UK, India likely to unveil trade deal next week, including whisky, EVs, textiles, sources say
In May, both countries announced the conclusion of trade negotiations after three years of stop-start negotiations, aiming to increase bilateral trade, remove trade barriers and allow duty-free entry of goods.
The countries are now preparing to formally sign the agreement, and the announcement could coincide with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's expected visit to London next week, one of the Indian officials said.
The trade pact will take effect in about a year, after it is approved by the British parliament and India's federal cabinet, the official added.
Officials spoke on the condition of anonymity as the details are not public.
'The trade agreement offers a win-win for both countries,' the second Indian source said, adding that Indian consumers would gain access to Scotch whisky at lower prices, as import tariffs will drop to 75% from 150% immediately, and further to 40% over the next decade.
On cars, India will cut duties to 10% from 100% under a quota system that will be gradually liberalised, the sources said. In return, Indian manufacturers are expected to gain access to the UK market for electric and hybrid vehicles, also under a quota regime, they added.
India's top think tank recommends easing investment rules for Chinese firms, sources say
India's commerce ministry did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Britain's trade ministry said that the countries were working to finalise the deal.
'We have been working with India on a landmark trade deal that will deliver for British people and business,' a UK government spokesperson said.
India's trade ministry has said 99% of Indian exports to Britain would benefit from zero duty under the deal, including textiles, while Britain will see reductions on 90% of its tariff lines.
An Indian trade delegation is separately holding talks in Washington, for a potential trade deal with the U.S. as President Donald Trump ramps up his trade war with the threat of sharply higher tariffs from August 1.
By 2030, India's middle class is projected to reach 60 million people and could rise to a quarter of a billion by 2050, according to British government estimates. India's overall import demand is forecast to grow by 144% in real terms to 1.4 trillion pounds ($1.88 trillion) by 2035, compared to 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israeli exceptionalism and Global South
Listen to article Two events in the past week provided yet another glimpse of the global political shifts and growing inter-state tensions. One was a meeting in Bogota, Colombia, convened by the Hague Group, which is expressly opposed to the Israeli-US exceptionalism in the Middle East (read Palestine) — an issue that has already caused ripples in Europe too. The other event revolved around Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's extensive visit to China, with a message that Sino-Australia relations remain unaffected by the intense tariffs' wars that the US President Donald Trump is waging. The Hague Group is an alliance of eight countries committed to cutting military ties with Israel and which insists on compliance with the arrest warrants for the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued by the International Criminal Court. The group consists of Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal, and South Africa. A joint statement issued after the meeting of nearly 30 countries — including China, Malaysia, Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Turkey, Iraq, Qatar, i.a. — demanded enforcement of international rulings to halt what they described as genocide in Gaza. The Bogota declaration called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, unrestricted access for humanitarian aid and the international prosecution of alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Hague Group declared after the meeting that the international community has "a legal and moral obligation to act". "This includes suspending all military trade with Israel and ensuring that the orders of the ICJ (International Court of Justice) are fully respected and implemented," it said. However, only 12 of the participating countries — including six founding members (Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Malaysia, Namibia, and South Africa), plus Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Nicaragua, Oman, and Saint?Vincent and the Grenadines — formally signed the joint declaration to underscore their commitment to the six specific measures (such as arms embargoes and port restrictions). Pakistan's absence was conspicuous if viewed it against the presence of almost all the heavy-weights of the Islamic fraternity - Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkiye, Bangladesh, and Qatar invited. Reportedly, the diplomat assigned to attend got his visa "very late" and hence missed the event, but one wonders if that was the only reason for one of the lead Muslim countries to miss such an important event in support of the Palestinian and against the Israeli aggression? Yet, the formal declaration, and its literal endorsement by a dozen countries marked the strongest joint statement yet by the group as well leading nations of the Global South. The Hague has aligned itself with South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. While the court has issued provisional measures ordering Israel to prevent acts of genocide, critics say those rulings have been largely ignored. Also present was Francesca Albanese, the United Nations' special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories. She warned that the world is facing a "critical test". "The events in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide," she said. "This is not just a legal matter — it is a moral one. The time for action is now." Now to the Australian PM Albanese's weeklong discussions and meetings in Shanghai. The visit carried two distinct messages; despite being the core member of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) and the Australia, United Kingdom, and the United States (AUKUS) partnership, the country's PM is ready to defy Trump's aggressive posturing in general, and the unjustified US campaign focused on China containment. This geo-political alignment cast its shadow also on the Sino-Aussie relations, leading to unnecessary tensions since 2017. The second message centred on Australia's resolve to maintain economic autonomy — national interest — and steer its trade relations with China clear of the partnership with the US and other allies. Bilateral relations have been on the mend since Albanese took office in 2022 as Australia's 31st prime minister. In an apparent thaw, China lifted its import restrictions on Australian lobsters in December last year. That is why PM Albanese chose to engage with Premier Li Qiang — a meeting that coincided with the 10th anniversary of the implementation of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. Both vowed to ramp up economic cooperation, and work for greater market and industrial integration - something that is sweet music to the Chinese ears because of Beijing's non-aggressive approach rooted in geo-economic relationships. And these are rapidly expanding under the Belt and Road Initiative. In a world riven with turmoil and uncertainties all around, it is indeed a welcome sign that as a key ally of the United States, Australia realizes the long-term hazards associated with political brinkmanship and economic coercion. It probably realizes that the Global South probably offers more economic and trade cooperation dividends than the partnership in geopolitically driven alliances. As political and economic centres gravitate towards China — and very soon to India too — the future belongs to Asia: a reality that the Global North needs to realise sooner than later instead of peddling narratives that blatantly paint China and its allies in bad light.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Altering Mughal history in Indian textbooks
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article In the 2025-26 academic year, the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) in India introduced a revamped Class 8 Social Science textbook that has stirred significant controversy. The new content devotes extensive space to portraying Mughal emperors — particularly Babur, Akbar and Aurangzeb — as intellectually refined yet deeply brutal rulers who plundered, enslaved and forcibly imposed their rule on Indian populations. Akbar, once widely celebrated as a symbol of secularism, is now shown as a temple-razer who slaughtered civilians, with only a brief reference to his later turn toward peace. Similarly, Babur is acknowledged for his appreciation of poetry and architecture but also condemned for his ruthlessness in conquest. Aurangzeb is portrayed primarily through the lens of temple destruction and religious persecution. The NCERT justifies this revision as an attempt to "unsanitise" Indian history, presenting rulers in their full complexity. However, critics argue this is less about academic honesty and more about a deeper political agenda — one that seeks to delegitimise the Muslim contribution to Indian civilisation by highlighting brutality over cultural or administrative legacy. This is not the first time the BJP-led government has surgically altered school curricula. Since coming to power in 2014, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), guided ideologically by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has consistently revised textbooks to reflect its vision of India as a Hindu Rashtra — one that prioritises Hindu identity over its constitutionally secular ethos. Under this agenda, Muslim rulers, who were once part of a nuanced narrative of India's pluralistic past, are being reduced to foreign invaders and religious bigots. Entire chapters on the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal courts have been removed from older textbooks. Muslim leaders like Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, India's first education minister and a key figure in the freedom struggle, have been omitted from political science curricula. The irony, however, is inescapable. Monarchs throughout history - whether Hindu, Muslim, or Christian — have employed violence as a tool of statecraft. Mughal emperors, like others, engaged in war, suppressed dissent and sometimes destroyed religious institutions. British monarchs in the 16th to 19th centuries killed, converted, and colonised on a massive scale in both Europe and their colonies. Henry VIII had his wives and political rivals executed. Queen Elizabeth I suppressed Catholics and waged wars in Ireland. Even within their own families, European monarchs eliminated siblings, cousins and advisers for power. Violence and conquest were the very grammar of monarchy. To underline Mughals as barbaric, while ignoring the universal behaviour of monarchs, is historically dishonest and academically irresponsible. The Mughals, in their centuries of rule, also chronicled some of India's most enduring institutions — in administration, art, architecture and interfaith dialogue. Akbar's Din-i-Ilahi and his policy of Sulh-i-Kul (peace with all) were pioneering experiments in religious coexistence. Such academic distortion manufactures critical political consequences. By poisoning young minds with partial history, the Indian state is emboldening a generation to view India's 200 million Muslims with suspicion and hostility. This is not merely revisionist history; it is the sowing of fascism. This curricular vilification of Mughals aligns with a broader global narrative of portraying Muslims as inherently violent, which is used to justify their marginalisation, persecution, and even annihilation. This is a global pattern seen recently with the genocide in Gaza and, before that, the destabilisation of Iraq, Libya, Lebanon and Syria through foreign interventions that contrived prolonged civil wars. These interventions disproportionately fractured the political structures and social cohesion of Muslim-majority societies. History must be told in full — its glories and horrors alike. Cherry-picking atrocities to vilify a community while erasing contributions is plainly propaganda. Its consequences will erupt in society, in politics and in blood.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan extends airspace ban for Indian aircraft till Aug 23
An Air India Airbus A320neo plane takes off in Colomiers near Toulouse, France, December 13, 2017. Photo: Reuters/ File Listen to article Pakistan has extended the suspension of its airspace for Indian aircraft for another month, according to a fresh notification issued by the Pakistan Airport Authority (PAA) on Thursday. The airspace closure—originally imposed on April 23 amid heightened tensions with India—will now remain in effect until August 23, as per the new Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) issued by the authority. According to the notification, all aircraft operated by Indian airlines or registered in India remain barred from using Pakistani airspace. The ban also covers Indian-owned or leased civil and military aircraft. Also Read: Pakistan, US aim to boost trade ties with focus on IT, minerals, and agriculture The ban was first enforced following a flare-up between the two nuclear-armed neighbours earlier this year. Although a ceasefire was brokered through US mediation, the airspace restrictions have remained in place. Last month, the PAA had similarly extended the ban until July 23, reaffirming its continued enforcement despite diplomatic backchannels. The suspension has significantly impacted Indian carriers' westbound routes, compelling them to adopt longer flight paths around Pakistan—a development that has led to increased fuel costs and travel times.
