'Please be careful.' There are risks and rewards as crypto heavyweights push tokenization
'Tokenization is going to open the door to a massive trading revolution,' said Vlad Tenev, the CEO of the trading platform Robinhood at a recent James Bond-themed tokenization launch event in the south of France.
Advocates say tokenization is the next leap forward in crypto and can help break down walls that have advantaged the wealthy and make trading cheaper, more transparent and more accessible for everyday investors.
But critics say tokenization threatens to undermine a century's worth of securities law and investor protections that have made the U.S. financial system the envy of the world. And Robinhood's push into tokenizing shares of private companies quickly faced pushback from one of the world's most popular startups.
What is tokenization?
The basic idea behind tokenization: Use blockchain technology that powers cryptocurrencies to create digital tokens as stand-ins for things like bonds, real estate or even fractional ownership of a piece of art and that can be traded like crypto by virtually anyone, anywhere at any time.
The massive growth of stablecoins, which are a type of cryptocurrency typically bought and sold for $1, has helped fuel the appetite to tokenize other financial assets, crypto venture capitalist Katie Haun said on a recent podcast.
She said tokenization will upend investing in ways similar to how streamers radically changed how people watch television.
'You used to have to sit there on a Thursday night and watch Seinfeld,' Haun said. 'You tune in at a specific time, you don't get to choose your program, you couldn't be watching a program like Squid Games from Korea. Netflix was market-expanding. In the same way, I think the tokenization of real-world assets will be market expanding.'
Growing momentum
Robinhood began offering tokenized stock trading of major U.S. public companies for its European customers earlier this month and gave away tokens to some customers meant to represent shares in OpenAI and SpaceX, two highly valued private companies.
Several other firms are diving in. Crypto exchange Kraken also allows customers outside the U.S. to trade tokenized stocks while Coinbase has petitioned regulators to open the market to its U.S. customers. Wall Street giants BlackRock and Franklin Templeton currently offer tokenized money market funds. McKinsey projects that tokenized assets could reach $2 trillion by 2030.
Crypto's golden age
The push for tokenization comes at a heady time in crypto, an industry that's seen enormous growth from the creation and early development of bitcoin more than 15 years ago by libertarian-leaning computer enthusiasts to a growing acceptance in mainstream finance.
The world's most popular cryptocurrency is now regularly setting all-time highs — more than $123,000 on Monday — while other forms of crypto like stablecoins are exploding in use and the Trump administration has pledged to usher in what's been called the 'golden age' for digital assets.
Lee Reiners, a lecturing fellow at Duke University, said the biggest winners in the push for tokenization could be a small handful of exchanges like Robinhood that see their trading volumes and influence spike.
'Which is kind of ironic given the origins of crypto, which was to bypass intermediaries,' Reiners said.
Trump bump
Interest in tokenization has also gotten a boost thanks to the election of President Donald Trump, who has made enacting more crypto-friendly regulations a top priority of his administration and signed a new law regulating stablecoins on Friday.
'Tokenization is an innovation and we at the SEC should be focused on how do we advance innovation at the marketplace,' said Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins.
Is it legal?
Securities law can be complex and even defining what is a security can be a hotly debated question, particularly in crypto. The crypto exchange Binance pulled back offerings of tokenized securities in 2021 after German regulators raised questions about potential violations of that country's securities law.
Under Trump, the SEC has taken a much less expansive view than the previous administration and dropped or paused litigation against crypto companies that the agency had previously accused of violating securities law.
Hilary Allen, a professor at the American University Washington College of Law, said crypto companies have been emboldened by Trump's victory to be more aggressive in pushing what they can offer.
'The most pressing risk is (tokenization) being used as a regulatory arbitrage play as a way of getting around the rules,' she said.
However, the SEC has struck a cautionary tone when it comes to tokens. Shortly after Robinhood's announcement, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who has been an outspoken crypto supporter, issued a statement saying companies issuing tokenized stock should consider 'their disclosure obligations' under federal law.
'As powerful as blockchain technology is, it does not have magical abilities to transform the nature of the underlying asset,' Peirce said.
All eyes on private companies
One of the most closely watched areas of tokenization involves private companies, which aren't subject to strict financial reporting requirements like publicly traded ones.
Many hot startups are not going public as often as they used to and instead are increasingly relying on wealthy and institutional investors to raise large sums of money and stay private.
That's unfair to the little guy, say advocates of tokenization.
'These are massive wealth generators for a very small group of rich, well-connected insiders who get access to these deals early,' said Robinhood executive Johann Kerbrat. 'Crypto has the power to solve this inequality.'
'Please be careful'
But Robinhood's giveaway of tokens meant to represent an investment in OpenAI immediately drew pushback from the company itself, which said it was not involved in Robinhood's plan and did not endorse it.
'Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer,' OpenAI said on social media. 'Please be careful.'
Public companies have strict public reporting requirements about their financial health that private companies don't have to produce. Such reporting requirements have helped protect investors and give a legitimacy to the U.S. financial system, said Allen, who said the push for tokenized sales of shares in private companies is 'eerily familiar' to how things played out before the creation of the SEC nearly a century ago.
'Where we're headed is where we were in the 1920s,' she said. 'Door-to-door salesmen offering stocks and bonds, half of it had nothing behind it, people losing their life savings betting on stuff they didn't understand.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crypto for Advisors: Blockchain and the Music Industry
Blockchain is reshaping industries beyond finance. In this Crypto for Advisors newsletter, we shift focus from traditional investments to explore a disruptive blockchain use case in the music industry. Inder Phull, CEO and Co-Founder of Pixelynx and creator of KOR Protocol, explains how on-chain music rights and royalties are transforming ownership and why this matters for artists and investors. Then, Ronald Elliot Yung from RaveDAO answers questions about these changes and how they impact investments in Ask an Expert. – Unknown block type "divider", specify a component for it in the ` option Remix, Rights & Revenue: Why Onchain Music Infrastructure Is the Future A fundamental shift, redefining how music is protected, managed, and monetized. Introduction: A Broken Symphony The digital revolution has empowered musicians with unprecedented tools to create, collaborate, and reach global audiences. Unfortunately, this rapid evolution has come with its own set of challenges. While the Internet has rewritten the rules of creation, distribution, and consumption, the methods we use to protect and monetize creative content, such as copyright laws, licensing models, and royalty structures, have not kept pace. In this environment, artists struggle to maintain control of their work, with inadequate attribution and a lack of fair compensation. For advisors, you may have clients in the music industry or investors seeking to invest in these assets. Understanding the evolution of this industry could be a strategic advantage as assets move on-chain. The systems that governed the industry were originally designed in a pre-Internet era when the concepts of global digital rights and licences were yet to be considered. We now find ourselves in a situation where TikTok hits are often born from unauthorized samples, AI-generated music is flooding streaming platforms, and artists struggle to make a living. Legal pathways to capitalize on emerging opportunities, such as AI or UGC virality, remain locked behind gatekeepers, legacy contracts, and unclear ownership data. Enter onchain rights infrastructure: a shift that could rewire how we protect, manage, and monetize music. The Problem: Rights Are Fragmented, and Creators Lose There is a reason why music on social media has yet to generate a revenue stream for artists, why the 'Metaverse' lacks music, and why AI is perceived as a threat. Existing copyright systems do not adequately address the complex web of ownership and usage rights associated with modern applications of music, such as remixing or user-generated content on social media platforms. The current complexity costs the industry billions, as this system often leaves creators underpaid and legally vulnerable. Creators are shifting to owner-created content, where they can track the usage of their creations and consumption, and get paid regardless of where their assets are consumed. The Future: Onchain Rights Infrastructure Onchain rights infrastructure redefines the backend of the music industry. It provides rightsholders with undisputed, verifiable ownership of their work, with rights transparently programmed into the registration. This transparency and programmability enable music to move effortlessly across platforms, applications, and media, automatically tracking attribution, verifying provenance, and eliminating the friction of traditional licensing processes. Artists receive payment instantly, and their rights are enforced in real-time. Imagine if every track came with a smart contract, one that listed the rights holders, the ownership percentages, and the licensing terms in code. If you wanted to use the song in a remix, a sync, or a sample, the contract would tell you what's allowed and automatically distribute royalties. That's what on-chain rights infrastructure makes possible. On a blockchain, rights can be: Transparent — anyone can see who owns what Programmable — remix terms, splits, and conditions are encoded Traceable — derivatives and remixes are tracked in real time Compositional — rights become building blocks, not walls If the music industry wants to capitalize on emerging technology and cater to tomorrow's digital consumers, it will need a more agile and forward-looking approach to music rights management and licensing. Onchain rights infrastructure is the answer. Understanding the shift to on-chain rights infrastructure is no longer niche; it's a key part of the future. Whether you're advising IP holders navigating their royalty flows or helping investors explore music IP as an emerging asset class, being fluent in how rights and revenue can be transparently encoded onchain is vital. Just as streaming reshaped consumption models, on-chain infrastructure is reshaping the ownership system; those who understand it early will be best positioned to grow in the evolving digital economy. - Unknown block type "divider", specify a component for it in the ` option Ask an Expert Q. In a world of corporate festivals and algorithm-driven playlists, how can decentralized models enable new music scenes, community leadership, and fan ownership? Music has always thrived in pockets: underground clubs, bedroom producers, DIY scenes. Blockchain now offers a chance to bring these microcultures to the world, placing influence in the hands of those who live the culture, not just those who monetize it. For investors, the upside is early access to untapped cultural capital and the energy of self-organizing communities. Most users still crave experiences, not just technology. No protocol can manufacture authenticity, and it's easy for on-chain 'ownership' to become performative if it's disconnected from what's happening on the ground. The winning models will get the 'local-to-global' flywheel right: using technology to empower people, not just platforms, and ensuring new voices and collectives receive the recognition and support they need before being absorbed by the next algorithmic trend. Q. What persistent problems can blockchain and AI fix in live events, and what's still unsolved for the music economy? Blockchain finally addresses ticket fraud, opaque splits, and the lack of fan ownership in events. On-chain tickets are tamper-proof and traceable, making resale and royalty flows transparent. AI is cutting through noise by personalizing experiences, automating support, and making sense of the huge, messy flood of fan data most venues still ignore. However, technology alone won't solve the music industry's most profound issues. Scene-building, trust, and curation remain deeply human challenges. No blockchain replaces the hustle of earning credibility, or the magic of a local scene bubbling up in defiance of the mainstream. Even the best AI can't spot next year's genre-defining artist without a pulse on culture itself. For investors and advisors, the risk is buying into the illusion that data and automation alone can drive engagement and loyalty. The most compelling opportunities will blend digital tools with real-world understanding, creating systems that empower communities rather than just optimize transactions. Q. What are the blind spots in the current 'Web3 x Music' hype cycle, and where should advisors exercise caution? There's no shortage of pitch decks promising to 'revolutionize' music with tokens and NFTs. But hype alone can't replace authentic connection, or build the grassroots energy that makes festivals last. Advisors should look beyond user counts or Discord noise and ask: Are local communities actually thriving? Is community governance a real process or just a buzzword? Can this model attract and retain both serious talent and loyal fans? The winners will be platforms that treat culture as a living ecosystem, not a quick flip, and that balance on-chain innovation with the off-chain work of building trust. - Unknown block type "divider", specify a component for it in the ` option Keep Reading Charles Schwab CEO says crypto trading is coming soon for clients. President Trump signed the first U.S. cryptocurrency bill into law during 'crypto week'. JP Morgan is planning to offer bitcoin-backed loans. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fine Print: ETFs Born in Banner Year May Lack Staying Power
From leveraged funds that invest only in Robinhood to products built to combat anti-semitism, exchange-traded funds are having a banner year. ETFs — investment vehicles known for their low costs, tax efficiencies and transparency — had collected $540 billion in new money, and issuers had launched 464 new funds, through the first six months of 2025, according to market researcher Morningstar. The industry is on track to launch a record 726 funds by the end of the year. Issuers are pumping out funds to meet investor demand, but there's a growing risk that many of the new ETFs will have short shelf lives because they serve very specific purposes or incorporate traditionally niche investing strategies. 'If that purpose falls out of favor and assets dwindle, it may be difficult for the ETF sponsor to keep the lights on,' said Zachary Evens, Morningstar research analyst. 'As the space gets saturated, only a relative few will likely see sustained success.' READ ALSO: Tariffs 'The World Can Live With': US-Japan Trade Pact Pushes Markets to Record Highs and Amazon, Meta Wear AI-mbitions on Their Wrists Fund on the Bun Low-cost funds with broad market exposure typically have the most assets under management and are the most popular with new investors. However, so few of them have launched this year that they're almost being seen as novel in the current ETF landscape. 'Perhaps Vanguard and [Charles] Schwab's continued push into very-low-cost bond strategies is unique amongst the sea of leveraged, covered call and buffer ETF launches,' Evens told The Daily Upside. The Morningstar data showed: First Trust, BlackRock's iShares and Graniteshares were among the top issuers in the first half of 2025, launching 23, 20 and 19 funds, respectively. Plenty of the new ETFs have also been fairly costly. The average expense ratio of 2025 ETF launches is 0.74%, much higher than all ETFs' average expense ratio of 0.6%. Active-ish: Many ETFs launched this year are being labeled as 'active,' meaning a fund manager is at the helm, regularly making investment decisions in the hopes of outperforming a benchmark instead of just mirroring it. That title is a bit of a misnomer, however, as some of those funds are more reliant on algorithms than traditional discretionary strategies, Evens said. They're only being called active because they don't track an index. 'Managers essentially have a formula for how to execute a strategy, removing much of the judgement or discretion associated with traditional stock-picking funds,' he said. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
9 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Sustainable Funds Rebound With Global Inflows of $4.9 Billion
The global market for sustainable funds recovered in the second quarter after posting record-high redemptions during the first three months of the year, according to an analysis by Morningstar Inc. Against a backdrop of 'ESG backlash and volatility sparked by geopolitical tensions and US tariffs, the picture for ESG funds improved last quarter,' led by investments in European-based offerings, said Hortense Bioy, head of sustainable investing research at Morningstar Sustainalytics.