
Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity - Middle East Business News and Information
The world woke up to the threat of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs early in Q2, responding with a crash-like swoon in early April as markets took the new trade regime seriously. But, as traders have come to expect—in what's now called the 'TACO trade' (Trump Always Chickens Out)—Trump quickly announced a 90-day delay to tariffs for all countries except China, buying time for the US to negotiate new trade deals. By mid-May, the US and China had agreed to step down from embargo-like tariff levels, setting the stage for Q3, which hopefully brings more answers and fewer questions than we saw in the first half of the year, though nothing is guaranteed in the age of Trump 2.0. As we look ahead to Q3, the issues that loom largest in the market include:
US-China: the path from here and who holds the leverage?
China remains 'the world's factory,' and finding alternative sources for everything it produces is a tall order. But its most potent leverage lies in rare earth metals, their processing and use in key industrial components. The world breathed a sigh of relief when China resumed rare earth exports after a near-embargo in early April, but a couple of caveats remain: China is fully aware of its power—not just in mining and refining these critical materials, but also in manufacturing essential industrial components containing these materials, especially magnets used in chip manufacturing, EV batteries, wind turbines, and military hardware. Estimates suggest more than three-quarters of US military equipment contains rare earth components. Building a full, non-Chinese supply chain would take years, even with maximum effort.
After briefly halting rare earth shipments in Q2, China has announced it will limit export licenses to just six months. It could also monitor buyers and restrict supply for specific end uses, such as military applications.
Meanwhile, the US retains some considerable leverage of its own, notably in jet engine components for Boeing aircraft and its exports of ethane, a crucial chemical input for plastics production.
The first big US trade deals and related tariff schedules
Beyond the nervous détente between the US and China, we'll be watching where US tariffs land with the rest of the world. As we write, President Trump is expected to unveil a new tariff schedule targeting less critical countries—and those deemed to be negotiating 'in bad faith.' Importantly, Q3 should see the most important trade deals with US traditional security allies Japan and Europe. The US-Japan trade negotiation process may be complicated by politics, as the tone may change after the July 20 upper house elections in Japan.
While few expect tariffs to return to the punitive levels of April's 'Liberation Day' announcements, they're likely to remain substantive, averaging perhaps in the 12–18% range—and will weigh on both US and global growth.
Iran-Israel conflict: does this fade or escalate?
This outlook is being written amid renewed hostilities between Israel and Iran, as Israel seeks to block Iran's nuclear ambitions. The impact on oil markets has been dramatic, raising fears of a new inflation wave. But impacts from geopolitical tensions are very difficult for market participants to anticipate or process. As for central banks that have their hands on the policy levers that can more directly move markets, they are likely to look through any energy-driven price spikes if sentiment and growth prospects deteriorate, maintaining a dovish stance despite an energy price-inspired inflation surge, if that's what we get.
US recession risks
Recession risks are likely set to rise in the second half, partly due to a post-tariff slowdown after the pre-tariff rush in Q1 and early Q2, and as leading indicators point to incoming weakness. The Federal Reserve's prolonged high policy rate, relative to inflation, adds to the pressure, with the housing market showing signs of severe deterioration. Our base case is for a mild recession in the second half, before inflationary growth picks up early next year ahead of the mid-term US elections.
Further downside this year in the growth outlook comes from tariffs, which act like a tax in terms of their first order effects. When you raise the price of something in the economy, there isn't suddenly more money to buy it; rather, participants in the economy either buy less of that item or less of something else, resulting in a real growth decline. Trump's anti-immigration policies may have a surprisingly large impact as well, as ICE raids and pressure tactics are scaring some workers without legal status underground and some may even be self-deporting. There's little hard data on this thus far, only anecdotes, but at the margin there will be a consumption and labor supply impact for select industries that employ the most workers without legal status, including in agriculture, construction and hospitality industries.
A wildcard for the US and global economy is whether AI disruption could trigger the first true white-collar recession, as jobs requiring higher cognitive skills across industries are replaced by highly productive AI tools. Again, anecdotes abound, but perhaps in Q3 or soon thereafter we'll get some real data on the impact of AI.
Anticipated market outcomes
USD to remain weak. Precious metals to remain strong.
Trump 2.0 policy is anti-globalist, a policy that economist Russell Napier calls 'national capitalism' and what others might dub a 'reverse mercantilism' as the US tries to unwind the global order it built since WWII. That global order was great for building the world economy and ensuring cheap prices for American consumers. A strong dollar has been at the heart of the order as mercantilist powers suppressed their currencies to build export-driven economies, hollowing out US manufacturing and making the US unacceptably prone to supply chain disruptions, a matter of national defense. Despite Trump's transactional style and erection of trade barriers, the US dollar will remain the most important currency, but it will be less important than before.
Other major economic players will recycle less of their capital into the US economy and US equities and US treasuries and have to rebalance their savings and consumption domestically. Europe is already showing strong signs of doing so, prompted by the suddenly shaky US commitment to the transatlantic alliance and Trump's posturing on the terms of trade. Germany's dramatic new fiscal expansion has already given the euro a strong boost, and EURUSD could be bound for 1.25 by year-end. Japan is proving slow to strike a deal with the Trump administration, as noted above possibly held up by the domestic political situation in Japan. But the very weak Japanese yen is a flashing red light for the US-Japan trade relationship that is likely set for course correction (a much stronger yen).
Precious metals power commodities sector to robust H1 performance, more gains ahead
The commodities sector is on track for a strong first half with the Bloomberg Commodities Index trading up around 9% at the time of writing, thereby comfortably outperforming other US dollar-denominated assets, including bonds and equities, with both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq lagging well behind. While commodities typically rally during periods of robust economic growth, the current upswing is largely driven by geopolitical risks and investment demand for tangible hard assets—particularly for precious metals.
Gold has led the charge for months, with silver and platinum recently joining the rally amid a potent mix of rising fiscal debt concerns, tariff-driven supply shocks, a softening labour market, and continued US dollar weakness—developments that may eventually prompt a dovish, and potentially stronger-than-expected, policy shift by the Federal Reserve. Adding to this is the risk of higher inflation and central banks extending their gold-buying spree into a fourth consecutive year; the groundwork for a push toward USD 4,000 within the next twelve months is, in our opinion, within reach.
Silver's recent break above USD 35 may signal higher prices ahead, also on a relative basis to gold where accelerated central bank demand for gold since 2022 has left silver trailing on a relative basis as seen through the gold-silver ratio trading closer to 95 than its five-year average near 80.
Equities outlook
For US equities, multiple paths are possible, but in general, the unwinding of US exceptionalism and a rebalancing away from the overallocation to US equities (peaked at over 70% of the MSCI world index early this year) will likely mean an underperformance relative to global peers for perhaps years to come. Nearer term, if the Fed cuts rates aggressively, equities could rally strongly, as we saw in late 2007 before the severity of the incoming global financial crisis became clearer. In addition, the belief that the US can't afford its endless large US fiscal deficits and a bleeding default via inflation is the only way to reduce the real burden of the national debt supports the TINA (There Is No Alternative) trade for US stocks. Nonetheless, if recession hits, expect a drop in corporate profits and renewed volatility.
For global equities, again, the unwind of US exceptionalism in portfolio allocations should continue to support global markets ex-US in relative terms. As well, a weaker USD is often a particular boost for emerging markets. In Europe, Germany's fiscal expansion is a long-term positive, though the slow rollout of corporate tax cuts (merely from 30% to 25%, and only starting in 2028) has been disappointing.
The biggest risks to the outlook are chiefly geopolitical. If Iran feels existentially threatened by Israel's attacks and lashes out in a way we don't anticipate, triggering a profound spike in global energy prices, global growth could come in for a hard landing. In this scenario, the US comes out on top due to its general self-reliance in energy. Otherwise, if the relationship between the US and China deteriorates badly once again for whatever reason, markets could come in for a negative shock.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
9 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Putin Signs Law Allowing Foreigners to Serve in Russian Military
By Ahmad El-Assasy Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a new law on Monday allowing foreign nationals to serve in the Russian military. According to Russia's state news agency TASS, the law enables non-Russian citizens to sign military contracts and serve in the armed forces until the end of mobilization orders, martial law, or wartime conditions. TASS reported that the legislation includes amendments to several key laws, such as those governing military duties, defense, and the status of military personnel. The law will officially come into effect upon its publication. A legislative note explained that the measure was expedited to allow for urgent additional recruitment into the Russian Armed Forces. This move is seen as part of Russia's efforts to bolster its military amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean


Daily News Egypt
10 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Egypt's Strategic Dilemma: Sovereignty, Diversification, and the $7.5bn Offer
The recent offer from the United States—$7.5bn in military modernization aid in exchange for guaranteed free passage through the Suez Canal—has placed Egypt at a crossroads. This proposal comes amid rising tensions over US aid conditions, congressional scrutiny of Egypt's human rights record, and Cairo's deliberate strategy to diversify its military partnerships with China and Russia. As an Egyptian politician, I recognise the gravity of this decision: balancing national sovereignty, strategic autonomy, and the undeniable financial allure of Washington's offer. The Suez Canal: A Sovereign Asset beyond Price The Suez Canal is not merely a waterway; it is a symbol of Egyptian sovereignty and a pillar of our economy. The Canal generates over $9bn annually—more when geopolitical conflicts to the south are resolved—and is governed exclusively by Egyptian law and international treaties, such as the 1888 Constantinople Convention, which guarantees free navigation without compromising Egypt's right to regulate transit fees and security. The US demand for 'free passage' in exchange for aid risks undermining this sovereignty, echoing President Trump's earlier controversial remarks that dismissed Egypt's control over the Canal. Accepting such terms could set a dangerous precedent, inviting further external pressure on our strategic assets. The $7.5bn Temptation and Its Strings The US offer is undeniably significant. It could modernise Egypt's ageing F-16 fleet, replenish missile stockpiles, and strengthen border security—all critical needs. However, history shows that US military aid is rarely unconditional. Congress has repeatedly withheld portions of Egypt's $1.3bn annual assistance over alleged human rights concerns, and the Biden administration has waived requirements only when aligned with US geopolitical interests—such as in Gaza ceasefire negotiations. Worse still, the proposed deal coincides with threats to cut aid if Egypt refuses to accept displaced Gazans—an absolute red line for Cairo. Can we trust that this $7.5bn won't come with hidden political costs? Diversification vs. Dependency: Egypt's Strategic Calculus Egypt's recent pivot toward Chinese and Russian arms—such as the HQ-9B air defence system and potential J-10C fighter jet deals—reflects a calculated strategy to reduce dependence on Western suppliers. The US has long restricted access to critical technologies (e.g., AIM-120 missiles for F-16s) to placate Israel, while China offers advanced systems with fewer political strings attached. Yet US law explicitly penalises countries that engage in 'significant transactions' with Russia or China's defence sectors, potentially jeopardising future aid. This puts Egypt in a bind: forfeit diversification—and with it, strategic flexibility—or risk losing US support. The Path Forward: Sovereignty and Pragmatism Egypt must negotiate from a position of strength. The Suez Canal's value to global trade grants us leverage; the US needs the Canal more than we need their aid. Any agreement must: Explicitly respect Egyptian sovereignty over Canal management and fee regulation. Avoid linkage to unrelated issues, such as Gaza displacement or human rights benchmarks. Permit continued military diversification, ensuring US aid complements—rather than replaces—partnerships with China or Russia. Be subject to time limits that correspond to the value and duration of the aid provided. The $7.5bn is tempting, but Egypt's long-term security cannot be auctioned off to the highest bidder. Our military partnerships must serve our interests—not the agendas of external powers. As the Arab world's and Africa's leading military power, Egypt has earned the right to chart its own course—one that balances pragmatism with unyielding sovereignty. The choice is difficult, but one thing is certain: we will explore all options, but never submit. Dr. Mohamed El-Seidy: EgyptAir pilot, education and sustainable mobility entrepreneur, and member of CPYP


Daily News Egypt
11 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
NDB expands to 11 members, raises $16.1bn in 2024, says Rousseff
The New Development Bank (NDB) has approved Colombia and Uzbekistan as new members, its president Dilma Rousseff said, as the lender focuses on expanding its membership and increasing financing in local currencies for sustainable development in the Global South. Speaking at the conclusion of the BRICS-led bank's Annual Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Rousseff confirmed the decision by the Board of Governors, which is composed of the finance ministers of the BRICS countries. The additions bring the bank's total membership to 11 countries, which also includes its founders Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, as well as the United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, Egypt, and Algeria. Rousseff said that other countries are under review for membership but did not disclose their names, citing internal confidentiality guidelines. 'Our expansion will follow strategic criteria, always with the goal of strengthening our representativeness within the Global South,' she explained. Rousseff also outlined the bank's governance model, drawing a contrast with institutions like the IMF and the World Bank. 'Our Bank was established by the Global South for the Global South, with a governance structure based on substantive equality among members,' she emphasized, noting that the model does not allow for unilateral veto power and rejects political or economic conditionalities on its loans. 'Our model is demand-driven. It is the member countries that define their development priorities, and we assess projects based on technical—not political—criteria.' The NDB president addressed a challenging 15-month period when the bank was unable to raise funds in international markets. Since taking leadership in March 2023, she said she has led a campaign to resume bond issuances, successfully raising $16.1bn in 2024 at competitive rates. 'Today we have strong credit ratings, including a AAA grade from the Japanese agency JCR, and we are expanding into new markets, such as yen-denominated instruments and the Middle East,' Rousseff said. The bank's approved project portfolio has now reached $40bn across 122 initiatives, with $22.4 billion already disbursed. Its investment strategy focuses on four pillars: logistics infrastructure, digital transformation, social infrastructure, and energy transition. Rousseff highlighted the bank's push to increase financing in local currencies to shield member countries from the risks ofrelying on the U.S. dollar. 'Any business or government that borrows in foreign currency becomes subject to decisions made by the Federal Reserve or other central banks in developed nations,' she cautioned. Technological innovation and cooperation among developing nations is another key theme, Rousseff said, positioning the NDB as a facilitator of knowledge-sharing. She cited a smart hospital project in São Paulo that incorporates Chinese expertise as an example of South-South cooperation. 'Storing wind and sunlight was once mocked as a fantasy, but today it is one of the most strategic areas in the global energy sector,' Rousseff noted. Asked about 'de-dollarization,' Rousseff said she did not see evidence of an imminent decline in the dollar's status but that the rise of local currency trade initiatives was an undeniable and positive development. Looking ahead, Rousseff said the bank's priorities include further strategic membership expansion, mobilising private capital, scaling up partnerships with research institutions, and continuing to increase local-currency operations. Founded in 2014 by BRICS countries as an alternative to traditional financial models, the Shanghai-headquartered NDB operates with a mandate of sustainable development and respect for national sovereignty.