Edinburgh taxi drivers granted extra extension on age and emissions limits
Cab drivers in Edinburgh have been given a one-year reprieve from possibly needing to sell off their old vehicles.
Councillors voted on Monday to approve a waiver to the city's hire vehicle age and emissions policy, meaning cabs older than a decade are still allowed to travel on city streets.
Under the city's hire car regulations, as of 2021, any petrol cabs or private hires need to be 10 years old or less, and either comply with Euro 6 emissions standards or be Euro 5 and retrofitted to meet council requirements.
However, every year since 2020, the council has approved a four year extension to this time period, meaning the maximum age of a cab or private hire car on city streets is 14 years.
Every six months after a vehicle passes ten years old, it needs to go through an inspection to make sure it is still in compliance with the city's regulations.
A report by officers to councillors said that some members of the taxi trade had found difficulty in finding vehicles that meet the city's current age and emissions standards.
SNP councillor Norman Work asked council officer Andrew Mitchell: 'Was there any sort of timescale for this? There have been these extensions. Was there any idea how long it would go on for?'
Mr Mitchell said: 'The initial target was 2021. The pandemic intervened, and the committee quite rightly gave an adjustment to the timeline.
'So the final timeline for Euro 6 then became 2023. The vast majority of the fleet has been compliant for quite some time.
'A smaller number [of drivers] have struggled, either for financial reasons or various other reasons.'
Regulatory Committee convener, Liberal Democrat councillor Neil Ross, asked: 'Over two thirds [of vehicles over ten years old] have failed their first presentation for testing.
'I know there have been efforts made to encourage compliance with these older vehicles, but I'm wondering if there's anything else that could be done to incentivise better presentations?'
He said: 'You're in the territory of, if you repeatedly fail, then you bring the operators to committee.
'It's not something we've done except in fairly extreme examples. But if you're testing them twice a year, and they're still turning up for their annual tests and failing, I struggle to see [what can be done].'
Another council officer, Catherine Scanlin, added: 'What we're finding on testing is that it's wear and tear of the rest of the vehicle. And with the best will in the world, it's very very difficult, and very expensive in the main, to keep on top of that.
'So when they're coming for tests, even when the vehicles are prepped, they can't forsee some of the issues.
'Historically, older vehicles were passed down the line to new people coming into the trade. That's not possible with these vehicles.
'Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that vehicle is fit for public service. It is a challenge, and it's difficult. Even the best maintained vehicles – it's a challenge for them as well.'
The report also said that a report would come to the committee in the near future updating on the council's progress towards a 100% wheelchair accessible taxi fleet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Choice is more decline or new direction with Labour
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, bottles whisky during a visit to the Glenkinchie Whisky Distillery to mark the UK-India trade deal (Picture: Andrew Milligan/) Tomorrow marks a year since the general election, when people across Scotland voted decisively for change. Since then, we have got to work delivering our Plan for Change to invest in Scotland's renewal, raise living standards and put more money in people's pockets. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Consider some of the achievements of the Labour Government so far. We've increased the minimum wage, delivering a pay rise for 200,000 Scots, and protected pensioners' living standards by guaranteeing the Triple Lock, something the Conservatives are now wavering over. We've ended austerity and provided a record budget settlement for the Scottish Government, with an additional £9.1 billion over the next three years thanks to Labour, meaning more money for Scottish public services. The SNP voted against it at Westminster but were happy enough to spend the money in the Scottish Budget. The public will rightly ask where they have spent their money? We've introduced the Employment Rights Bill, the most ambitious set of workers' rights proposals in a generation, which will ban fire and rehire, strengthen parental leave and end exploitative zero-hours contracts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We've safeguarded the UK's last blast furnaces at Scunthorpe, allocated £200 million for Grangemouth's future and brokered a deal to secure the Methil and Arnish fabrication yards. Contrast this with the SNP's years of inaction on Grangemouth, and their silence on the mothballing of the Dalzell and Clydebridge steelworks. We've invested for the long-term, with the recent Spending Review confirming £750m for Edinburgh University for the UK supercomputer, billions for GB Energy and a big commitment to nuclear south of the border. Meanwhile, in Scotland, the SNP clings to its ideological objection to nuclear. In England, where health is delivered by the UK Government, we are already seeing marked improvements in the NHS. We promised two million additional NHS appointments in the first year and have delivered four million. This could not be more different to the desperate situation in Scotland; last week the chair of BMA Scotland warned that the Scottish NHS is 'dying before our eyes'. On the international stage, we've agreed historic new trade deals with India and the United States, which will see Indian tariffs on Scotch whisky immediately halved, and then further reduced to just 40 per cent, and US tariffs on steel and aluminium slashed to zero. Additionally, we've reset the relationship with the EU with a new partnership which stands to be of enormous benefit to Scotland's young people and businesses. This comes alongside my Scotland Office Brand Scotland mission, which seeks to promote Scottish exports and attract foreign investment. In the face of unprecedented geopolitical instability, we've remained firm in our support for Ukraine and increased defence spending, which, in addition to keeping Scotland safe, will support our thriving defence industries from the Clyde to Rosyth and create jobs across the country. Changing a country is not like flicking a switch. We've had to make tough choices, and I know that people are as impatient as I am for change to come faster and go further. But be in no doubt, the work of change has begun. A year from now, that work continues in the Scottish elections, when Scots will have the opportunity to choose between more decline with the SNP or a new direction with Scottish Labour. Ian Murray is MP for Edinburgh South and Secretary of State for Scotland
Leader Live
16 hours ago
- Leader Live
‘Certain inevitability' to Grangemouth closure when Labour won power
Michael Shanks said the UK Government 'did not take any option off the table' when asked about whether Scotland's last oil refinery could have been nationalised. But he said the plant was 'far too far down the line' for the outcome to have been averted. The plant ceased crude oil processing in April, with its closure causing the loss of 430 jobs. The SNP had previously called for the UK Government to nationalise the site, which its owners said was losing £385,000 a day. Appearing before the Scottish Affairs Committee in the Commons on Wednesday, Mr Shanks, who is the MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, said the Government is 'not in the business of nationalising failing businesses'. However, he also described Grangemouth currently as a 'hugely investable opportunity' for businesses. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer previously announced £200 million in funding for the future of the site, cash which he hopes to triple in private investment. That came after the Scottish Government had announced £25 million in funding, while both governments funded Project Willow – a £1.5 million report into future options to keep the plant open. We're questioning Energy Minister @MGShanks on the future of North Sea energy as part of our inquiry into GB Energy and the net zero transition. Watch live ⬇️ — Scottish Affairs Committee (@CommonsScotAffs) July 2, 2025 Asked about whether the UK Government considered bringing Grangemouth into public ownership, Mr Shanks told MPs: 'I think it is fair to say we didn't take any option off the table and we did look at a whole series of options. 'But firstly, the Government's not in the business of nationalising failing businesses. 'That is difficult to say, but it is the reality that a business that's losing tens of millions of pounds, it can't be nationalised with the public facing the cost of that. 'That's the same position we're in with the Prax Lindsey refinery (North Lincolnshire), and it's the same position with Grangemouth.' Mr Shanks said Labour 'moved every possible option forward' to do what it could to save the refinery, but added: 'The truth is, we were far too far down the line with the Grangemouth process to really change the outcome and as regrettable as that is, and it genuinely is, and I've met the workers on a number of occasions, I know how significant the impact is on them and their families, there was a certain inevitability about the outcome by the point in which we came into Government.'
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP quango ‘squandered' £21m of public cash in benefits errors
A benefits quango created by the SNP government has been accused of 'squandering' almost £21 million of public money. New figures reveal that the cash has been paid out in error to claimants by Social Security Scotland (SSS) since 2019, when it was established. The quango, which employs 4,000 staff and has a budget of £321 million, was set up to handle additional benefits paid out by the Scottish Government, including the Scottish child payment; best start grants and job start payments. Stephen Kerr, the Conservative MSP for Central Scotland who obtained the overpayments data, accused the SNP of 'losing control' of state benefits and described SSS as a 'vast, out-of-control bureaucratic monster'. According to figures released under freedom of information, more than 67,000 overpayments logged by the quango cost taxpayers £18.7 million between 2019-20 and 2024-25. In the current financial year, almost 4,000 overpayments have cost more than £2.2 million. The highest number of errors occurred with claimants for best start goods, a benefit designed to help pregnant women and families with young children to purchase healthy meals. It provides financial support, typically on a prepaid card, to help cover the cost of items such as milk, fruit and vegetables. Since 2019, more than 32,000 overpayments were made. More than 22,000 overpayments were logged for the Scottish child payment, which helps low-income families with children under 16. 'The SNP have completely lost control of Scotland's benefits bill,' said Mr Kerr. 'They've built an enormous, well-paid bureaucracy that has wasted £21 million since its creation – and the more money they pour in, the worse it seems to get. 'Hardworking Scottish taxpayers deserve far better – and they demand it. It is totally unacceptable for millions of pounds of their money to be squandered through blatant administrative incompetence. 'That money should be funding frontline services – or better yet, staying in taxpayers' pockets – not disappearing because of basic, avoidable errors. 'The SNP promised Social Security Scotland would deliver a fairer, more efficient system. These figures show how absurd that claim truly is. It's time the SNP faced up to the reality of the vast, out-of-control bureaucratic monster they've created. They must get a grip and take real responsibility.' Growing social security spend The Scottish Government has said it is committed to using its social security powers to support low-income families, carers and those with disabilities to tackle poverty and provide financial assistance. However, MSPs on Holyrood's Social Justice and Social Security Committee are seeking views on the positive and negative aspects of growing social security spend in Scotland. The committee has highlighted that 2025/26, the Scottish Government is spending £1.2 billion more on social security policies than it gets in funding for social security from the UK Government. According to the Scottish Fiscal Commission, more than £5 billion was spent on social security in 2023/24 with this figure predicted to rise to £8.7 billion by 2030. A spokesperson for SSS, said: 'As we have introduced more benefits, our client numbers have significantly increased with an expected corresponding increase in payment errors, although the number of errors is small. 'Over 1 million individual clients have been paid more than £6.1 billion directly by Social Security Scotland since 2018. The total amount of money given in overpayments represents 0.35% of our total benefit expenditure since 2018. 'We are committed to minimising errors and improving our abilities to tackle them.'
