Labour hints at major luxury car tax U-turn to boost EV sales
A letter from Labour transport minister Lilian Greenwood to a local MP, seen by Auto Express, says the government will consider raising the threshold of the expensive car VED surcharge 'for zero emissions vehicles only, at a future fiscal event'. The aim would be to 'make it easier to buy electric cars'.
Greenwood is Labour's minister for the future of roads, and was responding to enquiries made by Ben Maguire, the MP for Launceston, who was in turn representing concerns raised by his constituent - the general manager of a local car dealership - regarding the negative impacts of the ZEV Mandate. Advertisement - Article continues below
In her reply, Greenwood also stated that the government response to its recent ZEV Mandate consultation 'has provided stability and certainty to British vehicle manufacturers by restoring the 2030 (internal combustion) phase out deadline'.
She then went on to highlight possible changes to the VED expensive cars supplement that has been imposed on EVs costing more than £40,000 since April. The move to introduce the supplement - often referred to as the 'luxury car tax' - has been widely condemned as a major disincentive to EV purchases. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
The ZEV Mandate changes have introduced what the government calls 'flexibilities' around how manufacturers must meet sales targets for EVs in the run-up to 2030. They also granted a heavily-trailed stay of execution for plug-in hybrid models, which use electric and internal combustion powertrains, up to 2035 but industry insiders scoff at the notion that stability has been achieved.
Discussions Auto Express has had with highly placed car retail group executives suggest they see a number of threats posed by current government policy. These include the potential rationing of petrol and diesel vehicles by dealers as happened in 2024, in order to meet ZEV Mandate EV sales percentage targets.
They also point to restricted consumer choice with drivers being coerced into vehicles they don't really want, and the possibility of cutbacks in UK car production costing jobs.
Greenwood's revelation that a VED luxury car tax break for EVs could be on the cards may prove to further destabilise the EV market if customers choose to hold off on purchases as a result.
The next 'fiscal event' in Labour government parlance will be the autumn budget - still many months away. Now the cat is out of the bag, the question is whether Labour will be forced to move sooner with a road tax cut, in order to provide clarity to car buyers considering a new EV purchase in those interim months.
Our Car Tax Checker tool lets you check your tax status and renewal date in seconds. Check your VED car tax now...
Find a car with the experts Flawed hybrid car efficiency data to stifle UK EV sales and propagate pollution
Flawed hybrid car efficiency data to stifle UK EV sales and propagate pollution
Half a million extra PHEVs could reach UK roads by 2030 in place of cleaner EVs due to changes surrounding the ZEV Mandate New Ford Fiesta: latest details on supermini's potential return
New Ford Fiesta: latest details on supermini's potential return
The Ford Fiesta could be coming back as an electric car, and here's everything we know so far Kia is returning to its 'Keeping It Affordable' roots
Kia is returning to its 'Keeping It Affordable' roots
Mike Rutherford thinks new cars are simply too expensive, but some manufacturers are starting to do something about it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
5 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Four people bailed after arrests over cyber attacks on M&S, Co-op and Harrods
The arrests on July 10 included a 17-year-old British man from the West Midlands, a 19-year-old Latvian man from the West Midlands, a 19-year-old British man from London, and a 20-year-old British woman from Staffordshire. A spokesperson for the National Crime Agency (NCA) said on Wednesday: 'All four individuals have been bailed pending further inquiries.' They were all arrested from their home address on suspicion of blackmail, money laundering, offences linked to the Computer Misuse Act, and participating in the activities of an organised crime group, according to the NCA. Empty shelves in a branch of the Co-op following a cyber attack (PA) The police also seized electronic devices from the properties. It comes after investigations by NCA into attacks against the three retailers, where hackers sought ransom payments after breaking into their IT systems. M&S was the first of the retailers to be targeted by the hackers, with the retailer shutting a raft of systems down in response on Easter Sunday. The company said the cyber attack has cost the firm around £300 million after it shut down its website for six weeks. Meanwhile, Co-op saw payments disrupted and shelves become bare from May because of the fallout of its cyber attack. Hackers also stole Co-op members' personal data, such as names and contact details. Harrods restricted internet access across its websites in May following attempts to gain unauthorised access to its systems.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kids need lessons on misogyny and Andrew Tate at school – who else is going to teach them?
I had one of those startling and shocking 'overwhelmed parent' moments, last week. The kind where you feel a sudden and all-encompassing crushing sense of helplessness. I literally put my head in my hands and sighed. The reason? My teenage daughter told me that a kid at school had spotted her Pride bracelet from the parade we'd been to, the weekend before – pointed and shouted 'Eww'. He then proceeded to quiz my little girl, incredulously by the sounds of it, on why she supported LGBT+ rights. Upon which – slightly flustered – she did something I'm achingly proud of: she took a spontaneous straw poll of tolerance in her classroom; asking each child around her whether or not they supported Pride (and all that it stands for). Her passion at 13 impressed me, but didn't surprise me. After all, just the week before, she came with me to The Independent's annual protest at Pride 2025 – as the official publishing partner for Pride London, we march proudly and openly in the parade. She was by my side as we listened to impassioned speeches from those who have experienced LGBT+ targeted hate crime; as we confronted small and unwelcome pockets of prejudice on the streets; as we danced and cheered and clapped. Our overt display of support couldn't come at a more crucial time: this year, the UK dropped down the European rankings for LGBT+ rights to 22nd – we were once top. In April, we witnessed the clampdown on trans rights as the Supreme Court ruled on the 'biological' definition of sex. It is entirely our duty, as parents and carers, to educate the next generation to keep fighting this fight for all our rights. Now, here for the head in hands bit: my daughter dug around in her blazer pocket while telling me about what had happened in class, then produced a piece of bedraggled paper. On it, she'd written two columns – 'For' and 'Against'. In the 'for' column were eight names, mostly girls. In the 'against' column were 14 names, overwhelmingly boys. The next lesson that day, she said, had been PSHE – Personal, Social, Health and Economic education ('sex ed', to you and me). The teacher told them all of the different definitions that fall under the LGBT+ umbrella – from asexual to aromantic; lesbian, gay and bisexual to trans, intersex, queer and questioning. At the end of the lesson, the original kid who'd shouted 'Eww' turned to my child with an eye-roll and said, 'I bet you loved that lesson.' He meant it as an insult, of course. Now, while this example is about LGBT+ rights – and I'm as offended and saddened as any other liberal parent that some kids are taught to stigmatise those with lives different to them – I can't blame the teachers. They seem to be doing a banging job of explaining the need for diversity and inclusivity in the curriculum (though a special exception goes to the teacher who told my daughter and the rest of Year 7s that abortion meant 'killing children' in last year's science lesson). So, who's really to blame? It can only be other parents. Which is why I believe it entirely right that our schools take over responsibility for teaching our kids how to combat issues including misogyny and how to resist 'incel' ('involuntary celibate') culture under new school guidance which was published on Tuesday – the rules will be mandatory from September 2026. The vital guidance will be taught as part of the relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) framework and according to the government, will specifically aim to help boys find positive role models – and counter the increasing spread of sexist online content from so-called 'manosphere' influencers like Tate. Secondary schools will also be required to provide young people with greater awareness of AI, deepfakes – and the links between pornography and misogyny – but will also aim not to 'stigmatise boys for being boys'. It couldn't come at a more pertinent time – the Department for Education (DfE) reports that misogynistic attitudes have reached 'epidemic scale' among young people, with 54 per cent of those aged 11-19 saying they had witnessed misogynist comments. My daughter is one of them. The kind of prejudice she witnessed about LGBT+ rights in her classroom is by no means an isolated example – these kinds of negative comments are also, far too often, aimed at girls. We already know that research suggests some 22 per cent of primary school-aged girls have seen or been shown 'rude images online'; and just last year, Ofsted reported a 'scourge' of sexism in the classroom – upon which, Labour promised to tackle misogyny in UK classrooms as part of its pledge to halve violence against women and girls. This guidance would go some way towards making this happen – in allowing teachers to 'sensitively respond to topics that children might have seen online or heard from their friends'. Like anti-LGBT+ sentiment, I suppose. And for those kids who are LGBT+, Tuesday's guidance also includes requirements on helping children with their mental health, including working with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention 'in an age-appropriate way'. We can't do this alone – there are far too few of us committed to teaching our kids to do the right thing, or brave enough to mention it at all. If watching Adolescence taught us anything, it's that education starts within the home – this goes for tolerance or prejudice. What we need to do is teach our kids to clap back against prejudice, wherever they see it. To counter hate with education, to protest against discrimination. But I'm not convinced that all other parents are doing a great job – that's why it's so vital that their teachers do.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's Turnberry faces logistical hurdles for British Open return
President Donald Trump is not getting a British Open to the Turnberry course he owns in the near future, an issue the R&A's new chief executive said Wednesday was more about transportation than politics. Turnberry is regarded as the most beautiful of the links on the Open rotation, set along the Ayrshire coast in Scotland across from the Ailsa Craig. It last hosted the Open in 2009, before Trump bought the resort. Mark Darbon, who took over at the R&A this year from Martin Slumbers, said Turnberry had not been taken off the list of potential British Open sites, but transportation and other issues had to be addressed. 'I think we've been extremely clear on our position in respect of Turnberry. We love the golf course but we've got some big logistical challenges there,' he said. 'You see the scale of their setup here and we've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry.' Darbon said the R&A met with Eric Trump and other leaders of Trump Golf a few months ago and the talks had been constructive. 'I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. We talked through some of the challenges that we have so we've got a good dialogue with them,' he said. Slumbers had previously said the R&A would not be going to Turnberry until it was comfortable the topic would be about golf and not the owner. Turnberry has only hosted the British Open four times, first in 1977 with the famous 'Duel in the Sun' when Tom Watson beat Jack Nicklaus. But the Open is getting bigger, and the roads are limited getting to Turnberry. There has been speculation Trump, whose golf courses have never hosted a men's major, might ask the British government to intercede in getting the Open back to Turnberry. 'We have an ongoing dialogue with the UK government given that we're a major event that creates significant value into the UK economy,' Darbon said. "We've spoken to them specifically about Turnberry and I think they've made it clear that the decision around where we take our championship rests with us. 'I would find it difficult to predict whether there will be any discussion on The Open if the President is making a visit here.' Turnberry is not the only Scottish links being ignored by the R&A. Muirfield, located along the Firth of Forth east of Edinburgh, is reputed to be the purest of links courses. Its first Open was in 1892, and there have been 15 others, most recently in 2013 won by Phil Mickelson. Only St. Andrews has hosted more Opens than Muirfield. But it has not been back there since 2013 as the R&A has been geared toward taking golf's oldest championship to courses that can hold big crowds. It is expected 278,000 spectators will be at Royal Portrush this week, the second-largest behind St. Andrews. The last Open at Muirfield had 142,000 spectators. The Open will be at Royal Birkdale next year, and then St. Andrews in 2027. The site for 2028 has not been announced. Muirfield has never gone more than 11 years — except for interruptions from World War I and World War II — between Opens. 'We love the golf course at Muirfield. We're in a discussion with the venue right now,' Darbon said. "There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield — the practice ground in particular is a challenge for us with a modern Open and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require. 'But it's a good dialogue and we'd love to be back there in the future.' ___ AP golf:
