Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators.
The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate.
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content.
'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said.
It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'.
Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements.
The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'.
A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech.
'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater.
'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content.
'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.'
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power.
He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mag 7 Plans to 'FOMO' Into $650B Tech Investment Despite Trump's U.S. Manufacturing Push
While President Donald Trump's tariff war aims to spark a manufacturing boom at home, corporate America's spending focus remains firmly on "bits" rather than "bricks and mortar." This contrast is evident in the spending patterns of the Magnificent 7 (Mag 7) stocks – a group comprising large-cap tech companies, including Alphabet (parent company of Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms (parent company of Facebook and Instagram), Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. These firms are expected to cumulatively spend an astonishing $650 billion this year on capital expenditure (capex) and research and development (R&D), according to data tracked by Lloyds Bank. That amount is larger than what the U.K. government spends on public investments in a year, the bank noted in a Thursday note. If that number alone doesn't impress you, consider this: the total economy-wide investment spending on IT equipment and software has continued to surge this year, accounting for 6.1% of GDP, while both private fixed and fixed non-residential investment, excluding IT, have shrunk for consecutive quarters. FOMO and AI According to Lloyds' FX Strategist Nicholas Kennedy, the decline in investments across other sectors of the economy could be due to several reasons, including the fear of missing out (FOMO) on the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. "There might be some explanations other than a crowding out by IT spending and political/trade uncertainties that you could call on; the building boom that was triggered by Biden's CHIPS act, which boosted structures, has faded, for instance. There is also a FOMO effect at work, firms encouraged to divert investment resources from what they traditionally do towards fashionable AI-related projects. So they're just spending elsewhere," Kennedy said in a note to clients. The chart indicates that U.S. corporate spending on IT equipment and software has increased to $1.45 trillion, representing a 13.6% year-over-year rise. The tally makes up over 40% of the total U.S. private fixed investment. The U.S. second-quarter GDP estimate, released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis early this week, showed that private fixed investment in IT increased by 12.4% quarter-on-quarter. Meanwhile, investment in non-IT sectors or the broader economy fell by 4.9%, extending the three-quarter declining trend. From 'bricks' to 'bits' This continued dominance of "bits" spending in corporate America should calm the nerves of those worried that the administration's focus on manufacturing may suck capital away from technology markets, including emerging avenues like cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and NVDA, the bellwether for all things AI, both bottomed out in late November 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT and have since enjoyed incredible bull runs, demonstrating a powerful correlation between technology's rise and the crypto market. "Whether that [AI spending boom] generates a return is another matter, but it does reshape plans towards bits from bricks," Kennedy said. Moreover, the crypto market has also found a significant tailwind in the form of a favourable regulatory policy under Trump. The administration has demonstrated its pro-crypto bias through the signing of several key pieces of legislation aimed at clarifying regulatory oversight for digital assets and stablecoins, including measures that have garnered bipartisan support. Additionally, the administration has made strategic appointments to financial regulatory bodies. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Original Tesla Cofounder Roasts Cybertruck for Looking "Like a Dumpster"
Martin Eberhard, one of the original cofounders of Tesla — who actually started the company and didn't retroactively bestow himself a title giving that impression, unlike a certain billionaire — isn't too pleased with his baby's newest crowning jewel: the Cybertruck. In comments made in a recent interview with YouTuber Kim Java spotted by Electrek, Eberhard vented his frustration with Tesla's recent direction — which is when the highly heterodox pickup truck caught a stray. "I am actually disappointed that Tesla canceled its low-end car program," he said in the interview. "Because that's what the world needs — not a truck that looks like a dumpster." Eberhard cofounded Tesla with Marc Tarpenning in 2003. Musk joined the next year after investing $6.5 million in the startup, and became chairman of the board. They were hardly ever on good terms. The first major blow was dealt by Musk, who sacked Eberhard as CEO in 2007, eventually stepping into the role himself. Eberhard clapped back by suing Musk in 2009 for libel and defamation, and later settled out of court. As part of that settlement, Musk was allowed to call himself a cofounder of Tesla. There's still bad blood between the two, and Eberhard has occasionally been publicly critical of Musk. In 2023, for example, Eberhard took a dig at Musk's alleged hot temper and hair-trigger firings. "I'm a believer of treating employees with respect, and I'm not into random firings and things like that," Eberhard said in an interview with Business Insider, ruminating about how he would run things instead. "So maybe the culture inside the company would have been a little bit nicer." His latest criticism is one echoed by many of Tesla's investors and even its fans: that it's sat on its promise of delivering an affordable, $25,000 EV. Proponents argue this would unlock millions of more customers that were reluctant to buy EVs due to their price and rescue the company's faltering sales. Recent comments from Musk, however, have all but confirmed reports that Tesla is abandoning the idea, despite teasing it for years. And in retrospect, the Cybertruck should've been a clear death knell. It's in every respect a giant F-U to sensible, frugal-minded buyers. It's large, heavy, expensive to maintain, and infamously unreliable. When it launched, it cost an eye-watering $100,000, and cheaper versions that have since been released are still well within the luxury SUV price range with the tradeoff of being a downgrade in every way possible. And with its staggeringly poor sales, which in the second quarter collapsed by more than 50 percent from the year before, Eberhard may be getting the last laugh. More on Tesla: The Cybertruck Is Aging Like Fast Fashion on Temu Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 Women's British Open prize money payouts include a record $1,462,500 to Miyu Yamashita
The 2025 AIG Women's British Open had a record purse and a record first-place prize. It also featured a first-time major champion. Miyu Yamashita held off a charging Charley Hull on Sunday at Royal Porthcawl in Wales in the UK, her final-round 70, one day after her 24th birthday, was enough to win the fifth and final major of 2025. Yamashita finished at 11 under, and beat Hull and Minami Katsu each by two shots. Yamashita was the lone golfer to reach double-digits under par. Yamashita also earned nearly $1.5 million for her win, the biggest of her young career. Since AIG took over as title sponsor in 2019, prize money has tripled. The total purse in 2025 was $9.75 million. 2025 AIG Women's British Open prize money payouts Pos. Golfer Score Earnings 1 Miyu Yamashita -11 $1,462,500 T2 Minami Katsu -9 $829,742 T2 Charley Hull -9 $829,742 T4 A Lim Kim -7 $485,403 T4 Rio Takeda -7 $485,403 T6 Megan Khang -6 $324,018 T6 Wei Ling Hsu -6 $324,018 T8 Steph Kyriacou -4 $244,650 T8 Lottie Woad -4 $244,650 T8 Paula Martin Sampedro -4 $244,650 T11 Andrea Lee -3 $187,760 T11 Mao Saigo -3 $187,760 T13 Chiara Tamburlini -2 $146,578 T13 Hyojoo Kim -2 $146,578 T13 Minjee Lee -2 $146,578 T13 Sei Young Kim -2 $146,578 T13 Lauren Coughlin -2 $146,578 T13 Pajaree Anannarukarn -2 $146,578 T19 Georgia Hall -1 115,538 T19 Mimi Rhodes -1 115,538 T19 Yan Liu -1 115,538 T19 Linn Grant -1 115,538 T23 Jenny Shin E $93,390 T23 Ariya Jutanugarn E $93,390 T23 Morgane Metraux E $93,390 T23 Esther Henseleit E $93,390 T23 Celine Boutier E $93,390 T23 Haeran Ryu E $93,390 T23 Jinhee Im E $93,390 T30 Anna Nordqvist 1 $75,581 T30 Jeeno Thitikul 1 $75,581 T30 Narin An 1 $75,581 T33 Ayaka Furue 2 $66,502 T33 Nasa Hataoka 2 $66,502 T33 Alexa Pano 2 $66,502 T36 Sarah Schmelzel 3 $58,391 T36 Lydia Ko 3 $58,391 T36 Nelly Korda 3 $58,391 39 In Gee Chun 4 $53,095 T40 Darcey Harry 5 $45,779 T40 Madelene Sagstrom 5 $45,779 T40 Casandra Alexander 5 $45,779 T40 Angel Yin 5 $45,779 T40 Akie Iwai 5 $45,779 T40 Shannon Tan 5 $45,779 T46 Ilhee Lee 6 $36,958 T46 Diksha Dagar 6 $36,958 T46 Lindy Duncan 6 $36,958 T46 Brooke Matthews 6 $36,958 T50 Bronte Law 7 $30,875 T50 Ashleigh Buhai 7 $30,875 T50 Amy Yang 7 $30,875 T50 Mi Hyang Lee 7 $30,875 T50 Stacy Lewis 7 $30,875 T55 Kristen Gillman 8 $26,641 T55 Emma Spitz 8 $26,641 T55 Manon De Roey 8 $26,641 T58 Chisato Iwai 9 $22,727 T58 Yuri Yoshida 9 $22,727 T58 Arpichaya Yubol 9 $22,727 T58 Carla Bernat 9 $22,727 T58 Mary Liu 9 $22,727 T63 Perrine Delacour 11 $20,028 T63 Leona Maguire 11 $20,028 T63 Patty Tavatanakit 11 $20,028 T63 Yani Tseng 11 $20,028 T67 Laura Fuenfstueck 12 $18,440 T67 Grace Kim 12 $18,440 T69 Dasom Ma 15 $17,383 T69 Pauline Roussin-Bouchard 15 $17,383 71 Jeneath Wong 17 $12,777 This article originally appeared on Golfweek: Women's British Open: Winner Miyu Yamashita earns $1.4625 million
