Ramkarpal backs tenure extension for Tengku Maimun, two senior judges
KUALA LUMPUR A DAP member of parliament has expressed his backing for extending the tenure of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and two other senior judges, saying it would end uncertainty over their positions and help advance the unity government's reform agenda.
Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh, who is also DAP national legal bureau chairman, said there appeared to be no compelling reason not to extend the tenures of Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, and Federal Court judge Tan Sri Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan.
"The government has stated on many occasions that institutional reform remains one of its top priorities and it is difficult to comprehend why the extension of the tenures of the said judges does not align with such an agenda, particularly at a time when many Federal Court judges have retired or are due to retire.
"In the circumstances, it is imperative to allow for a continuation of the status quo of the current administration of the judiciary in order to ensure a smooth transition when the new batch of Federal Court judges takes over," he said in a statement today.
Ramkarpal added that the Federal Constitution provides for the extension of Federal Court judges' tenure, and that such a provision must have been intended, among other things, to facilitate the administration of justice.
This, he said, is precisely what needs to be done now, given the number of vacancies that will arise following the mandatory retirement of several Federal Court judges, as previously mentioned.
"It must also be pointed out that this is not a case of the extension of one judge but three, two of whom are the top two judges in our judicial hierarchy, which makes it all the more important for the government to explain why their tenures are not being extended if that was the case.
"The said three judges have performed their duties well and have preserved, protected and defended the Constitution in accordance with their oaths of office and as such, there certainly is merit in extending their tenures for a further six months.
"The government should seriously consider doing so as this would certainly enhance the perception of its commitment to reform," he said.
It was previously reported that the Malaysian Bar had expressed concern over the uncertainty surrounding the extension of tenure for Tengku Maimun, Abang Iskandar and Nallini.
Its vice-president Anand Raj had said it was unusual for the Chief Justice, President of the Court of Appeal or a senior Federal Court judge not to be granted a six-month extension.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Appointment of judges decided by Constitution, PM reminds
PUTRAJAYA: Reiterating his stance on non-interference in the judiciary, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim says judicial decisions are made by the courts and should not be politicised. The Prime Minister also said that all appointments and extensions of service of judges must follow procedures as outlined in the Federal Constitution. "If one understands the Constitution, the process is clear. 'There's a commission, there's the Prime Minister and there's the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. "If you look at the recent appointments, the list of candidates is submitted to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and then brought to the Conference of Rulers for discussion. "These procedures must be followed,' he said at the Prime Minister's Department's monthly assembly. "I believe that when institutions like the judiciary are politicised, decisions can give the impression of betrayal," he said. "I've heard the issues being raised ... but I have never interfered in judicial matters. 'Whatever decisions are made (by the courts), those are theirs, but even that is being politicised," he said. The Prime Minister lamented the public's tendency to interpret judicial decisions based on their own political leanings. He cited recent high-profile cases, including those involving Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman and former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak. "We must respect the judges and the decisions they make. 'I notice people have double standards. They support a DNAA (discharge not amounting to an acquittal) in one case but reject it (in another). 'We can't be like that. 'We must remember to uphold (the integrity of the judiciary), not follow political preferences," he said. Meanwhile, the Malaysian Bar said the government should make it known whether Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's tenure as Chief Justice will be extended or a new appointment made in accordance with the Federal Constitution and Judicial Appointments Commission process. Its president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab said that with Tengku Maimun's retirement due today, the unknown status of her successor reflects "a failure in institutional responsibility". "This vacuum at the very apex of the judiciary is as absurd as it is dangerous," he said. Tengku Maimun turns 66 today, the mandatory retirement age for judges.
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
PM chooses key people in govt, not the royals
YOURSAY | 'You either don't understand your role or you don't have the courage.' PM pushes back against lobby to extend CJ's term, calls it politicisation GP20257: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, if you haven't figured it out yet, let me spell it out. The issue isn't that every retiring civil servant should have his/her tenure extended, but the excellent ones should, especially when there's a vacuum in key positions. There was no lack of candidates for the MACC chief or IGP posts, but they were duly filled, not according to normal promotion procedures. In Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's case, it's very clear that a very good CJ is being bypassed, even according to normal procedures. It's not just ordinary people who are asking for her extension, but the Malaysian Bar, respected leaders, and other professionals. To us, it means; 1) Your judgment is flawed and unreliable; 2) You don't understand your role, or you don't have the courage to advise the king on your choice. It's the prime minister who chooses the key people in his or her government, not the royals, as the royals in this country, according to the Federal Constitution, do not govern. Top appointments to the government are the PM's choices. As long as the choices are made according to the constitution, the king makes the PM's choices official. That's the meaning of the king acting on the advice of the PM. It takes a PM with a backbone, not a glib mouth, to advise the king on his role. Apparently, Anwar can't do the job. Just resign and spare us this misgovernance. BobbyO: What a lame excuse. Anwar, do you think the people are fools, or do you think that power is in your hands and you will decide according to your own selfish agenda, just as you did in extending MACC Azam Baki's tenure not once but thrice? Remember, even the toughest and cruellest dictator has fallen, as they think that power is theirs to wield as they like. Remember Umno and jailed former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak. They thought that they were unbeatable as they had the finance, resources, and manpower. Look at where they stand today. Such a lame excuse, and Malaysians can very clearly see through you and your motive if you do not want to extend Tengku Maimun's tenure. Why then did you extend Azam's tenure? Is it because it worked in your favour? Was it not a political move? Why were the others due for promotion made to wait? What about the inspector-general of police and his deputy? Why was the deputy not promoted to the next level? It is so clear to see that you are frightened of promoting decent and honest civil servants. Seriously, Anwar, stop taking the people for granted. Umno did, and they lost big - four states to the opposition. What will be PKR's position at the next election? Reduced to the level below MIC and MCA? Half full Cup: Let's face it, our PM does not welcome most of the people's opinions, especially the professional group and his supporters, because he feels he is now the maharaja of the day. In fact, he has even forgotten or refused to recognise who his supporters are for the past 20 over years. The fault lies in his supporters (especially the urban citizens). If we look at what he did when he was in Umno, he was a very racist leader, hence his meteoric rise to be the deputy president of Umno. He was almost on the verge of becoming the president (prime minister). Most of his reforms at the time were very much at the expense of a certain group of people. We have been badly mistaken, or maybe we have fooled ourselves. Has DAP also taken advantage of the people's foolishness to gain power and enjoys that power now? BetterMY: Thank you for shooting yourself in the foot once again! The rakyat is fully aware of your administration's tactics of only retaining those subservient to you. Where you should have retained talent, you let them go, and where you should have dispensed with them, you gleefully retained. We will keep this in mind when voting in the 16th general election. Mind you, we're not racist to completely dispel of BN and PN, there are good administrators there too. It's just a matter of ridding BN and PN of the extremist and corrupt voices. Once that is done, we'll have a credible alternative to your incompetent administration. We have given you an opportunity, and you squandered it. We have given you that opportunity despite your entitled attitude towards the top post since 1998. Your days at the administration are numbered, and you will soon join the one-term PM list. And before any ardent and blind supporters of Pakatan Harapan jump on this, please be known that I have voted for Harapan since GE10. So my thinking is both reflective of the groundswell against Harapan and also the maturing of our electorate. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Is it constitutional to criminalise the failure to notify police five days before a rally? Federal Court to decide today
KUALA LUMPUR, July 1 — Did you know that if you organise a peaceful rally in Malaysia but did not inform the police five days before the event, you can be fined up to RM10,000? Today, the Federal Court will decide if it is constitutional to make it a crime for an organiser not to notify the police five days in advance before a peaceful rally is held. What law is the Federal Court examining? The Peaceful Assembly Act 2012's (PAA) Section 9(1) requires an organiser to notify the police five days before the date of a peaceful gathering. Under the PAA's Section 9(5), anyone who fails to give the five days' notice commits an offence, and will be fined a maximum RM10,000 if convicted in court. Two questions for the Federal Court to answer today The Federal Court was asked to decide if it agrees that Section 9(5) is unconstitutional because it goes against the rights promised to all Malaysians under the Federal Constitution: the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 10(1)(a); and the right to assemble peacefully under Article 10(1)(b). Previously, the Court of Appeal gave two conflicting decisions in two different cases: in 2014, it said Section 9(5) is unconstitutional; and in 2015, it said Section 9(5) is constitutional. Today, the Federal Court will decide once and for all if Section 9(5) is a valid law and can be used in Malaysia against organisers of peaceful rallies. Lawyer Abraham Au confirmed to Malay Mail that there has been no Federal Court decision yet on whether Section 9(5) is constitutional or not. He confirmed that the Federal Court could make clear which of the Court of Appeal decisions was correct. How did this case come about? On August 26, 2022, political party Malaysian United Democratic Alliance's (Muda) then secretary-general Amir Hariri Abd Hadi was charged in the Magistrates' Court under Section 9(1) for failing, as the organiser, to inform the police five days before an August 14, 2022 rally. Amir Abd Hadi is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court August 26, 2022. — Picture by Firdaus Latif The charge stated that this was a crime that can be punished under Section 9(5). Before his trial could begin, Amir succeeded in getting the Magistrates' Court to refer constitutional questions regarding Section 9(5) to the High Court. The High Court later decided to forward those constitutional questions to the Federal Court. These are the two questions that the Federal Court will decide today. The Federal Court decision today will determine if Amir has to face trial in the Magistrates' Court, his lawyer Au confirmed. Why is this case important? In written arguments at the Federal Court, Amir's lawyers say politicians are often the organisers of public rallies, and Section 9(5) could result in them losing their status as MPs or the chance to be an MP. This is because the Federal Constitution's Article 48(1)(e) disqualifies a person from becoming or remaining an MP if the court convicts and sentences a person to a fine of at least RM2,000 or at least one year of jail and they have not been pardoned. In other words, if you are fined RM2,000 or more under Section 9(5), you cannot contest in elections to be an MP. If you are already an MP, you will lose your parliamentary seat. What does the government plan to do with the law on peaceful rallies? On February 13, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said the government will change the PAA 2012 to remove the need to get a venue owner's permission for a peaceful rally. But Anwar said organisers will still need to give five days' notice to the police to ensure safety and traffic control. On April 30, Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the government plans to bring the proposed changes to the PAA to Parliament in the next meeting (to be held in July and August) or by October at the latest.
