Why the BAE share price has soared – and whether there's still value left
For long-term investors like myself, it raises a pressing question: is there still value in the stock, or has the rally run its course?
Several factors have driven this exceptional run, the most obvious being geopolitical. Rising global tensions have forced NATO members to ramp up defence spending, and the UK's pledge of over £6bn for its submarine capacity gives a boost to BAE's Barrow shipyard.
Meanwhile, the company continues to secure lucrative contracts. Just this month, BAE won a $40.8m deal with the US Navy to produce advanced countermeasure decoys — further strengthening its rapidly growing order book.
The company's financials reflect strong operational efficiency. In its most recent results, revenue rose slightly to £26.3bn, missing expectations, yet earnings still beat expectations. Profit before tax rose to £2.33bn while earnings per share climbed to 69p – up roughly 10% on the prior year. That follows 14% growth in 2023, suggesting strong — albeit slowing — earnings growth.
The balance sheet also looks in decent shape, with manageable debt levels and solid free cash generation.
As is always the case with rapid growth, come questions about valuation. At present, BAE trades on a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 29, well above its historical average near 12. Some of this premium is arguably justified given the structural shift in defence spending and the quality of its earnings. However, it also implies the market's already pricing in a good chunk of future growth.
With the price rising, BAE's dividend yield has steadily declined over the past five years. Now it's as low as 1.7% — far below the FTSE 100 average of 3.5%. And yet, the actual dividend has been increasing consistently for over 20 years — evidence of just how rapidly the share price has risen.
Payments are very well covered with a payout ratio near 33%, so the company could afford to increase the annual dividend even quicker. On average, it's been growing at around 5% a year. Currently paying 33p per share, forecasts expect it to reach 40p per share by the end of 2026.
Price-wise, analysts appear cautiously optimistic. The average 12-month price target stands at roughly 2,008p, suggesting only a modest 7% growth from today's levels. Barron's recently described BAE as a strong value pick, projecting earnings growth of around 10% alongside potential share price gains of 8%.
But there are some suggestions of over-excitement across the European defence sector. Data suggests valuations have climbed to roughly 20 times earnings compared with a long-run average of 12 times, which puts the sector at risk of a downturn if investor sentiment shifts.
I will continue to hold my BAE Systems shares as a core part of my portfolio, but I suspect the days of easy gains may be behind us. With a high valuation and low yield, the current price doesn't make it feel like a must-have – but I still think it's a good defensive pick.
The post Why the BAE share price has soared – and whether there's still value left appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
More reading
5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50
One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool
Mark Hartley has positions in BAE Systems. The Motley Fool UK has recommended BAE Systems. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
Motley Fool UK 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Reeves Tells Cabinet Next Tax Rise to Be Challenging, Times Says
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves told cabinet ministers that tax increases in the Labour government's fall budget are likely to be even more challenging than a £40 billion ($55 billion) package she put in place last year, the Times reported. Reeves said the new increases are likely to be smaller but that she has limited options as taxes need to rise to cover the cost of abandoning welfare reforms, according to the report. Her comments went further than her public statements that have been less explicit about the prospect of higher taxes, the Times said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Glencore in talks with UK government over insolvent Lindsey oil refinery supply, source says
LONDON (Reuters) -Commodities trader Glencore is in talks with the British government over the status of its supply and offtake contract with the insolvent Lindsey oil refinery, according to a source familiar with the situation. The 113,000-barrel-per-day refinery was owned by Prax prior to its insolvency which was announced on Monday, alongside the insolvency of Prax's parent group, putting hundreds of jobs at risk and potentially increasing Britain's reliance on fuel imports. Glencore declined to comment. The government has ordered an investigation into Prax's directors and the circumstances surrounding the insolvency. Glencore last year won a tender to supply crude oil to the Lindsey refinery, replacing rival trader Trafigura, three sources with knowledge of the deal told Reuters at the time. Consultancy FTI, the special manager hired by the government to assist the so-called Official Receiver of the insolvent refinery, directed questions on the refinery to Britain's departments for Business and Trade as well as Energy Security and Net Zero. The Official Receiver is tasked with dealing with suppliers of the site. Neither department commented on talks with Glencore or how long the refinery would be able to operate if no deal was reached. A spokesperson for the department for Energy Security and Net Zero pointed to its statement from Monday which said that the government would ensure supplies were maintained. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
France says 'major issues' remain despite brandy price accord with China
France on Friday praised China's steps to settle a trade dispute over European brandy imports but warned that "major issues" remained unresolved. The signs of a thaw in the row over the alcohol came as China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi met French President Emmanuel Macron and Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot in Paris. In recent months China and the European Union have butted heads over Beijing's generous subsidies for its domestic industries. Beijing launched an investigation last year into EU brandy, months after the bloc undertook a probe into Chinese electric vehicle (EV) subsidies. In the latest salvo, China will from Saturday require European brandy exporters to raise prices or risk anti-dumping taxes of up to 34.9 percent. Beijing said 34 European brandy makers, including several French cognac producers, had signed an accord to avoid tariffs as long as they stick to an agreed minimum price. France's cognac makers' association BNIC, which includes key producers Hennessy, Remy Cointreau and Martell, confirmed that some companies had agreed to price increases in China to avoid anti-dumping taxes. - 'Positive step' - Macron and Barrot praised China's steps to resolve the dispute but stressed they would discuss the outstanding differences with Wang. "This is a positive step towards resolving this dispute, which was threatening our exports," Macron said on X. "I will continue to raise these issues with the Chinese authorities this afternoon." In a statement to AFP, Barrot said: "Several major issues remain unresolved, in particular the exclusion of certain players from the scope of the exemptions." "We remain fully committed to reaching a definitive solution based on the conditions that existed prior to the investigation," he said. Wang has held fraught meetings in several European countries this week. After meeting Macron and Barrot, Wang told a press conference: "The two sides had in-depth, active and sincere exchanges on Sino-French and European relations." No mention was made of the brandy dispute. Almost all EU brandy is cognac produced in France, whose exports to China are worth 1.4 billion euros ($1.6 billion) per year. French liquor giant Jas Hennessy said it would face levies of 34.9 percent if it did not stick to the deal. Remy Martin will be hit with 34.3 percent and Martell 27.7 percent. "The decision to accept the price commitment once again demonstrates China's sincerity in resolving trade frictions through dialogue and consultation," a Chinese commerce ministry spokesperson said in a statement. However, the European Commission kept up criticism of China's new tariffs. "We believe that China's measures are unfair. We believe they are unjustified," said commission trade spokesman Olof Gill. "We believe they are inconsistent with the applicable international rules and are thus unfounded." - Upcoming summit - China has sought to improve relations with the European Union as a counterweight to the United States. But frictions remain, including a yawning trade deficit of $357.1 billion between China and the EU, as well as Beijing maintaining close ties with Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine. The trade row blew up last year when the EU moved to impose hefty tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, arguing that Beijing's subsidies unfairly undercut European competitors. Beijing rejected the accusation and announced what were seen as retaliatory probes into imported European pork, brandy and dairy products. The EU imposed extra import taxes of up to 35 percent on Chinese electric vehicles in October. Beijing lodged a complaint with the World Trade Organisation, which in April said it would set up an expert panel to investigate. China and the EU are to hold a summit this month to mark the 50th anniversary of their diplomatic ties. But Bloomberg News reported, citing unnamed sources, that Beijing would cancel the second day of the summit, in a sign of the tensions. bur-pfc-as/tw/phz Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
