logo
Disney ‘evades animal-cruelty law' over rat-drowning scene

Disney ‘evades animal-cruelty law' over rat-drowning scene

Yahoo27-05-2025
Disney has been accused of exploiting a loophole in animal cruelty rules by screening scenes of a rodent being forcibly immersed in a liquid.
The RSPCA has criticised Disney over its decision to screen the scene in the film The Abyss where a real rat is deliberately submerged in fluorocarbon liquid.
The scene has been cut from all previous screenings of the film after being banned by the British Board for Film Classification (BBFC) from cinema and TV over animal welfare concerns.
The BBFC took advice from the RSPCA, the largest animal welfare charity in the UK, which said the 'forcible immersion of the rat caused terror' and amounted to animal cruelty.
Because streaming platforms such as Disney+ are not covered to the same standards by BBFC or Ofcom rules as cinema, DVD or traditional TV channels, they are not technically breaching any codes.
David Bowles, the RSPCA's head of public affairs, said: 'The RSPCA is really concerned that a loophole currently exists allowing animal abuse scenes deemed unacceptable elsewhere to be streamed freely and legally into our homes.
'The Abyss' controversial rat scene has long concerned the RSPCA, and has always been deemed unacceptable by BBFC – so it's hard to fathom out why Disney+ has decided to broadcast it. We need to ensure people are not being exposed to content which promotes or showcases cruelty to animals.
'As the way millions of households consume entertainment changes, it's vital the legal framework is responsive to that and continues to consistently protect people and animals.'
While the rats used during filming are said to have survived the ordeal, the scene remains prohibited from UK cinema screenings, DVD and traditional TV.
Given the infliction of terror, the scene was cut by the BBFC under the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937, meaning it must be cut for any theatrical use.
The BBFC – as the regulator of content released on physical media – has also cut the scene under the Video Recordings Act 1984, meaning it must not be included on releases on formats such as Blu-Ray and DVD.
UK television channels must also adhere to the Ofcom Broadcasting Code – which states no material cut refused classification by the BBFC may be broadcast to viewers – meaning the scene should also not be aired on traditional TV.
Streaming platforms, however, are not bound by the same standards as film releases in cinema, DVD or on traditional television – and the RSPCA fears this provides a 'loophole' to broadcasting animal abuse long considered unacceptable on other mediums.
A new piece of legislation – the Media Act – enhances Ofcom's regulation of streaming services, and the regulator is due to publish a new video-on-demand code.
The RSPCA said it hoped this would deliver a 'degree of consistency' with animal-abuse content standards across cinema, home entertainment and streaming services.
Many streaming services already work with the BBFC on a voluntary basis and the RSPCA hopes Ofcom will highlight this work as good practice in the new code.
Mr Bowles said: 'We hope a new code of conduct under the Media Act will help close this loophole – but we need to see a degree of consistency between streaming platforms and other forms of more traditional entertainment, so people can have confidence when watching films and other shows.
'It doesn't make sense that we have robust safeguards for animal-related content shown in cinemas, on DVDs or on traditional television channels – yet those protections could go out the window when you turn on a major streaming service. We can't backtrack now on what society deems is acceptable in terms of how we treat animals.'
Disney+ has been contacted for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet the three black cats still waiting to be adopted after 700 days
Meet the three black cats still waiting to be adopted after 700 days

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Meet the three black cats still waiting to be adopted after 700 days

Three black cats are still waiting to be adopted after spending 700 days in the care of the RSPCA - with staff believing their colour may be putting off potential adopters. Nico, Humbug, and Sweetie Pie have been housed at the RSPCA's Great Ayton Animal Centre in North Yorkshire after being found homeless on the streets. Beverley Dunn, cattery supervisor, said: "All three cats were on the streets with serious health issues but with the right care, some good food, a warm place to sleep and lots of TLC they have come on in leaps and bounds. Nico (Image: RSPCA) "They all enjoy a fuss and will take a treat from you, they just need understanding owners who are going to give them time and space to settle in, explore, and get to know you at their own pace." The trio have now spent more than 700 days in the charity's care. Nico, who arrived in November from the Middlesbrough area, was emaciated and suffering from a severe flea allergy when he was rescued by an RSPCA officer. Humbug (Image: RSPCA) The three-year-old, who is black with white markings, was so hungry at the time that he would snatch food out of desperation. Ms Dunn said: "We adore black cats here but sadly we do more rehoming appeals for them than any other coat colour. "There are overwhelmingly more of them in our care at any one time - and they always take longer to rehome. Sweetie Pie (Image: RSPCA) "Not only is this sad for them as they wait to be adopted, but it also means we have less space to take in other felines who need our help." Humbug and Sweetie Pie, both two years old, arrived at the centre just before Christmas. They were rescued as injured strays from Stockton and Gateshead and required veterinary treatment for leg injuries. The RSPCA said that 75 per cent of the cats at its Yarm Lane centre are black or black and white, and it takes more than three times longer to rehome them compared to other colours. Nico, Humbug, and Sweetie Pie were not microchipped, making it impossible to determine if they were previously owned. According to the RSPCA, it takes an average of 29 days to rehome a black cat, compared to just nine days for a grey tabby. READ MORE: Celebrate 200 years of rail with Hitachi Rail- here's how you can win tickets Disabled powerchair footballer to compete in unique race across Europe County Durham village steps up fight against crime with CCTV scheme Since 2020, more than 5,000 black or black-and-white cats have entered the charity's national rehoming centres. The charity believes that myths about black cats and concerns that they don't photograph well may contribute to their longer stays in care. Anyone interested in adopting Nico, Humbug, or Sweetie Pie can contact the centre by calling 0300 123 0743 or emailing greatayton@

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store