Red Cross ends donation ban on sexually active gay and bisexual men
Sexually active gay and bisexual men and transgender women will be able to donate blood from July 14 after a landmark change in eligibility rules.
Current Red Cross donor rules prevent gay and bisexual men from giving blood or plasma if they have had sex in the past three months.
The rule was designed to prohibit people at higher risk of exposure to HIV from donating.
READ MORE: 'Watch your kids': death cap mushrooms sprouting across regional areas
But the Red Cross said on June 18 that extensive research and modelling show that there will be no impact on the safety of the plasma supply with this change.
Lifeblood's chief medical officer, Dr Jo Pink, said they were "excited to welcome more people from across the community" into donor centres.
"With more than 600,0000 people estimated to be covered by the previous wait times, we now anticipate an extra 24,000 donors and 95,000 extra donations of plasma to be made each year," she said.
Dr Pink said the safety and well-being of patients who receive blood and plasma would always be foremost in decision-making.
"Our submission to change rules for blood donation included data that shows, for now, a six-month wait is the safest option for Australian patients, but we are committed to reviewing this as more evidence becomes available," she said.
"There are many steps that Lifeblood needs to take before we can implement the new gender-neutral assessments, including working with state and territory governments to change the donor questionnaire.
Dr Pink said they hoped to implement changes to gender-neutral assessments next year.Sexually active gay and bisexual men and transgender women will be able to donate blood from July 14 after a landmark change in eligibility rules.
Current Red Cross donor rules prevent gay and bisexual men from giving blood or plasma if they have had sex in the past three months.
The rule was designed to prohibit people at higher risk of exposure to HIV from donating.
READ MORE: 'Watch your kids': death cap mushrooms sprouting across regional areas
But the Red Cross said on June 18 that extensive research and modelling show that there will be no impact on the safety of the plasma supply with this change.
Lifeblood's chief medical officer, Dr Jo Pink, said they were "excited to welcome more people from across the community" into donor centres.
"With more than 600,0000 people estimated to be covered by the previous wait times, we now anticipate an extra 24,000 donors and 95,000 extra donations of plasma to be made each year," she said.
Dr Pink said the safety and well-being of patients who receive blood and plasma would always be foremost in decision-making.
"Our submission to change rules for blood donation included data that shows, for now, a six-month wait is the safest option for Australian patients, but we are committed to reviewing this as more evidence becomes available," she said.
"There are many steps that Lifeblood needs to take before we can implement the new gender-neutral assessments, including working with state and territory governments to change the donor questionnaire.
Dr Pink said they hoped to implement changes to gender-neutral assessments next year.Sexually active gay and bisexual men and transgender women will be able to donate blood from July 14 after a landmark change in eligibility rules.
Current Red Cross donor rules prevent gay and bisexual men from giving blood or plasma if they have had sex in the past three months.
The rule was designed to prohibit people at higher risk of exposure to HIV from donating.
READ MORE: 'Watch your kids': death cap mushrooms sprouting across regional areas
But the Red Cross said on June 18 that extensive research and modelling show that there will be no impact on the safety of the plasma supply with this change.
Lifeblood's chief medical officer, Dr Jo Pink, said they were "excited to welcome more people from across the community" into donor centres.
"With more than 600,0000 people estimated to be covered by the previous wait times, we now anticipate an extra 24,000 donors and 95,000 extra donations of plasma to be made each year," she said.
Dr Pink said the safety and well-being of patients who receive blood and plasma would always be foremost in decision-making.
"Our submission to change rules for blood donation included data that shows, for now, a six-month wait is the safest option for Australian patients, but we are committed to reviewing this as more evidence becomes available," she said.
"There are many steps that Lifeblood needs to take before we can implement the new gender-neutral assessments, including working with state and territory governments to change the donor questionnaire.
Dr Pink said they hoped to implement changes to gender-neutral assessments next year.Sexually active gay and bisexual men and transgender women will be able to donate blood from July 14 after a landmark change in eligibility rules.
Current Red Cross donor rules prevent gay and bisexual men from giving blood or plasma if they have had sex in the past three months.
The rule was designed to prohibit people at higher risk of exposure to HIV from donating.
READ MORE: 'Watch your kids': death cap mushrooms sprouting across regional areas
But the Red Cross said on June 18 that extensive research and modelling show that there will be no impact on the safety of the plasma supply with this change.
Lifeblood's chief medical officer, Dr Jo Pink, said they were "excited to welcome more people from across the community" into donor centres.
"With more than 600,0000 people estimated to be covered by the previous wait times, we now anticipate an extra 24,000 donors and 95,000 extra donations of plasma to be made each year," she said.
Dr Pink said the safety and well-being of patients who receive blood and plasma would always be foremost in decision-making.
"Our submission to change rules for blood donation included data that shows, for now, a six-month wait is the safest option for Australian patients, but we are committed to reviewing this as more evidence becomes available," she said.
"There are many steps that Lifeblood needs to take before we can implement the new gender-neutral assessments, including working with state and territory governments to change the donor questionnaire.
Dr Pink said they hoped to implement changes to gender-neutral assessments next year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
32 minutes ago
- The Age
‘A pretty hard crash landing': The fatherload of parenting Justin didn't see coming
Justin Fry always wanted to be a dad. But after his first child was born last year, he struggled with exhaustion and feeling overwhelmed, particularly when he returned to work. 'Once everything went back to normal, it just became a bit of a shock,' says the 44-year-old operations manager from Melbourne. Fry's parents died when he was young, and he says his wife's parents have not provided as much support as he expected. Having relocated to Melbourne from Perth a few years ago, the couple don't have a broad support network of friends to lean on. 'We went to classes, you know, what you do when you're an expecting parent … but the thing they don't tell you is the stuff around the support network and how important that is. So it was a pretty hard crash landing.' Working 10-hour days, with an hour commute each way, Fry says fatherhood has been mentally and physically exhausting. While he and his wife both work, he's felt increased pressure to fulfil the breadwinner role since becoming a dad. Being an older dad, too, has its challenges. 'No one mentioned going into this, 'hey, you're 40 years old, just be prepared. This is going to cripple you.'' New Australian research published this month highlights the importance of fathers' mental health in the perinatal period. The systematic review and meta-analysis aggregated results from 84 studies across 48 groups of people, and found a consistent association between mental distress in fathers and poorer social-emotional, cognitive, language, and physical development in their kids.
Sydney Morning Herald
38 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘A pretty hard crash landing': The fatherload of parenting Justin didn't see coming
Justin Fry always wanted to be a dad. But after his first child was born last year, he struggled with exhaustion and feeling overwhelmed, particularly when he returned to work. 'Once everything went back to normal, it just became a bit of a shock,' says the 44-year-old operations manager from Melbourne. Fry's parents died when he was young, and he says his wife's parents have not provided as much support as he expected. Having relocated to Melbourne from Perth a few years ago, the couple don't have a broad support network of friends to lean on. 'We went to classes, you know, what you do when you're an expecting parent … but the thing they don't tell you is the stuff around the support network and how important that is. So it was a pretty hard crash landing.' Working 10-hour days, with an hour commute each way, Fry says fatherhood has been mentally and physically exhausting. While he and his wife both work, he's felt increased pressure to fulfil the breadwinner role since becoming a dad. Being an older dad, too, has its challenges. 'No one mentioned going into this, 'hey, you're 40 years old, just be prepared. This is going to cripple you.'' New Australian research published this month highlights the importance of fathers' mental health in the perinatal period. The systematic review and meta-analysis aggregated results from 84 studies across 48 groups of people, and found a consistent association between mental distress in fathers and poorer social-emotional, cognitive, language, and physical development in their kids.
7NEWS
20 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Patients seek reassurances after IVF mix-ups at Monash
Alarms firing off in an IVF lab as work grinds to a halt may sound like the start of a technology meltdown but at many of Australia's major fertility clinics it's actually a sign safety systems are kicking into gear. Known as electronic witnessing, the mechanism prevents tissue mix ups and involves multiple layers of identity-document checks by humans and computers. While rarely needed, it's a safeguard standard that's becoming the norm in an industry suddenly needing to win back public trust following revelations of two devastating errors at one of Australia's biggest facilities. The first saw a mother give birth to another couple's biological child after she was impregnated with the wrong embryo at Monash IVF in Brisbane some years ago. The other involved a woman incorrectly receiving her own embryo instead of one from her same-sex partner as requested, which happened at the company's Melbourne clinic earlier in June. Trust 'eroded' The bungles have sparked a rush of patients reaching out to fertility clinics seeking reassurances about their own sperm, eggs, embryos and children. 'At the moment, the trust in the industry has been eroded,' says Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser. 'It certainly opened up the conversation again. 'I do believe those questions inherently are always there but it's probably made patients verbalise it a little.' She's found explaining electronic and human witnessing practices at her own facility in Sydney have put patients' minds at ease but knows it will take time for confidence to return. Monash IVF has repeatedly apologised and vowed to introduce additional verification processes over and above normal practices. About 40 IVF-related rules Official probes into what happened are under way, with the company yet to offer explanations for how the mix ups occurred beyond two ASX announcements. Pink Elephants Support Network chief operating officer Jen Tupaea is among many Monash IVF patients wanting to know more. She's noticed a general sense of uneasiness set in among IVF parents across Australia and believes patients need more reassurances that all due diligence is done. 'There's already a lot of uncertainty and worry and sort of lack of control and I think this just adds another element to that,' Ms Tupaea says. 'Patchwork' is a term often used to describe the 40-odd pieces of legislation affecting IVF in Australian states and territories. There's variations on anything from how long embryos can be stored to how many families can use the same sperm donor and even certain states banning overseas donor eggs. Until now, the industry has largely been left to regulate itself through yearly accreditations but the mix ups spurred health ministers including Victoria's Mary-Anne Thomas to unite behind a push to explore national regulation. It's something Pink Elephants supports, with Ms Tupaea describing IVF regulation as 'a bit of a black box'. Add-on treatments She's aware of parents worried about what would happen if a similar devastating mix up occurred at a smaller clinic that doesn't have ASX reporting requirements. 'The main concern when something like that comes up is, why are we hearing about it now, and what are we not hearing about?' she says. Australia's first IVF baby was born 45 years ago and now some 20,000 babies conceived through IVF are born here each year. Greater regulation is also something clinicians want, Ms Hiser explains. 'We regulated ourselves because no one enforced it upon us and because we saw the need for patient safety,' she says. 'We've done a very good job of that up until now, and that's why I'm very curious to find out exactly what went wrong (at Monash IVF) because we're having a hard time ... understanding how it did happen.' IVF researcher and University of Melbourne Senior Research Fellow Sarah Lensen wants any future regulation to also include greater monitoring of 'add-on' treatments. She specialises in evaluating their safety and effectiveness, saying for the most part there isn't a lot of good evidence they help patients. 'The banking industry is highly regulated and I think for the better, so I don't know why we wouldn't accept independent regulation in this space,' Dr Lensen says. City Fertility Group's Victorian Scientific Director Jayne Mullen wants patients to have confidence regardless of how big a clinic is, professionals are bound by strict accreditation and licensing requirements so any mistakes must be reported to health authorities. 'We're continuously monitored and audited, we are obliged to report any serious adverse event,' she says. The scientist is also fielding more calls than usual from concerned parents, offering to take them through laboratories. While fully confident in their use of electronic witnessing and human verification, she says the Monash IVF mix ups still cause her to pause and review protocols. 'Doctors, nurses, scientists, everyone that's working in our IVF industry, we have the best of intentions, we want everyone to walk away with a happy, healthy baby,' she says. 'Mistakes are so rare.' Both Ms Mullen and Ms Hiser find explaining safety controls has put many patients at ease, urging anyone still feeling nervous about treatments to reach out to their providers. 'If they don't, say, have an electronic witnessing system in place ask them why don't you, why do my fees not cover you having this extra layer of security?' Ms Hiser says. 'If you don't have that, fine, that's okay but tell me how you control (safety). 'If you still have questions after that, then maybe ask yourself are they the people that I want to be doing my IVF journey with?'
