozens of Harvard alumni and professors held a rally outside the courthouse in support of the university, chanting the school's 'Veritas' motto and slogans like 'Stand up, fight back!' Mr John Quackenbush, chair of the biostatistics department at Harvard's TH Chan School of Public Health, said the funding freeze threatens not only his own research related to cancer and other diseases, but the work of his post-doc researchers, who he said are now being recruited by foreign institutions. 'The drain on the future of American research is something none of us should stand for,' he said. During the hearing, Ms Burroughs heard arguments by lawyers for the university and a group of professors, who argued that the funding freeze was unlawful and unconstitutional. US lawyers claim the Trump administration properly froze funding because Harvard failed to curb antisemitism on campus, particularly after the Israel-Hamas war erupted in October 2023. They said Mr Trump rescinded grants because Harvard no longer complied with Mr Trump's policy of combating antisemitism. 'Harvard should have read the fine print,' Mr Velchik said during the hearing, arguing that the government can terminate grants at any time if a university is not aligned with its priorities. The school claims Mr Trump retaliated when it rejected government demands to control its governance, curriculum and the viewpoints of faculty and students. 'In some ways you're justifying the conduct on protecting Jews and upholding American values but on the other hand taking steps that are antithetical to those things,' Ms Burroughs said at the hearing. Later, at the end of the hearing, the judge told Mr Velchik that she hoped nothing had been said that would appear to diminish anyone's concerns about antisemitism. 'This is obviously a very fraught and emotional topic,' she said. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump, Xi aides discussed autumn US-China leaders' meeting, sources say
US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping at the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, in June 2019. WASHINGTON/BEIJING - Aides to Mr Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders during a trip by the US president to Asia later this year, according to two people familiar with the plans. While plans for a meeting have not been finalised, discussions on both sides of the Pacific have included a possible stopover by Mr Trump around the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea or talks on the sidelines of the Oct 30 - Nov 1 event, the people said. Mr Trump has sought to lower tensions with Beijing in recent weeks after pausing a tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. China has also sought the attendance of international guests, including some from the United States, for a Sept 3 Beijing ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two, said a spokesperson for China's embassy in Washington in a briefing last week for reporters. The Kremlin said on July 21 that it did not rule out the possibility of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Mr Trump meeting in Beijing in September if Mr Trump decides to attend that ceremony. Mr Putin has confirmed his attendance. 'Diplomacy between heads of state plays an irreplaceable strategic leading role in Sino-US relations,' said Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun on July 21, declining to comment on a possible Trump-Xi meeting. The White House declined to comment. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US President Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria World US not rushing trade deals ahead of August deadline, will talk with China, Bessent says Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for the hospitality sector? US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on July 21 there would be 'talks in the very near future' between the countries. 'Trade is in a good place, and I think now we can start talking about other things. The Chinese, unfortunately ... are very large purchasers of sanctioned Iranian oil, sanctioned Russian oil,' he told CNBC. He added: 'We could also discuss the elephant in the room, which is this great rebalancing that the Chinese need to do.' Mr Trump has sought to impose tariffs on virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10 per cent on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from some, including China. Imports from China have the highest tariff rate of 55 per cent. Mr Trump has set a deadline of August 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariff agreement. Other points of friction between the countries include China's support for Russia, trade in fentanyl-related chemicals, regional security worries, and exit bans on some American residents. The most recent high-level US-China meeting was on July 11, when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Mr Rubio said then that Mr Trump had been invited to China to meet with Mr Xi, and said that both leaders 'want it to happen'. On July 18, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war. REUTERS
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump releases Martin Luther King assassination files
FILE PHOTO: People walk by the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, ahead of the presidential inauguration of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, in Washington, U.S., January 16, 2025. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo WASHINGTON - The U.S. Justice Department on Monday released more than 240,000 pages of documents related to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., including records from the FBI, which had surveilled the civil rights leader as part of an effort to discredit the Nobel Peace Prize winner and his civil rights movement. Files were posted on the website of the National Archives, which said more would be released. King died of an assassin's bullet in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 1968, as he increasingly extended his attention from a nonviolent campaign for equal rights for African Americans to economic issues and calls for peace. His death shook the United States in a year that would also bring race riots, anti-Vietnam war demonstrations and the assassination of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump's administration released thousands of pages of digital documents related to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and former President John F. Kennedy, who was killed in 1963. Trump promised on the campaign trail to provide more transparency about Kennedy's death. Upon taking office, he also ordered aides to present a plan for the release of records relating to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and King. The FBI kept files on King in the 1950s and 1960s - even wiretapping his phones - because of what the bureau falsely said at the time were his suspected ties to communism during the Cold War between the U.S. and Soviet Union. In recent years, the FBI has acknowledged that as an example of "abuse and overreach" in its history. The civil rights leader's family asked those who engage with the files to "do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief," and condemned "any attempts to misuse these documents." Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US President Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for the hospitality sector? Life Cosby Show star Malcolm-Jamal Warner dies by drowning at 54 "Now more than ever, we must honor his sacrifice by committing ourselves to the realization of his dream – a society rooted in compassion, unity, and equality," they said in a statement. "During our father's lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation," the family, including his two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said, referring to the then-FBI director. James Earl Ray, a segregationist and drifter, confessed to killing King but later recanted. He died in prison in 1998. King's family said it had filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in Tennessee in 1999 that led to a jury unanimously concluding "that our father was the victim of a conspiracy involving Loyd Jowers and unnamed co-conspirators, including government agencies as a part of a wider scheme. The verdict also affirmed that someone other than James Earl Ray was the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. Our family views that verdict as an affirmation of our long-held beliefs." Jowers, once a Memphis police officer, told ABC's Prime Time Live in 1993 that he participated in a plot to kill King. A 2023 Justice Department report called his claims dubious. REUTERS
