logo
Judges call for environmental protection, condemn attack on environmentalists

Judges call for environmental protection, condemn attack on environmentalists

India Today06-06-2025

On the occasion of World Environment Day, recently retired Supreme Court Justice Abhay S Oka and sitting Supreme Court Justice Sanjay Karol called out the attacks on activists and the Judiciary for trying to protect the environment.Speaking at the inaugural ceremony for the Climate Change Conference organised by the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) and the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), Justice Karol drew attention to the annual problem of seasonal air pollution in Delhi and the stink from the pollution in the river Yamuna. Justice Karol also called for cooperation between industry, the judiciary, the government and the people to protect the environment.'I see that there is no conflict between activism in the Indian judiciary and economic growth, or the development of the economy or otherwise in India. There is no doubt that all of us have to work together to achieve the constitutional goal that is set out in the preamble,' said Justice Karol.Justice Oka, who was also honoured at the event for his contribution to the development of environmental law in India, praised the activists who fight for the environment, despite the opposition they face.'What I find from my long experience—20 years as a lawyer and nearly 22 years as a judge of three constitutional courts—is that very few citizens show enthusiasm and courage to take up environmental issues. It is not easy to address environmental concerns, as those who raise these issues rarely get active societal support,' said Justice Oka.advertisement'Often, people seriously addressing environmental issues are branded anti-development, accused of obstructing so-called developmental activities. That is the greatest tragedy of our society.Those fighting for the environment are fighting for social and economic justice guaranteed under the Constitution. Their ultimate aim is upholding the rights under Article 21. However, those advocating for environmental causes rarely receive societal support. When society doesn't support them, how can we expect public authorities or the government to support them?' said Oka further.Justice Oka also said that there is no conflict between development and protection of the environment.'Someday, we should debate the concept of development itself. Do we necessarily mean construction of huge buildings, roads, and flyovers, or should development mean providing basic amenities to the poor and needy? That is a separate debate altogether,' said Oka.Justice Karol also called for 'grassroots solutions' to environmental issues.advertisement
"If you were to see our report card in the last 75 years, or since the 1980s, what is it really we have done? Have we done enough to protect the environment, or not? My view is this: a lot needs to be done, at all levels. And I would borrow an expression that the solution to the problem now is grassroots solutions to an international problem. So, grassroots solutions for global challenges. The way forward, according to me, is that we as individuals have to take up the causes pertaining to the environment,' said Justice Karol.Delhi High Court Justice Jasmeet Singh also spoke about the need to maintain a balance between development and environmental protection, particularly in light of the economic impact. "Limited attention is given to environmental care because of the economic challenges it poses. Transitioning to sustainable practices is frequently seen as costly or disruptive, especially in a developing economy like India. There is significant dependence on fossil fuels. This creates a sense of conflict between environmental responsibility and economic growth. But I believe that challenge can be transformed into an opportunity, an instrument of meaningful change," said Justice Singh.Senior advocate Lalit Bhasin, President of SILF and Chairman of the CII National Committee on Legal Services, also said that 'Sustainability is no longer an optional agenda; it is a core element of national and business competitiveness.'Meanwhile, at a separate event to mark World Environment Day at the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Chairman NGT Justice Prakash Shrivastava called for 'collective action' to protect the environment. Highlighting the urgent need to curb plastic pollution, Justice Shrivastava said that 'The National Green Tribunal stands as a sentinel for environmental protection, but our efforts alone are insufficient without the active participation of every citizen.' Must Watch

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India asks Pakistan for early repatriation of 159 prisoners, fishermen
India asks Pakistan for early repatriation of 159 prisoners, fishermen

Business Standard

time40 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India asks Pakistan for early repatriation of 159 prisoners, fishermen

India and Pakistan on Tuesday exchanged, through diplomatic channels simultaneously in New Delhi and Islamabad, the lists of civilian prisoners and fishermen in each other's custody. India has shared names of 382 civilian prisoners and 81 fishermen in its custody, who are Pakistani or are believed-to-be Pakistani. Similarly, Pakistan has shared names of 53 civilian prisoners and 193 fishermen in its custody, who are Indian or are believed-to-be Indian, India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. Under the provisions of the bilateral Agreement on Consular Access 2008, such lists are exchanged every year on 1 January and 1 July. India has called for early release and repatriation of civilian prisoners, fishermen along with their boats, and missing Indian defence personnel from Pakistan's custody. Pakistan has been asked to expedite the release and repatriation of 159 Indian fishermen and civilian prisoners who have completed their sentence. In addition, Pakistan has been asked to provide immediate consular access to the 26 civilian prisoners and fishermen in Pakistan's custody, who are believed-to-be Indian and have not been provided consular access so far, the MEA said. Pakistan has been requested to ensure the safety, security and welfare of all Indian and believed-to-be Indian civilian prisoners and fishermen, pending their release and repatriation to India, it said. The ministry said that as a result of sustained efforts by New Delhi, 2,661 Indian fishermen and 71 Indian civilian prisoners have been repatriated from Pakistan since 2014. This includes 500 Indian fishermen and 13 Indian civilian prisoners who have been repatriated from Pakistan since 2023 till date.

India-Canada trade deal gets a second wind as diplomatic ties improve
India-Canada trade deal gets a second wind as diplomatic ties improve

Business Standard

time40 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India-Canada trade deal gets a second wind as diplomatic ties improve

Both countries have agreed to resume talks for an interim trade agreement in a volatile global scenario as part of their effort to reset diplomatic relations following a bitter fallout under Trudeau Shreya Nandi Delhi Listen to This Article After an acrimonious fallout late last year, India and Canada are tentatively trying to reset diplomatic relations, following the establishment of a new government in the north American nation, with the resumption of talks for an interim trade agreement. The new push comes after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart Mike Carney met on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Alberta, where they also agreed to restart senior ministerial as well as working-level engagements across various domains to 'rebuild trust' and 'bring momentum' to the relationship. Both leaders have also decided to designate new high commissioners

Major split in US education unions as NEA blasts, AFT backs parental rights ruling by Supreme Court
Major split in US education unions as NEA blasts, AFT backs parental rights ruling by Supreme Court

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Major split in US education unions as NEA blasts, AFT backs parental rights ruling by Supreme Court

Major split in US teachers unions after Supreme Court backs parental rights on LGBTQ lessons. (Getty Images) In a rare and public divide, the two largest teachers unions in the US—representing nearly 5 million educators combined—have taken opposing stances on a major Supreme Court decision involving parental rights and LGBTQ-themed content in public school curricula. The 6-3 ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor allows parents in Maryland to opt their children out of classroom lessons that include LGBTQ topics if such material conflicts with their religious beliefs. The case has not only stirred debate across the country but also exposed fault lines within the leadership of the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), two organizations that traditionally align closely on education policy and political matters. Union leaders react sharply to landmark ruling NEA President Becky Pringle sharply criticized the decision, claiming it undermines professional educators and harms students. As reported by Fox News, Pringle posted on BlueSky, 'Students pay the price when books are censored and educators are silenced.' She added that the court had 'failed students' and 'ignored the expertise of trained educational professionals,' calling the ruling 'shameful.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like People Aged 50-85 With No Life Insurance Could Get This Reassured Get Quote Undo The NEA, which represents more than 3 million educators, has long opposed efforts to restrict access to books or materials that reflect LGBTQ identities and experiences. In contrast, AFT President Randi Weingarten expressed a more nuanced position, emphasizing the importance of parental involvement and local decision-making. According to Fox News, Weingarten said, 'We have to respect all children and all families. Bad facts make bad law. Mahmoud should have been worked out on a local level, it's a shame it went all the way to SCOTUS.' She added, 'Parents must have a say about their own kids—they are our partners in education. ' Weingarten had echoed similar sentiments earlier this year during oral arguments, telling Fox News, 'This is something that has to be happening at the local level and not in the Supreme Court,' and noted that the books in question are not ones she would personally read to children. Unions typically united on social issues Both Pringle and Weingarten have historically shared political alignment, having endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race. The current divide is notable given their longstanding opposition to conservative-led education policies, including book bans and curriculum restrictions. Despite her statement supporting parental input, Weingarten has previously pushed back on book challenges. In 2023, she launched the 'Freedom to Teach and Learn' hotline to report attempts at banning educational content, accusing 'MAGA lawmakers' of using 'culture wars to divide communities,' as reported by Fox News. Other Supreme Court decisions announced The Mahmoud v. Taylor decision was one of several education-related rulings announced the same day. While details of other cases were not immediately available, the court's docket indicated a focus on First Amendment concerns and the balance between public education standards and religious liberties. This split between the NEA and AFT highlights growing tensions within US education policy—where cultural, legal, and parental rights debates continue to challenge traditional alliances and educational norms. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store